Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Security Access Control Using Statistical-Based Legitimate or Counterfeit Identification System
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Advancing Skin Cancer Prediction Using Ensemble Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Personalized Classifier Selection for EEG-Based BCIs

by
Javad Rahimipour Anaraki
1,2,*,
Antonina Kolokolova
3 and
Tom Chau
1,2,*
1
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G9, Canada
2
Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8, Canada
3
Department of Computer Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X5, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Computers 2024, 13(7), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13070158
Submission received: 7 May 2024 / Revised: 16 June 2024 / Accepted: 20 June 2024 / Published: 21 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine and Deep Learning in the Health Domain 2024)

Abstract

The most important component of an Electroencephalogram (EEG) Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) is its classifier, which translates EEG signals in real time into meaningful commands. The accuracy and speed of the classifier determine the utility of the BCI. However, there is significant intra- and inter-subject variability in EEG data, complicating the choice of the best classifier for different individuals over time. There is a keen need for an automatic approach to selecting a personalized classifier suited to an individual’s current needs. To this end, we have developed a systematic methodology for individual classifier selection, wherein the structural characteristics of an EEG dataset are used to predict a classifier that will perform with high accuracy. The method was evaluated using motor imagery EEG data from Physionet. We confirmed that our approach could consistently predict a classifier whose performance was no worse than the single-best-performing classifier across the participants. Furthermore, Kullback–Leibler divergences between reference distributions and signal amplitude and class label distributions emerged as the most important characteristics for classifier prediction, suggesting that classifier choice depends heavily on the morphology of signal amplitude densities and the degree of class imbalance in an EEG dataset.
Keywords: EEG data; classification; algorithm portfolio; brain–computer interface EEG data; classification; algorithm portfolio; brain–computer interface

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rahimipour Anaraki, J.; Kolokolova, A.; Chau, T. Personalized Classifier Selection for EEG-Based BCIs. Computers 2024, 13, 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13070158

AMA Style

Rahimipour Anaraki J, Kolokolova A, Chau T. Personalized Classifier Selection for EEG-Based BCIs. Computers. 2024; 13(7):158. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13070158

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rahimipour Anaraki, Javad, Antonina Kolokolova, and Tom Chau. 2024. "Personalized Classifier Selection for EEG-Based BCIs" Computers 13, no. 7: 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13070158

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop