Next Article in Journal
Encapsulation of Vitamin C by Glycerol-Derived Dendrimers, Their Interaction with Biomimetic Models of Stratum corneum and Their Cytotoxicity
Next Article in Special Issue
Luminous Self-Assembled Fibers of Azopyridines and Quantum Dots Enabled by Synergy of Halogen Bond and Alkyl Chain Interactions
Previous Article in Journal
Morphology-Controlled Synthesis of V1.11S2 for Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in Acid Media
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electro-Optical Characteristics of Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal Doped with MgO Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Development of Tunable Optical Devices Based on Liquid

1
School of Precision Instrument and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Tian** University, Tian** 300072, China
2
Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Information Technical Science, Tian** University, Tian** 300072, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(22), 8025; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27228025
Submission received: 26 October 2022 / Revised: 13 November 2022 / Accepted: 14 November 2022 / Published: 18 November 2022

Abstract

:
Liquid opens up a new stage of device tunability and gradually replaced solid-state devices and mechanical tuning. It optimizes the control method and improves the dynamic range of many optical devices, exhibiting several attractive features, such as rapid prototy**, miniaturization, easy integration and low power consumption. The advantage makes optical devices widely used in imaging, optical control, telecommunications, autopilot and lab-on-a-chip. Here, we review the tunable liquid devices, including isotropic liquid and anisotropic liquid crystal devices. Due to the unique characteristics of the two types of liquids, the tuning principles and tuning methods are distinguished and demonstrated in detail firstly and then some recent progress in this field, covering the adaptive lens, beam controller, beam filter, bending waveguide, iris, resonator and display devices. Finally, the limitations and future perspectives of the current liquid devices are discussed.

1. Introduction

With the devices’ tunability becoming more and more convenient for our lives, it has gradually become an indispensable parameter in optical devices. Due to the limitations of solid materials, the traditional tuning method mainly focuses on the mechanical, and the mechanical contact leads to a short life, low tuning efficiency and slow tuning speed of device, which also limits the miniaturization of optical devices. At the same time, the fixed structure and performance of a solid device mean that they have a high dependence on wavelengths, and the research expansion of wavelengths in the optical field, which is mainly caused by nonlinear optical materials [1] and the continued progress on material structures [2], is a disastrous challenge to solid optics. In recent years, researchers have introduced liquid into optical research. Based on its unique advantages [3], such as flexible adjustability, good compatibility, small size, easy manufacturing, etc., liquid devices can flexibly adjust optical characteristics so that the performance of liquid devices, especially the tunability, is favored by more and more researchers.
Currently, the core liquid mainly includes anisotropic liquid crystals and isotropic ordinary liquids. Liquid crystal materials are widely used, especially in the field of biochemistry. In 2022, Sulayman A. et al. [4] reviewed the applications of liquid crystals as biosensors for molecules [5], protein or peptide detection [6,7,8,9] and disease biomarkers [10]. The liquid crystal materials can also be found in the fields of optical [11,12,13], new energy [14] and the physical [15,16]. The wide application of liquid crystal materials is closely related to the continuous development of liquid crystal molecules. Liquid crystal materials have grown from nothing, from nematic liquid crystals to cholesteric liquid crystals doped with azobenzene chiral molecules [12,13,17,18,19], to the discovery of various derivative liquid crystal materials such as PDLC, SPLC and LCE, with the liquid crystal solubility and helical twisting ability improving [11,20,21]. Based on the liquid crystal molecules, the tuning performance of electrically controlled liquid crystal devices can be guaranteed gradually. There are review articles that explain the types and development of some typical liquid crystal devices and liquid devices before then. In 2018, Yi-Hsin Lin [22] systematically introduced the classification and comparison of adaptive liquid crystal lenses. Shin-Tson Wu et al. [23] summarized the principle of the LC beam steering device and the research progress over the past 19 years. Wang Lei [24] briefly described the research status of liquid crystal materials and devices in the field of terahertz and discussed the development trend of the combination of liquid crystal technology and terahertz technology. Zepeng Zhou [19] gave a comprehensive review of flexible LCP technologies covering electric circuits, antennas, integration and packaging technologies, front-end modules, MEMS and biomedical devices. Dissimilar to LC, due to the isotropic characteristics of ordinary liquid, tunable controls are more focused on the interface control of immiscible liquids. In recent years, devices that use the external environment to control the refractive index profile of liquids have gradually become a research hotspot, mainly including electric control and temperature control. The commonly used liquid includes ethanol and glycol because of their appropriate relative permittivity and stable properties. There are also good review articles in the research of ordinary liquid devices, including the summary of in-plane optical fluid tunable liquid lens in 2018 [25]. To make it easy to sense, the principle has been figured out (see Figure 1a), and the common and unique types optical devices are also summarized (see Figure 1b). Specific details about the principle will be illustrated in next section.
The characteristics and control methods of the two liquids are different, but the ultimate aim is the same: to achieve miniaturization and wide tuning of optical devices. Therefore, this paper briefly summarizes and supplements the development of liquid devices in the past 5 years. In this review, the advantages of liquid devices and the inevitability of their future development are introduced firstly; secondly, the relevant classifications and alignment technologies of liquid crystal materials and the control methods of ordinary liquids are illustrated; then, we introduce the tunable optical devices of liquid crystals in the past five years (2018–2022), including adaptive optical lenses, optical filters and absorbers, optical switching, beam steering, liquid crystal lasers and bistable state devices, with the structures or performance described briefly; at the same time, the optical devices made of ordinary liquid are introduced simply according to the same way; finally, the challenges and prospects of liquid optical devices are discussed.

2. Principles of Liquid Optics Control

The liquids currently used to make tunable devices include liquid crystals, which can be used to make lenses, filters, wave plates and other devices that can be tuned and transformed by refractive index transformation. Compatible or incompatible liquids that can be used to make lenses and optical switches, optical prisms, curved waveguides, etc. are tunable devices controlled by the liquid–liquid interface and the refractive index gradient distribution of the mixed liquid. The working principle and basis of various liquid optical devices will be introduced below.

2.1. Liquid Crystal Control

2.1.1. Liquid Crystal Material

The discovery of liquid crystals can be traced back to 1888, when the turbid state of benzoic acid cholelithol was observed by the Austrian botanist Reinitzer and the German physicist Lehmann successively [26]. Liquid crystals were officially confirmed, and the research on them began. According to the order of molecular arrangement to distinguish the liquid crystal phase, it can be divided into three categories: nematic, cholesteric and sematic and disk. Here, we mainly introduce the nematic and cholesteric liquid crystals that are widely used [27,28,29].
The characteristic of nematic liquid crystal is that the molecules do not have fixed positions, but the orientation of the molecules basically takes the same direction—that is, the long-range orientation is ordered. In the use of liquid crystals, polyimide film is often coated on the surface of the substrate as the initial alignment layer of the liquid crystal material. When no driving voltage is applied, the alignment of the directors of the liquid crystal molecules tends toward a predetermined direction, so that the initial free energy of the liquid crystal molecules is minimized. After a driving voltage of a certain frequency is applied to the electrodes, due to the anisotropy of the dielectric constant and conductivity of the liquid crystal, the liquid crystal molecules are subjected to a force that changes the orientation of the molecular axis.
Within the elastic limit of the liquid crystal, this electric field causes, I torque rotates the molecular axis, and finally, the surface anchoring force of the liquid crystal is balanced with the action of the external electric field. The liquid crystal is regarded as a kind of modulator of the optical system—that is, when the current (power) is input into the liquid crystal, the effective refractive index of the liquid crystal molecules will change, and as a result, the light beam passing through the liquid crystal layer is modulated. Due to the anisotropic properties of liquid crystal molecules, the relationship between the effective refractive index and the liquid crystal deflection angle θ can be expressed as [27]
n e f f ( y ) = n o n e n o 2 cos ϕ ( y ) + n e 2 cos ϕ ( y ) .
Cholesteric liquid crystals are also called helical liquid crystals. Since the difference between the cholesteric liquid crystal and the nematic liquid crystal is that the alignment of the molecules changes direction in a helical manner along one axisIthe distance between two adjacent points that are aligned on the axis with a difference of 2π is called the piI the schematic diagram of the arrangement of helical liquid crystal molecules. The cholesteric liquid crystal has a spontaneous helical arrangement and can selectively reflect circularly polarized light of the same chirality, forming a forbidden photon band. The central wavelength λc of the reflection spectrum of the circularly polarized light selectively reflected by the cholesteric liquid crystal is related to the helical pitch p of the cholesteric liquid crystal and the average refractive index of the liquid crystal ( n ¯ = (no + ne)/2), where [30]
λ c = n ¯ p   .
The helical structure of the cholesteric liquid product determines its own unique optical properties, including optical rotation, polarized dichroism, Bragg reflection, the production of reflective liquid crystal displays, color display devices, picture polarizers, broadband reflective polarizers, circular polarizing filters, etc. The helical pitch of cholesteric liquid crystals is easily changed by external fields, such as chiral dopant concentration, temperature control, UV curing and applied electric field. Therefore, cholesteric liquid crystals can be used to develop a variety of tunable optical devices. In recent years, cholesteric liquid crystal-based tunable filters, tunable gratings and tunable lasers have become the research hotspots of liquid crystal devices.

2.1.2. Liquid Crystal Alignment Technology

The coating layer in the liquid crystal cell that can induce the molecules from disorderly arrangement to orderly alignment is called the alignment layer, and the liquid cement used to prepare the alignment layer is the alignment agent. At present, polyimide (PI) is mainly used as the alignment layer. After rubbing alignment or photoalignment, PI molecules show orientation anisotropy on the surface, inducing liquid crystal molecules to be “anchored” and directionally aligned under the electric field [31,32]. The rubbing alignment is to conduct unidirectional mechanical friction on the surface of PI layer so as to form dense lines on the surface of the PI layer or induce the alignment of the PI molecular chain. It has the advantages of a simple process, stable LC orientation and mature development of the LC orientation control. However, in recent years, the rubbing alignment technology has been prone to generate dust, static electricity and mechanical damage, which will seriously affect the performance and quality of devices. In view of the defects of the rubbing alignment, many research institutions domestic and abroad have carried out the research on noncontact alignment technologies, such as ion beam alignment, oblique vapor deposition of silicon oxide and photoalignment, having emerged as the times require [32,33]. Chiou et al. [34] formed a periodic dense striated structure on the PI alignment layer through soft embossing technology instead of the traditional rubbing method, and the width limit reached 3 μm.
Among them, photoalignment technology has attracted more attention for its high-resolution surface and curved alignment [32,35]. The photoalignment is to induce the physicochemical reaction of the alignment agents through LPUV light, which leads the directional alignment, and then transfer this order to the LC through intermolecular interactions to achieve orientation control. According to the photochemical reaction mechanism, the photoalignment technology can be divided into three categories: photoisomerization, photodimerization and photodegradation [36,37]. The three technologies all depend on specific structures, such as photoisomerization corresponding to azobenzene structures [38]. The core team research on photoalignment technology is Lu Yanqing and Hu Wei’s group from Nan**g University. The applications of photoalignment in display and photonics are summarized in [39], mainly focusing on geometric phase manipulation:
  • micro-polarizer array using photoalignment technology for image sensors;
  • electrically tunable liquid crystal q-plates;
  • electrically switchable liquid crystal Fresnel lens and gratings;
  • liquid crystal optical elements with integrated Pancharatnam–Berry phases.
In a word, LC is gradually emerging in telecommunications, optical fiber communication systems, sensors, switchable lenses, LC optical converters and other optical fields, not just displays.

2.2. Conventional Liquid Devices Control

2.2.1. Interface Control

When the two-phase fluid is in contact with the cell wall, the contact angle of the interface is formed at this three-phase contact point. The angle is related to the surface tension of the three-phase material, and the angle of the meniscus of the contact surface can be changed by some special methods so as to complete the regulation of the surface curvature. These special ways include the electrowetting effect (EW) [40], thermal effect, dielectrophoresis (DEP) [41], etc. The decrease of the surface tension coefficient of a liquid with an increasing temperature is the core principle of thermal effect tuning. What needs to be described in detail are the EW (Figure 2a,b) and DEP(Figure 2c), as both are electrical controls.
In EW lenses, the wetting effect of a hydrophobic surface can be changed by applying a voltage, making the surface more hydrophilic. Therefore, the external voltage applied can alter the contact angle between the liquid and the cell’s sidewall, so as to obtain the droplet curvature and the focal length. Real-time modulation of the focal length can be achieved by changing the applied voltage. DEP is a phenomenon that an object with a low dielectric constant is subjected to force in a nonuniform electric field. DEP drives the liquid with a high dielectric constant to the strong electric field originally occupied by a medium with a smaller dielectric constant. The DEP has nothing to do with whether the object is charged or not but with the size, electrical properties of the object and the surrounding medium, the field strength and its change rate and frequency. By comparison, the core distinguishes between EW and DEP, which is the response liquid, and that EW corresponds to the conductive liquid while DEP corresponds to the dielectric.

2.2.2. Refractive Index Profile Due to Diffusion

For the optical device based on the interface control, the refractive index distribution of the liquid is uniform, and there is no gradient distribution. However, based on the refractive index gradient distribution, many optical devices with better characteristics can be produced. For example, the Luneburg lens has better light focusing and aberration, and the gradient fiber can self-focus to increase the transmission distance. The first GRIN lens based on diffusion was demonstrated in [42] (see Figure 3a,b), which provides a new strategy for develo** liquid microlens.
In order to realize the refractive index gradient distribution in liquid, there are two methods currently used: concentration convection diffusion [43] and thermal diffusion [44]. The expression for the diffusion process is [43,44]
C t = D 2 C u C + S   ,
T t = K 2 T v T   .
The above equations characterize the diffusion at the concentration (C) and temperature (T), respectively. D and K represent the diffusion coefficient of the concentration diffusivity and thermal diffusivity of the liquid, respectively. Both u and v represent the flow rate of the liquid. The S parameter represents the contribution of the chemical reaction in the diffusion process. Generally speaking, there is no chemical reaction between the two liquids selected, and it is a passive structure—that is, S = 0. The corresponding physical model of the diffusion expression is that the left side of the expression represents the change of concentration and temperature with time. As time goes by, the model will reach a stable state, and the change of concentration and temperature is equal to zero ( C / t = 0 , T / t = 0 ).
The first item on the right side represents the gradient diffusion. The concentration and temperature distribution of the substance are not uniform at the beginning, and this gradient distribution forms a diffusion phenomenon; the second item on the right side represents the convection item. The convection term depends on the role of velocity during liquid transport. The two modes of mass transport work together to affect the changes in the substance concentration and temperature. Which mode dominates depends on the parameter Peclet number (Pe) [45]. Generally speaking, in order to achieve a better concentration/temperature gradient distribution, the Pe number will be relatively smaller.

3. Tunable Devices Based on Liquid Crystal

3.1. Tunable Lens

3.1.1. Model Liquid Crystal Lens

In order to achieve a relatively uniform refractive index distribution of the liquid crystal tunable lens, a high resistance layer or a dielectric layer will be placed on the electrode, and both contribute to generate a linear change in the voltage and smooth the liquid crystal lens, transforming the phase plane from square to parabolic. Nowadays, modal technology is relatively mature, and lenses with several millimeters in apertures (up to 5–10 mm) and superior uniformity and low voltage control can be produced.
The research of the modal lens has gradually transformed from a single layer to multilayers. The bilayer lens was originally intended to solve the polarization-independent problem, and the specific realization light path diagram was fully elaborated in [46]. In 2019, in order to overcome the dilemma between the tunable range of lens power and the aperture size, Yu-Jen Wang et al. [47] proposed a NLC spatially expanded phase distribution to realize electrically tunable GRIN LC lenses. The lens consists of two LC elements, as shown in Figure 4a. The optical tuning at 0–10 mm is controlled by the upper LC element, and the optical tuning at 10–20 mm is controlled by the lower LC element, and finally achieves 20 mm effective aperture modulation. The individual and combined refractive index profiles are shown in Figure 4b–d. In addition, each LC element can be processed independently, and the focal length of the GRIN LC lens is continuously adjustable. It can be used as a positive lens, a negative lens and a bifocal lens and even has aberration correction function in different spatial positions. In 2020, Kumar, Kang et al. [48] proposed a liquid crystal lens with a three-layer birefringence structure, a layer of uniformly arranged nematic liquid crystal between two PET substrates. The polarization independence is finally achieved by the decomposition of the light beam by the PET layer and the modulation of the extraordinary light by the liquid crystal layer. Subsequent researchers found that the double-layer structure can achieve large aperture and wide tuning of the lens.
In 2022, Li S. et al. [49] fabricated an electrically tunable LALC lens with double-hole electrodes (see Figure 5). The surfaces of the top and middle substrates are engraved with hole electrodes with a diameter of 4 mm and 5 mm, respectively. An ITO common electrode is deposited on the inner surface of the bottle substrate. The lens is set with two layers of electrodes: TELC lenses have a focal length range of 325–220 mm in 24–66 V (DM1); MELC lenses have a focal length range of 310–200 mm in 24–59 V (DM2). The proposed LALC lens can achieve electrical tuning of the focal length by changing the operating voltage, while the two-layer electrode control expands the tuning range of the lens to 325–200 mm.
The array is the core of device integration, and the research of the LC lens array is equally important. In recent years, the Qionghua Wang group has been the main one to study the high-performance LC lens array based on dielectric layers. From 2019 to 2020, three types of double-layer LC lens arrays with composite dielectric layers have been successively proposed. The first two structures are similar but different, as shown in Figure 6a [27] and Figure 6b [50]. Figure 6a shows that the dielectric layer with a low dielectric constant acts as the resistive layer, and the periodically arranged ITOs act as the electrodes. In the voltage-on state, the vertical electric field in the LC layer varies linearly with the lens aperture, and finally, a centrosymmetric refractive index curve is generated. The simulation results show that, by changing the applied voltage, the focal length is tuned from 0.998 mm to infinity. Different from Figure 6a, Figure 6b has two electrodes at the edge of the lens acting as power electrodes. In the middle of the lens, the ITO electrodes above the low dielectric layer and the upper layer of the liquid crystal cell are grounded. The center ground electrode can stabilize the orientation of the liquid crystal above it, and the tilt angle distribution of the liquid crystal molecules can be adjusted by adjusting its width. The third structure is shown in Figure 6c [51], which is a LC lens array with a composited dielectric layer. In design, a spatially nonuniform electric field is generated between the strip electrodes, resulting in a gradient refractive index distribution in the LC layer. Since the upper and lower parts of the LC lens array both adopt a composite dielectric layer, the operation voltage of the LC lens array is effectively reduced. In terms of the LC lens, the double-layer design doubles the phase difference between the center and the periphery of the LC layer, thereby reducing the focal length of the LC lens array. In addition, the shortest focal length (~1.78 mm) of the LC lens array is obtained at V = 3.3 V, and the LC lens array has a large focusing range.
The three LC lens arrays proposed by the Qionghua Wang team have the same advantages: relatively low working voltage, flat substrate surface, simple electrode and uniform LC cavity gap.
A common technique to realize the gradient electric field profile that is required in liquid crystal tunable lenses is the use of a weakly conductive layer or the layer introduced as above. Thanks to this layer, an applied voltage with a certain frequency allows us to obtain a refractive index profile that is required for the lens operation. Due to the limited degrees of freedom, however, it is not possible to avoid aberrations in a weakly conductive layer-based tunable lens for a continuously tunable focal length. Tom Vanackere [52] et al. applied the higher frequency voltage components on the liquid crystal lens and optimized the amplitude and frequency selection of the high-frequency signal through the Zernike polynomial, making the edge refractive index closer to the parabolic distribution, to reduce the lens aberrations drastically.
Due to the birefringence characteristics of liquid crystals, the LC device has a certain dependence on the polarization of the incident light, which hinders the tuning of the LC lens and reduces the light efficiency. In order to improve it, polarization-independent or polarizer-free LC phase modulations are developed, including a double-layered structure, residual phase type, a mixed type (i.e., combination of a double-layered structure and residual phase type) and the type of Kerr effect. However, the two-layers structure must be identical, which is not easy in mass production, and there is also a trade-off between it and the response time. In 2021, Yi-Hsin Lin et al. [53] proposed a novel LC mode for a polarization-independent LC phase modulation by means of orthogonally anisotropic orientations of nematic LC on adjacent microdomains in a single LC layer through the scratched method. Each subdomain is 4 μm, and the total size is 112 μm (Figure 7a). Such an orthogonal (Figure 7b) nematic LC mode includes a subdomain with anisotropic orientations but collectively presents a capability of a polarizer-free optical phase modulation. An OLC mode cell provides a tunable optical phase of 3.35π radians for unpolarized light and different linearly polarized light. A polarizer-free LC micro-lens is also presented.

3.1.2. Pattern Electrode

Although the modal technology is mature, it is difficult to obtain a uniform high resistivity layer as the lens diameter increases. With the development of lithography technology and the improvement of etching precision, complex ITO (indium tin oxide) electrode structures appear. Designing different electrode topologies to realize the refractive index distribution of liquid crystal lenses has gradually become a research hotspot in recent years.
In 2018, Jeroen Beeckman et al. [54] used photolithography to fabricate a discrete multielectrode lens with an electrode width of 12.4 μm and a spacing of 2 μm, and verified the feasibility of the pattern electrode through simulation and experiments. Marenori Kawamura et al. [55] verified the possibility of a tunable conical lens through a similar multi-ring electrodes lens structure; the diameter of the central circular electrode is 183 μm, the width of the ring electrode is 245 μm and the electrode gap is 244 μm. A three-dimensional numerical calculation method for estimating the optical phase retardation in an LC lens is also proposed, and the three-dimensional inclination and azimuth distributions of the theoretically simulated six-ring electrode lens are simulated, the conical phase retardation in the lens area is estimated and the optical phase distribution is experimentally simulated. The results are in good agreement with the numerical results.
Additionally, based on the multi-ring electrode structure, in 2020, J.F. Algorri et al. [56] designed a voltage-divided multi-ring electrode lens, and the width of the electrode and the gap are both 10 μm. This microstructure is based on two main elements, a transmission line acting as a voltage divider and concentric electrodes distributing the voltage across the active area of the liquid crystal evenly (Figure 8a). The concentric electrodes only make electrical contact with the thinner transmission line (R1), not R2, and the main purpose is to control the voltage distribution between V1 and VC. Compared to the modal techniques, the transmission line has a low resistivity. Different geometries of the transmission line will result in different voltage distributions of the electrode at different radii, forming the lenses with different functions. The uniform transmission line (Figure 8b) can form a tapered lens with a linear distribution of a refractive index, and the tapered transmission line (Figure 8c) can form a GRIN lens with a parabolic refractive index distribution, even a logarithmic lens. The magnitude of the voltages V1 and V2 at both ends can also determine the concave or convex lens. In this paper, it is verified that a 1 cm aperture GRIN liquid crystal lens can achieve a focal length variation range of 5.8 D through experiments.
Using the same structure and idea of a transmission line voltage divider, J.F. Algorri et al. [57,58,59] modified the concentric ring electrode into strips with periodic distribution, as shown in Figure 9a. By applying four different voltages: V1, V2, V3 and V4 [60,61,62] to the endpoint of the upper and lower layers, six optical devices were realized. Voltages across the same layer had opposite phases. To avoid the cancellation when the amplitudes are equal between the upper and lower layers, a relative phase shift of 90° was applied. When the electrodes of the bottom substrate are grounded (V1 = V2 = 0), Powell lens and cylindrical lens can be realized according to the shape of the transmission line, such as in Figure 8b,c. If four endpoints work at the same time, the refractive index profile will be axisymmetric. The above two lenses convert to axicons and quasi-parabolic lenses, and the effect of the gap between perpendicular electrodes should be discussed, which relate and influence the function of the beam steering and 2D tunable diffraction grating. To achieve steering towards either the vertical or horizontal direction, a single voltage has to be applied at one terminal, whereas the rest have to be grounded. Combined with specific device parameters, the maximum steering range of the device is from −0.08° to +0.08°. In 2022, a novel pattern electrode [63] is designed to produce a parabolic profile of the voltage difference (Figure 9b). It consists of the generating unit (solid lines) and the distributing unit (dashed lines). The lengths of the resistive lines in the generating unit increase linearly from the center to the edges. The distributing unit is composed of many parallel ITO lines. Detailed voltage distribution derivation means that the terminal voltage can be set according to the required lens parameters. The experiment demonstrated that the optical power changes from −11.1 to +11.3 m−1. Some other electrode structures that form parabolic voltage profiles are also demonstrated.
In 2022, Justin Stevens introduced a newly designed electrically tunable gradient index LC lens and its working principle. Based on linear serpentine electrodes [64], no semiconductor layer is required, the width and spacing of the serpentine electrodes are w = 5 µm and g = 5 µm, the two substrates are separated by 40 µm-diameter microspheres and the interlayer is filled with a nematic LC (NLC) mixture with optical birefringence Δn ≈ 0.217. The electric field profile is generated by applying a sinusoidal voltage to each of the terminals: A, B, C and D with the same frequency, and these signals are sequentially phase-shifted by 90°, forming a symmetrical potential profile to control the focal length. The simulation results show that the voltage changes linearly from the edge of the lens to the cente, which preliminarily verifies the feasibility of a lens with 2 mm aperture and realizes an optical power of 9.5 D and a RMS wavefront error of 0.16 µm. And there is something to worth noting, a low-frequency (20 Hz) sine “bias” signal is added to the electrodes to raise the center voltage above the LC threshold, which converts cone voltage to paraboloid voltage. The lens performance was experimentally demonstrated with a miniature camera.
By designing spiral electrodes with different geometrics and densities, an uneven electric field can also be generated to obtain an ideal refractive index profile and realize a tunable focal length. Mingce Chen et al. [65,66] proposed a novel liquid crystal microlens with a planar nonuniform helical microcoil electrode. By applying a driving voltage signal, cylindrical microbeam focusing and spherical microbeam focusing corresponding to circular and elliptical microcoils are achieved, respectively. The entire liquid crystal microlens includes 2 × 2 spiral electrodes, and a pin A with a diameter of 1 mm is located in the center of the spiral electrode; the electrode pin B is connected to four spiral electrodes through a bus. The bus widths in the circular and elliptical electrodes are 30 μm and 20 μm, respectively. The focusing characteristics were experimentally demonstrated. The focal lengths of the circular and elliptical electrodes were 1.75 mm at 50.1 Vrms and 2.35 mm at 55.0 Vrms, respectively.

3.2. Tunable Filter and Absorber

Filters span many fields of electromagnetism, including optics and electricity. LC filters are good broadband, anisotropy and electrooptically and magnetooptically modulated. The development of LC filters covers from shortwave (such as visible light, near-infrared band) to longwave (such as mid-to-far infrared, THz band). Therefore, there are many studies on LC filters. The following will classify and introduce them according to wavelength.

3.2.1. Visible Light to Infrared

Although both microwave and infrared belong to electromagnetism, their models are different because of the great difference in wavelengths. The microwave filter is more focused on the improvement of the microstrip line structure, and the early model of the near-infrared filter is the FP cavity. The traditional FP cavity mainly relies on the external mechanical tuning of mems, which usually has the disadvantages of a long response time, complex structure and large volume. The introduction of liquid crystal into FP cavity filter tuning not only improves the response speed but also lays the foundation for the development of device miniaturization.
Since the introduction of liquid crystals, for a long time, the study of a single FP cavity was relatively mature. Jiuning Lin et al. [67] presented an electrically tunable infrared (IR) filter based on a key cascaded liquid–crystal Fabry–Perot (C-LC-FP), working in the wavelength range of 3–5 μm. The C-LC-FP is constructed by closely stacking two FP microcavities with different depths of 12 and 15 μm and fully filled by nematic LC materials. Through the continuous wavelength selection of both microcavities, radiation with a high transmittance and a narrow bandwidth can pass through the filter. According to the electrically controlled birefringence characteristics of nematic LC molecules, the transmission spectrum can be shifted through applying a dual-voltage signal over the C-LC-FP. Compared with common LC-FPs with a single microcavity, the C-LC-FP demonstrates better transmittance peak morphology and spectral selection performance. The experimental results also demonstrated that the number and the shifted scope of the IR transmission peak could be decreased and widened, respectively. Due to the birefringence of liquid crystals, infrared LC-FPs filters are polarization-sensitive, the same as microwave ones, and the polarization of light will greatly affect the filtering characteristics. For the polarization sensitivity of LC-FPs, Zhonglun Liu et al. [68] designed and experimentally verified an infrared filter with a multidirectional layer of PI film, which can make the LC distribute along two mutually perpendicular directions. The filter’s polarization insensitivity is substantially improved.
Besides inheriting the FP cavity structure, the idea of solid optical filters can also be applied to LC filters. Marwan Abuleil et al. [69] combined the Lyot filter structure with liquid crystal, and the Lyot filter transmittance is related to the wavelength. It contains a series of birefringent crystal plates and polarizers. The birefringence axis of each crystal is rotated 45° relative to the axis of the polarizer, and the structure is shown in Figure 10a. The filter tunes between nine spectral bands covering the range 450–1000 nm with bandwidths <10 nm and throughput >80%. Mi-Yun Jeong et al. [70] reported a continuously tunable and bandwidth variable optical notch and bandpass filters created by combining four left- and right-handed circular cholesteric liquid crystal cells without extra optical components. The filter performance was greatly improved by introducing an antireflection layer on the filter device. The filter comprised cholesteric liquid crystal wedge cells with continuous pitch gradients (see Figure 10b). The band wavelength position was spatially tuned from 470–1000 nm. The notch filters are polarization-independent in the spectral ranges. The band pass filters can be designed to be polarization-independent or polarization-dependent via cell alignment, and the bandwidth can be reversibly controlled from the original bandwidth 60–18 nm.
In addition to utilizing commonly used nematic liquid crystals and cholesteric liquid crystals, Chang li Sun et al. [71] proposed a near-infrared (NIR) filter using spherical phase liquid crystal (see Figure 11). It shows a low-operating electric field and large temperature gradient modulations. The central wavelength of the Bragg reflection can be thermally tuned from 1580 nm to 1324 nm with a temperature gradient of 42.7 nm/K. Meanwhile, the central wavelength can be electrically tuned over 76 nm within a low operating electric field of 0.3 V/μm. Thus, the SPLC filter may achieve a wavelength variation of 256 nm by thermal modulation and 76 nm by electrical modulation.
Similar to the tunable liquid crystal laser that will be discussed later, DBR has good optical filtering characteristics. Christophe Levallois et al. [72] combined the liquid crystals with photodetectors (Figure 12), achieving powerful spectral scanning in the wavelength range. The study of these tunable filters paves the way for the application of wavelength-tunable spectroscopic instruments in the visible and near-infrared response spectral ranges, revealing the great application potential of liquid crystal filters.

3.2.2. THz Absorber and Filter Based on Meta-Material

LC is one of the few materials with high birefringence, low absorption loss and a large phase shift tuning range in the THz band. The most attractive property of LC is that its optical anisotropy can be controlled by changing the external electric field, magnetic field, optical field or temperature to prepare THz tunable devices that can achieve specific functions, such as THz switches, filters, absorbers and modulators. In recent years, the rise of metamaterials has provided new opportunities for the development of THz devices. Metamaterials are artificial structures with special electromagnetic properties formed by subwavelength metal or dielectric elements arranged in a specific manner. It can flexibly manipulate the light by designing the geometric structure to realize filters and absorbers. These metamaterials can be combined with liquid crystals to form a THz–LC tunable device.
The most classical structure is the Split-ring resonator (SRR), which can be regarded as a LC circuit [73,74], and its resonant frequency is determined by the Equation (5) [75]:
f = 1 2 π L C     1 n e f f
L is the equivalent inductance determined by the enclosed area of the SRR, and C is the equivalent capacitance proportional to the dielectric constant of the medium deposited on the SRR. At the resonance frequency, certain frequency components of the signal pass, while other signals are highly damped. In order to describe the characteristics of the resonant circuit, the quality factor Q becomes an important parameter to measure the filtering performance of the resonant circuit.
Part of the research on THz–LC devices focuses on the design of metamaterial structures. Rafał Kowerdziej et al. [74] designed a subwavelength 25 nm-thick titanium split-ring resonator (SRR) planar square array to realize a tunable dual-band near-infrared metamaterial absorber using a combination of high-birefringence liquid crystals and high-loss metals (Figure 13a). Due to the high optical loss of Ti, perfect absorbance of over 99.4% was obtained at 328 THz and 364 THz. Furthermore, the absorption bandwidth is extended by the generated PSP resonance at the Ti-LC interface. The absorbance exceeds 70% over a broad spectral range of 318–372 THz, and spectral tunability up to 8 THz is achieved by simply switching the liquid crystal alignment wavelength. Shenghang Zhou et al. [76] proposed a tunable dielectric metamaterial absorber in the terahertz (THz) range. The absorber is composed of a silicon pillar array embedded in a liquid crystal (LC) layer, which is sandwiched by two graphene electrodes (Figure 13b,c). By way of varying the applied bias, the LC orientation can be continuously tuned. Structures such as single-layered fishnet metamaterial by Wei-Chih Wang [77] and keyhole-like metamaterial by Jun Yang [78] have also been proposed and tested.
Besides the study of the microstructure, Chia Yi Huang used the structures [73,79] to study how the resonance frequency influenced by the angles θ1 and θ2, polarized directions of the pump beam and LC directors with respect to the gaps of the SRRs (see Figure 14).
Similar to microwave and infrared light filters, the polarization sensitivity of THz filters/absorbers is also worth studying. Jun Yang and Deng Guangsheng et al. [80] designed a tunable polarization-dependent THz metamaterial absorber based on liquid crystals (LC) and studied the effect of the microstructure on TE and TM light (Figure 15). The absorption peak of TE polarized light is 239.5 GHz and that of TM polarized light is 306.6 GHz. By adjusting the bias voltage, the frequency tunability of the TE wave and TM wave are 4.7% and 4.1%, respectively.

3.3. Tunable Beam Controller

Beam control is also one of the common technical means in the optical field. Its main application is LIDAR [81,82,83], which is the cornerstone of various technologies, such as navigation, space communication, autonomous vehicles, drones and underwater vehicles. So far, many beam steering methods have been described [23,28]. Beam control devices involve beam deflection [29,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91], optical switches [92,93,94], laser control and many other types. The traditional mechanical beam control device is relatively fixed and has the emphatic shortcomings such as a short service life, heavy weight, high power consumption and high cost. In contrast, LC-based beam steering devices can be lightweight, compact, low-powered and inexpensive. The following will select representative structures for elaboration. Other types of beam controllers are also briefly described below.

3.3.1. Beam Deflection Control

The working principle of the LC-based beam deflection device is based on the phase modulation and diffraction. It mainly includes Bragg grating (Bragg diffraction), blazed grating (Raman-Nath diffraction), LC polarization diffraction grating (PB phase) and OPA (optical phased array). The concrete beam deflection theory was described by Wu Shin-Tson in [23]. The highly selective diffraction of blazed gratings can be achieved by the maximum retardation. Bragg gratings are similar to cholesteric liquid crystals (CLCs), which can vary the diffraction angle and wavelength by dynamically adjusting the pitch length. The PB phase is related to the evolution of light polarization. When the light beam passes through a nonuniform birefringent waveplate with local changes in the direction of the optical axis and uniform retardation, such as subwavelength polarization gratings, liquid crystal gratings and metasurfaces, the PB phase appears and relates to the rotation rate of the optical axis. Rowan Morris summarized many beam steering devices in [28], but some representative ones were not included, especially in LCPG.
According to previous studies on LCPG [13], a larger diffraction angle can be obtained by reducing its period ∧. However, for small period LCPGs that no longer satisfy the “thin” grating condition, the diffraction efficiency drops sharply. In the Raman–Nath region, despite a wide angular and spectral bandwidth, the gratings had a maximum single-order efficiency of less than 34% and produced many diffraction orders. Conversely in the Bragg region (Q > 10), when the incident wave propagated along the Bragg angle within the grating medium, single-order efficiencies of up to 100% were produced. In the case of linearly rotating the optical axis φ = π x / p , where p is the grating period, the PBD can theoretically deflect normal incident circularly polarized light toward first-order diffraction with an efficiency close to 100%. Combining the self-organized structure of a twisted liquid crystal with traditional PGs provided an important idea to solve the problem, which means that the Bragg diffraction and PB phase have become the current mainstream research directions. Both have a gradually rotating optical axis. At present, there are three main methods to achieve this by using optical alignment technology: a micro-projection exposure system based on a digital micromirror device (DMD), laser direct writing exposure system and interference exposure system. The most commonly used is the last one. It was mainly based on the interference of two orthogonal circularly polarized light beams. Theoretically, when two orthogonal circularly polarized light beams intersect at a certain angle, interference will occur, and the pattern of interference superposition is linearly polarized light with the periodic distribution of polarization direction rotation.
However, for traditional LCPG, the theoretical first-order diffraction efficiency of 100% can only be achieved if the half-wave condition is met, and zero order will appear if the half-wave condition is not met. Therefore, the traditional LCPG can only achieve 100% of the first-order diffraction efficiency of a single wavelength and cannot maintain a high diffraction efficiency in a wide band range. Since it is difficult for traditional LCPGs to maintain the high diffraction efficiency in a wide band, in order to solve the dispersion problem, a multilayer twist structure has been proposed. **ao **ang et al. [84] introduced transmissive Bragg PGs based on single-layer and double-layer twisted structures with large diffraction angles by creating two or more tilts within the grating (Figure 16). The fabrication of tilted gratings was also mentioned in their experiments. The chiral dopant-induced helical twist can effectively generate tilted gratings, and it was verified that the tilt angle θ of the grating is determined by the three parameters of twist angle, thickness and surface period. Compared with the nanoscale-tilted Bragg grating in 2017 [95], which FOV was 19–29° at 335 nm with a 450 nm grating period, the double-layer structure experimented in 2018 improved a lot, showing a 40° angular bandwidth, 200 nm spectral bandwidth, 76% average efficiency and 96% peak efficiency at 532 nm with a 400 nm grating period. This idea is based on the introduction of a new controllable variable in the original parameters of LCPG to eliminate the influence of wavelength change and the use of positive and negative twisted symmetrical structures to compensate for the changes in the diffraction efficiency caused by the introduction of the distortion.
In 2019, Kun-Yin et al. [90] proposed to attach PVG to a flexible thin film to make it stretchable, and rollable 3 µm-thick PVGs were prepared on a 160 µm-thick polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrate. By mechanical stretching, the horizontal direction of PVG is elongated, and the total thickness is reduced (Figure 17a,b). The Bragg period value changes, which affects the reflection band and deflection angle. Experiments show that the central wavelength is blue-shifted from 507.5 nm to 474.5 nm, and the deflection angle can be tuned from 35° to 46.5° with a tunable range of 11.5°. This study shows the potential for laser beam control applications and support the fabrication of flexible devices.
Since PB diffraction is highly polarization-selective, the most commonly used passive scheme is to control the input polarization state to switch the deflection angle of the PBD so that the output beam can switch between +1 and −1 diffraction orders. For active PBDs made of liquid crystals, the input beam can be switched between zero and first-order diffraction orders simply by applying a voltage to the PBDs, similar to a variable step blazed grating. The fabrication of PBD employs polarization holography, which transfers the linearly rotated polarization pattern to the LC director. In 2020, Comrun Yousefzadeh et al. [87]. proposed a nonmechanical beam steering device based on the Pancharatnam–Berry phase in liquid crystals, using a linear phase control elements (PCEs) array to locally control the orientation of the liquid crystal director. The device model is optimized to achieve a maximum deflection of 1.7° and a diffraction efficiency of 90%.
Inspired by the PB phase and multi-twisted structure, in 2020, Junyu Zou et al. [85] designed and experimentally demonstrated an efficient achromatic wide-angle PBD, which consisted of a three-layer mixture with liquid crystal thicknesses of 0.9 µm, 1.32 µm and 0.88 µm each (see Figure 17c), and proposed a new method that can precisely measure the thickness and twist angle of liquid crystal films, measuring the corresponding twist angles of each layer as −69.4°, 3.7° and 64°. The deflection angles at 457 nm, 532 nm and 635 nm were 0.75°, 0.87° and 1°, respectively, and the first-order diffraction efficiency could reach almost 100% under normal incidence. The study of such long-period polarization-dependent gratings is very useful for the resolution enhancement of near-eye displays.
The above studies were all based on the vicinity of visible light. As the research progresses to THz, the scheme of realizing the periodic distribution of the refractive index using the programmable element surface to realize the diffraction grating has been developed. By the binary encoding of subsurface units with different phase or amplitude responses and designing the encoding patterns, far-field scattered beams can be flexibly controlled, including single-beam, dual-beam and multi-beam radiation; polarization-dependent beam steering; beam steering and more. This is the specific use of the OPA (optical phased array) method and has been experimentally demonstrated that OPA is suitable for THZ deflection. Programmable metasurfaces enable novel communication and imaging systems.
In 2020, based on the pixelization of THz devices (Figure 18a,b), **gbo Wu et al. [29] applied the electrical addressing technology of a liquid crystal display and used terahertz programmable metasurfaces to achieve terahertz beam deflection, with a maximum deflection angle of 32°. Its principle is similar to the periodic phased array structure. The change of the periodic phase distribution affects the deflection angle, which is determined by Equation (6) [29]:
| sin θ s sin θ o | = λ M d .
where M : the number of elements of the periodic structure, d : the distance between elements and θs and θo incident angle and exit angle. After continuous coding optimization, it can achieve 32° beam deflection at 672 GHz. Based on similar ideas, Yanchun Shen et al. [91] applied optical alignment technology to form a periodic gradient distribution of LC. The frequency-independent geometric phase modulation can be obtained to form a blazed grating, which realizes light deflection of 13–19° in the 0.8–1.2 THz.
Wide angle is also an important measure of the performance of beam deflection devices. **ao Jian Fu et al. [86] introduced different metal resonance structures (see Figure 19a) in the LC tunable layer and used generalized Snell’s law to generate coding sequences and assign the coding sequences to reflective units. Beam deflection at large angles of 20–60° in the range of 0.630–0.650 THz.
The above structure realizes a terahertz programmable metasurface in reflection mode, and can be realized for transmitted light. The new metasurface structure proposed by Prof. **ao Jian Fu’s [89] team achieves transmission multi-beam deflection at 0.426 THz with a maximum deflection angle of 30° (see Figure 19b). It should be noted that in order to evaluate whether the complex reflectivity satisfies the requirements for 0 and 1 elements of a 1-bit encoded metasurface, a parameter Binary Bit Reflectivity Ratio (BBRR) is defined. T0 and T1 are the complex reflections in the two states, and BBRR is the ratio of the moduli of the difference between T0 and T1 to the moduli of their sum. Ideally, T0 and T1 should have the same amplitude and 180° phase difference, and the BBRR is infinite. The higher the BBRR, the higher the diffraction efficiency. The device can be designed as a reflective or transmissive according to the BBRR as Equation (7) explain [29]:
B B R R = | T 0 T 1 T 0 + T | .

3.3.2. Laser Polarization Mode

Tunable vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VCSELs) have the characteristics of low threshold current and single-mode continuous wavelength tuning characteristics, and have broad application prospects in the fields of optical communication, optical storage, spectroscopy and medical treatment. However, traditional VCSELs have weak anisotropy between polarization modes due to their symmetrical waveguide structure, and it is difficult to achieve stable single-polarization mode output. When the operating temperature and injection current of the device change, the VCSEL will switch between polarization modes. In 2006, Levalloisa et al. [96,97] first proposed to control the output polarization mode of VCSEL by embedding the liquid crystal layer structure in the cavity and use the birefringence to increase the threshold gain difference between the polarization modes in the cavity, and finally, the VCSEL can output stable single polarization mode light. At the same time, liquid crystal, as an electro-optical refractive index modulation material, can continuously tune the output wavelength of VCSEL by changing the equivalent refractive index of e-light under voltage.
The main team currently researching liquid crystal tunable lasers is Zou Yonggang group from Changchun University of Science and Technology and C. Levallois from Univ Rennes. Many works have been done on the basic structure [98]. In 2018, an intra-cavity liquid crystal tunable VCSEL was designed with two parts [99], whose central wavelength of 852 nm, a liquid crystal micronanocavity controlling the light phase and a half-VCSEL structure, including a high reflectivity dielectric Bragg mirror and an active 852 nm light-emitting region. The relationship between the applied tuning voltage and the threshold gain of the laser with different polarizations was measured experimentally. The threshold gains of the o-polarized light remained unchanged, while the threshold gains of the e-polarized light first decreased and then increased. It makes e-light more competitive in lasing and realizes single-polarization lasing. In the experiment, the continuous wavelength tuning range of 31 nm and the stable output of laser single polarization were realized, and the tuning efficiency was greater than 10 nm/V. Based on the original structure, Zou Yonggang optimized the coupling layer structure between [98] the semiconductor cavity and the liquid crystal cavity to make the liquid crystal tunable VCSEL have a wider wavelength tuning range, up to 41.1 nm. In 2020, C. Levallois et al. [100] investigated an InP-based VCSEL with a liquid crystal (LC) microcell monolithically integrated. This tunable VCSEL operates in CW at room temperature and exhibits more than 23 nm wavelength tuning around 1.55 μm at a maximum applied voltage of 20 V. The measured laser threshold around 6.5 mW is still comparable to VCSEL without LC microcell, a clear indication that the optical losses related the LC are very low.
In recent experimental studies, both DBR and HCG can meet lasing conditions and achieve ultra-broadband and high reflectivity. DBR is a multi-layer film structure, and HCG is a sub-wavelength grating structure in which a high-refractive-index material is completely surrounded by a low-refractive-index insulating dielectric (such as oxide or air) as showed in Figure 20. Using HCG, whose thickness is about a few tenths of DBR, as the upper mirror, can reduce the epitaxial thickness, reduce the difficulty of material growth, and simultaneously control the polarization of the emitted light and provide optical feedback. Compared with DBR, HCG is easier to embed liquid crystal and HCG simplifies the fabrication of devices, and is an ideal structure for the mirror in liquid crystal tunable VCSELs. **g Zhang et al. [101] experimentally demonstrate for the first time to our knowledge electrically injected vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSELs) with post-supported high-contrast gratings (HCGs) at 940 nm. Combined with theory that the HCG-VCSEL with a λ/2-cavity for the transverse magnetic polarization has a smaller effective mode length of 1.38·(λ/n), the −3 dB frequency of the HCG-VCSEL can theoretically reach 46.8 GHz at 12 mA.
Although beam deflectors and polarization mode laser output controller can change the light, the difference is changing from the inside or outside. Both provide a reference for the application of liquid crystal in the field of laser control.

3.3.3. Optical Switch

Optical switching is the most basic optical component in optical field and has wide applications, but there are relatively few studies based on liquid crystal optical switches in recent years. Optical switch controllers can be divided into two categories: one is the spectral optical switch controller, and the other is the channel optical switch controller. The spectral optical switch controller can be equivalent to the optical filter and optical absorber, which is used to control the transmission of light at a specific wavelength. Huan Peng ** laser beam and transmits an optical signal, while the upper layer transmits the pum** laser beam and stops the optical signal [139]. The operating principle is based on creating the circular thermocapillary rupture of the upper layer by Marangoni forces induced by heating with the pum** laser beam. The thermocapillary rupture serves as an aperture of the diaphragm. The aperture diameter at a fixed power of the laser beam depends on the upper layer thickness and reaches diameters up to two times larger in comparison with diaphragms operating on electrowetting and dielectrophoresis. The aperture tuning ratio is 100%. By shifting the pum** laser beam in the plane of the diaphragm, the aperture can be displaced for a distance up to a few of its radii.
In addition, Tao Chen et al. [142] designed a phase modulator based on electrowetting. Figure 35a shows the cross section of the optofluidic phase modulator, which is mainly composed of an upper cover sheet, a lower cover sheet, an outer circular cavity, an inner cylindrical cavity and a transparent sheet. In order to facilitate the flow of liquid in the chamber, there are four circular holes on the inner cylindrical chamber, and the height of the inner chamber is slightly shorter than that of the outer chamber. An insulating droplet is deposited in the center of the bottom, which is surrounded by a conductive liquid. The inner cavity is an effective part of the optical phase modulation, and the function of the outer cavity is to store the liquid. According to the electrowetting effect, when a voltage is applied, the wettability of the conductive liquid on the solid surface changes, so the shape of the insulating droplet also changes, resulting in a variable optical path length, thereby realizing the phase adjustment function. Indium tin oxide (ITO) planar electrode is used in the optofluidic phase modulator. Two electrode structures are presented, namely key type and interdigital type (see Figure 35b,c).
Additionally, the interdigital type electrodes can better control the planar movement of liquid and be applied in many studies, as in [122,143]. The experimental results also show that the two electrodes can achieve 6.68 π and 9.366 π, respectively, at the same voltage of 150 V. This research has great application potential in adaptive optics of coherence tomography and phase shift interferometry.

5. Conclusions and the Future

Based on the advantages of tunability, liquid devices are valued and applied in many fields, including augmented reality, holographic imaging, etc. Table 1 lists the classical references of LC devices, including recent typical structures and high-quality reviews before 2018. Due to the isotropic liquid unique characteristics, Table 2 lists another structure.
However, the challenges are increasingly notable. Although there are many kinds of liquid devices with different research points, the response time is a common difficulty to overcome. The interface deformation of ordinary liquid is deeply affected, and the response time reaches to seconds-order, which is mainly caused by the vibration at the interface. Although the diffusion method has greatly improved the modulation speed comparable to that of LC devices, it is still a sub-second response time, which means that tunable devices are difficult to meet the needs of beam direction switching in radar systems and adaptive lenses imaging in real time detection.
Due to the popular research of adaptive lens, different types of liquid lens have been demonstrated, which provides a prospect in precision medical, ultraportable image recorders and other equipment for their small size and light weight. At present, the focal range and aperture of the ordinary liquid lens are slightly better than those of the LC lens, but the aberration and applied voltage are on the contrary, which means the liquid lenses can still be improved. For the ordinary liquid lens, the near spherical interface will cause longitudinal spherical aberration, which is harmful to the focusing of a light spot. The diffusion lens needs continuous liquid supply, which hinders the miniaturization of devices. For LC devices, the major problem is that the constant refractive index difference of LC materials limits the simultaneous improvement of the aperture and focal range; another challenge needs to be solved is the high polarization dependence of LC lens, as the existing research on polarization independence cannot meet the commercial standard. At the same time, the reflection of the multilayer interface of the device needs to be considered by both lens, which may introduce a high loss of intensity. These challenges may be solved through the single layer joint control of and multiple regions (radial division), similar to the programmable LC deflector but involve the harsh selection and matching of LCs in each region.
Due to the isotropy of the ordinary liquid, it depends on the control means, which limits the diversity of the device. Hybridization may be the only way to develop. However, conversely, the birefringence and the diversity of its structure, LC can realize more optical devices, including THz LC devices, beam deflection control and polarization mode laser output. In THz band, the high absorption of THz by ordinary liquid, such as water, limits its application in this band, so the research is relatively less. The outstanding characteristics of LC in THz band make THz LC devices gradually become a research hotspot. Although most devices show exciting tuning performance at present, the research on THz LC devices has just started. There are challenges, such as low tuning speed, narrow phase modulation range and insufficient accuracy. The possible reason may be that the traditional LC physics theory and technologies are no longer applicable at the submillimeter scale. Therefore, the research of THz LC devices can be developed in the following directions: firstly, deeply exploring the interaction between LC and THz wave, the external field regulation and surface interaction of liquid crystal at the THz wavelength scale have become urgent problems to be solved; secondly, improving terahertz modulation technology and develo** a new generation of terahertz devices with high modulation depth, high switching rate, low consumption and low cost. The unit structures of THz presented is lesser. It may be a feasible scheme to summarize and study the mechanisms by drawing the nanostructures from other fields such as nanowire arrays.
In beam steering, ordinary liquid devices can only rely on the refraction of the interface, but the flatness is not ideal. The natural advantages of LC material with unique stratified and periodic spiral structure make it possible to achieve beam steering by diffraction. However, due to the limitations of itself, ideal phase modulation may not be obtained under the applied voltage, resulting in low deflection efficiency and low accuracy, especially in the case of two-dimension scanning, which will be the key point to be solved. Specifically, for the LCPG, it can only achieve high diffraction efficiency when circularly polarized light incident, but the diffraction efficiency of linearly polarized incident beam drops to 50%. Therefore, it is necessary to break through the limit of the incident polarization state of LCPG, such as the high diffraction efficiency grating device structure for linearly polarized light modulation. The most urgent issue of deflection efficiency and angle may be realized by device hybridization as well. After all, PVG and PBD theory have 100% diffraction efficiency.
The tunability of liquid devices has a great impact on optical research. We hope that this review can help scholars handle the recent development of liquid devices and provide a reference for the research liquid devices in the future.

Author Contributions

Investigation, H.Z. and Q.W.; writing review, Q.W.; editing and revision, H.Z. and Q.W.; supervision, D.J. and T.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2006216 and 61675153).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thanks the reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments and careful checks that made a significant contribution to the improvement of this review.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Mutailipu, M.; Pan, S. Emergent Deep-Ultraviolet Nonlinear Optical Candidates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 20302–20317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mutailipu, M.; Poeppelmeier, K.R.; Pan, S. Borates: A Rich Source for Optical Materials. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 1130–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, S.; Ren, H.; Wu, S.-T. Dielectrophoretically Tunable Optofluidic Devices. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2013, 46, 483001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Oladepo, S.A. Development and Application of Liquid Crystals as Stimuli-Responsive Sensors. Molecules 2022, 27, 1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Gong, X.; Yuan, Z.; Feng, S.; Xu, T.; Liu, T.; Chen, Y.-C. Bio-Electrostatic Sensitive Droplet Lasers for Molecular Detection. Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 2713–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. **a, C.; Zhou, D.; Su, Y.; Zhou, G.; Yao, L.; Sun, W.; Liu, Y. A Liquid-Crystal-Based Immunosensor for the Detection of Cardiac Troponin I. Analyst 2020, 145, 4569–4575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, P.-C.; Karn, A.; Lee, M.-J.; Lee, W.; Chen, C.-Y. Dye-Liquid-Crystal-Based Biosensing for Quantitative Protein Assay. Dyes Pigment. 2018, 150, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Kang, Q.; Yu, L. Simple and Label-Free Liquid Crystal-Based Sensor for Detecting Trypsin Coupled to the Interaction between Cationic Surfactant and BSA. Talanta 2018, 183, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kaur, J.; Singh, P.K. Trypsin Detection Strategies: A Review. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2022, 52, 949–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, X.; Zhao, X.; Liu, F.; Li, H.; Zhang, C.X.; Yang, Z. Simple, Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Parkinson’s Disease Related Alpha-Synuclein Using a DNA Aptamer Assisted Liquid Crystal Biosensor. Soft Matter 2021, 17, 4842–4847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jau, H.-C.; Lin, T.-H.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Chen, C.-W.; Liu, J.-H.; Fuh, A.Y.-G. Direction Switching and Beam Steering of Cholesteric Liquid Crystal Gratings. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 131909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gao, Y.; Ding, W.; Lu, J. Templated Twist Structure Liquid Crystals and Photonic Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lin, T.; **e, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Fan, F.; Wen, S. Recent Advances in Photoalignment Liquid Crystal Polarization Gratings and Their Applications. Crystals 2021, 11, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Alamro, F.S.; Gomha, S.M.; Shaban, M.; Altowyan, A.S.; Abolibda, T.Z.; Ahmed, H.A. Optical Investigations and Photoactive Solar Energy Applications of New Synthesized Schiff Base Liquid Crystal Derivatives. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, X.; Korblova, E.; Dong, D.; Wei, X.; Shao, R.; Radzihovsky, L.; Glaser, M.A.; Maclennan, J.E.; Bedrov, D.; Walba, D.M.; et al. First-Principles Experimental Demonstration of Ferroelectricity in a Thermotropic Nematic Liquid Crystal: Polar Domains and Striking Electro-Optics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 14021–14031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sebastián, N.; Cmok, L.; Mandle, R.J.; de la Fuente, M.R.; Drevenšek Olenik, I.; Čopič, M.; Mertelj, A. Ferroelectric-Ferroelastic Phase Transition in a Nematic Liquid Crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 037801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Li, Q.; Green, L.; Venkataraman, N.; Shiyanovskaya, I.; Khan, A.; Urbas, A.; Doane, J.W. Reversible Photoswitchable Axially Chiral Dopants with High Helical Twisting Power. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12908–12909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zografopoulos, D.C.; Ferraro, A.; Beccherelli, R. Liquid-Crystal High-Frequency Microwave Technology: Materials and Characterization. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2018, 4, 1800447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, Z.; Li, W.; Qian, J.; Liu, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Guo, Q.; Yashchyshyn, Y.; Wang, Q.; Shi, Y.; et al. Flexible Liquid Crystal Polymer Technologies from Microwave to Terahertz Frequencies. Molecules 2022, 27, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, Y.; Tamaoki, N. Asymmetric Dimers of Chiral Azobenzene Dopants Exhibiting Unusual Helical Twisting Power upon Photoswitching in Cholesteric Liquid Crystals. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 4918–4926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, J.; Li, Y.; White, T.; Urbas, A.; Li, Q. Light-Driven Nanoscale Chiral Molecular Switch: Reversible Dynamic Full Range Color Phototuning. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 3463–3465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lin, Y.-H.; Wang, Y.-J.; Reshetnyak, V. Liquid Crystal Lenses with Tunable Focal Length. Liq. Cryst. Rev. 2017, 5, 111–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. He, Z.; Gou, F.; Chen, R.; Yin, K.; Zhan, T.; Wu, S.-T. Liquid Crystal Beam Steering Devices: Principles, Recent Advances, and Future Developments. Crystals 2019, 9, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wang, L.; **ao, R.-W.; Ge, S.-J.; Shen, Z.-X.; Lü, P.; Hu, W.; Lu, Y.-Q. Research progress of terahertz liquid crystal materials and devices. Acta Phys. Sin. 2019, 68, 084205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, Q.; Li, T.; Li, Z.; Long, J.; Zhang, X. Optofluidic Tunable Lenses for In-Plane Light Manipulation. Micromachines 2018, 9, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Timothy, J.S.; David, A.D.; Horst, S. Crystals That Flow: Classic Papers from the History of Liquid Crystals; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004; ISBN 978-1-03-240262-8. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chu, F.; Tian, L.-L.; Li, R.; Gu, X.-Q.; Zhou, X.-Y.; Wang, D.; Wang, Q.-H. Adaptive Nematic Liquid Crystal Lens Array with Resistive Layer. Liq. Cryst. 2020, 47, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Morris, R.; Jones, C.; Nagaraj, M. Liquid Crystal Devices for Beam Steering Applications. Micromachines 2021, 12, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, J.; Shen, Z.; Ge, S.; Chen, B.; Shen, Z.; Wang, T.; Zhang, C.; Hu, W.; Fan, K.; Padilla, W.; et al. Liquid Crystal Programmable Metasurface for Terahertz Beam Steering. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116, 131104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mitov, M. Cholesteric Liquid Crystals in Living Matter. Soft Matter 2017, 13, 4176–4209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yeung, F.S.Y.; Ho, Y.L.J.; Li, Y.W.; Kwok, H.S. Liquid Crystal Alignment Layer with Controllable Anchoring Energies. J. Disp. Technol. 2008, 4, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cao, H.; Wu, S.; Wang, J.; Hu, W. Photoalignment Enabled Liquid Crystal Microstructures for Optics and Photonics. Chin. J. Liq. Cryst. Disp. 2021, 36, 921–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ishihara, S. How Far Has the Molecular Alignment of Liquid Crystals Been Elucidated? J. Disp. Technol. 2005, 1, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Momoi, Y.; Sato, O.; Koda, T.; Nishioka, A.; Haba, O.; Yonetake, K. Surface Rheology of Rubbed Polyimide Film in Liquid Crystal Display. Opt. Mater. Express 2014, 4, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, W.; Srivastava, A.; Rogach, A.; Kwok, H. Progress in Photo-Induced Semiconductor Quantum Rods Alignment. Chin. J. Liq. Cryst. Disp. 2020, 35, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chigrinov, V.G.; Kwok, H.S.; Takada, H.; Takatsu, H. Liquid Crystal Photoalignment: History and Future. In Emerging Liquid Crystal Technologies II; Chien, L.-C., Ed.; SPIE: San Jose, CA, USA, 2007; p. 64870F. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sugiyama, H.; Sato, S.; Nagai, K. Photo-Isomerization, Photodimerization, and Photodegradation Polyimides for a Liquid Crystal Alignment Layer. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2022, 33, 2113–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mahimwalla, Z.; Yager, K.G.; Mamiya, J.; Shishido, A.; Priimagi, A.; Barrett, C.J. Azobenzene Photomechanics: Prospects and Potential Applications. Polym. Bull. 2012, 69, 967–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chigrinov, V.; Sun, J.; Wang, X. Photoaligning and Photopatterning: New LC Technology. Crystals 2020, 10, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kuiper, S.; Hendriks, B.H.W. Variable-Focus Liquid Lens for Miniature Cameras. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 1128–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Berthier, J. Introduction to Liquid Dielectrophoresis. In Micro-Drops and Digital Microfluidics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 303–324. ISBN 978-1-4557-2550-2. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mao, X.; Lin, S.-C.S.; Lapsley, M.I.; Shi, J.; Juluri, B.K.; Huang, T.J. Tunable Liquid Gradient Refractive Index (L-GRIN) Lens with Two Degrees of Freedom. Lab Chip 2009, 9, 2050–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, H.L.; Zhu, X.Q.; Liang, L.; Zhang, X.M.; Yang, Y. Tunable Transformation Optical Waveguide Bends in Liquid. Optica 2017, 4, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zuo, Y.; Liu, H.; Yang, Y. Optofluidic Waveguide Bending by Thermal Diffusion for Visible Light Control. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 3725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yang, Y.; Liu, A.Q.; Chin, L.K.; Zhang, X.M.; Tsai, D.P.; Lin, C.L.; Lu, C.; Wang, G.P.; Zheludev, N.I. Optofluidic Waveguide as a Transformation Optics Device for Lightwave Bending and Manipulation. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. **n, Z.; Tong, Q.; Lei, Y.; Wei, D.; Zhang, X.; Liao, J.; Wang, H.; **e, C. An Electrically Tunable Polarization and Polarization-Independent Liquid-Crystal Microlens Array for Imaging Applications. J. Opt. 2017, 19, 095602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, Y.-J.; Hsieh, H.-A.; Lin, Y.-H. Electrically Tunable Gradient-Index Lenses via Nematic Liquid Crystals with a Method of Spatially Extended Phase Distribution. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 32398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kumar, M.B.; Kang, D.; Jung, J.; Park, H.; Hahn, J.; Choi, M.; Bae, J.-H.; Kim, H.; Park, J. Compact Vari-Focal Augmented Reality Display Based on Ultrathin, Polarization-Insensitive, and Adaptive Liquid Crystal Lens. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2020, 128, 106006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Li, S.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, Q.; Guo, T.; Zhou, X.; Wu, C. Electrically Tunable Large Aperture Liquid Crystal Lens with Dual Hole-Patterned Electrodes. Opt. Commun. 2022, 510, 127911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tian, L.-L.; Chu, F.; Dou, H.; Wang, Q.-H.; Li, L. Short-Focus Nematic Liquid Crystal Microlens Array with a Dielectric Layer. Liq. Cryst. 2020, 47, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, R.; Chu, F.; Dou, H.; Tian, L.-L.; Hou, W.-Y.; Li, L.; Wang, Q.-H. Double-Layer Liquid Crystal Lens Array with Composited Dielectric Layer. Liq. Cryst. 2020, 47, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Vanackere, T.; Vandekerckhove, T.; Claeys, E.; George, J.P.; Neyts, K.; Beeckman, J. Improvement of Liquid Crystal Tunable Lenses with Weakly Conductive Layers Using Multifrequency Driving. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lin, Y.-H.; Wang, Y.-J.; Hu, G.-L.; Reshetnyak, V. Electrically Tunable Polarization Independent Liquid Crystal Lenses Based on Orthogonally Anisotropic Orientations on Adjacent Micro-Domains. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 29215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Beeckman, J.; Yang, T.-H.; Nys, I.; George, J.P.; Lin, T.-H.; Neyts, K. Multi-Electrode Tunable Liquid Crystal Lenses with One Lithography Step. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Kawamura, M.; Ichimura, Y.; Sugawara, T. Liquid Crystal Lens with Tunable Conical Lens Properties. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 60, 042001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Algorri, J.F.; Morawiak, P.; Bennis, N.; Zografopoulos, D.C.; Urruchi, V.; Rodríguez-Cobo, L.; Jaroszewicz, L.R.; Sánchez-Pena, J.M.; López-Higuera, J.M. Positive-Negative Tunable Liquid Crystal Lenses Based on a Microstructured Transmission Line. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Algorri, J.F.; Morawiak, P.; Zografopoulos, D.C.; Bennis, N.; Spadlo, A.; Rodríguez-Cobo, L.; Jaroszewicz, L.R.; Sánchez-Pena, J.M.; López-Higuera, J.M. Multifunctional Light Beam Control Device by Stimuli-Responsive Liquid Crystal Micro-Grating Structures. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bennis, N.; Jankowski, T.; Strzezysz, O.; Pakuła, A.; Zografopoulos, D.C.; Perkowski, P.; Sánchez-Pena, J.M.; López-Higuera, J.M.; Algorri, J.F. A High Birefringence Liquid Crystal for Lenses with Large Aperture. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 14603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bennis, N.; Jankowski, T.; Morawiak, P.; Spadlo, A.; Zografopoulos, D.C.; Sánchez-Pena, J.M.; López-Higuera, J.M.; Algorri, J.F. Aspherical Liquid Crystal Lenses Based on a Variable Transmission Electrode. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 12237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kotova, S.; Patlan, V.; Samagin, S. Tunable Liquid-Crystal Focusing Device. 1. Theory. Quantum Electron. 2011, 41, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Algorri, J.F.; Love, G.D.; Urruchi, V. Modal Liquid Crystal Array of Optical Elements. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 24809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vdovin, G.; Gural’nik, I.; Kotova, S.; Loktev, M.; Naumov, A. Liquid-Crystal Lenses with a Controlled Focal Length. I. Theory. Quantum Electron. 1999, 29, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Feng, W.; Ye, M. Positive-Negative Tunable Liquid Crystal Lens of Rectangular Aperture. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2022, 34, 795–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Stevens, J.; Galstian, T. Electrically Tunable Liquid Crystal Lens with a Serpentine Electrode Design. Opt. Lett. 2022, 47, 910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Shao, Q.; **n, Z.; Wei, D.; Zhang, X.; Wang, H.; **e, C.; Han, X.; Chen, M.; Li, Z. A New Type of Liquid-Crystal Cylindrical Microlens Arrays with Nonuniform Microcoil Electrodes. In Proceedings of the Emerging Liquid Crystal Technologies XIV, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2–7 February 2019; Chien, L.-C., Ed.; SPIE: San Jose, CA, USA, 2019; p. 29. [Google Scholar]
  66. Dai, W.; Meng, J.; **e, X.; Wei, D.; Chen, M.; Zhang, X.; **e, C.; Wang, H.M.; Han, X.; **n, Z.M. Electrically Controlled Liquid-Crystal Microlens Arrays Based on Plane Nonuniform Spiral Microcoils. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information Optics and Photonics, Bei**g, China, 8–11 July 2018; Yang, Y., Ed.; SPIE: Bei**g, China, 2018; p. 83. [Google Scholar]
  67. Lin, J.; Tong, Q.; Lei, Y.; **n, Z.; Wei, D.; Zhang, X.; Liao, J.; Wang, H.; **e, C. Electrically Tunable Infrared Filter Based on a Cascaded Liquid-Crystal Fabry–Perot for Spectral Imaging Detection. Appl. Opt. 2017, 56, 1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Liu, Z.; Dai, W.; Han, X.; **n, Z.; Wei, D.; Zhang, X.; Wang, H.; **e, C. A Polarization Insensitive Infrared Filter Based on a Liquid-Crystal Fabry-Perot for Electrically Tunable Spectral Imaging. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information Optics and Photonics, Bei**g, China, 8–11 July 2018; Yang, Y., Ed.; SPIE: Bei**g, China, 2018; p. 115. [Google Scholar]
  69. Abuleil, M.; Abdulhalim, I. Narrowband Multispectral Liquid Crystal Tunable Filter. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Jeong, M.-Y.; Kwak, K. Continuously Tunable and Bandwidth Variable Optical Notch/Band-Pass Filters Over 500 Nm Spectral Range Using Cholesteric Liquid Crystals. IEEE Photonics J. 2019, 11, 4700211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sun, C.; Lu, J. A Tunable NIR Filter with Sphere Phase Liquid Crystal. Crystals 2019, 9, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Levallois, C.; Sadani, B.; Boisnard, B.; Camps, T.; Paranthoën, C.; Pes, S.; Bouchoule, S.; Dupont, L.; Doucet, J.-B.; Alouini, M.; et al. Liquid Crystal-Based Tunable Photodetector Operating in the Telecom C-Band. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 25952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Shih, Y.-H.; Lin, X.-Y.; Silalahi, H.M.; Lee, C.-R.; Huang, C.-Y. Optically Tunable Terahertz Metasurfaces Using Liquid Crystal Cells Coated with Photoalignment Layers. Crystals 2021, 11, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kowerdziej, R.; Jaroszewicz, L. Tunable Dual-Band Liquid Crystal Based near-Infrared Perfect Metamaterial Absorber with High-Loss Metal. Liq. Cryst. 2019, 46, 1568–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. O’Hara, J.F.; Singh, R.; Brener, I.; Smirnova, E.; Han, J.; Taylor, A.J.; Zhang, W. Thin-Film Sensing with Planar Terahertz Metamaterials: Sensitivity and Limitations. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhou, S.; Shen, Z.; Kang, R.; Ge, S.; Hu, W. Liquid Crystal Tunable Dielectric Metamaterial Absorber in the Terahertz Range. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, W.-C.; Chang, C.-L. Tunable Terahertz Filter Using PDLC Fishnet Metamaterial. In Proceedings of the Terahertz, RF, Millimeter, and Submillimeter-Wave Technology and Applications XI, San Francisco, CA, USA, 27 January–1 February 2018; Sadwick, L.P., Yang, T., Eds.; SPIE: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2018; p. 38. [Google Scholar]
  78. Deng, G.; Hu, H.; Mo, H.; Xu, J.; Yin, Z.; Lu, H.; Hu, M.; Li, J.; Yang, J. Tunable Terahertz Metamaterial Wideband Absorber with Liquid Crystal. Opt. Mater. Express 2021, 11, 4026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chiang, W.-F.; Lu, Y.-Y.; Chen, Y.-P.; Lin, X.-Y.; Lim, T.-S.; Liu, J.-H.; Lee, C.-R.; Huang, C.-Y. Passively Tunable Terahertz Filters Using Liquid Crystal Cells Coated with Metamaterials. Coatings 2021, 11, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Deng, G.; Lu, Y.; Yin, Z.; Lai, W.; Lu, H.; Yang, J.; Yang, A.; Ye, Y.; Liu, D.; Chi, B. A Tunable Polarization-Dependent Terahertz Metamaterial Absorber Based on Liquid Crystal. Electronics 2018, 7, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Okano, M.; Chong, C. Swept Source Lidar: Simultaneous FMCW Ranging and Nonmechanical Beam Steering with a Wideband Swept Source. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 23898–23915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cao, X.; Qiu, G.; Wu, K.; Li, C.; Chen, J. Lidar System Based on Lens Assisted Integrated Beam Steering. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 5816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhao, S.; Chen, J.; Shi, Y. All-Solid-State Beam Steering via Integrated Optical Phased Array Technology. Micromachines 2022, 13, 894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. **ang, X.; Kim, J.; Escuti, M.J. Bragg Polarization Gratings for Wide Angular Bandwidth and High Efficiency at Steep Deflection Angles. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Zou, J.; Zhan, T.; **ong, J.; Wu, S.-T. Broadband Wide-View Pancharatnam–Berry Phase Deflector. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Fu, X.; Shi, L.; Yang, J.; Fu, Y.; Liu, C.; Wu, J.W.; Yang, F.; Bao, L.; Cui, T.J. Flexible Terahertz Beam Manipulations Based on Liquid-Crystal-Integrated Programmable Metasurfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 22287–22294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yousefzadeh, C.; Van Rynbach, A.; Bryant, D.; Bos, P. High-Efficiency, Tunable, Fringe-Field Switching-Mode Beam Steering Based on a Liquid Crystal Pancharatnam Phase. Appl. Opt. 2020, 59, 10706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lee, Y.-H.; He, Z.; Wu, S.-T. Optical Properties of Reflective Liquid Crystal Polarization Volume Gratings. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2019, 36, D9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liu, C.X.; Yang, F.; Fu, X.J.; Wu, J.W.; Zhang, L.; Yang, J.; Cui, T.J. Programmable Manipulations of Terahertz Beams by Transmissive Digital Coding Metasurfaces Based on Liquid Crystals. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2100932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yin, K.; Lee, Y.-H.; He, Z.; Wu, S.-T. Stretchable, Flexible, Rollable, and Adherable Polarization Volume Grating Film. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 5814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Shen, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, Q.; Qiao, X.; Wang, Y.; Xu, D. Broadband Tunable Terahertz Beam Deflector Based on Liquid Crystals and Graphene. Crystals 2021, 11, 1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. **n, H.P.; Liu, F.; Ren, G.J.; Zhao, H.L.; Yao, J.Q. A Liquid Crystals Modulated Optical Tunable Filter Based on Fano Resonance of Au Nanorod Trimer. Opt. Commun. 2017, 389, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Otón, J.M.; Caño-García, M.; Gordo, F.; Otón, E.; Geday, M.A.; Quintana, X. Liquid Crystal Tunable Claddings for Polymer Integrated Optical Waveguides. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2019, 10, 2163–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chung, H.; Miller, O.D. Tunable Metasurface Inverse Design for 80% Switching Efficiencies and 144° Angular Deflection. ACS Photonics 2020, 7, 2236–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. **ang, X.; Kim, J.; Komanduri, R.; Escuti, M.J. Nanoscale Liquid Crystal Polymer Bragg Polarization Gratings. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 19298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Levallois, C.; Verbrugge, V.; Dupont, L.; de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, J.-L.; Caillaud, B.; Le Corre, A.; Dehaese, O.; Folliot, H.; Loualiche, S. 1.55-Μm Optically Pumped Tunable VCSEL Based on a Nano-Polymer Dispersive Liquid Crystal Phase Modulator. In Micro-Optics, VCSELs, and Photonic Interconnects II: Fabrication, Packaging, and Integration; Thienpont, H., Taghizadeh, M.R., Van Daele, P., Mohr, J., Eds.; SPIE: Strasbourg, France, 2006; p. 61850W. [Google Scholar]
  97. Levallois, C.; Richard, S.; Le Corre, A.; Loualiche, S.; Caillaud, B.; de Bougrenet de la Tocnaye, J.-L.; Dupont, L. Design and Fabrication of a Tunable InP-Based VCSEL Using a Electro-Optic Index Modulator. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials Conference Proceedings, Princeton, NJ, USA, 8–11 May 2006; IEEE: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 64–67. [Google Scholar]
  98. Wang, X.; Zou, Y.; Hao, Y.; Ma, X.; Liu, G. Characteristics of 850 Nm Liquid Crystal Tunable VCSEL with Polarization Stability and Wide Tuning Range. Chin. J. Lumin. 2020, 41, 1287–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, B.; Zou, Y. Tunable Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers. Laser Technol. 2018, 42, 556–561. [Google Scholar]
  100. Boisnard, B.; Levallois, C.; Paranthoen, C.; Pes, S.; Camps, T.; Sadani, B.; Tavernier, K.; Bouchoule, S.; Dupont, L.; Alouini, M.; et al. CW Operation of a Tunable 1550 nm VCSEL Integrating Liquid-Crystal Microcells. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2020, 32, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, J.; Hao, C.; Zheng, W.; Bimberg, D.; Liu, A. Demonstration of Electrically Injected Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Lasers with Post-Supported High-Contrast Gratings. Photonics Res. 2022, 10, 1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Qiu, Z.; Zhu, S.; Lu, H.; Gu, Y.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, G.; Deng, S.; Yang, B. An Electrophoretic E-paper Device with Stretchable, Washable, and Rewritable Functions. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2022, 30, 452–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wang, P.-C.; MacDiarmid, A.G. Integration of Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystal Composites with Conducting Polymer Thin Films toward the Fabrication of Flexible Display Devices. Displays 2007, 28, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chigrinov, V.G.; Kudreyko, A.A.; Podgornov, F.V. Optically Rewritable Liquid Crystal Displays: Characteristics and Performance. Crystals 2021, 11, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kim, D.Y.; Kim, M.-J.; Sung, G.; Sun, J.-Y. Stretchable and Reflective Displays: Materials, Technologies and Strategies. Nano Converg. 2019, 6, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Chigrinov, V.G.; Kudreyko, A.A. Tunable Optical Properties for ORW E-Paper. Liq. Cryst. 2021, 48, 1073–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Liu, H.; Guo, Z.H.; Xu, F.; Jia, L.; Pan, C.; Wang, Z.L.; Pu, X. Triboelectric-Optical Responsive Cholesteric Liquid Crystals for Self-Powered Smart Window, E-Paper Display and Optical Switch. Sci. Bull. 2021, 66, 1986–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sun, H.; **e, Z.; Ju, C.; Hu, X.; Yuan, D.; Zhao, W.; Shui, L.; Zhou, G. Dye-Doped Electrically Smart Windows Based on Polymer-Stabilized Liquid Crystal. Polymers 2019, 11, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Hu, X.; Zeng, W.; Yang, W.; **ao, L.; De Haan, L.T.; Zhao, W.; Li, N.; Shui, L.; Zhou, G. Effective Electrically Tunable Infrared Reflectors Based on Polymer Stabilised Cholesteric Liquid Crystals. Liq. Cryst. 2019, 46, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Du, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, F.; Luo, D. Electrically Switchable Bistable Dual Frequency Liquid Crystal Light Shutter with Hyper-Reflection in near Infrared. Liq. Cryst. 2019, 46, 1727–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Hemaida, A.; Ghosh, A.; Sundaram, S.; Mallick, T.K. Evaluation of Thermal Performance for a Smart Switchable Adaptive Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal (PDLC) Glazing. Sol. Energy 2020, 195, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Liu, Y.; Zhu, W.; Sang, J.; Zhang, X.; Lee, D.W.; Seo, D. Flexible Normally Transparent Smart Window Modulating Near-Infrared Penetration under Ambient Conditions. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 9, 2200338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Oh, S.-W.; Nam, S.-M.; Kim, S.-H.; Yoon, T.-H.; Kim, W.S. Self-Regulation of Infrared Using a Liquid Crystal Mixture Doped with Push–Pull Azobenzene for Energy-Saving Smart Windows. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 5028–5033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hemaida, A.; Ghosh, A.; Sundaram, S.; Mallick, T.K. Simulation Study for a Switchable Adaptive Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal Smart Window for Two Climate Zones (Riyadh and London). Energy Build. 2021, 251, 111381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Chen, L.; Ghilardi, M.; Busfield, J.J.C.; Carpi, F. Electrically Tunable Lenses: A Review. Front. Robot. AI 2021, 8, 678046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Cheng, Y.; Chen, C.; Cao, J.; Bao, C.; Yang, A.; Hao, Q. Tunable Lens Using Dielectric Elastomer Sandwiched by Transparent Conductive Liquid. Opt. Lett. 2021, 46, 4430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wang, L.; Hayakawa, T.; Ishikawa, M. Dielectric-Elastomer-Based Fabrication Method for Varifocal Microlens Array. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 31708–31717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhang, C.; He, H.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Dong, Z. Modeling and Design of Dielectric Elastomer Actuated Tunable Lens with Dual Chambers. AIP Adv. 2022, 12, 075119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Liu, S.; Qiu, Y.; Yu, W. Self-Contained Focus-Tunable Lenses Based on Transparent and Conductive Gels. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2020, 305, 2000393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Cheng, Y.; Li, Z.; Chen, C.; Cao, J.; Bao, C.; Ning, Y.; Hao, Q. Varifocal Liquid Lens Driven by a Conical Dielectric Elastomer Actuator. Appl. Opt. 2022, 61, 4633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Xu, M.; Xu, D.; Ren, H.; Yoo, I.-S.; Wang, Q.-H. An Adaptive Liquid Lens with Radial Interdigitated Electrode. J. Opt. 2014, 16, 105601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Xu, M.; Wang, X.; Ren, H. Tunable Focus Liquid Lens with Radial-Patterned Electrode. Micromachines 2015, 6, 1157–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Mishra, K.; Narayanan, A.; Mugele, F. Design and Wavefront Characterization of an Electrically Tunable Aspherical Optofluidic Lens. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 17601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Park, I.S.; Park, Y.; Oh, S.H.; Yang, J.W.; Chung, S.K. Multifunctional Liquid Lens for Variable Focus and Zoom. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2018, 273, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Lee, J.; Park, Y.; Oh, S.H.; Chung, S.K. Multifunctional Liquid Lens (MLL) for Variable Focus and Variable Aperture. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 30th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 22–26 January 2017; IEEE: Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2017; pp. 781–784. [Google Scholar]
  126. Xu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, Q. Non-Aqueous Organic Solution Based on a Large-Aperture Spherical Electrowetting Liquid Lens with a Wide Tunable Focal Length Range. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 6778–6793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Liu, C.; Wang, D.; Wang, Q.-H.; **ng, Y. Multifunctional Optofluidic Lens with Beam Steering. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 7734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Park, J.; Ha, J.; Choi, K.; Bae, J.; Kim, H.-Y. Critical AC Frequency for Stable Operation of Electrowetting-Driven Optofluidic Devices with Polymeric Electrolyte Solutions. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2019, 33, 1793–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Chen, Q.; Li, T.; Zhu, Y.; Yu, W.; Zhang, X. Dielectrophoresis-Actuated in-Plane Optofluidic Lens with Tunability of Focal Length from Negative to Positive. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 6532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Chen, Q.; Li, T.; Li, Z.; Lu, C.; Zhang, X. Dielectrophoresis-Actuated Liquid Lenses with Dual Air/Liquid Interfaces Tuned from Biconcave to Biconvex. Lab Chip 2018, 18, 3849–3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Chen, Q.; Tong, X.; Zhu, Y.; Tsoi, C.C.; Jia, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X. Aberration-Free Aspherical in-Plane Tunable Liquid Lenses by Regulating Local Curvatures. Lab Chip 2020, 20, 995–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Shian, S.; Diebold, R.M.; Clarke, D.R. Tunable Lenses Using Transparent Dielectric Elastomer Actuators. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 8669–8676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Malyuk, A.Y.; Ivanova, N.A. Varifocal Liquid Lens Actuated by Laser-Induced Thermal Marangoni Forces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 112, 103701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Malyuk, A.Y.; Ivanova, N.A. Optofluidic Lens Actuated by Laser-Induced Solutocapillary Forces. Opt. Commun. 2017, 392, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhao, H.; Yang, Y.; Chin, L.; Chen, H.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, J.; Yap, P.; Liedberg, B.; Wang, K.; Wang, G.; et al. Optofluidic Lens with Low Spherical and Low Field Curvature Aberrations. Lab Chip 2016, 16, 1617–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Chen, Q.; Jian, A.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X. Optofluidic Tunable Lenses Using Laser-Induced Thermal Gradient. Lab Chip 2016, 16, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Liu, H.; Shi, Y.; Liang, L.; Li, L.; Guo, S.; Yin, L.; Yang, Y. A Liquid Thermal Gradient Refractive Index Lens and Using It to Trap Single Living Cell in Flowing Environments. Lab Chip 2017, 17, 1280–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Liu, H.L.; Zuo, Y.F.; Zhu, X.Q.; Yang, Y. Optofluidic Gradient Refractive Index Resonators Using Liquid Diffusion for Tunable Unidirectional Emission. Lab Chip 2020, 20, 2656–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Klyuev, D.S.; Fliagin, V.M.; Al-Muzaiqer, M.; Ivanova, N.A. Laser-Actuated Optofluidic Diaphragm Capable of Optical Signal Tracking. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 114, 011602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Wan, J.; Xue, F.; Liu, C.; Huang, S.; Fan, S.; Hu, F. Optofluidic Variable Optical Attenuator Controlled by Electricity. Appl. Opt. 2018, 57, 8114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Xu, P.; Wan, J.; Zhang, S.; Duan, Y.; Chen, B.; Zhang, S. 2 × 2 Optofluidic Switch Chip with an Air Shutter. Appl. Opt. 2019, 58, 4637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Liang, Z.; Ding, W.; Zhao, R.; Huang, Y.; Kong, M.; Chen, T. Design and Characteristics of an Optofluidic Phase Modulator Based on Dielectrowetting. Langmuir 2021, 37, 769–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Huang, Y.; Zhao, R.; Liang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Kong, M.; Chen, T. Dielectrowetting Actuation of Droplet: Theory and Experimental Validation. Chin. Phys. B 2021, 30, 106801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A brief introduction of the tunable liquid devices’ (a) working principle and (b) a diagram that presents the common and unique device type.
Figure 1. A brief introduction of the tunable liquid devices’ (a) working principle and (b) a diagram that presents the common and unique device type.
Molecules 27 08025 g001
Figure 2. Electrical control diagrams of (a) electrowetting when the voltage is off (b) and the voltage is on [40]. (c) The diagrams of dielectrophoresis [41]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [40,41]. 2004 AIP Publishing and 2013 Elsevier Science.
Figure 2. Electrical control diagrams of (a) electrowetting when the voltage is off (b) and the voltage is on [40]. (c) The diagrams of dielectrophoresis [41]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [40,41]. 2004 AIP Publishing and 2013 Elsevier Science.
Molecules 27 08025 g002
Figure 3. Simulated refractive index profile due to the diffusion [42]. (a) Simulated model and distribution graph. (b) Cross-sectional refractive index distribution at different locations along the flow direction (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, as indicated in (a)). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [42]. 2009 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 3. Simulated refractive index profile due to the diffusion [42]. (a) Simulated model and distribution graph. (b) Cross-sectional refractive index distribution at different locations along the flow direction (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, as indicated in (a)). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [42]. 2009 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Molecules 27 08025 g003
Figure 4. NLC spatially expanded phase distribution. (a) Schematic diagram of the structure of the proposed LC lens. (b) The upper LC refractive index varies with the radius. (c) Lower LC refractive index as a function of radius. (d) Sum of the refractive indices of the upper and lower layers [47]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [47]. 2019 The Optical Society.
Figure 4. NLC spatially expanded phase distribution. (a) Schematic diagram of the structure of the proposed LC lens. (b) The upper LC refractive index varies with the radius. (c) Lower LC refractive index as a function of radius. (d) Sum of the refractive indices of the upper and lower layers [47]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [47]. 2019 The Optical Society.
Molecules 27 08025 g004
Figure 5. Dual-aperture LC lens at different working states: (a) when the voltage is on and (b) the voltage is off [49]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [49]. 2022 Elsevier.
Figure 5. Dual-aperture LC lens at different working states: (a) when the voltage is on and (b) the voltage is off [49]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [49]. 2022 Elsevier.
Molecules 27 08025 g005
Figure 6. LC lens arrays with different layers: (a) resistive layer [27], (b) low dielectric layer [50] and (c) composited dielectric layer [51]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [27,50,51]. 2020 Taylor & Francis.
Figure 6. LC lens arrays with different layers: (a) resistive layer [27], (b) low dielectric layer [50] and (c) composited dielectric layer [51]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [27,50,51]. 2020 Taylor & Francis.
Molecules 27 08025 g006
Figure 7. Polarizer-free LC micro-lens. (a) Schematic configuration (aperture of a micro-lens: 100 μm). (b) The illustration of a scratched PI area in (a) [53]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [53]. 2021 The Optical Society.
Figure 7. Polarizer-free LC micro-lens. (a) Schematic configuration (aperture of a micro-lens: 100 μm). (b) The illustration of a scratched PI area in (a) [53]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [53]. 2021 The Optical Society.
Molecules 27 08025 g007
Figure 8. Schematic depiction of the (a) voltage-dividing electrode. (b) Rectangular transmission line. (c) Triangular transmission line [56]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56]. 2020 Springer Nature.
Figure 8. Schematic depiction of the (a) voltage-dividing electrode. (b) Rectangular transmission line. (c) Triangular transmission line [56]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56]. 2020 Springer Nature.
Molecules 27 08025 g008
Figure 9. Pattern electrodes with parallel sub-electrodes. (a) Two electrode structures perpendicularly arranged, corresponding to the top and bottom substrates of a LC-cell [57]. (b) Resistance line distribution with a linear function of the coefficient k [63]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [57,63]. 2020 Springer Nature and 2022 IEEE.
Figure 9. Pattern electrodes with parallel sub-electrodes. (a) Two electrode structures perpendicularly arranged, corresponding to the top and bottom substrates of a LC-cell [57]. (b) Resistance line distribution with a linear function of the coefficient k [63]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [57,63]. 2020 Springer Nature and 2022 IEEE.
Molecules 27 08025 g009
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of (a) LC filter based on a Lyot filter [69] and (b) the wedge CLC cell with a pitch gradient [70]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [69,70]. 2016 The Optical Society and 2019 IEEE.
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of (a) LC filter based on a Lyot filter [69] and (b) the wedge CLC cell with a pitch gradient [70]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [69,70]. 2016 The Optical Society and 2019 IEEE.
Molecules 27 08025 g010
Figure 11. The model of the three-dimensional twist sphere structure in the sphere phase [71]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [71]. 2019 MDPI.
Figure 11. The model of the three-dimensional twist sphere structure in the sphere phase [71]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [71]. 2019 MDPI.
Molecules 27 08025 g011
Figure 12. Three-dimensional and cross-section view for a single tunable PD [72]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [72]. 2018 The Optical Society.
Figure 12. Three-dimensional and cross-section view for a single tunable PD [72]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [72]. 2018 The Optical Society.
Molecules 27 08025 g012
Figure 13. Metamaterial absorber in the THz range: (a) Planar Square Titanium SRR [74]. (b) The decomposition diagram of the LC-integrated dielectric metamaterial [76]. (c) The unit dimension of the pillar resonator: lattice periodicity, p: 210 μm; radius, r: 64 μm; height, h: 60 μm. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [74,76]. 2019 Taylor & Francis and 2018 MDPI.
Figure 13. Metamaterial absorber in the THz range: (a) Planar Square Titanium SRR [74]. (b) The decomposition diagram of the LC-integrated dielectric metamaterial [76]. (c) The unit dimension of the pillar resonator: lattice periodicity, p: 210 μm; radius, r: 64 μm; height, h: 60 μm. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [74,76]. 2019 Taylor & Francis and 2018 MDPI.
Molecules 27 08025 g013
Figure 14. Dimensions of SRRs with different units: (a) split ring [73] and (b) split square [79]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [73,79]. 2021 MDPI.
Figure 14. Dimensions of SRRs with different units: (a) split ring [73] and (b) split square [79]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [73,79]. 2021 MDPI.
Molecules 27 08025 g014
Figure 15. Schematic diagram of a metamaterial absorber based on liquid crystals [80]: (a) top view and (b) side view. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [80]. 2018 MDPI.
Figure 15. Schematic diagram of a metamaterial absorber based on liquid crystals [80]: (a) top view and (b) side view. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [80]. 2018 MDPI.
Molecules 27 08025 g015
Figure 16. Double-layer twisted Bragg grating [84]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [84]. 2018 Spring Nature.
Figure 16. Double-layer twisted Bragg grating [84]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [84]. 2018 Spring Nature.
Molecules 27 08025 g016
Figure 17. Schematic illustrations of the PVG structure and stretching process of PVG from an unstrained state to strained state. (a) PVG on PDMS without strain. (b) Strained PVG structure [90]. (c) Three-layer twisted structure PB phase control beam deflector [85]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [90,85]. 2019 The Optical Society.
Figure 17. Schematic illustrations of the PVG structure and stretching process of PVG from an unstrained state to strained state. (a) PVG on PDMS without strain. (b) Strained PVG structure [90]. (c) Three-layer twisted structure PB phase control beam deflector [85]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [90,85]. 2019 The Optical Society.
Molecules 27 08025 g017
Figure 18. Cross-type programmable element grating. (a) Brief circuit schematic diagram. (b) Specific unit allocation control [29].
Figure 18. Cross-type programmable element grating. (a) Brief circuit schematic diagram. (b) Specific unit allocation control [29].
Molecules 27 08025 g018
Figure 19. The elements of the array-grating: (a) square SRR [86] and (b) arc SRR [89]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [86,89]. 2022 American Chemical Society and 2021 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 19. The elements of the array-grating: (a) square SRR [86] and (b) arc SRR [89]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [86,89]. 2022 American Chemical Society and 2021 John Wiley and Sons.
Molecules 27 08025 g019
Figure 20. Schematic diagram of the structure. Basic structure of the tunable LC-VSCEL the same as the HCG liquid crystal laser control structure are displayed [101]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [101]. 2022 The Optical Society.
Figure 20. Schematic diagram of the structure. Basic structure of the tunable LC-VSCEL the same as the HCG liquid crystal laser control structure are displayed [101]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [101]. 2022 The Optical Society.
Molecules 27 08025 g020
Figure 21. Optical switch structure: (a) nanometal structure [92] and (b) MMI channel switching control [93]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [92,93]. 2017 Elsevier and 2019 Beilstein-Institut.
Figure 21. Optical switch structure: (a) nanometal structure [92] and (b) MMI channel switching control [93]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [92,93]. 2017 Elsevier and 2019 Beilstein-Institut.
Molecules 27 08025 g021
Figure 22. Joint control lens of electrowetting and Maxwell force. Schematic of the device consisting of three electrodes (1), (2), (3) with different voltages applied. [123]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [123]. 2019 The Optical Society.
Figure 22. Joint control lens of electrowetting and Maxwell force. Schematic of the device consisting of three electrodes (1), (2), (3) with different voltages applied. [123]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [123]. 2019 The Optical Society.
Molecules 27 08025 g022
Figure 23. Multifunctional lens with single- and multi-electrode controls [127]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [127]. 2020 The Optical Society.
Figure 23. Multifunctional lens with single- and multi-electrode controls [127]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [127]. 2020 The Optical Society.
Molecules 27 08025 g023
Figure 24. Schematics of the electrical setup to actuate the liquid–liquid interface by EWOD [128]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [128]. 2019 Spring Nature.
Figure 24. Schematics of the electrical setup to actuate the liquid–liquid interface by EWOD [128]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [128]. 2019 Spring Nature.
Molecules 27 08025 g024
Figure 25. Schematic design of the DEP lens, the DEP force drives the liquid–air interface from concave to convex through: (a) one side [129] and (b) both sides [130]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [129,130]. 2018 The Optical Society and 2018 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 25. Schematic design of the DEP lens, the DEP force drives the liquid–air interface from concave to convex through: (a) one side [129] and (b) both sides [130]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [129,130]. 2018 The Optical Society and 2018 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Molecules 27 08025 g025
Figure 26. Schematic design of the DEP-actuated aspherical lens with two arrays of ITO electrode strips patterned on the top plate. (a) Working principle of the control of longitudinal spherical aberration (LSA). (b) The lens interfaces are divided into discrete slices with variable local curvatures to form an aspherical lens. (c) Schematic design of the DEP-actuated aspherical lens [131]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [131]. 2020 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 26. Schematic design of the DEP-actuated aspherical lens with two arrays of ITO electrode strips patterned on the top plate. (a) Working principle of the control of longitudinal spherical aberration (LSA). (b) The lens interfaces are divided into discrete slices with variable local curvatures to form an aspherical lens. (c) Schematic design of the DEP-actuated aspherical lens [131]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [131]. 2020 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Molecules 27 08025 g026
Figure 27. Dual-chamber sandwich DE lens: (a) In the initial state, the three membranes deform due to the hydraulic pressure. (b) Three membranes reshaped when a driving voltage is applied to the copper foil [116]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [116]. 2020 The Optical Society.
Figure 27. Dual-chamber sandwich DE lens: (a) In the initial state, the three membranes deform due to the hydraulic pressure. (b) Three membranes reshaped when a driving voltage is applied to the copper foil [116]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [116]. 2020 The Optical Society.
Molecules 27 08025 g027
Figure 28. Thermal effect lens actuated by laser-induced: (a) Marangoni forces [133], the laser power axis shows the power increase; (b) solutocapillary forces [134], schema of the droplet formation process by laser, which contributes to the surface tension gradient. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [133,134]. 2018 AIP Pulishing and 2017 Elsevier.
Figure 28. Thermal effect lens actuated by laser-induced: (a) Marangoni forces [133], the laser power axis shows the power increase; (b) solutocapillary forces [134], schema of the droplet formation process by laser, which contributes to the surface tension gradient. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [133,134]. 2018 AIP Pulishing and 2017 Elsevier.
Molecules 27 08025 g028
Figure 29. Multichannel mixing GRIN lens. (a) The structure to form the refractive index distribution, and (b) the equivalent optical path diagram of the graded refractive index lens [135]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [135]. 2016 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 29. Multichannel mixing GRIN lens. (a) The structure to form the refractive index distribution, and (b) the equivalent optical path diagram of the graded refractive index lens [135]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [135]. 2016 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Molecules 27 08025 g029
Figure 30. Laser-induced thermal gradient. (a) Schematic diagram of the thermal lens, and (b) the simulated two-dimensional refractive index profiles [136]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [136]. 2016 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 30. Laser-induced thermal gradient. (a) Schematic diagram of the thermal lens, and (b) the simulated two-dimensional refractive index profiles [136]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [136]. 2016 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Molecules 27 08025 g030
Figure 31. The schematic design of fluidic thermal GRIN lens for cell manipulation: The system includes a lens chamber and a cell trap** chamber. Five streams at different temperatures are injected into the microfluidic chip to form a gradient refractive index across the channel [137]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [137]. 2017 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 31. The schematic design of fluidic thermal GRIN lens for cell manipulation: The system includes a lens chamber and a cell trap** chamber. Five streams at different temperatures are injected into the microfluidic chip to form a gradient refractive index across the channel [137]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [137]. 2017 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Molecules 27 08025 g031
Figure 32. Diffusion device: (a) Counterflow convection–diffusion, Refractive index profile in a concentration gradient light-bending device [43]. (b) thermal-gradient bending device, conceptual design of the concentration gradient bending device and refractive index profile in a thermal gradient light-bending device [44]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [43,44]. 2017 and 2020 The Optical Society.
Figure 32. Diffusion device: (a) Counterflow convection–diffusion, Refractive index profile in a concentration gradient light-bending device [43]. (b) thermal-gradient bending device, conceptual design of the concentration gradient bending device and refractive index profile in a thermal gradient light-bending device [44]. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [43,44]. 2017 and 2020 The Optical Society.
Molecules 27 08025 g032
Figure 33. Schematic of a liquid–diffusion optofluidic gradient index resonator. (a) The optofluidic diffusing structure, (b) ray trajectory squeezed and (c) ray trajectories are symmetrical in a conventional circular cavity. (d) Squeezing the light intensity profile enables unidirectional emissions on the low refractive index side [138]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [138]. 2020 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 33. Schematic of a liquid–diffusion optofluidic gradient index resonator. (a) The optofluidic diffusing structure, (b) ray trajectory squeezed and (c) ray trajectories are symmetrical in a conventional circular cavity. (d) Squeezing the light intensity profile enables unidirectional emissions on the low refractive index side [138]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [138]. 2020 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Molecules 27 08025 g033
Figure 34. Schematic diagram of the working mechanism. (a) The thermocapillary flow rises in the upper layer. (b) The thermocapillary deformation of the upper layer and the convex deformation of the bottom layer. (c) The upper thermocapillary rupture [139]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [139]. 2019 AIP Publishing.
Figure 34. Schematic diagram of the working mechanism. (a) The thermocapillary flow rises in the upper layer. (b) The thermocapillary deformation of the upper layer and the convex deformation of the bottom layer. (c) The upper thermocapillary rupture [139]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [139]. 2019 AIP Publishing.
Molecules 27 08025 g034
Figure 35. Phase modulator structure. (a) Cross-sectional view of the liquid phase modulator; the bottom electrode configuration: (b) key type; (c) interdigital type. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [142]. 2021 American Chemical Society.
Figure 35. Phase modulator structure. (a) Cross-sectional view of the liquid phase modulator; the bottom electrode configuration: (b) key type; (c) interdigital type. Reprinted/adapted with permission from Ref. [142]. 2021 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 27 08025 g035
Table 1. A summarization of the LC device with typical references attached.
Table 1. A summarization of the LC device with typical references attached.
Device TypeClassificationWorking PrincipleMaterials
Adaptive LC lensModal typeElectronicallyNLC [47]
Pattern typeNLC [56]
Tunable LC filter/absorbersVisible to infraredElectronicallySPLC [71], CLC [70], NLC [68]
THzNLC [73,80], PDLC [77]
LC Beam controllersDeflectorElectronicallyCLC [84], NLC [29,89]
Laser polarizationLight-operatedNLC [100]
Optical switchElectronicallyNLC [93]
Bistable state LC devicesE-paperElectronicallyPDLC [103], TNLC [106], CLC [107]
Smart windowsElectronically, light-operatedPDLC [114], CLC [109], PSLC [108]
Table 2. A summarization of an isotropic liquid device with typical references attached.
Table 2. A summarization of an isotropic liquid device with typical references attached.
Device TypeWorking PrincipleDevice TypeMaterials
Interface modulationEWTunable lens, deflector Silicone oil [126]
DEPTunable lens, e-paperSilicone oil [129,130]
DE membranesTunable lensGlycerol [118]
ThermalTunable lens, beam trackerEthanol and glycol [133,134]
Index distributionDiffusionGRIN lensBenzyl alcohol [136]
GRIN resonatorBenzyl alcohol and glycol [138]
Bending waveguideGlycol [43]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, Q.; Zhang, H.; Jia, D.; Liu, T. Recent Development of Tunable Optical Devices Based on Liquid. Molecules 2022, 27, 8025. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27228025

AMA Style

Wu Q, Zhang H, Jia D, Liu T. Recent Development of Tunable Optical Devices Based on Liquid. Molecules. 2022; 27(22):8025. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27228025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Qi, Hongxia Zhang, Dagong Jia, and Tiegen Liu. 2022. "Recent Development of Tunable Optical Devices Based on Liquid" Molecules 27, no. 22: 8025. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27228025

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop