Next Article in Journal
Alagille Syndrome: Diagnostic Challenges and Advances in Management
Next Article in Special Issue
18F-FDG PET/CT for Response Assessment in Pediatric Sebaceous Carcinoma of the Parotid Gland
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Diagnostic Tests for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
Previous Article in Special Issue
CT Findings in Negative Pressure Pulmonary Edema
 
 
Interesting Images
Peer-Review Record

Massive Relief: Papillary Adenoma of the Lung in Asymptomatic Former Smoker Patient

Diagnostics 2020, 10(11), 906; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110906
by Jelena Stojšić 1,*, Marko Popović 2, Federica Pezzuto 3 and Jelena Marković 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2020, 10(11), 906; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110906
Submission received: 9 October 2020 / Revised: 2 November 2020 / Accepted: 4 November 2020 / Published: 6 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Interesting Images)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Stojsic et al. provide a nice and interesting case report about a rare pulmonary tumor. I have only a couple of minor Points to raise:

  • did the Patient undergo "tumorectomy" (line 39) without previous biopsy or radiological staging to rle out distant metastases?
  • I suggest also adding a CT Image of the tumor
  • some minor spelling mistakes: line 27 investigated, line 35 persistent dry coug, line 36 hypertensive cardiomyopathy
  • mention the rarity of the Tumor also in the discussion (lines 72 ff).
  • maybe make the title more concrete. One somewhat playful example could be "Massive relief: papillary adenoma of the lung in a symptomatic ex smoker"

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

the authors appreciate the time invested by you in the review of this paper.

  1. Patient went under tumourectomy without previous biopsy and radiological staging to rule out the eventual metastases.
  2. Unfortunately, there was no CT-scan to obtain as previously discussed.
  3. All mentioned spelling mistakes as well as a couple more were corrected.
  4. Rarity of the tumour was added in discussion.
  5. The title suggestion was gladly accepted.

Kind regards,

dr Stojsic and co-authors

Reviewer 2 Report

This is nice case presentation and clear description of an unusual tumour in a previously fit smoker. I agree with the authors, it’s important to report these rarer cases for the purposes of a fuller differential diagnosis.

This submission would be greatly improved with the inclusion of the diagnostic radiology - presenting CXR / CT thorax.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

the authors appreciate your time invested in the review of our manuscript.

Unfortunately, thorax CT-scan was not performed, and CXR was lost by the patient himself without saving in hospital database.

Kind regards,

dr Stojsic and co-authors

 

Back to TopTop