Next Article in Journal
Effect of the Height of a 3D-Printed Model on the Force Transmission and Thickness of Thermoformed Orthodontic Aligners
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation of Dam** Properties of Selected Polymer Materials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Three-Dimensional Meso-Structure-Based Model for Evaluating the Complex Permittivity of Asphalt Concrete
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 17
Issue 12
10.3390/ma17123022
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Potential Risk of Nanoparticulate Release from Photocatalytic Pavement Concrete Surface Due to a Simulated Abrasion Load—An Experimental Study

by
Hubert Witkowski
1,*,
Janusz Jarosławski
2,
Artur Szkop
2,
Karol Chilmon
1,
Maciej Kalinowski
1 and
Wioletta Jackiewicz-Rek
1
1
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-637 Warsaw, Poland
2
Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-452 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(12), 3022; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17123022
Submission received: 24 April 2024 / Revised: 6 June 2024 / Accepted: 10 June 2024 / Published: 20 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Alternative Asphalt and Pavement Materials: Design, Structure and Properties)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The risk of the releasing of nanometric particles from construction materials with nanometric components might be one of the biggest threats to further development of them. One of the possible ingress routes to human organisms is the respiratory system. Therefore, it is crucial to determine the risk of emission of nanometric particles during material usage. In the presented paper, abrasion of mortar samples with nanometric TiO2 was investigated. A special abrasion test setup was developed to reflect everyday abrasion of the concrete surface of pavements. In the study, three TiO2-modifed mortar series (and respective reference series) underwent the developed test protocol and the grains were mobilized from their surface due to the applied load analyzed (granulation, morphology, and chemical composition). For a comparative analysis, an abrasion parameter was developed. Based on the obtained results, the modification of cementitious composites with nanometric TiO2 contributed to a reduction in the emission of aerosols and, therefore, confirmed the compatibility between TiO2 and cement matrix.

1. Introduction

The use of nanometric components in building materials has completely revolutionized building materials in recent decades. Materials at atomic and molecular scales exhibit significantly different properties from those at a larger scale [1,2,3,4]. Many laboratories and academic centers research the modification of cement materials using nanomaterials such as nano-clays, nanoCaCO3, and nanoSiO2 [5]. Through this type of modification, the mechanical properties of cementitious materials can be enhanced, the use of Portland cement clinker in total binder mass can be reduced, or new and desired properties can be added to concrete’s characteristics. One of the latter is the potential to improve environmental conditions (reduce the concentration of gaseous pollutants—both organic and inorganic) due to the inclusion of nanoparticulate photocatalytic materials in the composition of cementitious composite. Such composites have self-cleaning properties and can reduce the concentration of airborne pollution through photocatalytic reactions [6]. The most investigated photocatalyst in the construction industry has been titanium dioxide (TiO2). Photocatalytic cementitious materials with nanometric TiO2 have already been used in many civil and building applications, such as tunnels [7,8,9], concrete facade elements [10,11,12,13], and concrete pavements [14,15,16,17,18].
Once irradiated with an electromagnetic wave of specific characteristics, electrons from nanoparticulate photocatalysts (semiconductor–titanium oxide, zinc oxide, etc.) shift bands from valance to conduction, forming electron holes. This phenomenon initiates various reduction–oxidation processes caused by the creation of hydroxyl radicals and superoxide radicals, allowing for the decomposition/conversion of various gaseous pollutants [19]. Considering the use of photocatalytic cementitious composites as a pavement material for roads, sidewalks, and other surface types exposed to solar radiation, their main potential lies in reducing the photochemical pollution caused by urban traffic—mainly nitrogen oxides, near-surface ozone, and aromatic hydrocarbons [6,20]. As the aforementioned types of pollution cause significant risks to human health and contribute to climate change acceleration, using building materials with functions to passively reduce their concentration over large areas is justified and desirable. However, it is essential to note that their use cannot cause an increase in other types of pollution.
Nanomaterials are widely used in various areas of everyday life—nanometric TiO2 can be found, among others, in cosmetics, toothpaste, suncream [21], and even food [22]. It has been proven that exposure to a nanoparticulate TiO2 increases the risk of adverse effects on human health, such as pulmonary inflammation and increased risk of many diseases, tumors, or the progress of existing cancer processes [23]. The average crystallite size of photocatalytic materials used in the construction sector is smaller than 20 nm [24]. As crystallites usually agglomerate, the average diameter of such agglomerated grains is usually below 800 nm. That being said, the nanoscale dimensions of such grains could be treated as suspended dust, categorized as atmospheric aerosols with a maximum diameter of 2.5 μm, considered the most dangerous to human health. Such aerosols could enter and accumulate within the human respiratory system, possibly causing harm in the case of long-lasting exposure [25]. The health impact of nanomaterials on human health is still under investigation. Studies on the effects of TiO2 nanoparticles on the pulmonary system show both local and systemic effects and intensified pre-existing symptoms.
Dylla and Hassan [26] investigated the issue of nanoparticulate emissions from photocatalytic pavements during construction activity. The study measured the size distribution of nanoparticles released during laboratory and field activity for photocatalytic mortar overlays and photocatalytic spray coatings. The obtained nanoparticle counts and size distribution curves suggested that TiO2 nanoparticles were released when applying photocatalytic pavements. However, identification of the nanoparticles was not possible due to difficulties in obtaining high-resolution images. Bossa et al. [27] investigated nanometric TiO2 release from photocatalytic cement paste in a static leaching test. After 168 h of leaching, less than 0.04 w.% of the initial nanometric TiO2 had been released from the cement pellets. Boonen et al. [28] investigated two types of abrasion on photocatalytic paving elements and surface coatings. The coating durability was tested according to the abrasion test for glazed ceramic tiles following NBN EN ISO 10545-7:1999 [29], and paving elements were tested via the Bohme abrasion test according to NBN EN 1338:2003 [30]. The aim of the performed tests was the verification of the composites’ photocatalytic performance properties after the aging tests. The abrased material was not investigated.
Assessing the risk of releasing nanometric particles from nano-modified construction materials during their lifecycle is one of the critical issues regarding further application of them. Therefore, the scientific project the authors are conducting focused at one of its stages on assessing the risk involving the mobilization of photocatalytic nanoparticles from cement matrix under abrasion load, which typically occurs during the usage of any pavement. In the paper, the authors investigated and developed laboratory methods to simulate the abrasion of pavement surfaces with a low-enough intensity to allow for an analysis of the nanoparticulate granulation of mobilized grains. The risk of photocatalytic nanoparticulate emissions due to abrasion was then investigated—three variants of cementitious photocatalytic pavement coatings, differing in material composition, were studied. The study’s goal was to determine the risk associated with emissions of nano-modifiers from the cement matrix of the pavement material due to simulated light traffic–continuous pedestrian usage. It was assumed that although photocatalytic modification of cementitious composite allows for an increase in its application potential, it must be verified through laboratory tests whether such composites contribute to a deterioration in public health when exposed to mechanical loads through an increase in the concentration of suspended dust of different granulations in the air.
For the purpose of the study, a protocol for light abrasion of cementitious composites was developed, and the size, the number of abrased grains, and their chemical composition were analyzed. As the standard abrasion resistance test on the Bhome disc might not entirely reflect the everyday conditions under which the precast elements are used, a rub abrasion test with a textile was adopted using a crockmeter.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Photocatalytic Cementitious Composites

Six variants of photocatalytic cementitious mortars were considered for abrasion tests, and their material composition differed. Three pairs of mortars were considered, consisting of a reference mortar without TiO2 and a photocatalytic mortar of the same composition (Table 1). Each photocatalytic mortar was characterized by the same mass content of nanoparticulate photocatalytic modifier (12.5 kg/m3) and the same water-to-cement ratio (0.36). Mortars differed in the cement-to-sand ratio, from 0.72 to 0.81. A superplasticizer was used to modify the rheological parameters of mortars and obtain similar mortar liquidity, which was determined using the slump flow method. A mini-slump cone (upper diameter = 100 mm, lower diameter = 120 mm) was used in the test, and the average from two perpendicular measurements of slump flow diameters was noted. The density of the mortars was calculated using the geometrical method.
The cement CEM I 42.5 R (Ożarów, Poland) used in the study met the requirements of EN 197-1 [31]. Its specific surface area was measured via the Blain method and equaled 3920 cm2/g. The micro-silica used in the study (Łaziska, Poland) met the requirements of EN 13263-1 [32] and consisted of the properties presented in [19]. The BET method measured its specific surface area, which was 23.86 m2/g. The quartz powder used in this study met the requirements of ISO/DIS 3262-13 [33]. The study used two types of fire-dried quartz sand aggregates of different granulations: 0.1/0.5 and 0.5/1.2 (Corrado, Poland), which met the requirements of EN 13139 [34].
The cement, micro-silica, and quartz powder granulations were measured via the laser diffraction technique. The test was performed using the laser scattering method with the laser analyzer Horiba LA-300. It involved passing laser beams through an isopropyl alcohol solution containing powder grains and determining their particle diameter (in the range of 0.01–600 μm). Based on the test, granulation curves were prepared (Figure 1).
The chemical composition of cement, micro-silica, and quartz powder was investigated via the XRF method. Test samples were initially dried at 105 °C. Next, they were placed in special measuring cups and placed in the XRF apparatus, and their chemical composition was investigated. Loss of ignition (LOI) was also investigated. Powder samples were dried to a constant mass and subjected to a calcination process at 975 °C for 15 min. After cooling the samples to room temperature, their mass was determined. The percentage loss of the initial mass was the loss of ignition, which was included in the chemical composition results and is presented in Table 2.
Two types of nanometric titanium dioxide were used in this study: TiO2 (A)—K7000 (Leverkusen, Germany) and TiO2 (B)—P25 (Shanghai, China), with properties in the powder state as described in [35]. The content of the individual crystalline phases, the size of the crystallites, and the specific surface area of the photocatalysts are presented in Table 3. The content of the individual crystalline phases and the size of the crystallites in the tested samples were measured via the XRD method, and the specific surface area was measured via the BET method. The chemical composition (XRF) of the photocatalysts is presented in Table 2. The morphology of the grains of both TiO2 samples is presented in SEM images in Figure 2. Both considered modifiers exhibited photocatalytic potential in UV light, with K7000 being additionally active in the visible light spectrum.
The water used in this study met the requirements of EN 1008 [36]. The superplasticizer used in the study met the EN 934-2 [37] requirements and was characterized by electrostatic and steric mechanisms of action. Its maximal content in cementitious composite was set by the manufacturer to 3% mass of cement.
Mortars were mixed in the mixer compliant with EN 196-1 [38] using the same procedure as in the aforementioned standard. Three prismatic samples of 140 × 160 × 40 mm (a × b × h) dimensions were prepared for each series. Before demolding, the samples were stored for 24 h in the laboratory and covered with plastic foil. After demolding, the samples were cured in the curing chamber (RH > 95%, Temp = 20 +/− 2 °C) for 27 additional days. Afterward, the samples were mechanically cut to 140 × 80 × 20 mm (a × b × h), washed, and dried prior to the abrasion tests.

2.2. Test Setup

A test setup developed by the authors at the Central Geophysical Observatory of IGF PAN in Belsk, Poland, was adopted to simulate an abrasion load of pedestrian traffic, which aimed to investigate the granulation and chemical composition of fine grains mobilized from mortar samples due to abrasion load. To achieve that goal, prepared mortar samples were placed in a sealed chamber made of plexiglass in the abrasion resistance tester crockmeter model 418 (Taber Industries, New York, NY, USA) (Figure 3). A repeated friction load was applied on the 140 × 80 mm surface of the mortar sample with a frequency of 1 Hz using the aforementioned device. A standard crocking cloth fixed to an acrylic rubbing finger resting on the sample’s surface was used. The abrasion path was set to approx. 100 mm and the vertical force transferring to the sample’s surface equaled 9.0 N. Each mortar sample was submitted to a total number of 180 cycles of abrasion.
Air flow was provided by a Thomas-type pump located at the end of the sampling path at an average rate of 4 L/min and supplied to the chamber through the HEPA filter (TSI Incorporated, Shoreview, MN, USA). The content and quality of suspended solids in the air with abrased material from the inside of the testing chamber were analyzed by two particle scanners with a different measuring range—a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer Model 3054 (TSI Incorporated, Shoreview, MN, USA) and an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (TSI Incorporated, Shoreview, MN, USA). The polluted air was introduced to the analyzers through an outlet located next to the abrasion platform. Additionally, a base from the SEM microscope covered with carbon tape was placed at the chamber outlet to collect the abrased material directly. The collected particles were then analyzed in terms of morphology and chemical composition.

2.2.1. Abrasion Test Procedure

The test sample was placed in the crockmeter. The mortar sample was taped to the crockmeter’s table to prevent dislocation during the test. Despite using a HEPA filter to reduce any contaminants from the outside of the setup that might impact the measurement results, particles that were not the effect of sample abrasion were recorded during the tests. Particle distributions were recorded twice in the test, before and after abrasion, as background to the abrasion measurement. After a preliminary analysis of the size distribution of background particles, the results of the third background measurement after abrasion were included for further analysis.
The test procedure began after sealing the test chamber and consisted of three steps:
  • Analysis of the granulation of background aerosols in the testing chamber before abrasion of the mortar sample (of origin other than the tested mortar sample);
  • Analysis of the granulation of aerosols mobilized from the mortar sample due to an abrasion load;
  • Analysis of the granulation of background aerosols in the testing chamber after abrasion of the mortar sample.
Each step consisted of three measurements, with each measurement lasting for three minutes. The granulation of suspended solids mobilized from the mortar surface due to an abrasion load was calculated in real time by the aforementioned set of granulation analyzers with different particle size ranges:
  • 10.4 nm–469.8 nm;
  • 0.523 µm–19.810 µm.

2.2.2. SEM Analysis

Material for SEM analysis was collected in an additional abrasion run with a test sequence analogous to the abrasion tests. A SEM sample table was placed at the inlet pipe. On the top face of the table an adhesive carbon tape was placed, where abrased material was immobilized. Afterward, the collected samples were put in a sealed box and underwent microscopic analysis.
In the analysis, a NanoSEM 200 (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) microscope with electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) was used with an EDS detector–X-ray energy dispersive spectrometer (EDAX, Pleasanton, CA, USA). The imaging analysis determined the size of the collected abrased material and the size of individual grains. Their chemical composition was investigated with EDS.

3. Results and Discussion

In this paper, the analyzed results refer to average values obtained in the study. The respiratory system is the most dominant ingress route of nanoparticles; therefore, in this study, the emission and size distribution of grains abrased from cementitious composite was investigated. An abrasion protocol different from those typically used in concrete technology had to be developed, as the authors wanted to investigate a particular grain emittance type. Usually, the abrasion resistance is determined through an intensive simulated load (that is the case in the Bohme test) regarding the mass loss of the sample after the procedure. However, due to the significant load present in such test conditions, mobilized grains include aggregate grains, as well as micro and millimetric grains of cement matrix. Also, the purpose of such tests is different—it is to assess the abrasion resistance of the element, not to investigate the characteristics of the mobilized material. The considered issue of the surface properties of the composite required a different approach to the test setup. To investigate the emittance potential of particles of nanometric diameters, the authors established a test procedure of much lower intensity. As a result, the outer surface of the tested samples was exposed to a low-stress abrasion, which could simulate day-to-day exposure to mechanical loads of a standard concrete pavement. Such test conditions contributed to a significantly lower number of mobilized grains and influenced their granulation. To properly assess the granulation characteristics of the mobilized particles, the authors had to consider that particles of similar characteristics constitute one of the most typical air pollutants present in the air (PM 2.5 and PM 10). Hence, to address this issue and improve the quality of the experiment, a parameter was implemented to quantify the results obtained and to assess the risk of increased particle emissions from the material into the air during abrasion: the ratio of grains recorded during the background measurement to the number of grains emitted during the abrasion test for each grain diameter (Figure 4). It was calculated based on the initial concentration of particles of considered diameters in the sealed testing chamber prior to the beginning of the abrasion test (background) and their concentration during the aforementioned test. An abrasion parameter value (APV) close to 1 indicates no additional grain emission from the sample due to abrasion (no significant change in the content of particles of the considered diameters in the measuring apparatus due to abrasion of the sample). In contrast, values greater than 1 indicate how many times the emission in a given grain diameter range increased due to applying an abrasion load on the sample’s outer surface.
The APV for the grain diameter in the range of 10.4 ÷ 469.8 nm of all investigated samples—reference and TiO2 ones—was similar and comparable to the aerosols’ background content of that granulation. In contrast, grain emissions differed significantly in the range of 0.523 ÷ 19.810 μm (Table 4)—the APV values for samples with nanometric TiO2 were in the range of 3.31 ÷ 18.42, while the values of the reference samples were in the range of 7.11 ÷ 107.18. The standard deviation of the APV for the grain diameter of 0.523÷19.810 μm for reference samples was significantly higher than that for the TiO2-modified samples—from 8.93 to 153.61 (reference) and from 3.53 to 28.92 (TiO2-modified).
A trend was observed for all analyzed sample variants, where the APV for the TiO2-modified samples was lower than for the reference samples. The highest emittance levels were observed for grains of approx. 1.0 to 5.0 µm, especially for reference variants (Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8).
The nanomodification of cementitious composites allows them to acquire new functionalities or for their basic properties to be enhanced. The most common considers using nano-silica or powdered quartz to increase concrete’s mechanical performance—both focus on the densification of the cement matrix. In the case of nano-silica, pozzolanic reactions cause the formation of additional C-S-H and C-A-S-H phases, reducing the overall porosity of the cement matrix and improving its properties [39]. The introduction of powdered non-reactive powders (powdered quartz or others), although not directly involved in the hydration of the binder, contributes to a reduction in the porosity of the matrix and, therefore, increases the mechanical performance of the composite [40]. Such materials are usually referred to as micro- or nano-fillers, as they allow for the cement matrix’s densification by physically filling its micro- and nanopores. Although titanium dioxide does not have binding properties and is not treated as an additive of pozzolanic or latent hydraulic properties in concrete technology, it has been proven that its addition to a cementitious material can enhance its performance [41]. It is economically unfounded to consider the addition of TiO2 in significant amounts with a sole focus on the enhancement of the mechanical properties of the composite (nanoparticulate TiO2 is several times more expensive than any other ingredients of cementitious composites). However, an increase in the density of the cement matrix due to TiO2 modification is caused by the same phenomena associated with the use of other non-reactive filler powders. In the case of titanium dioxide, due to the nanometric diameters of modifier grains, it can facilitate the nucleation of hydration products over the outer surface of the nano-TiO2 grains, as well as reduce the porosity of the composite [42]. In the conducted research, this phenomenon of an increase in the mechanical properties of the cement matrix due to TiO2 modification was confirmed through indirect means—the developed abrasion test. The investigated mortars differed in the cement-to-sand ratio (the ratio between the amount of cement paste and fine aggregate filler material). The change in the aforementioned ratio increased the overall volume of the cement matrix in consecutive tested mortars (M1, M2, and M3). With the assumed force and intensity of the abrasion load in the performed tests and the test setup allowing for an analysis of the granulation of aerosols—grains fine enough to act as suspended solids in the air—only grains mobilized from the cement matrix were analyzed. As all sample series were modified with the same mass amount of nanometric TiO2, it was the authors’ initial intent to determine the scope of the change in the properties of the near-surface layer of the composite, with an initial premise that within the assumed scope of the variability of the cement-to-sand ratio, the effect of TiO2 would differ between the series and reach its peak for the series of the highest TiO2-to-cement mass ratio (M1). However, it was found that the effect on the properties of the near-surface layer of the composite was comparable for all titanium-modified series. With the introduction of TiO2, a significant reduction in the emissions of aerosols of diameters below 5.0 µm was observed. Moreover, no additional emissions of nanometric TiO2 grains were detected, confirming through an indirect means the densification of the near-surface layer of the cementitious composite due to the conducted modifications.
As load is introduced to a cementitious system, stress and displacements propagate over the composite’s mineral skeleton. The dependence between those two values is relevant in concrete technology and accurately describes the mechanical performance of a cementitious composite. Abrasion is one of the most commonly occurring phenomena that contributes to deterioration in the performance of concrete pavement elements over time. With the introduction of an abrasion dynamic load, the outer surface of the composite is exposed to a combination of stresses (compressive, tensile, and various variants of those—shear, among others), which in value exceed the strength of the material. As a result, the propagation of numerous randomly oriented microcracks occurs, weakening the modulus of the composite, which results in an additional energy release, providing a reasonable explanation for the emission of fine particles from the surface of the composite [43]. The size of grain emittance due to such conditions depends heavily on the properties of the composite, regarding both its overall mechanical performance and chemical composition, and the intensity of the abrasion load. In the case of the conducted research, the proposed abrasion method allowed for mobilization of grains of diameters below approx. 7 µm from the outer surface of the composite. Although the number of mobilized grains from the TiO2-modified composites diminished significantly compared to the reference series, their chemical composition and morphology were also studied. This part of the research investigated whether solely nano-TiO2 grains were mobilized from the cement matrix or whether they constituted a part of agglomerated cement matrix grains (of TiO2 and other hydration products). As the test setup focused on obtaining grains of diameters that could contribute to an increase in PM 2.5 and PM 10 pollution (aerosols with the most harmful impact on human health), the collected samples for microscopic imaging were contaminated by fibers from cloth that was used in the abrasion test. Within that cloth, grains that were emitted from the mortar samples were immobilized. Only the TiO2 samples were investigated in SEM analysis, as the primary goal of the research was to determine whether photocatalytic cementitious materials contribute to an increase in aerosol concentration and quality. Throughout several attempts, only one grain consisting of only TiO2 was identified (Figure 9). Even in that case, crystallites of TiO2 agglomerated into a grain with a diameter of approx. 1.50 µm. The limited observance of such grains was probably caused by a homogenous distribution of TiO2 within the cement matrix.
Finer grains were observed once immobilized on the adhesive tape fibers located at the inlet of the testing setup (Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12). Due to the low intensity of the abrasion test, a small number of immobilized grains was observed. EDS analysis confirmed that the grains mainly consisted of Ca, Si, Al, and Ti elements for all considered cases, suggesting that they were of cement matrix origin—no matrix-constituent compounds mobilized independently (Figure 13). The high content of C and O presence in the EDS analysis was caused by the chemical composition of the adhesive tape on which the aerosols were immobilized.
As the nano modifier is introduced into the composite, products of various reactions between binder ingredients and water form with it a homogenous matrix during hydration. Although, as presented in Figure 2, TiO2 crystallites have a spherical morphology and tend to agglomerate, such agglomerates were not observed as a result of the performed abrasion tests. Knowing that nanomaterials usually exhibit different properties than their macroscopic variants (photocatalytic properties in the case of TiO2), the authors consider that nano-TiO2 could additionally act as a nucleation core for hydration products. Although such a role is beneficial regarding the mechanical performance of the composite, intensification of binder hydration contributes to TiO2 grains being covered with hydration products, limiting their exposure to external pollutants [44]. In the case of photocatalytic cementitious composites, a photocatalyst needs to be exposed to an external source of electromagnetic radiation of specific wavelengths for photocatalytic reactions to occur [45]—it needs to be located on the outer surface of the element. It can be said that as the quality of TiO2 embedment in the cement matrix increases, the photocatalytic performance of the composite is negatively affected [46]. In the case of this research, TiO2 was added directly to other ingredients before mixing. However, there are various other methods of applying TiO2 to the exposed surface of a composite—immersion in TiO2 solution [47], coating [48], spraying mix ingredients [49], and other types of surface modifications [25]. All of those assume that the higher the exposure of photocatalytic grains on the surface, the higher the efficiency in the photocatalytic performance of the composite. However, almost no effort is put into the durability of such solutions, especially if exposed to various environmental loads. If tested, it usually involves the investigation of a decrease in photocatalytic efficiency over time, including the development of countermeasure methods (mainly focusing on various maintenance protocols of photocatalytic surfaces) [50,51]. The mobilization potential of exposed nanometric photocatalytic grains from cementitious surfaces is usually not investigated, although it is assumed that such surfaces would be subjected to various mechanical loads.
If no additional modification is implemented, TiO2 grains distribute homogenously throughout the volume of the cement matrix as grains of agglomerated crystallites of diameters dependent on the composite preparation protocol. In the case of this study, TiO2 constituted approx. 1% of the volume of the cement matrix—the same ratio could be assumed regarding its presence on the outer surface on which abrasion was investigated.
The conducted test verified the proper embedment of the nano modifier in the cement matrix, confirming its compatibility with the cement matrix (Figure 12 and Figure 13). Although exposed to an external load, TiO2 grains contributed to increased resistance of the near-surface layer of the composite, suggesting its influence over cement matrix organization and structure. The effect of photocatalytic modifications is usually investigated in terms of the ability of the composite to either decompose gaseous pollutants [52] (organic and inorganic—nitrogen oxides, ozone, aromatic hydrocarbons, and others) or through self-cleaning tests (decomposition of different organic dyes under exposure to electromagnetic radiation of a specific wavelength and irradiation—the rhodamine b test, for instance [19]). Those test procedures assume verification of the surface properties—the quality and the concentration of TiO2 embedded in the outer surface of the element. With an increase in the TiO2 content in that layer, the overall photocatalytic performance of the composite is enhanced. However, those methods do not provide any information regarding the quality of TiO2 immobilization within the cement matrix. The proposed light abrasion test for photocatalytic composites allowed us to determine whether the modifier’s grains were properly embedded in the cement matrix and did not pose a significant mobilization risk during exposure to light mechanical loads.

4. Conclusions

Throughout the conducted research, the authors confirmed that in the developed laboratory conditions, due to the nanometric diameter of TiO2 grains, the modifier contributed to an enhancement in the near-surface mechanical performance of the hardened composite, preventing excessive nanometric emissions due to an abrasion load. Therefore, the cement matrix constituted an environment for stable TiO2 immobilization, allowing it to contribute to various photocatalytic reactions without a significant risk of increasing the concentration of harmful airborne aerosols under mechanical load. The release of grains of nano-metric diameters during abrasion was not observed. Although a grain composed only of TiO2 was found in SEM/EDS analysis, it had agglomerated to a size of up to 2.0 μm, which was the average size of abrased grains observed in the research. Based on the above observations, it should be concluded that the risk of the release of nanometric particles during the abrasion process is minimal.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.W. and M.K.; methodology, H.W. and J.J.; software, A.S.; validation, H.W., J.J. and K.C.; investigation, H.W., J.J., A.S. and K.C.; resources, K.C., M.K. and W.J.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, H.W. and A.S.; writing—review and editing, J.J. and M.K.; supervision, W.J.-R.; project administration, W.J.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the project TECHMATSTRATEG-III/0013/2019-01 of the NCBiR (National Centre for Research and Development).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Dowling, A. Development of nanotechnologies. Mater. Today 2004, 7, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liang, S.; Xu, F.; Li, W.; Yang, W.; Cheng, S.; Yang, H.; Chen, J.; Yi, Z.; Jiang, P. Tunable smart mid infrared thermal control emitter based on phase change material VO2 thin film. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2023, 232, 121074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cui, S.; Lu, Y.; Kong, D.; Luo, H.; Peng, L.; Yang, G.; Yang, H.; Xu, K. Laser direct writing of Ga2O3/liquid metal-based flexible humidity sensors. Opto-Electron. Adv. 2023, 6, 220172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yalagala, B.P.; Dahiya, A.S.; Dahiya, R. ZnO nanowires based degradable high-performance photodetectors for eco-friendly green electronics. Opto-Electron. Adv. 2023, 6, 220020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kawashima, S.; Corr, P.H.D.J.; Shah, S.P. Modification of cement–based materials with nanoparticles. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2013, 36, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dudek, D.; Janus, M. Photoactive Cements: A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 5407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Boonen, E.; Akylas, V.; Barmpas, F.; Boréave, A.; Bottalico, L.; Cazaunau, M.; Chen, H.; Daële, V.; De Marco, T.; Doussin, J.F.; et al. Construction of a photocatalytic de-polluting field site in the Leopold II tunnel in Brussels. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 155, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guerrini, G.L. Photocatalytic performance in a city tunnel in Rome: NOx monitoring results. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 27, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Georeg, C.; Beeldens, A.; Barmapss, F.; Doussin, J.-F.; Manganelli, G.; Herrmann, H.; Kleffmann, J.; Mellouki, A. Impact of photocatalytic remediation of pollutants on urban air quality. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2016, 10, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martinez, T.; Dompoint, D.; Bertron, A.; Escadeillas, G.; Ringot, E. Photocatalytic coatings for building materials: Degradation of NOx and inhibition of algal growth. Int. J. 3 R’s 2013, 4, 520–533. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bertron, T.M.A.; Ringot, E.; Escadillas, G. Degradation of NO using photocatalytic coatings applied to different substrates. Build. Environ. 2011, 46, 1808–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, Y.K.; Hong, S.J.; Kim, H.B.; Lee, S.W. Evaluation of In-Situ NOx Removal Efficiency of Photocatalytic Concrete in Expressways. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2018, 22, 2274–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Maggos, T.; Plassais, A.; Bartzis, J.G.; Vasilakos, C.; Moussiopoulos, N.; Bonafous, L. Photocatalytic degradation of NOx in pilot street canyon configuration using TiO2-mortar panels. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 136, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guerrini, G.L.; Beeldens, A.; Crispino, M.; D’Ambarosio, G.; Vismaro, S. Environmental benefits of innovative photocatalytic cementitous road material. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Concrete Pavement, Quebeck, QC, Canada, 8–12 July 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Boonen, E.; Beeldens, A. Recent Photocatalytic Applicaions for Air Purification in Belgium. Coatings 2014, 4, 553–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Witkowski, H.; Jarosławski, J.; Tryfon-Bojarska, A. Application of Photocatalytic Concrete Paving Blocks in Poland-Verification of Effectiveness of Nitric Oxides Reduction and Novel Test Method. Materials 2020, 13, 5183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guerrini, G.L. Some observations regarding in–service preformance Photocatalytic paving block surface. Betonw. Und Fert. Tech. BFT 2009, 5, 16–25. [Google Scholar]
  18. Witkowski, H.; Jackiewicz-Rek, W.; Chilmon, K.; Jarosławski, J.; Tryfon-Bojarska, A.; Gąsiński, A. Air Purification Performance of Photocatalytic Concrete Paving Blocks after Seven Years of Service. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kalinowski, M.; Chilmon, K.; Jackiewicz-Rek, W.; Rakowski, B. The Influence of Selected Material Variables of Photocatalytic Cementitious Composites on the Self-Cleaning Properties and Air Purification Efficiency from NOx Pollutants. Sustainability 2023, 15, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bautista-Gutierrez, K.P.; Herrera-May, A.L.; Santamaría-López, J.M.; Honorato-Moreno, A.; Zamora-Castro, S.A. Recent Progress in Nanomaterials for Modern Concrete Infrastructure: Advantages and Challenges. Materials 2019, 12, 3548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shah, S.N.A.; Shah, Z.; Hussain, M.; Khan, M. Hazardous Effects of Titanium Dioxide, Nanoprticles in Ecosystem. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2017, 2017, 4101735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nile, S.H.; Baskar, V.; Selvaraj, D.; Nile, A.; **ao, J.; Kai, G. Nanotechnologies in Food Science: Applications, Recent Trends and Future Perspectives. Nanomicro Lett. 2020, 12, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shakeel, M.; Jabeen, F.; Shabbir, S.; Asghar, M.S.; Khan, M.S.; Chaudhry, A.S. Toxicity of Nano–Titanium Dioxide (TiO2-NP) Through Various Routes of Exposure: A Review. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2015, 172, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Baranowska-Wójcik, E.; Szwajger, D.; Oleszczuk, P. Winiarska-Mleczan. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 193, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kalinowski, M.; Woyciechowski, P.; Jackiewicz-Rek, W. Surface Modification of Photocatalytic Cementitious Composites with Polyacrylic Superabsorbent Polymers (SAP). Mater. Proc. 2023, 13, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dylla, H.; Hassan, M.M. Characterization of nanparticles released during construction of photocatalytic pavements using nanoparticles. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2012, 14, 825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bossa, N.; Chaurand, P.; Levard, C.; Borschneck, D.; Miche, H.; Vicente, J.; Geantet, C.; Aguerre-Chariol, O.; Michel, F.M.; Rose, J. Environmental exposure to TiO2 nanomaterials incorporated in building material. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 220, 1160–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Boonen, E.; Beeldens, A.; Dirkx, I.; Bams, V. Durability of Cementitious Photocatalytic Building Materials. Catal. Today 2017, 287, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. ISO 10545-7:1999; Ceramic Tiles—Part 7: Determination of Resistance to Surface Abrasion for Glazed Tiles. International Organization for Standarization: Geneve, Switzerland, 1999.
  30. EN 1338:2003; Concrete Paving Blocks—Requirements and Test Methods, ANNEX D: Determination of Freeze/Thaw Resistance with De-Icing Salt + ANNEX H: Measuring of Abrasion According to the Böhme Test. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2003.
  31. EN 197-1; Cement Part 1: Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
  32. CEN-EN 13263-1; Silica Fume for Concrete. Definitions, Requirements and Conformity Criteria. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2009.
  33. ISO/DIS 3262-13:2023; Specifications and Methods of Test. Part 13: Natural Quartz (Ground). International Organization for Standarization: Geneve, Switzerland, 2023.
  34. EN 13139:2003; Aggregates for Mortars. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2003.
  35. Witkowski, H.; Jackiewicz-Rek, W.; Jarosławski, J.; Chilmon, K.; Szkop, A. Ozone Formation during Photocatalytic Oxidation of Nitric Oxides under UV Irradiation with the Use of Commercial TiO2 Photocatalytic Powders. Materials 2022, 15, 5905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. EN 1008:2002; Mixing Water for Concrete. Specification for Sampling, Testing and Assessing the Suitability of Water, Including Water Recovered from Processes in the Concrete Industry, as Mixing Water for Concrete. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
  37. EN 934-2+A1:2012; Admixtures for Concrete, Mortar and Grout—Part 2: Concrete Admixtures for Masonry Mortar—Definitions, Requirements, Conformity and Marking and Labelling. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
  38. EN 196-1:2016-07; Methods of Testing Cement—Part 1: Determination of Strength. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2016.
  39. Elyasigorji, F.; Farajiani, F.; Hajipour Manjili, M.; Lin, Q.; Elyasigorji, S.; Farhangi, V.; Tabatabai, H. Comprehensive Review of Direct and Indirect Pozzolanic Reactivity Testing Methods. Buildings 2023, 13, 2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bagheri, A.; Samea, S.A. Role of non-reactive powder in strength enhancement of foamed concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 203, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sudhanshu, S.P.; Gaurang, R.V. Effect of nano TiO2 on mechanical properties and microstructure of concrete. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 65, 1915–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, F.; **e, J.; Wang, W.; Wang, W.; Wang, Z. The role of nano-TiO2 on the mechanical properties and hydration behavior of C2S, C3S and C4A3S. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 388, 131558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, K.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, K.; Du, H.; Sioutas, C.; Wang, Q. Mechanics of abrasion-induced particulate matter emission. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2024, 188, 105661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, K.; Qu, F.; Huang, Y.; Cai, J.; Wu, F.; Li, W. Advancing photocatalytic concrete technologies in design, performance and application for a sustainable future. Adv. Nanocomposites 2024, 1, 180–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tryba, B.; Prowans, B.; Wróbel, R.J.; Szołdra, P.; Pichór, W. Application of TiO2 Supported on Nickel Foam for Limitation of NOx in the Air via Photocatalytic Processes. Molecules 2024, 29, 1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jimenez-Relinque, E.; Rodriguez-Garcia, J.; Castillo, A.; Castellote, M. Characteristics and efficiency of photocatalytic cementitious materials: Type of binder, roughness and microstructure. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 71, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xu, Y.; **, R.; Hu, L.; Li, B.; Chen, W.; Shen, J.; Wu, P.; Fang, J. Studying the mix design and investigaiting the photocatalytic performance of previous concrete containing TiO2-Soaked recycled aggregates. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 248, 119281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rachel, A.; Subrahmanyam, M.; Boule, P. Comparision of photocatalytic efficiencies of TiO2 in suspended and immobilised form for the photocatalytic degradation of nitrobenzenesulfonic acids. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2002, 37, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sirota, V.V.; Vashchilin, V.S.; Ogurtsova, Y.N.; Gubareva, E.N.; Podgornyi, D.S.; Kovaleva, M.G. Structure and photocatalytic properties of the composite coating fabricated by detonation sprayed Ti powders. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50 Pt A, 739–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, F.; Yang, L.; Wang, H.; Yu, H. Facile preparation of photocatalytic exposed aggregate concrete with highly efficient and stable catalytic performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 264, 577–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pacheco-Torgal, F.; Jalali, S. Nanotechnology: Advantages and drawbacks in the field of construction and building materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 27, 582–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Si, H.; Zhou, M.; Fang, Y.; He, J.; Yang, L.; Wang, F. Photocatalytic concrete for NOx degradation: Influence factors and durability. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 298, 123835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 17 03022 g001
Figure 1. The relative granulations (q) for cement CEM 42.5 R, micro-silica, and quartz powder that were used in the study.
Figure 1. The relative granulations (q) for cement CEM 42.5 R, micro-silica, and quartz powder that were used in the study.
Materials 17 03022 g001
Materials 17 03022 g002
Figure 2. Morphology of agglomerated nanometric photocatalytic materials used in the study: TiO2 (A)—micrograph (a); TiO2 (B)—micrograph (b). TEM analysis performed on copper grids covered with a carbon film (microscope—TEM Tecnai TF 20 X-TWIN; parameters—EDAX, voltage 200 kV, STEM images collected using the HAADF detector).
Figure 2. Morphology of agglomerated nanometric photocatalytic materials used in the study: TiO2 (A)—micrograph (a); TiO2 (B)—micrograph (b). TEM analysis performed on copper grids covered with a carbon film (microscope—TEM Tecnai TF 20 X-TWIN; parameters—EDAX, voltage 200 kV, STEM images collected using the HAADF detector).
Materials 17 03022 g002
Materials 17 03022 g003
Figure 3. A schematic diagram of the experimental setup applied in the research of particle size analysis: (1) HEPA filter, (2) plexiglass chamber, (3) crockmeter, (4) grinding cloth, (5) tested sample, (6) air with particle inlet, (7) flow meter, (8) Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer, (9) Aerodynamic Particle Sizer.
Figure 3. A schematic diagram of the experimental setup applied in the research of particle size analysis: (1) HEPA filter, (2) plexiglass chamber, (3) crockmeter, (4) grinding cloth, (5) tested sample, (6) air with particle inlet, (7) flow meter, (8) Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer, (9) Aerodynamic Particle Sizer.
Materials 17 03022 g003
Materials 17 03022 g004
Figure 4. An example of a comparison of grain diameter distribution. Figure on the top—results of the reference’s sample abrasion (blue) vs. results background (green). Figure on the bottom—results presented as an abrasion parameter value (APV).
Figure 4. An example of a comparison of grain diameter distribution. Figure on the top—results of the reference’s sample abrasion (blue) vs. results background (green). Figure on the bottom—results presented as an abrasion parameter value (APV).
Materials 17 03022 g004
Materials 17 03022 g005
Figure 5. Comparison of grain diameter distribution for grains emitted during the abrasion test. APV values for mortar sample M1—reference (blue) vs. TiO2-modified samples (red) for grain diameters of 10.4 ÷ 469.8 nm.
Figure 5. Comparison of grain diameter distribution for grains emitted during the abrasion test. APV values for mortar sample M1—reference (blue) vs. TiO2-modified samples (red) for grain diameters of 10.4 ÷ 469.8 nm.
Materials 17 03022 g005
Materials 17 03022 g006
Figure 6. Comparison of grain diameter distribution for grains emitted during the abrasion test. APV values for mortar sample M1—reference (blue) vs. TiO2-modified samples (red) for grain diameters of 0.523 ÷ 19.810 μm.
Figure 6. Comparison of grain diameter distribution for grains emitted during the abrasion test. APV values for mortar sample M1—reference (blue) vs. TiO2-modified samples (red) for grain diameters of 0.523 ÷ 19.810 μm.
Materials 17 03022 g006
Materials 17 03022 g007
Figure 7. Comparison of grain diameter distribution for grains emitted during the abrasion test. APV values for mortar sample M3—reference (blue) vs. TiO2-modified samples (red) for grain diameters of 10.4 ÷ 469.8 nm.
Figure 7. Comparison of grain diameter distribution for grains emitted during the abrasion test. APV values for mortar sample M3—reference (blue) vs. TiO2-modified samples (red) for grain diameters of 10.4 ÷ 469.8 nm.
Materials 17 03022 g007
Materials 17 03022 g008
Figure 8. Comparison of grain diameter distribution for grains emitted during the abrasion test. APV values for mortar sample M3—reference (blue) vs. TiO2-modified samples (red) for grain diameters of 0.523 ÷ 19.810 μm.
Figure 8. Comparison of grain diameter distribution for grains emitted during the abrasion test. APV values for mortar sample M3—reference (blue) vs. TiO2-modified samples (red) for grain diameters of 0.523 ÷ 19.810 μm.
Materials 17 03022 g008
Materials 17 03022 g009
Figure 9. SEM micrograph of a grain of agglomerated TiO2 nanocrystallites mobilized from cementitious mortar (M1)—confirmation of chemical composition presented through an EDS analysis; the entire agglomerate had a diameter of approx. 1.50 µm.
Figure 9. SEM micrograph of a grain of agglomerated TiO2 nanocrystallites mobilized from cementitious mortar (M1)—confirmation of chemical composition presented through an EDS analysis; the entire agglomerate had a diameter of approx. 1.50 µm.
Materials 17 03022 g009
Materials 17 03022 g010
Figure 10. SEM micrograph of mobilized grains through an abrasion test of the mortar’s surface (M2) and immobilized on the adhesive fiber, with magnification on the immobilized material.
Figure 10. SEM micrograph of mobilized grains through an abrasion test of the mortar’s surface (M2) and immobilized on the adhesive fiber, with magnification on the immobilized material.
Materials 17 03022 g010
Materials 17 03022 g011
Figure 11. EDS analysis for different mobilized grains presented in an SEM micrograph in Figure 11; all EDS signals indicate a mix of various compounds at the exact location (red marker)—grains consisting of hydration products with TiO2 grains embedded within.
Figure 11. EDS analysis for different mobilized grains presented in an SEM micrograph in Figure 11; all EDS signals indicate a mix of various compounds at the exact location (red marker)—grains consisting of hydration products with TiO2 grains embedded within.
Materials 17 03022 g011
Materials 17 03022 g012
Figure 12. SEM micrograph of mobilized grains through an abrasion test of the mortar’s surface (M3) and immobilized on the adhesive fiber, with magnification on the immobilized material.
Figure 12. SEM micrograph of mobilized grains through an abrasion test of the mortar’s surface (M3) and immobilized on the adhesive fiber, with magnification on the immobilized material.
Materials 17 03022 g012
Materials 17 03022 g013
Figure 13. EDS analysis for different mobilized grains presented in an SEM micrograph in Figure 13; all EDS signals indicate a mix of different compounds at the exact location (red marker)—grains consisting of hydration products with TiO2 grains embedded within.
Figure 13. EDS analysis for different mobilized grains presented in an SEM micrograph in Figure 13; all EDS signals indicate a mix of different compounds at the exact location (red marker)—grains consisting of hydration products with TiO2 grains embedded within.
Materials 17 03022 g013
Table 1. The composition and basic properties of tested mortars.
Table 1. The composition and basic properties of tested mortars.
Component/Series IDM1M2M3M1 (Ref)M2 (Ref)M3 (Ref)
Content (kg/m3)
Cement794812837794812837
Silica101010101010
Quartz powder898784898784
Water286292301286292301
Sand 0.1/0.5424413397424413397
Sand 0.5/1.2679661635679661635
TiO2 (A)2.52.52.5---
TiO2 (B)101010---
Superplasticizer4.764.875.024.214.544.89
Mortar properties
w/c *0.360.360.360.360.360.36
c/s **0.720.760.810.720.760.81
Slump flow, mm320310315315315320
Density, kg/m3224522352220224022352225
* Water-to-cement ratio (mass), ** cement-to-sand ratio (mass).
Table 2. Chemical composition (XRF) of cement, nanoparticulate silica, quartz powder, and photocatalysts used in the study.
Table 2. Chemical composition (XRF) of cement, nanoparticulate silica, quartz powder, and photocatalysts used in the study.
MaterialOxide (wt. %)LOI, %
CaOSiO2Al2O3MgOSO3TiO2P2O5Fe2O3MnO
Cement67.216.83.30.94.00.30.23.80.22.3
Silica0.496.71.3<0.1-<0.1<0.010.2<0.011.1
Quartz powder0.194.30.21.2-<0.10.10.60.12.5
TiO2 (A)-0.2--0.499.20.06--n.d. *
TiO2 (B)-0.7---99.1---n.d. *
* n.d.—Not determined.
Table 3. Properties of photocatalysts used in the study (SSA—specific surface area).
Table 3. Properties of photocatalysts used in the study (SSA—specific surface area).
PhotocatalystPhase Composition (%)Size of Crystallites (nm)WettabilitySSA (m2/g)
RutileAnataseRutileAnatase
TiO2 (A)-100-10Hydrophilic246.8 +/− 2.9
TiO2 (B)13875433Hydrophobic53.8 +/− 0.2
Table 4. APV for investigated cement mortar samples.
Table 4. APV for investigated cement mortar samples.
APV for Grain Diameter Range
10.4 ÷ 469.8 nm		Standard Deviation for APV in Range 10.4 ÷ 469.8 nmAPV for Grain Diameter Range
0.523 ÷ 19.810 μm		Standard Deviation for APV in Range 0.523 ÷ 19.810 μm
M11.030.2618.4228.92
M1 (ref)1.170.37107.18153.61
M20.980.173.313.53
M2 (ref)1.080.147.118.93
M31.040.2417.0121.43
M3 (ref)1.030.3371.40102.75
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Witkowski, H.; Jarosławski, J.; Szkop, A.; Chilmon, K.; Kalinowski, M.; Jackiewicz-Rek, W. The Potential Risk of Nanoparticulate Release from Photocatalytic Pavement Concrete Surface Due to a Simulated Abrasion Load—An Experimental Study. Materials 2024, 17, 3022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17123022

AMA Style

Witkowski H, Jarosławski J, Szkop A, Chilmon K, Kalinowski M, Jackiewicz-Rek W. The Potential Risk of Nanoparticulate Release from Photocatalytic Pavement Concrete Surface Due to a Simulated Abrasion Load—An Experimental Study. Materials. 2024; 17(12):3022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17123022

Chicago/Turabian Style

Witkowski, Hubert, Janusz Jarosławski, Artur Szkop, Karol Chilmon, Maciej Kalinowski, and Wioletta Jackiewicz-Rek. 2024. "The Potential Risk of Nanoparticulate Release from Photocatalytic Pavement Concrete Surface Due to a Simulated Abrasion Load—An Experimental Study" Materials 17, no. 12: 3022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17123022

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop