Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Photosynthetic Efficiency for Increased Carbon Assimilation and Woody Biomass Production in Engineered Hybrid Poplar
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Potential of Portable Spectroscopic Techniques for the Biochemical Characterization of Roots in Shallow Landslides
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Physical and Mechanical Properties Considering the Stem Height and Cross-Section of Paulownia tomentosa (Thunb.) Steud. x elongata (S.Y.Hu) Wood
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advanced Eco-Friendly Wood-Based Composites II

1
Faculty of Forest Industry, University of Forestry, 1797 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Department of Wood Industry, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Cawangan Pahang Kampus Jengka, Bandar Tun Razak 26400, Pahang, Malaysia
3
Research Center for Biomass and Bioproducts, National Research and Innovation Agency, Cibinong 16911, Indonesia
4
Research Collaboration Center for Biomass and Biorefinery between BRIN and Universitas Padjajaran, National Research and Innovation Agency, Cibinong 16911, Indonesia
5
Faculty of Wood Sciences and Technology, Technical University in Zvolen, 96001 Zvolen, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2023, 14(4), 826; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040826
Submission received: 13 April 2023 / Accepted: 17 April 2023 / Published: 18 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Eco-Friendly Wood-Based Composites II)
The ongoing twin transition of the wood-based panel industry towards a green, digital, and more resilient bioeconomy is essential for a successful transformation, with the aim of decarbonising the sector and implementing a circular development model, transforming linear industrial value chains to minimize pollution and waste generation, and providing more sustainable growth and jobs. This green transition represents an opportunity to place the wood-based panel industry on a new path of more sustainable and inclusive growth, tackling climate change and reducing our dependence on fossil-derived raw materials, thus improving the industry’s resource efficiency and security.
A crucial circular economy principle is exploiting natural resources more effectively to produce various value-added wood-based products, as the demand for wood and wood-based components is anticipated to triple between 2010 and 2050. In efforts to promote effective recycling and reuse, the upcycling of wood and wood-based materials and the search for substitute raw materials, recent legislative regulations and increased awareness of social environments have posed new challenges to both industry and academia. These regulations and laws are related to enhancing the “cascading use” of wood or prioritising the value-added, non-fuel applications of wood and other lignocellulosic resources.
Wood composites are manufactured from different wood and non-wood lignocellulosic raw materials, bonded together with synthetic or bio-based adhesives and used for particular value-added applications and service requirements [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Conventional wood-based composites are manufactured with synthetic, formaldehyde-based resins, commonly produced from petroleum-based components, such as urea, phenol and melamine [10,11,12,13]. The use of these thermoset adhesives has several drawbacks related to the release of harmful volatile organic compounds, such as formaldehyde emissions from the created wood-based composites. Free formaldehyde emissions from the created wood-based composites has been linked to seriously detrimental human health effects, including irritation of the eyes, nose, throat and skin; nausea (short-term exposure); as well as respiratory problems and cancer (long-term exposure) [14,15,16,17,18]. The transition towards a circular, low-carbon wood-based panel industry, increased environmental concerns related to the use of unsustainable petroleum-based resources and the strict legislative requirements of free formaldehyde release from engineered wood composites have tremendously increased the research and development of ‘green’, eco-friendly wood-based composites [19,20,21,22,23,24,25], optimal valorisation of available lignocellulosic resources [26,27,28,29,30], and use of alternative raw materials [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. The adverse free formaldehyde emission from wood-based composites can be mitigated by coating the surfaces of finished composites, by adding various organic or inorganic formaldehyde scavengers to synthetic wood adhesives, or by using bio-based, environmentally friendly wood adhesives [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. The manufacture of binderless wood-based composites is another viable option since wood as a natural raw material is composed of biopolymeric constituents, i.e., cellulose, lignin, and hemicelluloses [50,51,52,53,54].
In this Special Issue, 11 well-written, authentic pieces of research and critical analysis are collated to show instances of recent technological advances in the design, manufacture, characteristics, and future uses of environmentally friendly wood and wood-based composites.
Barbu et al. [55] investigated and evaluated the physical and mechanical characteristics of Paulownia tomentosa × elongata plantation wood. These characteristics were determined taking into consideration the effects of cross section position and stem height. This study was conducted due to the increased interest in Paulownia as a fast-growing tree species. The authors came to the conclusion that, in terms of wood density and dimensional stability, Paulownia plantation wood becomes stable after the fifth year of growth, and they recommended harvesting trees older than seven years in order to maximise the yield of sawn wood. This recommendation was made in light of the fact that the authors harvested trees younger than five years in order to obtain optimal results.
Bamboo is another sustainable and eco-friendly material that has attracted significant study interest in recent years due to its multiple advantages and abundance, as well as ability to be recycled and reused. Although bamboo is seen as a promising substitute of wood, its poor stiffness and culm diameter are the key reasons restricting its widespread use. To address these issues, bamboo culms can be disassembled into flat thin lamellae and bonded together with an adhesive to create a certifiable structural material known as laminated bamboo [56,57,58].
The components of bamboo-based composites were investigated by Hao et al. [59] for their bending performance, fracture toughness, and enhancement mechanism. According to the authors’ reports, the bamboo composites exhibited greater fracture toughness, compared to bamboo itself. Additionally, the composites exhibited longer deformation and less damage to fibre and parenchymal cell walls. The mechanical strength of cell walls, particularly parenchymal cell walls, was found to be enhanced by phenol–formaldehyde resin, as evidenced by an increase in indented modulus and hardness. According to the authors, the main factor affecting the fracture toughness of bamboo-based composites was the crosslinking effects of phenol–formaldehyde resin with the cell wall and fibres.
The shear performance of laminated boards fabricated from two Malaysian bamboo species was studied by Mohd Yusof et al. [60]. The two species studied were semantan (Gigantochloa scortechinii) and beting (Gigantochloa levis). Using phenol–resorcinol–formaldehyde (PRF) and polyurethane (PUR) adhesive systems, three-layer laminated bamboo panels with two lay-up patterns, perpendicular and parallel, and three strip arrangements (vertical, horizontal, and mixed) were fabricated. Board delamination, bamboo failure, and shear strength were all measured. It was determined that the lay-up pattern and adhesive type were the primary determinants of shear performance. The authors reported higher values for shear strength and bamboo failure for laminated bamboo boards bonded with PRF compared to those bonded with PUR resin. PUR-bonded bamboo, on the other hand, had a significantly lower rate of delamination, indicating a more durable bond. Overall, PRF was found to be the superior adhesive for bonding laminated bamboo boards due to its superior shear performance.
Particleboard made of sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria) wood was fabricated by Iswanto et al. [61]. In their study, single-layer particleboard with a density of 750 kg.m3 was produced. Urea–formaldehyde (UF) resin added with methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) was used as a binder for the particleboard. The physico-mechanical properties of the resultant particleboards were explored. Four different hot-pressing temperatures (130, 140, 150, and 160 °C) were used to produce the particleboard. Based on a total adhesive content of 12%, the used UF/MDI mixtures were composed of 100% UF and 0% MDI, 85% UF and 15% MDI, 70% UF and 30% MDI, and 55 UF and 45% MDI, respectively. Hot pressing at 140 °C with an adhesive system consisting of 85UF/15MDI produced particleboard with physical and mechanical properties meeting the requirements for type 8 boards, as specified in JIS A5908-2003. Additionally, the particleboard fulfilled the requirements for type 2 boards according to EN 312 standards.
Another interesting study was carried out by Yusof et al. [62] on the influence of boric acid pretreatment on bamboo strips. The physical and mechanical performance of the pre-treated bamboo strips was assessed after boric acid treatment. Adhesion properties were also studied, as well as the morphological characteristics of the bamboo strips. These bamboo strips were derived from four widely distributed bamboo species in Malaysia: Gigantochloa scortechinii, Gigantochloa levis, Bambusa vulgaris and Dendrocalamus asper. According to the authors’ findings, treating bamboo strips with boric acid improved their wettability, dimensional stability, and mechanical properties, resulting in a greater potential for use in composite applications. Most importantly, treatment with boric acid may improve the biological durability of the bamboo strips and broaden the range of potential applications for these laminated panels in the exterior environment.
The ongoing digitalization of the wood-based panel industry via the adoption of Industry 4.0 principles and technological advances, referring to enhanced automation and use of smart, data-driven manufacturing systems, is a prerequisite for the green and digital transformation of sector, enhancing its competitiveness and sustainability.
Kminiak et al. [63] used a computer numerical control machine for the adaptive control of cutting processes to examine the impact of various input parameters on processing wood-based composites (particleboards). The authors conducted experiments to determine the relationship between feed speed, revolutions, and radial depth of cut, as well as the equivalence of sound pressure level and milling tool temperature. The obtained results show that the noise level and temperature of the milling tool were affected by all of the investigated parameters, with the rate of radial depth of cut having the greatest influence on the rise in temperature, and the number of revolutions having the greatest influence on the sound pressure level.
Buildings are designed and constructed with careful consideration given to the selection and application of structural materials that are renewable and friendly to the environment. When compared to a reinforced concrete road bridge of the same span and load, the performance of a cross-prestressed timber-reinforced concrete bridge is superior. Mitterpach et al. [64] used the LCA principle to investigate and evaluate the environmental performance of each structure. The results show that the timber-reinforced concrete bridge was more eco-friendly than the steel-concrete road bridges. The findings have important implications for evaluating the ecological effectiveness of building components and structures.
Adhering to circular economy practices, which include the upcycling of raw materials and the increased utilization of by-products to manufacture new products with added value, Pędzik et al. [65] studied the possibilities of using forest residues generated from Scots pine harvesting as a substitutional material for manufacturing particleboards. Markedly, the composites, fabricated from forest biomass residues, exhibited satisfactory mechanical properties, fulfilling the requirements for type P5 particleboards, suitable for load-bearing applications for use in humid conditions in accordance with EN 312 standard. However, the lower dimensional stability of the produced composites allowed their classification as type P2 particleboards, suitable for internal use (including furniture) in dry conditions.
Particleboard and oriented strand boards (OSB) are two types of wood-based composite that, if burned, could create a dangerous environment in homes and public buildings. Marková et al. subjected unfinished particleboards and OSB panels were to radiant heat testing and evaluation [66]. Mass loss and time-to-ignition of the composites were reported to be significantly affected by heat flux. The experiment findings reveal that the ignition time and the temperature at which thermal decomposition occurred were both significantly higher for OSB panels than for particleboards.
Paulownia (Paulownia tomentosa (Tunb.) × elongata (S.Y. Hu)) sawn wood from three European plantation sites was studied for its physical and mechanical properties by Barbu et al. [67]. The results conclusively show that Paulownia wood’s physical and mechanical qualities were significantly affected by the growing conditions. Paulownia wood was found to have a significant promise as an alternative natural feedstock to be used in specialised applications, such as non-load-bearing structural components and thermal insulation, despite having inferior physical and mechanical properties compared to traditional tree species.
Finally, Maulana et al. [68] conducted a comprehensive overview on the latest advancements in the field of “green,” eco-friendly, starch-based wood adhesives. These can be used to produce wood-based composites that are non-toxic, have low emissions, superior properties and a reduced negative impact on the environment. The authors described and analyzed the vast potential of starch as a cheap and abundant natural feedstock for use in wood adhesives. New methods of starch modification were also discussed, with the goal of enhancing the effectiveness of starch-based wood adhesives.
A significant precondition for the ongoing movement toward the production of environmentally friendly, high-performance wood-based composites is the industry’s ongoing transformation from a linear to a circular bioeconomy. This transition is a strong prerequisite for this production trend. This Special Issue provides a detailed summary of potential developments in the design, production and applications of sustainable, environmentally friendly wood-based composites with enhanced properties and a reduced carbon footprint, which form the focus of this discussion.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.A., S.H.L., M.A.R.L., L.K. and R.R.; Writing and editing, P.A., S.H.L., M.A.R.L., L.K. and R.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the project “Properties and application of innovative biocomposite materials in furniture manufacturing”, no. HИC-Б-1215/04.2022, carried out at the University of Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria. This research was also supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under contracts No. APVV-20-004, APVV-19-0269 and No. SK-CZ-RD-21-0100.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pizzi, A.; Papadopoulos, A.N.; Policardi, F. Wood composites and their polymer binders. Polymers 2020, 12, 1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Barbu, M.C.; Reh, R.; Irle, M. Wood-based composites. In Research Developments in Wood Engineering and Technology; Aguilera, A., Davim, J.P., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2014; Chapter 1; pp. 1–45. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zanuttini, R.; Negro, F. Wood-Based Composites: Innovation towards a Sustainable Future. Forests 2021, 12, 1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Papadopoulos, A.N. Advances in Wood Composites III. Polymers 2021, 13, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mirski, R.; Derkowski, A.; Kawalerczyk, J.; Dziurka, D.; Walkiewicz, J. The Possibility of Using Pine Bark Particles in the Chipboard Manufacturing Process. Materials 2022, 15, 5731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Savov, V. Nanomaterials to Improve Properties in Wood-Based Composite Panels. In Emerging Nanomaterials; Taghiyari, H.R., Morrell, J.J., Husen, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 135–153. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee, S.H.; Lum, W.C.; Boon, J.G.; Kristak, L.; Antov, P.; Rogoziński, T.; Pędzik, M.; Taghiyari, H.R.; Lubis, M.A.R.; Fatriasari, W.; et al. Particleboard from Agricultural Biomass and Recycled Wood Waste: A Review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 20, 4630–4658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Taghiyari, H.R.; Morrell, J.J.; Husen, A. Emerging Nanomaterials for Forestry and Associated Sectors: An Overview. In Emerging Nanomaterials; Taghiyari, H.R., Morrell, J.J., Husen, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sandberg, D.; Gorbacheva, G.; Lichtenegger, H.; Niemz, P.; Teischinger, A. Advanced Engineered Wood-Material Concepts. In Springer Handbook of Wood Science and Technology; Niemz, P., Teischinger, A., Sandberg, D., Eds.; Springer Handbooks; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 1835–1888. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mantanis, G.I.; Athanassiadou, E.T.; Barbu, M.C.; Wijnendaele, K. Adhesive systems used in the European particleboard, MDF and OSB industries. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 13, 104–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dorieh, A.; Ayrilmis, N.; Pour, M.F.; Movahed, S.G.; Kiamahalleh, M.V.; Shahavi, M.H.; Hatefnia, H.; Mehdinia, M. Phenol formaldehyde resin modified by cellulose and lignin nanomaterials: Review and recent progress. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 222, 1888–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Valyova, M.; Ivanova, Y.; Koynov, D. Investigation of free formaldehyde quantity in the production of plywood with modified urea-formaldehyde resin. Int. J. Wood Des. Technol. 2017, 6, 72–76. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dorieh, A.; Pour, M.F.; Movahed, S.G.; Pizzi, A.; Selakjani, P.P.; Kiamahalleh, M.V.; Hatefnia, H.; Shahavi, M.H.; Aghaei, R. A review of recent progress in melamine-formaldehyde resin based nanocomposites as coating materials. Prog. Org. Coat. 2022, 165, 106768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, R.N.; Pizzi, A. Environmental Aspects of Adhesives–Emission of Formaldehyde. In Adhesives for Wood and Lignocellulosic Materials; Wiley-Scrivener Publishing: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 293–312. [Google Scholar]
  15. Walkiewicz, J.; Kawalerczyk, J.; Mirski, R.; Dziurka, D.; Wieruszewski, M. The Application of Various Bark Species as a Fillers for UF Resin in Plywood Manufacturing. Materials 2022, 15, 7201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bekhta, P.; Sedliačik, J.; Noshchenko, G.; Kačík, F.; Bekhta, N. Characteristics of Beech Bark and its Effect on Properties of UF Adhesive and on Bonding Strength and Formaldehyde Emission of Plywood Panels. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 2021, 79, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Savov, V.; Antov, P.; Zhou, Y.; Bekhta, P. Eco-Friendly Wood Composites: Design, Characterization and Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Classifies Formaldehyde as Carcinogenic to Humans; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ninikas, K.; Mitani, A.; Koutsianitis, D.; Ntalos, G.; Taghiyari, H.R.; Papadopoulos, A.N. Thermal and Mechanical Properties ofGreen Insulation Composites Made from Cannabis and Bark Residues. J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Antov, P.; Savov, V.; Trichkov, N.; Krišťák, Ľ.; Réh, R.; Papadopoulos, A.N.; Taghiyari, H.R.; Pizzi, A.; Kunecová, D.; Pachikova, M. Properties of High-Density Fiberboard Bonded with Urea–Formaldehyde Resin and Ammonium Lignosulfonate as a Bio-Based Additive. Polymers 2021, 13, 2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Savov, V.; Valchev, I.; Antov, P.; Yordanov, I.; Popski, Z. Effect of the Adhesive System on the Properties of Fiberboard Panels Bonded with Hydrolysis Lignin and Phenol-Formaldehyde Resin. Polymers 2022, 14, 1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Reh, R.; Kristak, L.; Antov, P. Advanced Eco-Friendly Wood-Based Composites. Materials 2022, 15, 8651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Valchev, I.; Yordanov, Y.; Savov, V.; Antov, P. Optimization of the Hot-Pressing Regime in the Production of Eco-Friendly Fibreboards Bonded with Hydrolysis Lignin. Period. Polytech. Chem. Eng. 2022, 66, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hidayati, S.; Budiyanto, E.F.; Saputra, H.; Hadi, S.; Iswanto, A.H.; Solihat, N.N.; Antov, P.; Lee, S.H.; Fatriasari, W.; Salit, M.S. Characterization of Formacell Lignin Derived from Black Liquor as a Potential Green Additive for Advanced Biocomposites. J. Renew. Mater. 2023, 11, 2861–2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bekhta, P.; Noshchenko, G.; Réh, R.; Kristak, L.; Sedliačik, J.; Antov, P.; Mirski, R.; Savov, V. Properties of Eco-Friendly Particleboards Bonded with Lignosulfonate-Urea-Formaldehyde Adhesives and pMDI as a Crosslinker. Materials 2021, 14, 4875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Reinprecht, L.; Iždinský, J. Composites from Recycled and Modified Woods—Technology, Properties, Application. Forests 2022, 13, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pędzik, M.; Kwidziński, Z.; Rogoziński, T. Particles from Residue Wood-Based Materials from Door Production as an Alternative Raw Material for Production of Particleboard. Drv. Ind. 2022, 73, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Koynov, D.; Valyova, M.; Parzhov, E.; Lee, S.H. Utilization of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) Timber with Defects in Production of Engineered Wood Products. Drv. Ind. 2023, 74, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ahamad, W.N.; Salim, S.; Lee, S.H.; Abdul Ghani, M.A.; Mohd Ali, R.A.; Md Tahir, P.; Fatriasari, W.; Antov, P.; Lubis, M.A.R. Effects of Compression Ratio and Phenolic Resin Concentration on the Properties of Laminated Compreg Inner Oil Palm and Sesenduk Wood Composites. Forests 2023, 14, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pędzik, M.; Auriga, R.; Kristak, L.; Antov, P.; Rogoziński, T. Physical and Mechanical Properties of Particleboard Produced with Addition of Walnut (Juglans regia L.) Wood Residues. Materials 2022, 15, 1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Barbu, M.C.; Sepperer, T.; Tudor, E.M.; Petutschnigg, A. Walnut and Hazelnut Shells: Untapped Industrial Resources and Their Suitability in Lignocellulosic Composites. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kain, G.; Morandini, M.; Stamminger, A.; Granig, T.; Tudor, E.M.; Schnabel, T.; Petutschnigg, A. Production and Physical–Mechanical Characterization of Peat Moss (Sphagnum) Insulation Panels. Materials 2021, 14, 6601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Barbu, M.C.; Montecuccoli, Z.; Förg, J.; Barbeck, U.; Klímek, P.; Petutschnigg, A.; Tudor, E.M. Potential of Brewer’s Spent Grain as a Potential Replacement of Wood in pMDI, UF or MUF Bonded Particleboard. Polymers 2021, 13, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rammou, E.; Mitani, A.; Ntalos, G.; Koutsianitis, D.; Taghiyari, H.R.; Papadopoulos, A.N. The Potential Use of Seaweed (Posidonia oceanica) as an Alternative Lignocellulosic Raw Material for Wood Composites Manufacture. Coatings 2021, 11, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pędzik, M.; Janiszewska, D.; Rogoziński, T. Alternative Lignocellulosic Raw Materials in Particleboard Production: A Review. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 174, 114162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chaydarreh, K.C.; Lin, X.; Guan, L.; Yun, H.; Gu, J.; Hu, C. Utilization of tea oil camellia (Camellia oleifera Abel.) shells as alternative raw materials for manufacturing particleboard. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 161, 113221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khalaf, Y.; El Hage, P.; Mihajlova, J.; Bergeret, A.; Lacroix, P.; El Hage, R. Influence of agricultural fibers size on mechanical and insulating properties of innovative chitosan-based insulators. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 287, 123071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Grigorov, R.; Mihajlova, J.; Savov, V. Physical and Mechanical Properties of Combined Wood-Bases Panels with Participation of Particles from Vine Sticks in Core Layer. Innov. Wood. Ind. Eng. Des. 2020, 1, 42–52. [Google Scholar]
  39. Santos, J.; Pereira, J.; Ferreira, N.; Paiva, N.; Ferra, J.; Magalhães, F.D.; Martins, J.M.; Dulyanska, Y.; Carvalho, L.H. Valorisation of non-timber by-products from maritime pine (Pinus pinaster, Ait) for particleboard production. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 168, 113581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lykidis, C. Formaldehyde Emissions from Wood-Based Composites: Effects of Nanomaterials. In Emerging Nanomaterials; Taghiyari, H.R., Morrell, J.J., Husen, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 337–360. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kawalerczyk, J.; Walkiewicz, J.; Dziurka, D.; Mirski, R.; Brózdowski, J. APTES-Modified Nanocellulose as the Formaldehyde Scavenger for UF Adhesive-Bonded Particleboard and Strawboard. Polymers 2022, 14, 5037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kristak, L.; Antov, P.; Bekhta, P.; Lubis, M.A.R.; Iswanto, A.H.; Reh, R.; Sedliacik, J.; Savov, V.; Taghiayri, H.; Papadopoulos, A.N.; et al. Recent Progress in Ultra-Low Formaldehyde Emitting Adhesive Systems and Formaldehyde Scavengers in Wood-Based Panels: A Review. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 18, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kawalerczyk, J.; Walkiewicz, J.; Woźniak, M.; Dziurka, D.; Mirski, R. The effect of urea-formaldehyde adhesive modification with propylamine on the properties of manufactured plywood. J. Adhes. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Medved, S.; Gajsek, U.; Tudor, E.M.; Barbu, M.C.; Antonovic, A. Efficiency of bark for reduction of formaldehyde emission fromparticleboards. Wood Res. 2019, 64, 307–315. [Google Scholar]
  45. Arias, A.; González-Rodríguez, S.; Vetroni Barros, M.; Salvador, R.; de Francisco, A.C.; Piekarski, C.M.; Moreira, M.T. Recent developments in bio-based adhesives from renewable natural resources. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 314, 127892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hussin, M.H.; Abd Latif, N.H.; Hamidon, T.S.; Idris, N.N.; Hashim, R.; Appaturi, J.N.; Brosse, N.; Ziegler-Devin, I.; Chrusiel, L.; Fatriasari, W.; et al. Latest advancements in high-performance bio-based wood adhesives: A critical review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 21, 3909–3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gonçalves, S.; Ferra, J.; Paiva, N.; Martins, J.; Carvalho, L.H.; Magalhães, F.D. Lignosulphonates as an Alternative to Non- Renewable Binders in Wood-Based Materials. Polymers 2021, 13, 4196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sari, R.A.L.; Lubis, M.A.R.; Sari, R.K.; Kristak, L.; Iswanto, A.H.; Mardawati, E.; Fatriasari, W.; Lee, S.H.; Reh, R.; Sedliacik, J.; et al. Properties of Plywood Bonded with Formaldehyde-Free Adhesive Based on Poly(vinyl alcohol)–Tannin–Hexamine at Different Formulations and Cold-Pressing Times. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gumowska, A.; Kowaluk, G. Physical and Mechanical Properties of High-Density Fiberboard Bonded with Bio-Based Adhesives. Forests 2023, 14, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Puspaningrum, T.; Haris, Y.H.; Sailah, I.; Yani, M.; Indrasti, N.S. Physical and mechanical properties of binderless medium density fiberboard (MDF) from coconut fiber. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 472, 012011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jerman, M.; Böhm, M.; Dušek, J.; Černý, R. Effect of steaming temperature on microstructure and mechanical, hygric, and thermal properties of binderless rape straw fiberboards. Build. Environ. 2022, 223, 109474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kaffashsaei, E.; Yousefi, H.; Nishino, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Mashkour, M.; Madhoushi, M. Binderless Self-densified 3 mm-Thick Board Fully Made from (Ligno)cellulose Nanofibers of Paulownia Sawdust. Waste Biomass Valor. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ferrandez-Garcia, A.; Ferrandez-Garcia, M.T.; Garcia-Ortuño, T.; Ferrandez-Villena, M. Influence of the Density in Binderless Particleboards Made from Sorghum. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, D.; Zhang, A.; Xue, L. A review of preparation of binderless fiberboards and its self-bonding mechanism. Wood Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 661–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Barbu, M.C.; Tudor, E.M.; Buresova, K.; Petutschnigg, A. Assessment of Physical and Mechanical Properties Considering the Stem Height and Cross-Section of Paulownia tomentosa (Thunb.) Steud. x elongata (S.Y.Hu) Wood. Forests 2023, 14, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lee, S.H.; Md Tahir, P.; Osman Al-Edrus, S.S.; Uyup, M.K.A. (Eds.) Bamboo Resources, Trade, and Utilisation. In Multifaceted Bamboo; Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  57. Dwianto, W.; Darmawan, T.; Nugroho, N.; Lubis, M.A.R.; Bahanawan, A.; Adi, D.S.; Triwibowo, D. Development of Compressed Bamboo Lamination from Curved Cross-Section Slats. In Multifaceted Bamboo; Md Tahir, P., Lee, S.H., Osman Al-Edrus, S.S., Uyup, M.K.A., Eds. Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 193–216. [Google Scholar]
  58. Abidin, W.N.S.N.Z.; Al-Edrus, S.S.O.; Hua, L.S.; Ghani, M.A.A.; Bakar, B.F.A.; Ishak, R.; Qayyum Ahmad Faisal, F.; Sabaruddin, F.A.; Kristak, L.; Lubis, M.A.R.; et al. Properties of Phenol Formaldehyde-Bonded Layered Laminated Woven Bamboo Mat Boards Made from Gigantochloa scortechinii. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hao, X.; Yu, Y.; Yang, C.; Yu, W. In Situ Detection of the Flexural Fracture Behaviors of Inner and Outer Bamboo-Based Composites. Forests 2023, 14, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mohd Yusof, N.; Md Tahir, P.; Lee, S.H.; Anwar Uyup, M.K.; James, R.M.S.; Osman Al-Edrus, S.S.; Kristak, L.; Reh, R.; Lubis, M.A.R. Effects of Adhesive Types and Structural Configurations on Shear Performance of Laminated Board from Two Gigantochloa Bamboos. Forests 2023, 14, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Iswanto, A.H.; Sutiawan, J.; Darwis, A.; Lubis, M.A.R.; Pędzik, M.; Rogoziński, T.; Fatriasari, W. Influence of Isocyanate Content and Hot-Pressing Temperatures on the Physical–Mechanical Properties of Particleboard Bonded with a Hybrid Urea–Formaldehyde/Isocyanate Adhesive. Forests 2023, 14, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yusof, N.M.; Hua, L.S.; Tahir, P.M.; James, R.M.S.; Al-Edrus, S.S.O.; Dahali, R.; Roseley, A.S.M.; Fatriasari, W.; Kristak, L.; Lubis, M.A.R.; et al. Effects of Boric Acid Pretreatment on the Properties of Four Selected Malaysian Bamboo Strips. Forests 2023, 14, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kminiak, R.; Němec, M.; Igaz, R.; Gejdoš, M. Advisability-Selected Parameters of Woodworking with a CNC Machine as a Tool for Adaptive Control of the Cutting Process. Forests 2023, 14, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mitterpach, J.; Fojtík, R.; Machovčáková, E.; Kubíncová, L. Life Cycle Assessment of a Road Transverse Prestressed Wooden–Concrete Bridge. Forests 2023, 14, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pędzik, M.; Tomczak, K.; Janiszewska-Latterini, D.; Tomczak, A.; Rogoziński, T. Management of Forest Residues as a Raw Material for the Production of Particleboards. Forests 2022, 13, 1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Marková, I.; Ivaničová, M.; Osvaldová, L.M.; Harangózo, J.; Tureková, I. Ignition of Wood-Based Boards by Radiant Heat. Forests 2022, 13, 1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Barbu, M.C.; Buresova, K.; Tudor, E.M.; Petutschnigg, A. Physical and Mechanical Properties of Paulownia tomentosa x elongata Sawn Wood from Spanish, Bulgarian and Serbian Plantations. Forests 2022, 13, 1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Maulana, M.I.; Lubis, M.A.R.; Febrianto, F.; Hua, L.S.; Iswanto, A.H.; Antov, P.; Kristak, L.; Mardawati, E.; Sari, R.K.; Zaini, L.H.; et al. Environmentally Friendly Starch-Based Adhesives for Bonding High-Performance Wood Composites: A Review. Forests 2022, 13, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Antov, P.; Lee, S.H.; Lubis, M.A.R.; Kristak, L.; Réh, R. Advanced Eco-Friendly Wood-Based Composites II. Forests 2023, 14, 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040826

AMA Style

Antov P, Lee SH, Lubis MAR, Kristak L, Réh R. Advanced Eco-Friendly Wood-Based Composites II. Forests. 2023; 14(4):826. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040826

Chicago/Turabian Style

Antov, Petar, Seng Hua Lee, Muhammad Adly Rahandi Lubis, Lubos Kristak, and Roman Réh. 2023. "Advanced Eco-Friendly Wood-Based Composites II" Forests 14, no. 4: 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040826

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop