Next Article in Journal
Metastatic Nodular Melanoma with Angiosarcomatous Transdifferentiation—A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Journal
Emerging Innovations in Preoperative Planning and Motion Analysis in Orthopedic Surgery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nodal Low-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma Co-Expressing CD5 and CD10 but Not CD23, IRTA1, or Cyclin D1: The Diagnostic Challenge of a Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Complete Blood Counts and Research Parameters in the Detection of Myelodysplastic Syndromes

by
Eloísa Urrechaga
1,*,
Mónica Fernández
2 and
Urko Aguirre
3,4
1
Laboratory, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, 48960 Galdakao, Spain
2
Hematology, Hospital Universitario Araba, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
3
Research Unit, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Barrualde-Galdakao Integrated Health Organisation, Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital, 48960 Galdakao, Spain
4
Kronikgune Institute for Health Services Research, 48902 Barakaldo, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(13), 1322; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14131322
Submission received: 12 May 2024 / Revised: 6 June 2024 / Accepted: 20 June 2024 / Published: 21 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Hematology and Oncology)

Abstract

:
The diagnosis of Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is frequently challenging, especially in terms of the distinction from the other non-neoplastic causes of cytopenia. Currently, it is based on the presence of peripheral blood cytopenias, peripheral blood and bone marrow dysplasia/blasts, and clonal cytogenetic abnormalities, but MDS diagnostic features are polymorphic and non-specific. We investigated the utility of complete blood count (CBC) and research parameters (RUO) from the analyzer BC 6800 Plus (Mindray Diagnostics) to discriminate MDS-related cytopenia. Methods: 100 samples from healthy individuals were used to establish the values of research parameters in normal subjects. A retrospective study was conducted including 66 patients diagnosed with MDS, 90 cytopenic patients due to other diseases (cancer patients receiving therapy, aplastic anemia, other hematological malignancies) and 50 with macrocytic anemia. The Wilcoxon test was applied to detect statistical differences among the groups of patients, considering p < 0.05 significant. The diagnostic performance of the RUO parameters for discriminating MDS among cytopenias was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Amultivariable logistic regression model was performed to identify the potential predictors for having MDS. The area under curve (AUC) and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test of the model were assessed. The performance of the model was verified in a prospective study including 224 cytopenic patients (validation group). Results: In the MDS group, the mean cell volume (MCV), percentage of macrocytic red cells (MAC), red cell distribution width (RDW) and immature platelets fraction (IPF) had increased values compared to the cytopenic and normal patients, while platelets, red and white cell counts, Neu X (related to the cytoplasmic complexity of neutrophils), Neu Y (related to nucleic acid content) and Neu Z (related to cell size) were lower (p < 0.001). Neu X, Neu Y, and Neu Z showed higher AUC for detecting MDS > 0.80; MAC, RDW and IPF AUC > 0.76. The multivariable model demonstrated that Neu X and Neu Y could be used in the recognition of MDS, AUC 0.88. In the validation group, 89.0% of the MDS patients were well classified. Conclusion: MDS are common malignant disorders with a poor prognosis, and early diagnosis is warranted for optimal benefit from treatment. RUO gain insights to detect dysplasia of MDS and could be used in the differential diagnosis of MDS from cytopenias of other etiologies.

1. Introduction

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of clonal stem cell disorders characterized by ineffective and dysplastic hematopoiesis, which result in one or more cytopenias (anemia in most cases, as well as thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia) [1].
The supportive therapy has been replaced with advanced treatment of high risk MDS, but about 30% of MDS cases progress to acute myeloid leukemia. These facts make the early and correct diagnosis of MDS crucial [2]. The risk of develo** MDS increases with age and its diagnosis is frequently challenging because the clinical presentation is insidious dependent on the severity and type of cytopenia [3,4].
MDS is suspected upon detection of cytopenia and morphological changes of peripheral blood cells, and the diagnosis/prognosis must be confirmed by bone marrow aspiration, flow cytometry, cytogenetic and molecular analyses [5]. The recommended cytopenia thresholds for defining MDS are hemoglobin (Hb) < 100 g/L, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1.8 × 109/L, and platelet count < 100 × 109/L [6], but it is important to consider that blood counts above these thresholds do not exclude MDS [7].
Hematology analyzers perform complete blood counts (CBC) and the initial classification of blood cells. Due to technological progress over past decades, the number of parameters reported has increased, as well as the so-called research use only parameters (RUO). In addition to the leukocyte differential counts, they can also provide cell population data (CPD) parameters reflecting morphological characteristics of the cells [8]. But dysplasia, including erythroid and megakaryocytic lineage can be observed in MDS.
The Mindray BC-6800 Plus analyzer (Mindray Biomedical Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) reports not only leukocyte CPD but also red blood cell (RBC)-derived parameters, including the percentage of macrocytic RBC (MAC), the percentage of hypochromic or hyperchromic RBC, or immature platelets fraction (IPF).
All those parameters give insights into the morphology of blood cells which could be distinctively disrupted in MDS when compared with cytopenias of a different etiology. In this study, we hypothesized that the novel parameters RUO could be used to detect dysplasia of MDS and might help to identify MDS in a routine clinical setting.

2. Patients and Methods

2.1. Instrumentation

2.1.1. Mindray Technology

The Mindray BC-6800 Plus analyzer adopts shrated flow impedance combined with fluorescent flow cytometry with a semi-conductor diode laser (SF Cube analysis technology) [9].
The red blood cell (RBC) channel combines the 2 optical signals, side scatter (SS) and forward scatter (FS), to measure subsets of RBCs based on size (micro/normo/macrocytes) and hemoglobin concentration (hypo/normo/hyperchromic). The percentages of each subset are reported and the V/HC cytogram (Mie map) illustrates the distribution (Figure 1). Not only is red cell distribution width (RDW) reported, but hemoglobin distribution width (HDW) is also reported.
Leukocytes (WBC) are counted and classified in different analytical channels, using lysing and fluorescent staining reagents, and channel-specific detectors for FS, SS, and fluorescence of each cell, elaborating information on cell size, cytoplasmic granules, and nuclear characteristics. All measurements are combined in scatterplots, which provide a visual representation of cell cluster distribution according to the analyzed properties. The intensity of fluorescent signal reflects the degree to which the cells are stained and is plotted along the Y axis. The internal complexity is plotted along the X axis and the cell size is plotted along the Z axis. Cell population data (CPD) are the numerical coordinates to compose those clusters in the scattergram according to the morphology of the leukocyte subsets (Figure 2).
Reticulocyte counts are measured from FS and side fluorescence signals after staining with a proprietary fluorochrome. The optical platelets count can also be obtained from this channel.
Immature platelet fraction (IPF) can be detected and quantified since there is a large amount of RNA in IPF, which produce higher FL (RNA) and FS (size) signals (Figure 3).
Quality control assurance was carried out according to manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of data was validated by routine use of BC-6D and BC-RET quality control materials (Mindray Diagnostics, Shenzhen, China), based on three different levels.

2.1.2. Implantation: Quality Control and Metrological Aspects

Quality control assurance was carried out according to manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of data was validated by routine use of BC-6D and BC-RET quality control materials (Mindray Diagnostics, Shenzhen, China), based on three different levels; mean, standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) were recorded daily for CBC and reticulocytes establish the between-batch precision.
Within run precision can be checked automatically; fresh blood samples (with different concentrations of individual parameters) are processed ten consecutive times; the counter calculates mean, standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV).
All blood specimens used in these studies and stability verification were residual material that remained after all medically requested tests had been completed. The patient identification was known only to the laboratory.
CBC parameters may be affected by several preanalytical phase variables which could potentially bias results. These include time between phlebotomy and analysis, and storage/transport conditions.
For the stability study, 25 blood specimens were analyzed, including healthy subjects and samples in a wide range of RBC and WBC values.
The specimens were processed (T0) and left at room temperature (RT).
Analysis was performed after 2, 4, and 8 h of storage.
Then samples were spiked in 2 aliquots, one stored at room temperature and the other refrigerated at 4 °C overnight; all were processed after 24 h.
The stability limits (SL) were calculated SL = ±1.65 Cvi.
Cvi is the between-day imprecision calculated from the internal quality control Mindray BC-RET level 2 for each parameter in the 3 months period in use.
Percentage deviations (PD) were calculated PD = 100/n × Σ (Yi − **, cytoplasmic hypogranularity and pseudo-Chediak-Higashi granules and small size [11]. Recent studies have found that CPD reflecting the cellular characteristics of neutrophils like cell internal complexity or granularity, can be used to detect dysgranulopoiesis [12].
Despite technical matters, the identification of MDS through CBC and RUO data related to the granulocyte dysplasia has been explored over years. Different researchers have conducted studies using Sysmex analyzers [13,14,15,16,17,18].
Also, predictive scoring systems have been proposed using these parameters for the diagnosis of MDS, even using advanced machine learning algorithms [19,20]. Few data from Beckman Coulter and Abbott counters have been published [21,22,23,24].
Regarding platelets and derived new parameters, our study demonstrates that the immature fraction presents opposite trends in MDS versus macrocytic anemia and non-MDS cytopenia.
Despite the technical matters, similar to those previously stated for RUO parameters, IPF has been considered a reliable marker for the differential diagnosis of thrombocytopenic disorders and can contribute to distinguish peripheral thrombocytopenia with high diagnostic performance [25,26].
Our data are in concordance with previous published data: increased values have been found in patients with MDS, even in the absence of thrombocytopenia; in such cases, IPF would not be associated with an increase in megakaryopoiesis, but the underlying mechanism remains unknown. Moreover, a relationship between the increase in IPF and the poor prognosis in patients with MDS has been suggested [27,28].
Macrocytic anemia, a hallmark of MDS, is due to ineffective erythropoiesis with a high degree of apoptosis of marrow erythroid progenitors. MCV is usually increased in a many non-clonal anemias: liver diseases and endocrinological, vitamin deficiencies, etc. Diagnosis of MDS when anemia is the only abnormality can be complicated [29], especially in the older population, in whom a certain degree of anemia is expected and considered normal by many clinicians. The early diagnosis enables optimal care of these patients, but it is difficult to detect those patients whose CBC only present a mild anemia, as our results show.
Several articles have highlighted the contribution of RBC analysis to MDS diagnosis. Using Sysmex-XN, Boutault et al. showed that MCV was significantly increased in MDS patients versus non-clonal cytopenias and included MCV in a score [19]. Ravalet et al. reported similar MVC using the DxH 800 Beckman Coulter analyzer [23].
In microscopic examinations of RBCs from MDS patients, anisocytosis and poikilocytosis are also frequently observed, which can be quantified by means of RDW. Certain analyzers can report other distribution parameter similar to RDW: HDW or Hb distribution width, which reflects anisochromia, and the distribution of Hb in the individual red cells. Both parameters could be useful in the screening of MDS among other anemias, as suggested by Hwang et al., using the Abbott Alinity-hq analyzer. RDW, HDW, MCV and MCH were higher in MDS patients than in non-clonal cytopenias [24], and the values are in full agreement with our results.
Among RUO parameters, the best attention has been paid to those related to the granulocyte dysplasia, which is typical feature of MDS. Despite different technologies, Neu X provided by analyzers from different brands was correlated with the morphological change of neutrophil-decreased granules. Granularity index can be derived from data of the Mindray [10] Sysmex, Abbott and Beckman Coulter analyzers [30,31,32].
Neu X, Neu Y and Neu Z can reflect in numbers the severe alterations of the neutrophil morphology, internal complexity (Neu X), nucleic acid content (Neu Y) and cellular size (Neu Z). In our study, all of them presented significant lower values compared to the values seen in other maladies, macrocytic anemia and cytopenic non-MDS patients.
Our results confirm those previously reported using Sysmex analyzers (those using fluorescence flow cytometry like the analytical principles on Mindray counters). NEUT-X and NEUT-Y are privative of Sysmex counters, with similar morphological meaning as Neu X and Neu Y, respectively.
Le Roux et al., using Sysmex XE-2100 counter concluded that a low NEUT-X value in combination with anemia was strongly correlated with MDS [30]. Furundarena et al. with the same analyzer verified these results and suggested the value of NEUT-Y to detect neutrophil dysplasia arising from MDS [13].
It must be stated that, due to the lack of standardization among different brands, CPD cannot be used interchangeably, and instrument-specific clinical decision limits are required. This study was conducted in one hospital, and thus the cut offs selected must be verified in a multicentric evaluation.
The use of Neu X and Neu Y are convenient and objective markers obtained from the automated analyzer along with the CBC. This could help to detect MDS rapidly without additional costs, improving the efficiency of the laboratory process and contributing to making final diagnose of the patients in time.

5. Conclusions

The diagnosis of MDS is frequently challenging, especially in terms of the distinction from the other non-neoplastic causes of cytopenia. Research parameters from hematology analyzers may be useful to discriminate MDS-related cytopenia. Parameters such as Neu X (related to the cytoplasmic complexity) and Neu Y (related to nucleic acid content) show promise to detect dysplasia of MDS and aid to recognize MDS from cytopenias of other etiologies.

Author Contributions

E.U. was responsible for the study conceptualization, data management and drafted the manuscript; M.F. recruited patients and recorded all clinical data; U.A. performed the statistical analysis, data analysis and visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Hospital Galdako Usansoo, with code: 00455/2019.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data collected and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sekeres, M.A.; Taylor, J. Diagnosis and Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Review. JAMA 2022, 328, 872–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Garcia-Manero, G. Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am. J. Haematol. 2023, 98, 1307–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Khan, A.M. Why are myelodysplastic syndromes unrecognized and underdiagnosed? A primary care perspective. Am. J. Med. 2012, 125, S15–S17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bastida, J.M.; López-Godino, O.; Vicente-Sánchez, A.; Bonanad-Boix, S.; **coy-Cirici, B.; Hernández-Sánchez, J.M.; Such, E.; Cervera, J.; Caballero-Berrocal, J.C.; López-Cadenas, F.; et al. Hidden myelodysplastic syndrome(MDS): A prospective study to confirm or exclude MDS inpatients with anemia of uncertain etiology. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2019, 41, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fenaux, P.; Haase, D.; Santini, V.; Sanz, G.; Platzbecker, U.; Mey, U. Myelodysplastic syndromes: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2021, 32, 142–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Swerdlow, S.H.; Campo, E.; Harris, N.L.; Jaffe, E.S.; Pileri, S.A.; Stein, H.; Thiele, J.; Vardiman, J.W. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues; IARC Press: Lyon, France, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  7. Greenberg, P.L.; Tuechler, H.; Schanz, J.; Sanz, G.; Garcia-Manero, G.; Solé, F.; Bennett, J.M.; Bowen, D.; Fenaux, P.; Dreyfus, F.; et al. Revised International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Blood 2012, 120, 2454–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhu, J.; Clauser, S.; Freynet, N.; Bardet, V. Automated Detection of Dysplasia: Data Mining from Our Hematology Analyzers. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. BC-6800 Plus Auto Hematology Analyzer. Operator’s Manual; Mindray Bio-medical Electronics Co., Ltd.: Shenzhen, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sun, P.; Li, N.; Zhang, S.; Liu, S.; Zhang, H.; Yue, B. Combination of NeuX and NeuZ can predict neutrophil dysplasia features of myelodysplastic neoplasms in peripheral blood. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2023, 45, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, H.; Hu, F.; Gale, R.P.; Sekeres, M.A.; Liang, Y. Myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2022, 8, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shekhar, R.; Srinivasan, V.K.; Pai, S. How I investigate dysgranulopoiesis. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2021, 43, 538–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Furundarena, J.R.; Araiz, M.; Uranga, M.; Sainz, M.R.; Agirre, A.; Trassorras, M.; Uresandi, N.; Montes, M.C.; Argoitia, N. The utility of the Sysmex XE-2100 analyzer’s NEUT-X and NEUT-Y parameters for detecting neutrophil dysplasia in myelodysplastic syndromes. Int. J. Lab. Hem. 2010, 32, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Goel, S.; Sachdev, R.; Gajendra, S.; Jha, B.; Sahni, T.; Dorwal, P.; Srivastava, C.; Tiwari, A.K.; Sood, N.; Gupta, S.; et al. Picking up myelodysplastic syndromes and megaloblastic anemias on peripheral blood: Use of NEUT-X and NEUT-Y in guiding smear reviews. Int. J. Lab. Hem. 2015, 37, e48–e51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, H.; Han, E.; Lee, H.K.; Kim, Y.; Han, K. Screening of myelodysplastic syndrome using cell population data obtained from an automatic hematology analyzer. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2021, 43, e54–e57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Murphy, P.T.; Bergin, S.; O’Brien, M.; Healy, G.; Murphy, P.W.; Glavey, S.; Quinn, J. Cell population data from Sysmex XN analyzer and myelodysplastic syndrome. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2022, 44, e138–e139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Di Luise, D.; Giannotta, J.A.; Ammirabile, M.; De Zordi, V.; Torricelli, S.; Bottalico, S.; Chiaretto, M.L.; Fattizzo, B.; Migliorini, A.C.; Ceriotti, F. Cell Population Data NE-WX, NE-FSC, LY-Y of Sysmex XN-9000 can provide additional information to differentiate macrocytic anaemia from myelodysplastic syndrome: A preliminary study. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2022, 44, e40–e43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kwiecień, I.; Rutkowska, E.; Gawroński, K.; Kulik, K.; Dudzik, A.; Zakrzewska, A.; Raniszewska, A.; Sawicki, W.; Rzepecki, P. Usefulness of New Neutrophil-Related Hematologic Parameters in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome. Cancers 2023, 15, 2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Boutault, R.; Peterlin, P.; Boubaya, M.; Sockel, K.; Chevallier, P.; Garnier, A.; Guillaume, T.; Le Bourgeois, A.; Debord, C.; Godon, C.; et al. A novel complete blood count-based score to screen for myelodysplastic syndrome in cytopenic patients. Br. J. Haematol. 2018, 183, 736–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Pozdnyakova, O.; Niculescu, R.S.; Kroll, T.; Golemme, L.; Raymond, N.; Briggs, D.; Kim, A. Beyond the routine CBC: Machine learning and statistical analyses identify research CBC parameter associations with myelodysplastic syndromes and specific underlying pathogenic variants. J. Clin. Pathol. 2023, 76, 624–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Raess, P.W.; van de Geijn, G.J.M.; Njo, T.L.; Klop, B.; Sukhachev, D.; Wertheim, G.; McAleer, T.; Master, S.R.; Bagg, A. Automated screening for myelodysplastic syndromes through analysis of complete blood count and cell population data parameters. Am. J. Hematol. 2014, 89, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, S.Y.; Park, Y.; Kim, H.; Kim, J.; Kwon, G.C.; Koo, S.H. Discriminating myelodysplastic syndrome and other myeloid malignancies from non-clonal disorders by multiparametric analysis of automated cell data. Clin. Chim. Acta 2018, 480, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ravalet, N.; Foucault, A.; Picou, F.; Gombert, M.; Renoult, E.; Lejeune, J.; Vallet, N.; Lachot, S.; Rault, E.; Gyan, E.; et al. Automated Early Detection of Myelodysplastic Syndrome within the General Population Using the Research Parameters of Beckman–Coulter DxH 800 Hematology Analyzer. Cancers 2021, 13, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hwang, S.M.; Nam, Y. Complete blood count and cell population data parameters from the Abbott Alinity hq analyzer are useful in differentiating myelodysplastic syndromes from other forms of cytopenia. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2022, 44, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dima, F.; Hoffmann, J.J.; Montolli, V.; Lippi, G. Assessment of reticulated platelets with automated hemocytometers: Are we measuring the same thing? Diagnosis 2016, 3, 91–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Briggs, C.; Kunka, S.; Hart, D.; Oguni, S.; Machin, S.J. Assessment of an immature platelet fraction IPF in peripheral thrombocytopenia. Br. J. Haematol. 2004, 126, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Larruzea Ibarra, A.; Muñoz Marín, L.; Perea Durán, G.; Torra Puig, M. Evaluation of Immature Platelet Fraction in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Association with Poor Prognosis Factors. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2019, 57, e128–e130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sugimori, N.; Kondo, Y.; Shibayama, M.; Omote, M.; Takami, A.; Sugimori, C.; Ishiyama, K.; Yamazaki, H.; Nakao, S. Aberrant increase in the immature platelet fraction in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: A marker of karyotypic abnormalities associated with poor prognosis. J. Haematol. 2019, 82, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Santini, V. Anemia as the Main Manifestation of Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Semin. Hematol. 2015, 52, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Le Roux, G.; Vlad, A.; Eclache, V.; Malanquin, C.; Collon, J.-F.; Gantier, M.; Schillinger, F.; Peltier, J.-Y.; Savin, B.; Letestu, R.; et al. Routine diagnostic procedures of myelodysplastic syndromes: Value of a structural blood cell parameter (NEUT-X) determined by the Sysmex XE-2100. Int. J. Lab. Hem. 2010, 32, e237–e243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Inaba, T.; Yuki, Y.; Yuasa, S.; Fujita, N.; Yoshitomi, K.; Kamisako, T.; Torii, K.; Okada, T.; Urasaki, Y.; Ueda, T.; et al. Clinical utility of the neutrophil distribution pattern obtained using the CELL-DYN SAPPHIRE hematology analyzer for the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome. Int. J. Hematol. 2011, 94, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shestakova, A.; Nael, A.; Nora, V.; Rezk, S.; Zhao, X. Automated leukocyte parameters are useful in the assessment of myelodysplastic syndromes. Cytometry B Clin. Cytom. 2021, 100, 299–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The V/HC cytogram, Mie map, and Hb concentration is plotted along the X axis and cell volume is plotted along the Y axis. Only red blood cells appear on this cytogram. Markers organize the cytogram into 9 distinct areas of red blood cell morphology. On the X axis, Hb concentration markers are set at 28.0 g/dL and 41.0 g/dL. RBC with a Hb concentration < 28.0 g/dL are hypochromic, while cells with a Hb concentration > 41.0 g/dL are hyperchromic. On the Y axis, red cell volume markers are set at 60 fL and 120 fL. Red cells with a volume < 60.0 fL are microcytic, while cells with a volume > 120.0 fL are macrocytic.
Figure 1. The V/HC cytogram, Mie map, and Hb concentration is plotted along the X axis and cell volume is plotted along the Y axis. Only red blood cells appear on this cytogram. Markers organize the cytogram into 9 distinct areas of red blood cell morphology. On the X axis, Hb concentration markers are set at 28.0 g/dL and 41.0 g/dL. RBC with a Hb concentration < 28.0 g/dL are hypochromic, while cells with a Hb concentration > 41.0 g/dL are hyperchromic. On the Y axis, red cell volume markers are set at 60 fL and 120 fL. Red cells with a volume < 60.0 fL are microcytic, while cells with a volume > 120.0 fL are macrocytic.
Diagnostics 14 01322 g001
Figure 2. Each leukocyte can be described by 3 optical signals appearing in the DIFF scattergram: the coordinates to compose this scattergram are the morphometric parameters, so called Cell Population Data. CPD are related to the morphology and functional characteristics of the leukocyte populations and report on internal cellular complexity: Neu X, Lym X, Mon X; nucleic acid content: Neu Y, Lym Y, Mon Y; and cell size: Neu Z, Lym Z, Mon Z.
Figure 2. Each leukocyte can be described by 3 optical signals appearing in the DIFF scattergram: the coordinates to compose this scattergram are the morphometric parameters, so called Cell Population Data. CPD are related to the morphology and functional characteristics of the leukocyte populations and report on internal cellular complexity: Neu X, Lym X, Mon X; nucleic acid content: Neu Y, Lym Y, Mon Y; and cell size: Neu Z, Lym Z, Mon Z.
Diagnostics 14 01322 g002
Figure 3. PLT-O Scattergram (reticulocyte channel). X axis represents the fluorescence signal; Y axis represents forward scatter light. IPF is gated within a certain area showing stronger fluorescent signals. PLT-O optical platelets. 1: Platelets. 2: Immature platelets. 3: Optical red blood cells.
Figure 3. PLT-O Scattergram (reticulocyte channel). X axis represents the fluorescence signal; Y axis represents forward scatter light. IPF is gated within a certain area showing stronger fluorescent signals. PLT-O optical platelets. 1: Platelets. 2: Immature platelets. 3: Optical red blood cells.
Diagnostics 14 01322 g003
Figure 4. Box and whisker plots of the NEUT-X parameter for the different patient groups. Median in the MDS group was significantly lower (279 arbitrary units, au) when compared to the groups, macrocytic anemia and no-MDS cytopenias (355 au and 350, respectively).
Figure 4. Box and whisker plots of the NEUT-X parameter for the different patient groups. Median in the MDS group was significantly lower (279 arbitrary units, au) when compared to the groups, macrocytic anemia and no-MDS cytopenias (355 au and 350, respectively).
Diagnostics 14 01322 g004
Figure 5. Box and whisker plots of the NEUT-Y parameter for the different patient groups. Median in the MDS group was significantly lower (362 arbitrary units, au) when compared to the groups, macrocytic anemia and no-MDS cytopenias (413 au and 436 au, respectively).
Figure 5. Box and whisker plots of the NEUT-Y parameter for the different patient groups. Median in the MDS group was significantly lower (362 arbitrary units, au) when compared to the groups, macrocytic anemia and no-MDS cytopenias (413 au and 436 au, respectively).
Diagnostics 14 01322 g005
Figure 6. Box and whisker plots of the NEUT-Z parameter for the different patient groups. Median in the MDS group was significantly lower (1604 arbitrary units) when compared to the groups, macrocytic anemia and no-MDS cytopenias (1869 au and 1849 au, respectively).
Figure 6. Box and whisker plots of the NEUT-Z parameter for the different patient groups. Median in the MDS group was significantly lower (1604 arbitrary units) when compared to the groups, macrocytic anemia and no-MDS cytopenias (1869 au and 1849 au, respectively).
Diagnostics 14 01322 g006
Figure 7. Box and whisker plots of the immature platelet fraction for the different patient groups. Median in the MDS group was significantly higher (14.4%) when compared to the groups, macrocytic anemia and no-MDS cytopenias (5.4% and 7.5%, respectively).
Figure 7. Box and whisker plots of the immature platelet fraction for the different patient groups. Median in the MDS group was significantly higher (14.4%) when compared to the groups, macrocytic anemia and no-MDS cytopenias (5.4% and 7.5%, respectively).
Diagnostics 14 01322 g007
Figure 8. Box and whisker plots of the percentage of macrocytic red cells for the different patient groups. Median in the MDS group was significantly higher (9.8%) when compared to the no-MDS cytopenias group (5.8%).
Figure 8. Box and whisker plots of the percentage of macrocytic red cells for the different patient groups. Median in the MDS group was significantly higher (9.8%) when compared to the no-MDS cytopenias group (5.8%).
Diagnostics 14 01322 g008
Table 1. To quantify within-run precision, 10 peripheral blood samples were processed 10 consecutive times; the counter can calculate mean, standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV). We report the results obtained for RUO parameters.
Table 1. To quantify within-run precision, 10 peripheral blood samples were processed 10 consecutive times; the counter can calculate mean, standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV). We report the results obtained for RUO parameters.
MeanSDCVMeanSDCVMeanSDCV
Neu X3221.10.353752.70.753673.81.0
Neu Y4583.90.853932.80.723921.90.48
Neu Z19316.20.3219637.50.39180611.10.61
Lym X941.972.0830.770.92871.21.37
Lym Y5968.51.436118.51.395786.61.14
Lym Z97910.11.19714.40.459578.80.92
Mon X2144.51.91852.51.352011.90.95
Mon Y869202.390413.81.5384310.71.27
Mon Z136418.71.33133314.71.113519.90.73
IPF7.30.547.42.50.166.43.750.25.3
MIC0.630.0610.50.650.058.121.80.190.88
MAC6.90.152.12.70.114.21.210.087.1
HPER0.520.048.071.330.043.61.780.784.4
HPO0.860.089.80.130.043.53.20.092.9
RDW33.80.381.1239.80.190.4852.90.230.44
HDW23.040.210.94200.291.4540.40.330.82
Neu X, neutrophils complexity; Neu Y, neutrophils fluorescence; Neu Z, neutrophils size; Lym X, lymphocytes complexity; Lym Y, lymphocytes fluorescence; Lym Z, lymphocytes size; Mon X, monocytes complexity; Mon Y, monocytes fluorescence; Mon Z, monocytes size. Cell Population Data rare reported in arbitrary optical units. IPF immature platelet fraction (%); MIC, microcytic red cells (%); MAC macrocytic RBC (%); HYPER, hyperchromic RBCs (%); HYPO, hypochromic RBCs (%); RDW, red cell distribution width; and HDW, hemoglobin distribution width (g/L).
Table 2. Complete blood counts and research parameters obtained using the Mindray BC 6800 Plus analyzer in various groups: healthy subjects, macrocytic anemia, cytopenias and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). p values, significance of the differences when compared with the MDS values.
Table 2. Complete blood counts and research parameters obtained using the Mindray BC 6800 Plus analyzer in various groups: healthy subjects, macrocytic anemia, cytopenias and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). p values, significance of the differences when compared with the MDS values.
HealthyMacrocytic Cytopenia MDS
MedianIQRMedianIQRp-ValueMedianIQRp-ValueMedianIQR
WBC6.574.93–8.779.004.5–11.70.00923.252.38–4.010.0183.982.9–4.95
RBC4.654.22–5.223.283.08–4.020.46783.743.24–4.150.033.472.99–3.88
Hb134125–15510379–1110.310310299–1280.0679996–119
MCV92.387.0–95.5103.499.8–113.80.000493.786.1–100.00.00197.890.2–105.1
MCH28.928.5–31.331.930.5–35.10.004929.928.7–30.30.18828.927.5–29.8
MCHC312310–322306295–3181318314–3330.178316313–330
RDW44.241.0–48.152.549.1–63.50.222748.242.3–53.7 54.748.9–59.4
Platelets266190–352253148–3750.00018532–1480.00111962–191
IPF4.12.0–6.45.42.9–9.8<0.00017.53.6–13.20.000114.44.0–23.8
MIC0.780.3–1.81.140.3–1.50.00451.150.99–4.10.041.551.0–3.2
MAC3.42.3–4.810.97.8–21.20.0285.83–7.80.0019.83.1–18
HYPER1.70.8–3.62.90.7–4.20.13010.940.45–1.60.022.030.7–3.5
HYPO0.10–0.20.60.2–1.70.01690.870.2–1.50.080.790.1–1.1
HDW19.115.9–23.823.916.2–380.0822.919.1–26.90.0325.218.1–29.0
Neu X332303–369355317–374<0.0001350290–3880.0001279195–305
Neu Y3823663–407413362–4330.0009436405–475<0.0001362299–403
Neu Z19511873–206118691702–1987<0.000118491780–1981<0.000116041378–1771
Lym X9086–949084–970.2789589–1000.11539286–96
Lym Y592565–624594569–6260.0005634600–6590.7947640578–675
Lym Z10211002–10421011966–10330.59381031999–10570.21191019933–1051
Mon X197190–208208196–2220.7304208191–2220.7389206188–226
Mon Y858827–906881834–9410.0025940855–9790.3556968865–1039
Mon Z13871339–145114131354–14410.344714011332–14450.893213981338–1420
Neut3.622.38–5.695.951.46–7.02<0.00012.221.45–3.030.051.831.45–3.39
Lymph2.271.45–3.141.990.83–2.40.041.591.18–2.220.2121.510.99–2.18
Mono0.440.31–0.640.90.23–0.990.0010.520.38–0.730.030.390.19–0.68
Abbreviations: MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome, IQ interquartils; WBC, leukocyte count (×109/L); RBC, red blood cells (×1012/L); Hb, Hemoglobin (g/L); MCV, mean cell volume (fL); MCH, mean cell hemoglobin (pg); MCHC, mean cell hemoglobin concentration (g/L); RDW, red cell distribution width (fL); IPF immature platelet fraction (%); MIC, microcytic red cells (%); MAC macrocytic RBC (%); HYPER, hyperchromic RBCs (%); HYPO, hypochromic RBCs (%); HDW, hemoglobin distribution width (g/L); Neu X, neutrophils complexity; Neu Y, neutrophils fluorescence; Neu Z, neutrophils size; Lym X, lymphocytes complexity; Lym Y, lymphocytes fluorescence; Lym Z, lymphocytes size; Mon X, monocytes complexity; Mon Y, monocytes fluorescence; Mon Z, monocytes size; Neut, neutrophils (×109/L); Lymph, lymphocytes (×109/L); Mono, monocytes (×109/L). Cell Population Data rare reported in arbitrary optical units. IQR: Interquartile range.
Table 3. The performance of the research use only parameters to detect myelodysplastic syndromes among other cytopenias was studied using receiver operating characteristic curves.
Table 3. The performance of the research use only parameters to detect myelodysplastic syndromes among other cytopenias was studied using receiver operating characteristic curves.
AUC95% CICut offSensitivity %Specificity %
Neu X0.8360.728–0.944<330 au80.581.3
Neu Y0.8250.705–0.944<375 au58.996.0
Neu Z0.8410.731–0.951<1700 au83.180.8
IPF0.7870.642–0.933>10.5%72.180.9
MAC0.7980.714–0.878>9.8%50.886.1
RDW0.7650.677–0.855>55 fL70.879.2
AUC, area under curve; CI, confidence interval; Neu X, neutrophils complexity; Neu Y, neutrophils fluorescence; and Neu Z, neutrophils size, all reported in arbitrary units. IPF, Immature platelet fraction; MAC, percentage of macrocytic red cells; and RDW, red cell distribution width.
Table 4. Results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Table 4. Results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis.
OR95%CIp ValueCut off
Neu X19.232.00–185.260.01<330 au
Neu Y39.652.91–538.990.006<375 au
AUC (95% CI)0.88 (0.79–0.95)
AUC, area under curve; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; Neu X, neutrophils complexity; and Neu Y, neutrophils fluorescence.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Urrechaga, E.; Fernández, M.; Aguirre, U. Complete Blood Counts and Research Parameters in the Detection of Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1322. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14131322

AMA Style

Urrechaga E, Fernández M, Aguirre U. Complete Blood Counts and Research Parameters in the Detection of Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(13):1322. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14131322

Chicago/Turabian Style

Urrechaga, Eloísa, Mónica Fernández, and Urko Aguirre. 2024. "Complete Blood Counts and Research Parameters in the Detection of Myelodysplastic Syndromes" Diagnostics 14, no. 13: 1322. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14131322

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop