Next Article in Journal
Systemic Symptoms as Potential Predictors of Chronic Neck Pain on Initial Examination: Can Systemic Symptoms Act as a Predictor of Neck Pain?
Previous Article in Journal
Genicular Artery Embolization: A New Tool for the Management of Refractory Osteoarthritis-Related Knee Pain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

No Additional Effects of Sequential Facilitatory Cerebral and Cerebellar rTMS in Subacute Stroke Patients

1
Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular and Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Department of Medical Device Management & Research, Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06355, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(7), 687; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070687
Submission received: 30 April 2024 / Revised: 20 June 2024 / Accepted: 24 June 2024 / Published: 26 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Medicine, Cell, and Organism Physiology)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the additional effects of cerebellar rTMS on the motor recovery of facilitatory rTMS over affected primary motor cortex (M1) in subacute stroke patients. Twenty-eight subacute stroke patients were recruited in this single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. The Cr-Cbll group received Cr-Cbll rTMS stimulation consisting of high-frequency rTMS over affected M1 (10 min), motor training (10 min), and high-frequency rTMS over contralesional Cbll (10 min). The Cr-sham group received sham rTMS instead of high-frequency rTMS over the cerebellum. Ten daily sessions were performed for 2 weeks. A Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) was measured before (T0), immediately after (T1), and 2 months after the intervention (T2). A total of 20 participants (10 in the Cr-Cbll group and 10 in the Cr-sham group) completed the intervention. There was no significant difference in clinical characteristics between the two groups at T0. FMA was significantly improved after the intervention in both Cr-Cbll and Cr-sham groups (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant interaction in FMA between time and group. In conclusion, these results could not demonstrate that rTMS over the contralesional cerebellum has additional effects to facilitatory rTMS over the affected M1 for improving motor function in subacute stroke patients.
Keywords: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; stroke; motor learning; cerebellum; rehabilitation repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; stroke; motor learning; cerebellum; rehabilitation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, H.S.; Kim, S.; Kim, H.; Baik, S.-m.; Kim, D.H.; Chang, W.H. No Additional Effects of Sequential Facilitatory Cerebral and Cerebellar rTMS in Subacute Stroke Patients. J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14, 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070687

AMA Style

Lee HS, Kim S, Kim H, Baik S-m, Kim DH, Chang WH. No Additional Effects of Sequential Facilitatory Cerebral and Cerebellar rTMS in Subacute Stroke Patients. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2024; 14(7):687. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070687

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Ho Seok, Sungwon Kim, Heegoo Kim, Seung-min Baik, Dae Hyun Kim, and Won Hyuk Chang. 2024. "No Additional Effects of Sequential Facilitatory Cerebral and Cerebellar rTMS in Subacute Stroke Patients" Journal of Personalized Medicine 14, no. 7: 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070687

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop