Next Article in Journal
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Preschoolers with Antenatal Zika Virus Exposure Born in the United States
Previous Article in Journal
Persistently Elevated Expression of Systemic, Soluble Co-Inhibitory Immune Checkpoint Molecules in People Living with HIV before and One Year after Antiretroviral Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Endoparasite Infections in Captive Inland Bearded Dragons (Pogona vitticeps) in Italy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Asymptomatic Malaria Reservoirs in Honduras: A Challenge for Elimination

1
Instituto de Investigaciones en Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Tegucigalpa 11101, Honduras
2
Department of Parasitology, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit South (NAMRU SOUTH), Lima 07006, Peru
3
Unidad de Entomología, Región Sanitaria de Gracias a Dios, Secretaría de Salud de Honduras, Puerto Lempira 33101, Gracias a Dios, Honduras
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2024, 13(7), 541; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13070541
Submission received: 16 May 2024 / Revised: 17 June 2024 / Accepted: 21 June 2024 / Published: 27 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research on Host–Pathogen Interaction in 2024)

Abstract

:
Background: Efforts on a global scale for combating malaria have achieved substantial progress over the past twenty years. Two Central American nations have accomplished their goal of eliminating malaria: El Salvador and Belize. Honduras has decreased the incidence of malaria and now reports fewer than 4000 malaria cases annually, aspiring to reach elimination by 2030. To accomplish this goal, it is essential to assess the existing strategies employed for malaria control and to address the task of incorporating novel intervention strategies to identify asymptomatic reservoirs. Methods: A survey for detecting asymptomatic cases was carried out in the community of Kaukira, in Gracias a Dios, Honduras, focusing on malaria transmission during 2023. Asymptomatic community members were recruited as participants, malaria screening was performed through a rapid diagnostic test in situ, and a blood sample was collected on filter paper. Highly sensitive molecular assays based on photo-induced electron transfer PCR (PET-PCR) were performed to detect the two species of Plasmodium circulating in Honduras: Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum. In addition, the identification of the parasite species was verified by amplifying three genetic markers (Pvmsp3α, Pvmsp3ß, and Pfmsp1). Results: A total of 138 participants were recruited, mostly adult women. All individuals tested negative on the rapid diagnostic test. Positive results for malaria were detected by PET-PCR in 17 samples (12.3%). Most samples (12 out of 17) were amplified with a Ct value between 37 and 42, indicating very low parasitemias. Out of the 17 samples, 16 of them also showed amplification in the species assays. There were nine cases of P. falciparum infections and seven cases of P. vivax infections that were further confirmed by nested PCR (nPCR) of Pvmsp3 and Pfmsp1. Parasitemias ranged from 100 p/μL to less than 0.25 p/μL. One sample showed mixed infection. Conclusions: The existence of asymptomatic malaria reservoirs in Honduras can contribute to disease transmission and pose a challenge that may hinder elimination efforts, requiring public health authorities to modify surveillance strategies to identify the disease and treat this population accordingly.

1. Background

Significant advancements have been achieved in controlling malaria over the past two decades. The number of countries that recorded less than 100 malaria cases per year has increased from six in 2000 to twenty-seven in 2022. Also, the number of countries with less than ten indigenous cases increased from four in 2000 to twenty-five in 2022 [1]. Malaria elimination has been accomplished in a growing number of countries. In 2023, the World Health Organization (WHO) certified three countries (Azerbaijan, Belize, and Tajikistan), as malaria-free, and several others are making progress towards eliminating the disease by 2024 [1]. Belize has become the fourth country in the WHO Region of the Americas, and the second in Central America, after El Salvador, to reach this status within the last 5 years.
Still, the situation is less favorable in the remaining countries of the Central American isthmus. Case incidence in Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and Panama experienced a rise of 55% or higher in 2022 when compared to 2015. However, in 2022, Honduras reduced the incidence of malaria infections by 25% to 55% compared to 2015, and the country has officially entered the elimination stage [2].
Following the WHO guidelines, localities with moderate and high transmission of malaria are defined by an annual parasite index (API) of 1 to 10 cases per 1000 population and over 10 cases per 1000 population, respectively. Areas of low transmission are defined as those with an API rate < 1 per 1000 people [3]. Based on this classification, Honduras is categorized as a low transmission country, with an API of 0.25 [4]. However, several locations along the Atlantic coast, such as the department of Gracias a Dios, are classified as high transmission areas, with an API beyond 20 per 1000 residents. In 2022, Gracias a Dios reported 3476 malaria cases (65% by P. vivax), accounting for 97% of the total malaria cases in the country [4]. Moreover, specific communities, such as Kaukira in 2023, have even higher incidence rates, with an API of 79.9 [4].
Honduras collaborates with the technical assistance of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), as well as other key partners, including the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), Clinton Health Action Initiative (CHAI), and the Global Fund to eliminate malaria. Current disease control programs rely heavily on readily available detection methods like light microscopy (LM) and rapid diagnostic tests (RDT). These methods primarily identify individuals showing symptoms and seeking medical care, or those uncovered through targeted efforts in known infection hotspots. However, this approach misses two crucial groups: asymptomatic carriers (with parasites in the peripheral blood in the absence of fever or other acute symptoms in individuals who have not received recent anti-malarial treatment) and symptomatic individuals who do not seek medical care (often due to access limitations). These overlooked individuals serve as hidden reservoirs, as they may have gametocytes circulating in the peripheral blood, thus maintaining the transmission of the disease [5].
A recent study was conducted by our research group, at Puerto Lempira, located in the Gracias a Dios department, to evaluate the sensitivity of LM compared to two molecular techniques [6]. The authors reported that molecular techniques, specifically a photo-induced electron transfer PCR (PET-PCR), were 1.6 times more sensitive than LM. They also observed that 14 patients who tested positive by PET-PCR were not detected by LM, even though the participants showed symptoms of malaria. Ultrasensitive techniques, like PET-PCR, have demonstrated their utility as effective instruments for detecting asymptomatic or subclinical malaria, particularly in the context of surveillance surveys [7,8,9,10,11,12].
Considering the country’s entry into the elimination stage, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic malaria infections in the region of La Moskitia of Honduras, through an active search strategy.

2. Methods

2.1. Ethical Consideration

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Infectious and Zoonotic Diseases Master’s Program (CEI-MEIZ) at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras (Protocol 02-2023). Before patients were enrolled in the study sites, benefits and any perceived risks were explained to all participants in Spanish or the Miskito language. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study and/or their legal guardians in the case of minors.

2.2. Study Site and Population

This study was conducted as a cross-sectional survey for asymptomatic malaria cases. Asymptomatic infections were described as the presence of parasites (antigens or DNA) in the peripheral blood in the absence of fever or other acute symptoms in individuals who have not received recent anti-malarial treatment [13,14]. The survey was carried out in the department of Gracias a Dios, Honduras, in the village of Kaukira, a municipality of Puerto Lempira (15.313611, −83.583056/15.309837, −83.567727). Kaukira is a remote region, that can be accessed by boat only. It is located a few meters above sea level and the population consists mainly of Miskito people. Living standards are generally based on a subsistence economy including fishing, agriculture, and occasional hunting. Households of two neighborhoods were visited (Kiankan and Cocodacra) (Figure 1). Kiankan includes 128 homes and 590 inhabitants, and Cocodacra includes 217 homes and 1025 inhabitants, according to the local census from 2022. Puerto Lempira is characterized as one of the rainiest regions of the country with up to 2167 millimetres of precipitation on average per year. Precipitation is unevenly distributed throughout the year, except for January and May to December, which have rainfall exceeding 100 mm. The average annual temperature fluctuates between 23 °C and 32 °C, rarely falling below 22 °C or rising above 33 °C. The Kaukira community was selected for the survey due to the high incidence of malaria in 2023, as reported by the national malaria surveillance system (https://www.salud.gob.hn/sshome/index.php/malaria, accessed on 23 March 2024), with a total of 762 cases reported during 2023.

2.3. Sample Collection and RDT

The survey occurred at the household level, where individuals of any age and sex participated. Participant recruitment took place between 8 and 17 November 2023. Households were selected randomly across the community and individuals of any age and sex were invited to participate. Inclusion criteria for study participants were the ability to provide informed consent. Three study teams visited households to screen for eligibility, obtained informed consent, administered questionnaires, and performed finger-prick blood collection. The survey registered individual demographic information, history of malaria infection, recent travel information, and history of having lived with individuals diagnosed with malaria in the last 30 days.
An RDT (Bioline™ Malaria Ag P.f/P.v, Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) was performed using blood collected from a finger by lancet puncture according to manufacturer instructions. Additionally, approximately 50 µL of blood was collected on InstaDNA Card® (Himedia, Kelton, PA, USA) filter paper for further molecular analysis.
A Fisher exact test was conducted to examine whether there was a significant association between individuals who tested positive and the demographic variables.

2.4. DNA Extraction and PET-PCR

The blood samples were stored on filter paper and placed in separate sealed plastic bags with desiccant. The samples were then sent to the “Centro de Investigaciones Genéticas” of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras in Tegucigalpa. Three circles of 1.2 mm2 each were cut from paper impregnated with blood for DNA extraction. The DNA was extracted with the Extracta DNA Prep for PCR kit (Quantabio, Beverly, MA, USA) according to manufacturer instructions.
Each sample was amplified three to four times using specific primers for the genus Plasmodium by PET-PCR [6,7,15]. Samples that returned at least one positive result for the genus were subjected to amplification using two distinct pairs of primers targeting the two parasite species found in Honduras (P. falciparum and P. vivax). Amplification reactions were carried out in a volume of 20 μL and contained 10 µL Go Taq® Probe qPCR Master Mix (Promega Corp. Madison, WI, USA), 0.5 μL of each primer (10 μM) (Table 1), 4 μL of nuclease-free water, and 5 μL of DNA (~40 ng/µL). Reactions were run on a Mic qPCR Cycler (Bio Molecular Systems, Brisbane, Australia) and the results were visualized in the Mic qPCR Cycler Software v.2.10.1. The amplification conditions for both genus and species detection were 95 °C for 15 min, 45 cycles at 95 °C for 20 s, 63 °C for 40 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. The fluorescence channel was selected for each labeled primer (6FAM for genus and HEX for species). Each experiment comprised both positive and negative controls. PET-PCR reactions for both parasite species were performed in duplicate. A cycle threshold (Ct) of 42 or below was used to consider samples as positive. Samples with a Ct value between 42 and 44 were also considered putative positive with very low parasitemia. To prevent false positives, the amplification curve’s correct sigmoidal shape was examined in every case (Supplementary Figure S2).
The number of parasites per μL of blood was quantified using a reference curve. The reference curve was prepared by consecutive serial dilution (from 1:1 to 1:1,000,000) in nuclease-free water of DNA extracted from a quantified P. falciparum strain 3D7 containing 100,000 parasites per μL. This lyophilized DNA was donated by the Malaria Branch of the CDC in Atlanta, GA, USA. Using this standard curve, the number of parasites per μL present in the sample was estimated based on the Ct value (Supplementary Figure S1).
To verify the presence of P. vivax in the positive samples, a nested PCR (nPCR) method that targeted the Pvmsp3α and Pvmsp3ß genes was conducted [20]. Pvmsp3α was amplified using a final volume of 25 μL. The mixture consisted of 12.5 μL of KOD DNA Polymerase Master Mix (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), 1.0 μL of each primer (10 μM) (Table 1), 9.5 μL of nuclease-free water, and 1 μL of DNA. A subsequent nested reaction was conducted using identical concentrations to the previous one. The amplification conditions for both reactions consisted of an initial denaturation step at 98 °C for 30 s, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s, annealing at 54 °C for 10 s, and extension at 68 °C for 30 s. The reactions concluded with a final extension step at 68 °C for 2 min. After the visualization of amplification bands in the nested reaction, the size of the amplicon was registered. Pvmsp3ß was amplified using a reaction mixture consisting of 12.5 μL of KOD DNA Polymerase Master Mix (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), 1.0 μL of each primer (10 μM) (Table 1), 8 μL of nuclease-free water, and 2.5 μL of DNA. A nested reaction was conducted using identical concentrations as the initial one, except that just one microliter of DNA and 9.5 μL of nuclease-free water were used. The amplification program was the same as for Pvmsp3α.
Samples positive for P. falciparum were confirmed by amplification of the Pfmsp1 gene by a nPCR as previously described [18,19]. Primary and secondary PCRs were performed in a total volume of 50 μL containing 25 μL of KOD polymerase and 10 μL and 1 μL of DNA, respectively. Three secondary and independent PCRs were run for each allelic family using specific oligonucleotides (Table 1). Cycle conditions for primary PCR were 98 °C for 30 s; 30 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 54 °C for 10 s, and 68 °C for 30 s; and a final extension at 68 °C for 2 min. One μL of primary PCR product was amplified in the two nested PCR reactions with the following cycle conditions: 98 °C for 1 min; 35 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 58–59 °C for 10 s, and 68 °C for 30 s; and one final step of 68 °C for 2 min. Separate reactions were required to amplify one out of three possible allelic families: K1, MAD20, and RO33.

3. Results

A total of 138 participants were enrolled from 81 households. Most subjects were female (n = 91, 65.9%). The mean age was 41.8 years (standard deviation = 18.2; median = 40) and most of them were homemakers (n = 77, 55.8%).
Most subjects did not travel outside the community within the last three months (n = 119, 86.2%), eight reported a previous malaria case in the last twelve months (5.8%), and twenty-eight reported a previous case in the household during the last month (20.3%).
All the participants tested negative for malaria using RDT. However, 17 individuals (12.3%) tested positive for the presence of the Plasmodium genus using PET-PCR amplification, with a Ct value of 44 or below (Supplementary Table S1). Twelve (8.7%) of these seventeen samples returned a Ct value of 42 or less. The mean Ct value of all positive samples for the genus Plasmodium spp. was 40.6 [34.8–44.1], with a standard deviation of 2.7. Fourteen samples, including those with Ct values over 42, were positive for the markers Pvmsp3α, Pvmsp3ß, and Pfmsp1, thereby confirming the presence of infections with extremely low parasitemias (Figure 2).
The mean age of cases positive for the genus Plasmodium was 42.9 years and women accounted for most cases with 82.4% (n = 14). Among the eight people who reported having malaria in the previous 12 months, two tested positive for the parasite by PET-PCR. Statistical analysis showed an association between previous cases in the house within the last 30 days and current malaria positivity (Fisher exact test p < 0.05, 95CI: 0.94–11.43, OR 3.3). No other epidemiological variables were associated with malaria positivity.
All 17 samples that returned at least one positive result for malaria (genus) were subjected to PET-PCR specific for either P. falciparum or P. vivax. Out of the total number of samples, nine (6.5% of the total and 52.9% of the total positive samples) revealed amplification for P. falciparum. Out of the positive results, eight had a Ct value below 40, while one amplification had a Ct value of 40.3. The mean Ct value for the amplifications of P. falciparum was 38.3 [37.3–40.3], with a standard deviation of 0.92. Additionally, seven samples yielded a positive result at least once for P. vivax (5% of the total, and 41.2% of the total of positive samples). The mean Ct value for the amplifications of P. vivax was 39.5 [36.6–40.8], with a standard deviation of 1.7. One of the samples exhibited a mixed infection by both parasite species. However, two samples that were found to be positive for the genus Plasmodium (11.8% of all positive samples) did not show any amplification for any of the two species (Figure 2). The nine samples that tested positive for P. falciparum were found to belong to the K1 allelic subfamily of the Pfmsp1 gene.

4. Discussion

The study employed RDTs and ultrasensitive molecular approaches to assess the presence of asymptomatic malaria carriers in the Honduran Moskitia, a region with high malaria transmission rates (20 to 80 cases/1000 population). The PET-PCR analysis revealed that 8.7% of the subjects tested positive with a Ct value below 42, while 12% tested positive with a Ct value below 44. As expected, the PET-PCR method identified individuals with malaria parasitemia, while the RDTs were unable to detect it. Individuals were categorized as asymptomatic due to the absence of symptoms of malaria, despite having evidence of parasitemia. The parasitemias ranged between 100 parasites per μL and less than 0.25 p/μL. RDTs identified none of the cases, indicating that the method is less suited for this purpose. These results align with previous research that employed an active case detection strategy among people without symptoms, revealing positive cases despite a negative result from RDTs [10,12,21,22].
Asymptomatic infections behave like the submerged base of icebergs and are a hidden threat that hinders efforts aimed at eliminating malaria from the country and the Central American region. Infected individuals without symptoms are a source of persistent infection and contribute to the continued transmission of malaria [23,24]. Infections with very low parasite density are frequent in highly endemic settings in which the population has herd immunity and premunition. However, asymptomatic infections have also been demonstrated in regions of low transmission [25,26]. A reason for the absence of symptoms in some people infected with malaria could be attributed to the lower virulence of specific parasite strains, which allows them to avoid competition against more aggressive forms. According to the hypothesis proposed by Björkman, these less virulent strains could persist at low levels without being detected or treated for extended periods and are therefore subject to evolutionary selection [27].
Asymptomatic infections outnumber symptomatic ones in various malaria transmission settings [13]. Thus, the effectiveness of elimination strategies rests on the sensitivity of the diagnostic techniques, the results of which are then used to appropriately treat the carriers. The sensitivities of various malaria diagnostic methods have been compared in different epidemiological settings [28]. LM and RDTs have shown limited accuracy in detecting infections with low parasitemia, particularly in asymptomatic people, when compared to PCR [8,9,11,24,29,30,31,32,33,34,35].
Among the many variants of PCR-based methods, those that use PET-PCR have proven to be highly sensitive in detecting low parasitemias [6,7,15]. PET-PCR has been used mostly in the African context to evaluate the presence of asymptomatic carriers [8,9,10,11,12]. These authors compared PET-PCR with conventional diagnostic methods such as LM and RDT, agreeing that PET-PCR is much more sensitive than LM.
In the Americas, Lucchi et al. applied PET-PCR for the first time to detect falciparum malaria cases in a nationwide community survey in Haiti, with samples from almost 3000 individuals, of which 12 (0.4%) tested positive for P. falciparum. In that survey, the authors reported that 316 samples had a Ct value >40 but were considered negative as they did not amplify using two reference methods [7]. Valdivia et al. conducted a study in 217 participants in Peru in 2021 to assess the accuracy of a diagnostic instrument that relies on the detection of hemozoin and compared it against LM and two RDTs, using nPCR as a reference; PET-PCR was used to set cutoff points for the device and determined an optimal parasitemia limit for the device of 323 parasites/μL [36]. More recently, a study was carried out among 309 participants with malaria symptoms in Puerto Lempira, in the Honduran Moskitia, whose samples were analyzed by LM, nPCR, and PET-PCR. Malaria prevalence was 19.1% by LM and 31.1% by PET-PCR. These findings demonstrated that LM could identify 59 positive cases (19%), with a sensitivity of less than 60%, whereas molecular techniques (nPCR and PET-PCR) exhibited significantly higher sensitivity [6]. This study supports the findings of Matamoros et al., indicating that the diagnostic methods LM and RDT, commonly employed in Honduras for malaria detection, are inadequate in identifying cases of malaria with low parasitemias, particularly among asymptomatic carriers.
A significant finding from this survey is that the percentage of individuals with a positive PET-PCR result who reported living with someone diagnosed with malaria in the last 30 days is considerably higher (41.2%) compared to those with a negative result (10.7%). This finding corroborates the notion that a household in which one individual has been diagnosed with malaria is consequently more likely to have a cluster of infected individuals [37,38].
To evaluate the importance of asymptomatic individuals in the transmission of malaria, there are strategies such as cross-sectional active case detection (ACD) surveys [39,40,41]. These sampling strategies, when coupled with PCR-based tests, can be used to estimate the true burden of hidden infections [42]. These interventions could be regularly implemented in Honduras and other areas that aim to achieve malaria elimination by 2030. A good example of this strategy was applied by Contreras-Mancilla et al. in the Peruvian Amazon in 2018 [43]. The authors conducted four consecutive ACD interventions at 10-day intervals in four communities. The inhabitants were visited in their homes and an immediate diagnosis was made through LM. A quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used for subsequent molecular analysis, revealing that more than 54% of the participants tested positive for malaria, with most of them being asymptomatic.
Evidence suggests that people with asymptomatic malaria play a significant role in maintaining low levels of transmission in the community [13,24,38]. Consequently, novel strategies are necessary to successfully attain the objective of elimination [13,22]. The use of mass testing, treatment, and tracking (MTTT) seems to have contributed to the reduction of asymptomatic carriers among a population in Ghana [44]. Similarly, the mass screening and treatment (MSAT) strategy concentrates on providing antimalarial medications specifically to the population that is infected [45]. Alternatively, the approach called mass drug administration (MDA) for malaria, defined by the WHO as “the administration of a full therapeutic course of an antimalarial medicine at approximately the same time, and often at repeated intervals, to all age groups of a population in a defined geographical area. Antimalarial medicines are administered without prior malaria testing, and therefore, regardless of the malaria infection status of individuals. Consequently, any existing infections are treated and new infections are prevented for the duration of the drug’s prophylactic period” [3] which has demonstrated efficacy in the past for controlling and eliminating malaria and should be considered a component of a holistic approach for malaria elimination in particular contexts [46].
Some authors propose that MDA has the potential to reduce transmission for a limited time [47] and that it should not be used alone but together with other conventional strategies. At the same time, it must be implemented repetitively if it is to have a sustained effect [48]. According to the WHO, in situations where the prevalence of P. falciparum is below 10%, or the incidence is less than 250 cases per 1000 people annually, MDA may effectively decrease both the burden of the disease and the intensity of transmission [3].
The responsibility for designing and implementing new control and elimination strategies to target asymptomatic malaria reservoirs in Honduras will ultimately rest with the country’s decision-makers. Nevertheless, continuing to rely on traditional strategies like passive and reactive case detection after outbreaks emerge could hinder efforts to achieve the goal of malaria elimination by 2030.

5. Limitations

The main limitation in this study is the small sample size of individuals recruited, which means that the proportion of asymptomatic malaria carriers identified using this method does not accurately reflect the statistical prevalence of asymptomatic cases in Gracias a Dios, Honduras.

6. Conclusions

Despite the low number of participants recruited, this study provides insight into the prevalence of asymptomatic malaria infections at a high-transmission hotspot in the Americas. The low sensitivity of RDTs highlights the need to integrate molecular methods such as PET-PCR into national surveys carried out in the coming years. Finally, the presence of such a high number of asymptomatic reservoirs in the Moskitia region poses a hidden threat to malaria elimination efforts. These results highlight the importance of modifying the elimination strategies currently in force in the national standard since they are not capable of detecting or treating asymptomatic infected individuals promptly, which serve as reservoirs of the disease.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://mdpi.longhoe.net/article/10.3390/pathogens13070541/s1, Supplementary Table S1: Ct values of positive PET-PCR reactions for the diagnosis of genus and species of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum; Supplementary Figure S1: Standard curve prepared with 7 consecutive serial dilutions of DNA from Plasmodium falciparum strain 3D7 with known concentration. The slope and R2 values of the curve are shown, as well as the concentrations (parasites per microliter) for each dilution; Supplementary Figure S2: Sigmoidal curves showing (A) one of the dilutions of the reference curve with a Ct = 23; (B) Two samples with Ct less than 40; (C) Two samples with Ct greater than 40 and less than or equal to 42; and (D) three samples with Ct between 42 and 44. The behavior of the non-template control (NTC) curve and a negative sample are also shown.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.F., H.O.V. and D.E.; methodology, G.F., D.E. and H.O.V.; validation, G.F., G.M. and D.E.; formal analysis, G.F. and G.M.; investigation, S.B., M.M., G.M., D.E., A.R. and A.P.; resources, G.F., D.E. and H.O.V.; data curation, G.F., G.M. and D.E.; writing—original draft preparation, G.F.; writing—review and editing, G.F., D.E., G.M. and H.O.V.; visualization, G.F.; supervision, D.E., G.M. and G.F.; project administration, D.E. and A.P.; funding acquisition, G.F., D.E. and H.O.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by the Genetic Research Center, CIG-UNAH with funds recovered from the sale of services (CIG001-2024), and by the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division (AFHSD), Global Emerging Infections Surveillance (GEIS) Program (PROMIS ID P0091_24_N6). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted following the guiding principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the National Autonomous University of Honduras (CEI-MEIZ/UNAH) under protocol number 02-2020. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study and/or their legal guardians in the case of being minors. The protocol for this study (NAMRU6.2018.0002) was reviewed and approved by the Research Administration Program Head of the U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit SOUTH (NAMRU SOUTH).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their gratitude to the clinical staff of the Gracias a Dios Health Region of the Ministry of Health of Honduras for their collaboration for the development of this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, the Department of Defense, nor the U.S. Government. One of the authors of this manuscript (H.O.V.) is an employee of the U.S. Government. This work was prepared as part of his official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. §105 states that “Copyright protection under this Title is not available for any work of the United States Government”. Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defines U.S. Government work as work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person’s official duties.

List of Abbreviations

PET-PCRPhoto-induced electron transfer PCR.
APIAnnual Parasite Index.
CHAIClinton Health Access Initiative.
RDTRapid Diagnostic Test.
CtCycle threshold.
LMLight Microscopy.
nPCRNested Polymerase Chain Reaction.
qPCRQuantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction.
ACDActive Case Detection.
MTTTMass Testing, Treatment and Tracking.
MSATMass Screening and Treatment.
MDAMass Drug Administration.
PAHOPan American Health Organization.
WHOWorld Health Organization.

References

  1. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2023; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; p. 62. [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization. Global Technical Strategy for Malaria 2016-2030; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for Malaria. 16 October 2023. Available online: https://files.magicapp.org/guideline/3413afba-e74a-42e5-ba86-dde4818dcd3a/published_guideline_7661-7_1.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2024).
  4. Secretaría de Salud de Honduras. Boletín Epidemiológico Malaria; Secretaría de Salud de Honduras: Tegucigalpa, Honduras, 2024.
  5. Tadesse, F.G.; van den Hoogen, L.; Lanke, K.; Schildkraut, J.; Tetteh, K.; Aseffa, A.; Mamo, H.; Sauerwein, R.; Felger, I.; Drakeley, C.; et al. The shape of the iceberg: Quantification of submicroscopic Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax parasitaemia and gametocytaemia in five low endemic settings in Ethiopia. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Matamoros, G.; Escobar, D.; Pinto, A.; Serrano, D.; Ksandrova, E.; Grimaldi, N.; Juarez-Fontecha, G.; Moncada, M.; Valdivia, H.O.; Fontecha, G. PET-PCR reveals low parasitaemia and submicroscopic malarial infections in Honduran Moskitia. Malar. J. 2023, 22, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lucchi, N.W.; Karell, M.A.; Journel, I.; Rogier, E.; Goldman, I.; Ljolje, D.; Huber, C.; Mace, K.E.; Jean, S.E.; Akom, E.E.; et al. PET-PCR method for the molecular detection of malaria parasites in a national malaria surveillance study in Haiti, 2011. Malar. J. 2014, 13, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Agbana, H.B.; Rogier, E.; Lo, A.; Abukari, Z.; Jones, S.; Gyan, B.; Aidoo, M.; Amoah, L.E. Detecting asymptomatic carriage of Plasmodium falciparum in southern Ghana: Utility of molecular and serological diagnostic tools. Malar. J. 2022, 21, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Badiane, A.S.; Ndiaye, T.; Thiaw, A.B.; Binta, D.A.; Diallo, M.A.; Seck, M.C.; Diongue, K.; Garba, M.N.; Ndiaye, M.; Ndiaye, D. High prevalence of asymptomatic Plasmodium infection in Bandafassi, South-East Senegal. Malar. J. 2021, 20, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mwenda, M.C.; Fola, A.A.; Ciubotariu, I.I.; Mulube, C.; Mambwe, B.; Kasaro, R.; Hawela, M.B.; Hamainza, B.; Miller, J.M.; Carpi, G.; et al. Performance evaluation of RDT, light microscopy, and PET-PCR for detecting Plasmodium falciparum malaria infections in the 2018 Zambia National Malaria Indicator Survey. Malar. J. 2021, 20, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Sitali, L.; Miller, J.M.; Mwenda, M.C.; Bridges, D.J.; Hawela, M.B.; Hamainza, B.; Chizema-Kawesha, E.; Eisele, T.P.; Chipeta, J.; Lindtjorn, B. Distribution of Plasmodium species and assessment of performance of diagnostic tools used during a malaria survey in Southern and Western Provinces of Zambia. Malar. J. 2019, 18, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Talundzic, E.; Maganga, M.; Masanja, I.M.; Peterson, D.S.; Udhayakumar, V.; Lucchi, N.W. Field evaluation of the photo-induced electron transfer fluorogenic primers (PET) real-time PCR for the detection of Plasmodium falciparum in Tanzania. Malar. J. 2014, 13, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lindblade, K.A.; Steinhardt, L.; Samuels, A.; Kachur, S.P.; Slutsker, L. The silent threat: Asymptomatic parasitemia and malaria transmission. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2013, 11, 623–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for Malaria, 13 July 2021; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021; p. 214. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lucchi, N.W.; Narayanan, J.; Karell, M.A.; Xayavong, M.; Kariuki, S.; DaSilva, A.J.; Hill, V.; Udhayakumar, V. Molecular diagnosis of malaria by photo-induced electron transfer fluorogenic primers: PET-PCR. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kudyba, H.M.; Louzada, J.; Ljolje, D.; Kudyba, K.A.; Muralidharan, V.; Oliveira-Ferreira, J.; Lucchi, N.W. Field evaluation of malaria malachite green loop-mediated isothermal amplification in health posts in Roraima state, Brazil. Malar. J. 2019, 18, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Thanapongpichat, S.; Khammanee, T.; Sawangjaroen, N.; Buncherd, H.; Tun, A.W. Genetic Diversity of Plasmodium vivax in Clinical Isolates from Southern Thailand using PvMSP1, PvMSP3 (PvMSP3alpha, PvMSP3beta) Genes and Eight Microsatellite Markers. Korean J. Parasitol. 2019, 57, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lopez, A.C.; Ortiz, A.; Coello, J.; Sosa-Ochoa, W.; Torres, R.E.; Banegas, E.I.; Jovel, I.; Fontecha, G.A. Genetic diversity of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum in Honduras. Malar. J. 2012, 11, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Schoepflin, S.; Valsangiacomo, F.; Lin, E.; Kiniboro, B.; Mueller, I.; Felger, I. Comparison of Plasmodium falciparum allelic frequency distribution in different endemic settings by high-resolution genoty**. Malar. J. 2009, 8, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kuesap, J.; Rungsihirunrat, K.; Chaijaroenkul, W.; Mungthin, M. Genetic Diversity of Plasmodium vivax Merozoite Surface Protein-3 Alpha and Beta from Diverse Geographic Areas of Thailand. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2022, 75, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Searle, K.M.; Katowa, B.; Kobayashi, T.; Siame, M.N.S.; Mharakurwa, S.; Carpi, G.; Norris, D.E.; Stevenson, J.C.; Thuma, P.E.; Moss, W.J.; et al. Distinct parasite populations infect individuals identified through passive and active case detection in a region of declining malaria transmission in southern Zambia. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Doum, D.; McLver, D.J.; Hustedt, J.; Hii, J.; Sovannaroth, S.; Lek, D.; Richardson, J.H.; Tatarsky, A.; Lobo, N.F. An active and targeted survey reveals asymptomatic malaria infections among high-risk populations in Mondulkiri, Cambodia. Malar. J. 2023, 22, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Andolina, C.; Rek, J.C.; Briggs, J.; Okoth, J.; Musiime, A.; Ramjith, J.; Teyssier, N.; Conrad, M.; Nankabirwa, J.I.; Lanke, K.; et al. Sources of persistent malaria transmission in a setting with effective malaria control in eastern Uganda: A longitudinal, observational cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 1568–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Biruksew, A.; Demeke, A.; Birhanu, Z.; Golassa, L.; Getnet, M.; Yewhalaw, D. Schoolchildren with asymptomatic malaria are potential hotspot for malaria reservoir in Ethiopia: Implications for malaria control and elimination efforts. Malar. J. 2023, 22, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Okell, L.C.; Bousema, T.; Griffin, J.T.; Ouédraogo, A.L.; Ghani, A.C.; Drakeley, C.J. Factors determining the occurrence of submicroscopic malaria infections and their relevance for control. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Carrasco-Escobar, G.; Miranda-Alban, J.; Fernandez-Minope, C.; Brouwer, K.C.; Torres, K.; Calderon, M.; Gamboa, D.; Llanos-Cuentas, A.; Vinetz, J.M. High prevalence of very-low Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax parasitaemia carriers in the Peruvian Amazon: Insights into local and occupational mobility-related transmission. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bjorkman, A.B. Asymptomatic low-density malaria infections: A parasite survival strategy? Lancet Infect Dis. 2018, 18, 485–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chaturvedi, N.; Krishna, S.; Bharti, P.K.; Gaur, D.; Chauhan, V.S.; Singh, N. Prevalence of afebrile parasitaemia due to Plasmodium falciparum & P. vivax in district Balaghat (Madhya Pradesh): Implication for malaria control. Indian J. Med. Res. 2017, 146, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Getachew, H.; Demissew, A.; Abossie, A.; Habtamu, K.; Wang, X.; Zhong, D.; Zhou, G.; Lee, M.C.; Hemming-Schroeder, E.; Bradley, L.; et al. Asymptomatic and submicroscopic malaria infections in sugar cane and rice development areas of Ethiopia. Malar. J. 2023, 22, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Okell, L.C.; Ghani, A.C.; Lyons, E.; Drakeley, C.J. Submicroscopic infection in Plasmodium falciparum-endemic populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 200, 1509–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hofer, L.M.; Kweyamba, P.A.; Sayi, R.M.; Chabo, M.S.; Maitra, S.L.; Moore, S.J.; Tambwe, M.M. Malaria rapid diagnostic tests reliably detect asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in school-aged children that are infectious to mosquitoes. Parasit Vectors 2023, 16, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kumari, P.; Sinha, S.; Gahtori, R.; Yadav, C.P.; Pradhan, M.M.; Rahi, M.; Pande, V.; Anvikar, A.R. Prevalence of Asymptomatic Malaria Parasitemia in Odisha, India: A Challenge to Malaria Elimination. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020, 103, 1510–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. San, N.N.; Kien, N.X.; Manh, N.D.; Van Thanh, N.; Chavchich, M.; Binh, N.T.H.; Long, T.K.; Edgel, K.A.; Rovira-Vallbona, E.; Edstein, M.D.; et al. Cross-sectional study of asymptomatic malaria and seroepidemiological surveillance of seven districts in Gia Lai province, Vietnam. Malar. J. 2022, 21, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shamseddin, J.; Ghanbarnejad, A.; Zakeri, A.; Abedi, F.; Khojasteh, S.; Turki, H. Molecular Method Is Essential to Identify Asymptomatic Malaria Reservoirs: A Successful Experience in the Malaria Elimination Program in Iran. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tadesse, F.G.; Pett, H.; Baidjoe, A.; Lanke, K.; Grignard, L.; Sutherland, C.; Hall, T.; Drakeley, C.; Bousema, T.; Mamo, H. Submicroscopic carriage of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in a low endemic area in Ethiopia where no parasitaemia was detected by microscopy or rapid diagnostic test. Malar. J. 2015, 14, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Valdivia, H.O.; Thota, P.; Braga, G.; Ricopa, L.; Barazorda, K.; Salas, C.; Bishop, D.K.; Joya, C.A. Field validation of a magneto-optical detection device (Gazelle) for portable point-of-care Plasmodium vivax diagnosis. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0253232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lawpoolsri, S.; Chavez, I.F.; Yimsamran, S.; Puangsa-Art, S.; Thanyavanich, N.; Maneeboonyang, W.; Chaimungkun, W.; Singhasivanon, P.; Maguire, J.H.; Hungerford, L.L. The impact of human reservoir of malaria at a community-level on individual malaria occurrence in a low malaria transmission setting along the Thai-Myanmar border. Malar. J. 2010, 9, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sturrock, H.J.; Hsiang, M.S.; Cohen, J.M.; Smith, D.L.; Greenhouse, B.; Bousema, T.; Gosling, R.D. Targeting asymptomatic malaria infections: Active surveillance in control and elimination. PLoS Med. 2013, 10, e1001467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Carrasco-Escobar, G.; Gamboa, D.; Castro, M.C.; Bangdiwala, S.I.; Rodriguez, H.; Contreras-Mancilla, J.; Alava, F.; Speybroeck, N.; Lescano, A.G.; Vinetz, J.M.; et al. Micro-epidemiology and spatial heterogeneity of P. vivax parasitaemia in riverine communities of the Peruvian Amazon: A multilevel analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Stratil, A.S.; Vernaeve, L.; Lopes, S.; Bourny, Y.; Mannion, K.; Hamade, P.; Roca-Feltrer, A.; Tibenderana, J.K.; Sovannaroth, S.; Debackere, M. Eliminating Plasmodium falciparum malaria: Results from tailoring active case detection approaches to remote populations in forested border areas in north-eastern Cambodia. Malar. J. 2021, 20, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wickremasinghe, R.; Fernando, S.D.; Thillekaratne, J.; Wijeyaratne, P.M.; Wickremasinghe, A.R. Importance of active case detection in a malaria elimination programme. Malar. J. 2014, 13, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Han, K.T.; Han, Z.Y.; Zainabadi, K. Develo** Molecular Surveillance Capacity for Asymptomatic and Drug-Resistant Malaria in a Resource-Limited Setting-Experiences and Lessons Learned. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2022, 107, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Moreno-Gutierrez, D.; Llanos-Cuentas, A.; Luis Barboza, J.; Contreras-Mancilla, J.; Gamboa, D.; Rodriguez, H.; Carrasco-Escobar, G.; Boreux, R.; Hayette, M.P.; Beutels, P.; et al. Effectiveness of a Malaria Surveillance Strategy Based on Active Case Detection during High Transmission Season in the Peruvian Amazon. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ndong, I.C.; Okyere, D.; Enos, J.Y.; Mensah, B.A.; Nyarko, A.; Abuaku, B.; Amambua-Ngwa, A.; Merle, C.S.C.; Koram, K.A.; Ahorlu, C.S. Prevalence of asymptomatic malaria parasitaemia following mass testing and treatment in Pakro sub-district of Ghana. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Crowell, V.; Briet, O.J.; Hardy, D.; Chitnis, N.; Maire, N.; Di Pasquale, A.; Smith, T.A. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of mass screening and treatment for reducing Plasmodium falciparum malaria burden. Malar. J. 2013, 12, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Newby, G.; Hwang, J.; Koita, K.; Chen, I.; Greenwood, B.; von Seidlein, L.; Shanks, G.D.; Slutsker, L.; Kachur, S.P.; Wegbreit, J.; et al. Review of mass drug administration for malaria and its operational challenges. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 93, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Poirot, E.; Skarbinski, J.; Sinclair, D.; Kachur, S.P.; Slutsker, L.; Hwang, J. Mass drug administration for malaria. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013, 2013, CD008846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Brady, O.J.; Slater, H.C.; Pemberton-Ross, P.; Wenger, E.; Maude, R.J.; Ghani, A.C.; Penny, M.A.; Gerardin, J.; White, L.J.; Chitnis, N.; et al. Role of mass drug administration in elimination of Plasmodium falciparum malaria: A consensus modelling study. Lancet Glob. Health 2017, 5, e680–e687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Map showing the neighbourhoods of Kiankan and Cocodacra, in the village of Kaukira, municipality of Puerto Lempira, where the active search for malaria cases was carried out. Black dots indicate households where health authorities reported index cases during 2023. Map created using open data from the GADM database of global administrative areas, version 3.6. www.gadm.org.
Figure 1. Map showing the neighbourhoods of Kiankan and Cocodacra, in the village of Kaukira, municipality of Puerto Lempira, where the active search for malaria cases was carried out. Black dots indicate households where health authorities reported index cases during 2023. Map created using open data from the GADM database of global administrative areas, version 3.6. www.gadm.org.
Pathogens 13 00541 g001
Figure 2. Workflow illustrating the findings of malaria testing techniques in a population without symptoms.
Figure 2. Workflow illustrating the findings of malaria testing techniques in a population without symptoms.
Pathogens 13 00541 g002
Table 1. List of primers used for amplification reactions and nucleotide sequences.
Table 1. List of primers used for amplification reactions and nucleotide sequences.
Method and TargetPrimer NameSequence (5′-3′)References
PET-PCR for genus PlasmodiumGenus forwardGGC CTA ACA TGG CTA TGA CG[6,15]
Genus reverse6FAM-agg cgc ata gcg cct gg CTG CCT TCC TTA GAT GTG GTA GCT
PET-PCR for P. falciparumFalciparum forwardACC CCT CGC CTG GTG TTT TT[15]
Falciparum reverseHEX-agg cgc ata gcg cct gg TCG GGC CCC AAA AAT AGG AA
PET-PCR for P. vivaxVivax forwardACT GAC ACT GAT GAT TTA GAA CCC ATT T[16]
Vivax reverseHEX-agg cgc ata gcg cct ggT GGA GAG ATC TTT CCA TCC TAA ACC T
Nested PCR for P. vivax msp3α (1st round)Pvmsp-3a P1CAG CAG ACA CCA TTT AAG G[17]
Pvmsp-3a P2CCG TTT GTT GAT TAG TTG C
Nested PCR for P. vivax msp3α (2nd round)Pvmsp-3a N1GAC CAG TGT GAT ACC ATT AAC C
Pvmsp-3a N2ATA CTG GTT CTT CGT CTT CAG G
Nested PCR for P. vivax msp3ß (1st round)Pvmsp-3b P1GTA TTC TTC GCA ACA CTC[17]
Pvmsp-3b P2CTT CTG ATG TTA TTT CCA G
Nested PCR for P. vivax msp3ß (2nd round)Pvmsp-3b N1CGA GGG GCG AAA TTG TAA ACC
Pvmsp-3b N2GCT GCT TCT TTT GCA AAG G
Nested PCR for P. falciparum msp1 (1st round)MIOFCTA GAA GCT TTA GAA GAT GCA GTA TTG[18,19]
MIORCTT AAA TAG ATT CTA ATT CAA GTG GAT CA
Nested PCR for P. falciparum msp1 (2nd round)K1FAAA TGA AGA AGA AAT TAC TAC AAA AGG TGC
K1RGCT TGC ATC AGC TGG AGG GCT TGC ACC AG
MAD20FAAA TGA AGG AAC AAG TGG AAC AGC TGT TAC
MAD20RATC TGA AGG ATT TGT ACG TCT TGA ATT ACC
RO33FTAA AGG ATG GAG CAA ATA CTC AAG TTG TTG
RO33RCAA GTA ATT TTG AAC TCT ATG TTT TAA ATC AGC GTA
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Banegas, S.; Escobar, D.; Pinto, A.; Moncada, M.; Matamoros, G.; Valdivia, H.O.; Reyes, A.; Fontecha, G. Asymptomatic Malaria Reservoirs in Honduras: A Challenge for Elimination. Pathogens 2024, 13, 541. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13070541

AMA Style

Banegas S, Escobar D, Pinto A, Moncada M, Matamoros G, Valdivia HO, Reyes A, Fontecha G. Asymptomatic Malaria Reservoirs in Honduras: A Challenge for Elimination. Pathogens. 2024; 13(7):541. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13070541

Chicago/Turabian Style

Banegas, Sharon, Denis Escobar, Alejandra Pinto, Marcela Moncada, Gabriela Matamoros, Hugo O. Valdivia, Allan Reyes, and Gustavo Fontecha. 2024. "Asymptomatic Malaria Reservoirs in Honduras: A Challenge for Elimination" Pathogens 13, no. 7: 541. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13070541

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop