Next Article in Journal
Study on the Optimization of Investment Casting Process of Exhaust Elbow for High-Power Engine
Next Article in Special Issue
Importance of Changes in the Copper Production Process through Mining and Metallurgical Activities on the Surface Water Quality in the Bor Area, Serbia
Previous Article in Journal
Characteristics of Oxide Films on Zr702 and Their Corrosion Performance in Boiling Fluorinated Nitric Acid
Previous Article in Special Issue
From Bauxite as a Critical Material to the Required Properties of Cast Aluminum Alloys for Use in Electro Automotive Parts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Status of Production, Administration Policies, and Low-Carbon Technology Development of China’s Steel Industry

by
Yufeng Qiao
and
Guang Wang
*
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Metallurgy, University of Science and Technology Bei**g, Bei**g 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2024, 14(4), 480; https://doi.org/10.3390/met14040480
Submission received: 14 March 2024 / Revised: 12 April 2024 / Accepted: 16 April 2024 / Published: 20 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Extractive Metallurgy)

Abstract

:
In 2023, China’s crude steel production amount reached 1.019 billion tons, and the energy consumption of China’s steel industry amount reached 561 million tons of coal. China’s steel industry, with its dominant reliance on coal for energy and the primary use of blast furnaces and converters in production processes, as well as its massive output, has become the main field for achieving China’s “carbon peaking” and “carbon neutrality” goals. Firstly, this article summarizes the current production status of the steel industry and the situation of carbon emissions in the steel industry. Secondly, it discusses the dual-carbon policies based on the national and steel industry levels and outlines the future directions for China’s steel industry. Subsequently, it analyzes the current state of research and application of mature and emerging low-carbon technology in China’s steel industry and details the low-carbon plans of China’s steel companies using the low-carbon technology roadmaps of two representative steel companies as examples. Finally, the article gives policy suggestions for the further carbon reduction of China’s steel industry. The purpose of this paper is to show the efforts and contributions of China’s steel industry to the early realization of its “carbon peaking” and “carbon neutrality” goals.

1. Introduction

The increase in greenhouse gas emissions, such as carbon dioxide and methane, caused by human industrial, energy, and other activities is the main cause of global warming. Global warming leads to climate problems, such as rising sea levels and increasing extreme weather, and indirectly causes conflicts and economic issues. China currently possesses the world’s most comprehensive and largest-scale steel industry system, equipped with the world’s most advanced equipment and technology [1]. This industry can provide the most abundant iron and steel products. As an important basic industry, the steel industry contributes to the material foundation and material security of national economic development. However, the steel industry has been under significant pressure due to its environmental impact [2]. The steel industry is a resource-intensive and energy-intensive industry, while it is a high-energy-consumption and high-emission industry [3]. China’s crude steel production is about 1.019 billion tons, ranking first globally. The steel industry’s carbon emissions account for 15% of China’s carbon dioxide emissions, and it is the second largest emitting industry [4]. Therefore, the steel industry faces enormous pressure to reduce carbon emissions.
China announced it will strive to reach peak carbon dioxide emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060 [5]. As a major contributor to China’s carbon emissions, the steel industry has received increasing attention recently. The Chinese government, large steel enterprises, universities, research institutions, and others have all carried out relevant work. On 24 December 2021, the Chinese government issued the “Working Guidance for Carbon Dioxide Peaking and Carbon Neutrality in Full and Faithful Implementation of the New Development Philosophy” [6]. It pointed out the formulation of action plans for carbon peaking in the energy, steel, and other industries to accelerate low-carbon technological development in the industrial sector. On 20 January 2022, the Chinese government issued “The Guiding Opinions on Promoting the High-Quality Development of the Steel Industry” [7]. It pointed out that innovative development, total quantity control, low-carbon development and overall co-ordination are the basic principles to achieve high-quality development in the steel industry. On 18 November 2021, Baowu Steel Group established a Low-Carbon Metallurgy Innovation Center and completed the construction of a Hydrogen-enriched Carbonic oxide Recycling Oxygenate Furnace (HyCROF), providing support for the progress of low-carbon metallurgical technology [8]. In December 2022, through the implementation of the “Hegang Low-Carbon Product Plan”, Hegang Group promotes the innovation of low-carbon technologies with upstream and downstream industries by using carbon reduction technologies such as biomass energy substitution and carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) [9]. In 2021, Capital Engineering & Research Incorporated was approved to establish the Low-Carbon Technology Research Institute (Bei**g) of China Metallurgical Corporation, which provides a solid foundation for future low-carbon technology research and development. Northeastern University, University of Science and Technology Bei**g, Chongqing University, North China University of Science and Technology, and other universities have established low-carbon metallurgical research departments based on their advantageous disciplines of metallurgy and focus on the key technologies for low-carbon steelmaking to help China’s steel industry to achieve low-carbon development.
Although many scholars have discussed carbon emissions and low-carbon technologies in China’s steel industry [10,11], few have discussed low-carbon policies for the steel industry and steel enterprise’s carbon reduction technologies. To fill this gap, firstly, this article overviews the development status of China’s steel industry. Secondly, it discusses the dual-carbon policies based on the national and steel industry levels. Subsequently, it analyzes the current state of research on low-carbon technology in China’s steel industry and details the low-carbon plans of China’s steel companies. Finally, the article gives suggestions for further carbon reduction in China’s steel industry. It is aiming to provide a reference for China’s steel industry to achieve carbon peaking and carbon neutrality as soon as possible.

2. Current Production Status of China’s Steel Industry

2.1. Variations of Crude Steel Production Amount

China’s crude steel production amounts from less than one-thousandth of the world’s production amount when the People’s Republic of China was established, to 53.9% of the global crude steel production amount by 2023; this growth rate sets a new historical record for humanity [12]. Before 2000, China’s crude steel production amount showed relatively stable growth. However, starting in 2001, with China’s accession to the World Trade Organization and the subsequent surge in trade, China’s crude steel production amount began to surge. It increased from 150 million tons in 2001 to 1.019 billion tons in 2023, and the trend is shown in Figure 1 [13,14]. According to data from the National Bureau of Statistics of China, the country’s steel exports amount to 91.201 million tons, accounting for 8.94% of the production amount in 2023. This indicates that China’s steel production primarily aims to meet domestic demand, and the economic condition heavily influences the crude steel production level.

2.2. Overview of Carbon Emissions and Challenges Ahead

Currently, the carbon emissions from the Chinese steel industry account for approximately 15% of the country’s carbon emissions. The primary use of blast furnaces and converters in production processes in China’s steel industry contributes to the high level of carbon emissions because this process relies on coal and coke as the reducing agent and source of heat. The energy consumption of various major processes and carbon emission factors of the main raw materials are given in Table 1 and Figure 2 [15,16,17]. In recent years, the carbon dioxide emission from the Chinese steel industry has continued to increase, and the trend is shown in Figure 3. Until 2022, the carbon dioxide emissions from the Chinese steel industry had reached 1.823 billion tons [18,19,20,21].
The Chinese steel industry faces several challenges in reducing carbon emissions [1,22,23,24]: (1) Increasingly stringent carbon emission regulations. Since 2021, the Chinese government and relevant departments have introduced a series of policies requiring steel enterprises to reduce carbon emissions. For example, “The Guiding Opinions on Promoting the High-Quality Development of the Steel Industry” emphasizes the need for the steel industry to achieve carbon peaking before 2030. (2) Imbalanced low-carbon technology levels among enterprises. Some leading steel companies have already reached or are close to world-class levels in terms of equipment and key technologies. However, some companies still have relatively outdated equipment and technologies, leading to high energy consumption and emissions. This imbalance hinders carbon reduction efforts in China’s steel industry. (3) Lack of unified national low-carbon technology research and application plan. The Chinese steel industry has made significant progress in low-carbon technology recently. However, the development is still unbalanced. It is necessary to prioritize applying and develo** universally applicable low-carbon technology. Mature and highly applicable low-carbon technology should be promoted and widely adopted as soon as possible.

2.3. Predictions on China’s Steel Production Amount and Regional Distribution Changes

Whether or not the carbon emission can peak quickly depends on the amount of crude steel production. Although the crude steel production amount in China started to decline in 2022 and may enter a sustained slow decline, however, to support the sustainable development of emerging economies and China’s urbanization process, the steel industry will still maintain a large production amount in the future. It is projected that, by 2050, China’s crude steel production amount will decrease to 600 million tons; the trend is shown in Figure 4 [25]. To realize the sustainable development of China’s steel industry, we must focus on develo** low-carbon and zero-carbon technology. It can contribute to national carbon neutrality goals by achieving carbon neutrality within itself.
The future production layout of crude steel in China will primarily depend on factors such as the place of crude steel consumption and ore production, the costs of hydrogen energy, transportation, and carbon capture and storage (CCS). Under deep decarbonization, the Chinese steel industry will mainly be concentrated in the northern regions by 2050 [26]. The crude steel production amount has significantly increased in ** ** the social economy. Therefore, the steel industry’s low-carbon development is society’s responsibility. It is necessary to provide financial and policy support for the research of low-carbon technology from the national level and to promote the study of low-carbon technology by establishing a national-level industrialization experiment platform.
(3)
Select key technologies for research by process
Long processes currently dominate China’s iron and steel smelting, but the proportion of short processes will significantly increase, eventually forming a complementary situation. Therefore, research on low-carbon technology in the steel industry should be carried out using long and short processes. The development of carbon reduction technologies based on long processes is of great significance to the carbon peaking and initial carbon reduction of China’s steel industry, while the development of low-carbon technologies based on short processes is of decisive importance to realizing carbon neutrality in China’s steel industry.
(4)
Establish new research co-operation model
China’s government attaches great importance to the goal of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, so the relevant departments should play a leading role in the research of low-carbon technology. The research of low-carbon technology in the steel industry should be aimed at engineering applications, and enterprises, design institutes, and engineering companies in the leading position in the industry play an important role in the research of low-carbon technology. The research on low-carbon technology must rely on the proposal of original technology, which comes from a large amount of basic research. Therefore, it is inseparable from the active participation of universities and research institutes. The research work requires a large amount of workforce and material resources, and it is also essential to ensure the stability of funding channels and balance the relationship between inputs and benefits. Organizational models used in the European Union (EU) and Japan for metallurgical process development, such as Ultra Low CO2 Steelmaking (ULCOS), CO2 Ultimate Reduction in Steelmaking process by innovative technology for cool Earth 50 (COURSE50), etc., can be referenced, with efforts to mobilize more positive factors.

6. Conclusions

(1)
China’s steel industry faces significant pressure to reduce carbon emissions with its massive production, its dominant reliance on coal for energy, and the primary use of blast furnaces and converters in production processes. The Chinese steel industry has limited potential to reduce process energy consumption alone to achieve carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. It relies on technological innovation and continues investing in low-carbon technology research.
(2)
China’s steel industry prioritizes dual-carbon goals, and companies and research institutions are taking significant action to achieve them. However, the development of high-efficiency carbon reduction technologies in China is in its early stages and relatively behind compared to other countries. It has yet to reach the level of industrial application, and there is still a significant gap in obtaining world-class carbon reduction technologies.
(3)
Many Chinese steel companies have not proposed clear dual-carbon plans, and more unified research activities are needed at the industry level. Companies should establish their dual-carbon plans, co-operate with relevant universities and research institutions in collaborative research, and strive to achieve dual-carbon goals as soon as possible.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Q.; methodology, Y.Q.; formal analysis, Y.Q.; data curation, Y.Q.; writing—original draft, Y.Q.; writing—review and editing, G.W.; funding acquisition, G.W.; investigation, G.W.; supervision, G.W.; resources, G.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1960205), the China Baowu Low-Carbon Metallurgical Innovation Foundation (No. BWLCF202101 and No. BWLCF202104), and the China Minmetals Science and Technology Special Plan Foundation (No. 2020ZXA01).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, L.Q.; Chen, J. Discussion on Achieving “Carbon Peak” and Suggestions for Reducing Carbon in Iron and Steel Industry. China Metall. 2021, 31, 21–25+52. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bataille, C.; Åhman, M.; Neuhoff, K.; Nilsson, L.J.; Fischedick, M.; Lechtenböhmer, S.; Solano-Rodriquez, B.; Denis-Ryan, A.; Stiebert, S.; Waisman, H.; et al. A Review of Technology and Policy Deep Decarbonization Pathway Options for Making Energy-Intensive Industry Production Consistent with the Paris Agreement. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 187, 960–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yu, J.Y.; Xu, R.S.; Zhang, J.L.; Zheng, A.Y. A Review on Reduction Technology of Air Pollutant in Current China’s Iron and Steel Industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 414, 137659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, X.Y.; Li, B.; Lv, C.; Guan, Z.J.; Cai, B.F.; Lei, Y.; Yan, G. China’s Iron and Steel Industry Carbon Emissions Peak Pathways. Res. Environ. Sci. 2022, 35, 339–346. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, Y.; Guo, C.H.; Chen, X.J.; Jia, L.Q.; Guo, X.N.; Chen, R.S.; Zhang, M.S.; Chen, Z.Y.; Wang, H.D. Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality in China: Goals, Implementation Path and Prospects. China Geol. 2021, 4, 720–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Working Guidance for Carbon Dioxide Peaking and Carbon Neutrality in Full and Faithful Implementation of the New Development Philosophy. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-10/24/content_5644613.htm?eqid=dd0858d50015ab6900000004646e2a99 (accessed on 9 April 2024).
  7. The Guiding Opinions on Promoting the High-Quality Development of the Steel Industry. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-02/08/content_5672513.htm (accessed on 9 April 2024).
  8. Lin, A.C.; Yin, S.B.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, H.Q. Summary on lron and Steel Processes and Primary Investigation of Development Direction (Part two). Yunnan Metall. 2021, 5, 119–128+134. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tong, S.; Ai, L.Q.; Hong, L.K.; Li, Y.Q.; Sun, C.J.; Wang, X.F. Development of hydrogen metallurgy in China and research progress of key technologies. J. Iron Steel Res. 2024, 1, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ren, L.; Zhou, S.; Peng, T.D.; Ou, X.M. A Review of CO2 Emissions Reduction Technologies and Low-Carbon Development in the Iron and Steel Industry Focusing on China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 143, 110846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, J.S.; Shen, J.L.; Xu, L.S.; Zhang, Q. The CO2 Emission Reduction Path towards Carbon Neutrality in the Chinese Steel Industry: A Review. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2023, 99, 107017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, H.F.; **, X.D.; Zhou, J.C.; Li, X.P.; Lu, L.J. Review and Prospect of Green Development for Chinese Steel Industry. Iron Steel 2023, 58, 8–18. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dong, J.C.; Wang, X.Y.; Cai, B.F.; Wang, J.N.; Liu, H.; Yang, L.; **a, C.Y.; Lei, Y. Mitigation Technologies and Marginal Abatement Cost for Iron and Steel Industry in China. Environ. Eng. 2021, 10, 23–31+40. [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang, H.; Guan, M.K.; Wang, K.X.; Zhao, J.Y.; Yang, Q.Z. Research on the Coal Saving and Emission Reduction Potential of Advanced Technologies in China’s Iron and Steel Industry. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2024, 78, 101373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bei, L.; Gao, Y.W.; Wang, A.N.; Yang, W.; Wang, B.; Liu, H.T.; Sun, S.L. Analysis of Energy Consumption of Main Production Processes in Iron and Steel Enterprise. Energy Res. Manag. 2023, 4, 175–180. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wei, Y.L.; Huang, S.L.; Yu, Z.W.; Wu, Z.Y.; Cheng, T.; Long, H.M.; Wann, W. Development and Application of Key Synergistic Technologies Continuously Reducing Energy Consumption in Sintering Process. Sinter. Pelletizing 2023, 4, 110–118+126. [Google Scholar]
  17. GB/T 32151.5-2015; Greenhouse Gas Emissions Accounting and Reporting Requirements. Standards Press of China: Bei**g, China, 2015.
  18. Shangguan, F.Q.; Liu, Z.D.; Yin, R.Y. Study on Implementation Path of “Carbon Peak” and “carbon Neutrality” in Steel Industry in China. China Metall. 2021, 31, 15–20. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhu, R.; Wei, G.S.; Zhang, H.J. Research and Prospect of EAF Steelmaking with Near-Zero Carbon Emissions. Iron Steel 2022, 57, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wei, R.F.; Zheng, X.T.; Li, J.X.; Jiao, L.L.; Mao, X.M.; Xu, H.F. Reaction Behavior of Burden above Soft Melting Zone in Carbon Cycle Oxygen Blast Furnace. Iron Steel 2023, 58, 69–81. [Google Scholar]
  21. Steady Implementation of Carbon Reduction in the Steel Industry. Available online: http://www.news.cn/energy/20230417/695fdc5079504549a7b96306e2034bd6/c.html (accessed on 20 September 2023).
  22. Dong, H.B.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.J.; Li, X.C.; Tian, Z.L.; Huang, Y.X.; McDonald, C. Roadmap of China Steel Industry in the Past 70 Years. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2019, 46, 922–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, G.; Zhang, H.Q.; Su, B.X.; Ma, J.C.; Zuo, H.B.; Wang, J.S.; Xue, Q.G. The Current Situation of Carbon Emission and Carbon Reduction in Chinese Steel Industry. Ind. Miner. Process. 2021, 50, 55–64. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang, Y.J.; Zuo, H.B.; Zhao, J. Recent Progress and Development of Ironmaking in China as of 2019: An Overview. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2020, 47, 640–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ren, M.; Lu, P.T.; Liu, X.R.; Hossain, M.S.; Fang, Y.R.; Hanaoka, T.; O’Gallachoir, B.; Glynn, J.; Dai, H.C. Decarbonizing China’s Iron and Steel Industry from the Supply and Demand Sides for Carbon Neutrality. Appl. Energy 2021, 298, 117209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiang, K.J.; **ang, P.P.; He, C.M.; Feng, S.B.; Liu, C.Y.; Tan, X.; Chen, S.; Dai, C.Y.; Deng, L.C. Impact Analysis of Zero Carbon Emission Power Generation on China’s Industrial Sector Distribution. Glob. Energy Internet 2021, 4, 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  27. Proposals for Formulating the 14th Five-Year Plan (2021–2025) for National Economic and Social Development and the Long-Range Objectives through the Year 2035. Available online: http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2021/0313/c1001-32050444.html (accessed on 7 April 2024).
  28. Action Plan for Carbon Dioxide Peaking before 2030. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2021-10/26/content_5644984.htm (accessed on 7 April 2024).
  29. Several Opinions on Strict Energy Efficiency Constraints to Promote Energy Conservation and Carbon Reduction in Key Areas. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-10/22/content_5644224.htm (accessed on 7 April 2024).
  30. Wen, Z.G.; Meng, F.X.; Chen, M. Estimates of the Potential for Energy Conservation and CO2 Emissions Mitigation Based on Asian-Pacific Integrated Model (AIM): The Case of the Iron and Steel Industry in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 65, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Böhringer, C.; Rutherford, T.F. Integrated Assessment of Energy Policies: Decomposing Top-down and Bottom-Up. J. Econ. Dyn. Control. 2009, 33, 1648–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lin, Q.G.; Huang, G.H.; Bass, B.; Qin, X.S. IFTEM: An Interval-Fuzzy Two-Stage Stochastic Optimization Model for Regional Energy Systems Planning under Uncertainty. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 868–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Suganthi, L.; Samuel, A.A. Energy Models for Demand Forecasting—A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 1223–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ko, F.K.; Huang, C.B.; Tseng, P.Y.; Lin, C.H.; Zheng, B.Y.; Chiu, H.M. Long-Term CO2 Emissions Reduction Target and Scenarios of Power Sector in Taiwan. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 288–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tan, X.H.; Li, H.; Guo, J.X.; Gu, B.H.; Zeng, Y. Energy-Saving and Emission-Reduction Technology Selection and CO2 Emission Reduction Potential of China’s Iron and Steel Industry under Energy Substitution Policy. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 222, 823–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.J.; Xu, J.; Cao, X.C. Potential of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction and Energy Efficiency Improvement of China’s Steel Industry. Iron Steel 2019, 54, 7–14. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhu, T.Y.; Liu, X.L.; Wang, X.D.; He, H. Technical Development and Prospect for Collaborative Reduction of Pollution and Carbon Emissions from Iron and Steel Industry in China. Engineering 2023, 31, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guo, Y.L.; Hu, J.H.; Zhou, W.T. Development and Application Status of CMC in China. Mod. Chem. Ind. 2019, 36, 8–12. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pan, D.; Xu, Q.X. Research of Peak Carbon Emissions and Carbon Reduction Pathways in Coking Industry. Fuel Chem. Process. 2023, 54, 5–7. [Google Scholar]
  40. Han, Y.J.; Cao, Y.J.; Tao, Y.Z. Process Optimization and Productive Practice of Shougang **gtang No.1 Blast Furnace. Metall. Power 2010, 4, 20–21+25. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhou, J.C.; Zhang, C.X.; Han, W.G.; Li, X.P.; Shangguan, F.Q. Application Status and Development Trend of TRT Technology in Chinese Steel Industry. Iron Steel 2015, 50, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, F.M.; Zhang, D.G.; Zhang, L.Y.; Han, Y.J.; Cheng, S.S.; Yan, Z.H. Research and Application on Large BOF Gas Dry Dedusting Technology. Iron Steel 2013, 48, 1–9+43. [Google Scholar]
  43. Dong, H.; Wang, A.H.; Feng, J.S.; Zhang, Q.; Cai, J.J. Progress and prospect in sintering waste heat resource recovery and utilization technology. Iron Steel 2014, 49, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  44. Abdel Halim, K.S. Effective Utilization of Using Natural Gas Injection in the Production of Pig Iron. Mater. Lett. 2007, 61, 3281–3286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gao, J.J.; Zhu, L.; Ke, J.C.; Huo, X.F.; Qi, Y.H. Industrialized application of hydrogen-rich gas injection into blast furnace of **nan Steel. Iron Steel 2022, 57, 42–48. [Google Scholar]
  46. **ao, X.W.; Wang, G.; Li, M.M.; Zhou, Z.P.; Zhao, Y.J. Analysis of carbon reduction strategy based on hydrogen-rich or carbon-containing gas used for smelting reductant. China Metall. 2023, 33, 121–127. [Google Scholar]
  47. Song, S.T.; Zhao, Z.J. High Lump Iron Ore Proportion Production Practice of Hanbao Iron. Gansu Metall. 2021, 43, 11–13. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang, J.J.; Mao, X.P.; Wang, C.F.; Zhu, W.J. Development and expection on high-efficiency producing technology of steelmaking in TSCR line. Iron Steel 2019, 54, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhu, M.Y. A Study of Transport Phenomena and Key Technologies for High-Speed Continuous Casting of Steel. Iron Steel 2021, 56, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhu, M.Y. Some Considerations for New Generation of High-Efficiency Continuous Casting Technology Development. Iron Steel 2019, 54, 21–36. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gao, J.J.; Qi, Y.H.; Yan, D.L.; Wang, F.; Xu, H.C. Development Path and Key Technical Problems of Low Carbon Ironmaking in China. China Metall. 2021, 31, 64–72. [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang, X.D.; Hao, L.Y. Analysis of Modern Ironmaking Technology and Low-Carbon Development Direction. China Metall. 2021, 31, 1–5+18. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, Q.; Shen, J.L.; Ji, Y.M. Analysis of Carbon Emissions in Typical Iron- and Steelmaking Process and Implementation Pathresearch of Carbon Neutrality. Iron Steel 2023, 58, 173–187. [Google Scholar]
  54. Liu, H.X.; Wu, L.M.; Zhao, L.; Cui, Y.; Wang, S.Q.; Si, H.L.; Zhou, Y.N.; Zhou, H.; Xue, J.C. Analysis on CO2 emission characteristics and treatment technologies in iron and steel industry. Sinter. Pelletizing 2022, 47, 38–47. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sui, P.; Ren, B.L.; Wang, J.S.; Wang, G.; Zuo, H.B.; Xue, Q.G. Current Situation and Development Prospects of Metallurgical By-Product Gas Utilization in China’s Steel Industry. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2023, 48, 28945–28969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xu, W.Q.; Fu, L.; Yang, Y.; Tian, Q.L.; Li, C.Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Hao, R. Research progress in low carbon smelting technology of blast furnace gas cycle coupling carbon capture. Energy Environ. Prot. 2023, 37, 175–184. [Google Scholar]
  57. Development Status and Suggestions of Hydrogen Metallurgy in China’s Steel Industry. Available online: http://www.csteelnews.com/xwzx/jrrd/202109/t20210910_54739.html (accessed on 20 September 2023).
  58. Wang, X.D.; Zhao, Z.L.; Li, C.M.; Yang, Y.G. Hydrogen Metallurgy Engineering Technologies Based on Zero Reforming of Hydrogen Enriched Coke Oven Gas. Iron Steel 2023, 58, 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  59. HBIS Group the World’s First! The First Phase of HBIS’s 1.2 Million Ton Hydrogen Metallurgy Demonstration Project Was Fully Completed. Available online: https://www.hbisco.com/en/news/group/t101/2075 (accessed on 20 September 2023).
  60. Zhang, G.Q.; Zhang, X.F.; Han, J.Y.; Liu, D.Y. The research process and production application of HIsmelt reduction technology. Hebei Metall. 2022, 5, 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhu, R.; Wang, X.L.; Liu, R.Z. Recent Progress and Prospective of Application of Carbon Dioxide in Ferrous Metallurgy Process. China Metall. 2017, 27, 1–4+10. [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhu, R.; Ren, X.; Xue, B.T. Research Progress of Ultimate Carbon Emission in BOF Steelmaking Process. Iron Steel 2022, 58, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  63. Guo, Y.H. Current station and tendency of purification and upgrading of blast furnace gas. J. Iron Steel Res. 2020, 32, 525–531. [Google Scholar]
  64. Guo, Y.H.; Zhou, J.C. Current situation and future outlook of steel chemical co-production in China. China Metall. 2020, 30, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  65. Yang, Q.; Yang, Q.C.; Xu, S.M.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, D.W. Technoeconomic and Environmental Analysis of Ethylene Glycol Production from Coal and Natural Gas Compared with Oil-Based Production. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 123120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Baowu Group Low-Carbon Technology Roadmap and Zero Carbon Industry. Available online: https://www.baowugroup.com/glcmia/detail/246785 (accessed on 20 September 2023).
  67. Wang, X.D.; ShangGuan, F.Q.; **ng, Y.; Hou, C.J.; Tian, J.L. Research on the low-carbon development technology route of iron and steel enterprises under the “double carbon” target. Chin. J. Eng. 2023, 45, 853–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hebei Iron and Steel Group’s Low-Carbon Technology Roadmap. Available online: http://heb.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202203/02/ws621f63e9a3107be497a08c89.html (accessed on 20 September 2023).
Figure 1. China’s crude steel yield and the proportion of the world in recent years.
Figure 1. China’s crude steel yield and the proportion of the world in recent years.
Metals 14 00480 g001
Figure 2. Carbon emission factors of main raw material.
Figure 2. Carbon emission factors of main raw material.
Metals 14 00480 g002
Figure 3. Changes in carbon emissions of China’s steel industry in different years.
Figure 3. Changes in carbon emissions of China’s steel industry in different years.
Metals 14 00480 g003
Figure 4. Forecast of China’s crude steel production.
Figure 4. Forecast of China’s crude steel production.
Metals 14 00480 g004
Figure 5. Baowu group’s low-carbon technology roadmap.
Figure 5. Baowu group’s low-carbon technology roadmap.
Metals 14 00480 g005
Figure 6. Hebei iron and steel group’s low-carbon technology roadmap.
Figure 6. Hebei iron and steel group’s low-carbon technology roadmap.
Metals 14 00480 g006
Table 1. Process energy consumption of steel enterprises in 2023.
Table 1. Process energy consumption of steel enterprises in 2023.
Sintering ProcessPellet ProcessCoking ProcessBlast Furnace ProcessConverter
Process
Rolling Process
kgce/t54.9524.3590.26376.40−12.2754.75
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiao, Y.; Wang, G. Recent Status of Production, Administration Policies, and Low-Carbon Technology Development of China’s Steel Industry. Metals 2024, 14, 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14040480

AMA Style

Qiao Y, Wang G. Recent Status of Production, Administration Policies, and Low-Carbon Technology Development of China’s Steel Industry. Metals. 2024; 14(4):480. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14040480

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiao, Yufeng, and Guang Wang. 2024. "Recent Status of Production, Administration Policies, and Low-Carbon Technology Development of China’s Steel Industry" Metals 14, no. 4: 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14040480

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop