Current and Future Challenges for Rehabilitation for Inflammatory Arthritis
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Complexity of Rehabilitation
3. Models of Rehabilitation for People with Inflammatory Arthritis
3.1. Extended and Advanced Scope of Practice
3.2. Shared Care Model
3.3. Remote Care (Telehealth) Models
3.4. Work Rehabilitation Models
4. Challenges for Research
4.1. Clinical Trial Design
4.2. Implementation
5. Discussion
5.1. Early Detection of Disability
5.2. Patient Engagement
5.3. Financial Barriers
5.4. Policy Priorities
5.5. WHO Rehabilitation Packages
6. Conclusions
7. Future Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Global, regional, and national burden of osteoarthritis, 1990–2020 and projections to 2050: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023, 5, e508–e522. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Briggs, A.M.; Dreinhöfer, K.E. Rehabilitation 2030: A Call to Action Relevant to Improving Musculoskeletal Health Care Globally. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2017, 47, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cieza, A.; Causey, K.; Kamenov, K.; Hanson, S.W.; Chatterji, S.; Vos, T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2021, 396, 2006–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roodenrijs, N.M.T.; de Hair, M.J.H.; van der Goes, M.C.; Jacobs, J.W.G.; Welsing, P.M.J.; van der Heijde, D.; Aletaha, D.; Dougados, M.; Hyrich, K.L.; McInnes, I.B.; et al. Characteristics of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: Results of an international survey. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 77, 1705–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Hair, M.J.H.; Jacobs, J.W.G.; Schoneveld, J.L.M.; van Laar, J.M. Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: An area of unmet clinical need. Rheumatology 2018, 57, 1135–1144. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Batko, B.; Batko, K.; Krzanowski, M.; Żuber, Z. Physician Adherence to Treat-to-Target and Practice Guidelines in Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Batko, B.; Urbański, K.; Świerkot, J.; Wiland, P.; Raciborski, F.; Jędrzejewski, M.; Koziej, M.; Cześnikiewicz-Guzik, M.; Guzik, T.J.; Stajszczyk, M. Comorbidity burden and clinical characteristics of patients with difficult-to-control rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2019, 38, 2473–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramiro, S.; Nikiphorou, E.; Sepriano, A.; Ortolan, A.; Webers, C.; Baraliakos, X.; Landewé, R.B.M.; Van den Bosch, F.E.; Boteva, B.; Bremander, A.; et al. ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis: 2022 update. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2023, 82, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vliet Vlieland, T.P.; Li, L.C. Rehabilitation in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: Differences and similarities. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2009, 27 (Suppl. 55), S171–S178. [Google Scholar]
- Sivera, F.; Alunno, A.; Najm, A.; Avcin, T.; Baraliakos, X.; Bijlsma, J.W.; Badreh, S.; Burmester, G.; Cikes, N.; Da Silva, J.A.; et al. 2019 EULAR points to consider for the assessment of competences in rheumatology specialty training. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020, 80, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edelaar, L.; Nikiphorou, E.; Fragoulis, G.E.; Iagnocco, A.; Haines, C.; Bakkers, M.; Barbosa, L.; Cikes, N.; Ndosi, M.; Primdahl, J.; et al. 2019 EULAR recommendations for the generic core competences of health professionals in rheumatology. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2019, 79, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bearne, L.M.; Byrne, A.-M.; Segrave, H.; White, C.M. Multidisciplinary team care for people with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol. Int. 2015, 36, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kjeken, I.; Bø, I.; Rønningen, A.; Spada, C.; Mowinckel, P.; Hagen, K.B.; Dagfinrud, H. A three-week multidisciplinary in-patient rehabilitation programme had positive long-term effects in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Randomized controlled trial. J. Rehabil. Med. 2013, 45, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Uhlig, T.; Bjørneboe, O.; Krøll, F.; Palm, Ø.; Olsen, I.C.; Grotle, M. Involvement of the multidisciplinary team and outcomes in inpatient rehabilitation among patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2016, 17, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Klokkerud, M.; Hagen, K.; Kjeken, I.; Bremander, A.; Hørslev-Petersen, K.; Vlieland, T.; Grotle, M.; STAR-ETIC Collaboration. Development of a framework identifying domains and elements of importance for arthritis rehabilitation. J. Rehabil. Med. 2012, 44, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hagel, S.; Lindqvist, E.; Petersson, I.; Meesters, J.; Klokkerud, M.; Aanerud, G.; Stovgaard, I.; Hørslev-Petersen, K.; Strömbeck, B.; Vlieland, T.; et al. Which patients improve the most after arthritis rehabilitation? A study of predictors in patients with inflammatory arthritis in Northern Europe, the STAR-ETIC collaboration. J. Rehabil. Med. 2014, 46, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skinnes, M.N.; Moe, R.H.; Johansen, T.; Lyby, P.S.; Dahl, K.; Eid, I.; Fagertun, T.C.; Habberstad, A.; Johnsen, T.J.; Kjeken, I.; et al. Work Ability in the Year after Rehabilitation-Results from the RehabNytte Cohort. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 7391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sagen, J.S.; Kjeken, I.; Habberstad, A.; Linge, A.D.; Simonsen, A.E.; Lyken, A.D.; Irgens, E.L.; Framstad, H.; Lyby, P.S.; Klokkerud, M.; et al. Patient Involvement in the Rehabilitation Process Is Associated with Improvement in Function and Goal Attainment: Results from an Explorative Longitudinal Study. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grotle, M.; Klokkerud, M.; Kjeken, I.; Bremander, A.; Hagel, S.; Strömbeck, B.; Hørslev-Petersen, K.; Meesters, J.; Vlieland, T.; Hagen, K. What’s in the black box of arthritis rehabilitation? A comparison of rehabilitation practice for patients with inflammatory arthritis in Northern Europe. J. Rehabil. Med. 2013, 45, 458–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Bodies Alliance. White Book on Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) in Europe. Chapter 4. History of the specialty: Where PRM comes from. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2018, 54, 186–197. [Google Scholar]
- Speerin, R.; Slater, H.; Li, L.; Moore, K.; Chan, M.; Dreinhöfer, K.; Ebeling, P.R.; Willcock, S.; Briggs, A.M. Moving from evidence to practice: Models of care for the prevention and management of musculoskeletal conditions. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2014, 28, 479–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chehade, M.; Gill, T.; Kopansky-Giles, D.; Schuwirth, L.; Karnon, J.; McLiesh, P.; Alleyne, J.; Woolf, A. Building multidisciplinary health workforce capacity to support the implementation of integrated, people-centred Models of Care for musculoskeletal health. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2016, 30, 559–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Skivington, K.; Matthews, L.; Simpson, S.A.; Craig, P.; Baird, J.; Blazeby, J.M.; Boyd, K.A.; Craig, N.; French, D.P.; McIntosh, E.; et al. A new framework for develo** and evaluating complex interventions: Update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2021, 374, n2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wade, D.T. What is rehabilitation? An empirical investigation leading to an evidence-based description. Clin. Rehabil. 2020, 34, 571–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wade, D.T. Defining rehabilitation: An exploration of why it is attempted, and why it will always fail. Clin. Rehabil. 2021, 35, 1650–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Health Organisation. Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
- Kechichian, A.; Lafrance, S.; Matifat, E.; Dubé, F.; Lussier, D.; Benhaim, P.; Perreault, K.; Filiatrault, J.; Rainville, P.; Higgins, J.; et al. Multimodal Interventions Including Rehabilitation Exercise for Older Adults with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Geriatr. Phys. Ther. 2020, 45, 34–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butink, M.H.P.; Webers, C.; Verstappen, S.M.M.; Falzon, L.; Betteridge, N.; Wiek, D.; Woolf, A.D.; Stamm, T.A.; Burmester, G.R.; Bijlsma, J.W.J.; et al. Non-pharmacological interventions to promote work participation in people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the EULAR taskforce on healthy and sustainable work participation. RMD Open 2023, 9, e002903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.C.; Davis, A.M.; Lineker, S.C.; Coyte, P.C.; Bombardier, C. Effectiveness of the primary therapist model for rheumatoid arthritis rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 55, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, L.C.; Maetzel, A.; Davis, A.M.; Lineker, S.C.; Bombardier, C.; Coyte, P.C. Primary therapist model for patients referred for rheumatoid arthritis rehabilitation: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 55, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhangu, G.; Hartfeld, N.M.S.; Lacaille, D.; Lopatina, E.; Hoens, A.M.; Barber, M.R.; Then, K.L.; Zafar, S.; Fifi-Mah, A.; Hazlewood, G.; et al. A sco** review of shared care models for rheumatoid arthritis with patient-initiated follow-up. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2023, 60, 152190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porter, M.E. A Strategy for Health Care Reform—Toward a Value-Based System. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Porter, M.E.; Teisberg, E.O. Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-Based Competition on Results; Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Brkic, A.; Kim, J.G.; Haugeberg, G.; Diamantopoulos, A.P. Decentralizing healthcare in Norway to improve patient-centered outpatient clinic management of rheumatoid arthritis—A conceptual model. BMC Rheumatol. 2021, 5, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Rezende, D.R.B.; Neto, I.A.; Iunes, D.H.; Carvalho, L.C. Analysis of the effectiveness of remote intervention of patients affected by chronic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Access 2023, 7, 27550834231197316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.W.; Park, S.W.; Kim, D.Y.; Lee, B.S.; Kim, D.; Jeon, N.; Yang, Y.J. E-Health Interventions for Older Adults with Frailty: A Systematic Review. Ann. Rehabil. Med. 2023, 47, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Thurah, A.; Bosch, P.; Marques, A.; Meissner, Y.; Mukhtyar, C.B.; Knitza, J.; Najm, A.; Østerås, N.; Pelle, T.; Knudsen, L.R.; et al. 2022 EULAR points to consider for remote care in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2022, 81, 1065–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marques, A.; Bosch, P.; De Thurah, A.; Meissner, Y.; Falzon, L.; Mukhtyar, C.; Bijlsma, H.; Dejaco, C.; Stamm, T. Effectiveness of remote care interventions: A systematic review informing the 2022 EULAR points to consider for remote care in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. RMD Open 2022, 8, e002290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Edwards, D.; Williams, J.; Carrier, J.; Davies, J. Technologies used to facilitate remote rehabilitation of adults with deconditioning, musculoskeletal conditions, stroke, or traumatic brain injury: An umbrella review. JBI Evid. Synth. 2022, 20, 1927–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaiser, C.; Ackerhans, S.; Huynh, T.; Denzinger, J.; Riegler, M.; Dumitrescu, D.; Guckel, D.; Schmidt, A.; Schultz, C. Challenges in the Implementation of Disruptive Innovations in Health Care Organizations. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2023, 309, 145–149. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, S.; Wang, D.; Liang, Y.; ** review. BMJ Open Qual. 2023, 12, e002309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Belton, J.; Hoens, A.; Scott, A.; Ardern, C.L. Patients as Partners in Research: It’s the Right Thing to Do. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2019, 49, 623–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Keegan, C.; Connolly, S.; Wren, M.-A. Measuring healthcare expenditure: Different methods, different results. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2017, 187, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmer, K.S.; Agoritsas, T.; Martin, D.; Scott, T.; Mulla, S.M.; Miller, A.P.; Agarwal, A.; Bresnahan, A.; Hazzan, A.A.; Jeffery, R.A.; et al. Activity-Based Funding of Hospitals and Its Impact on Mortality, Readmission, Discharge Destination, Severity of Illness, and Volume of Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wade, D.T. The future of rehabilitation in the United Kingdom National Health Service: Using the COVID-19 crisis to promote change, increasing efficiency and effectiveness. Clin. Rehabil. 2021, 35, 471–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. Integrating Rehabilitation into Health Systems/Financing; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
- Bautz-Holter, E.; Sveen, U.; Søberg, H.; Røe, C. Challenges and trends in rehabilitation. Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforening Tidsskr. Prakt. Med. Ny Raekke 2007, 127, 304–306. [Google Scholar]
- Røe, C.; Kirkevold, M.; Andelic, N.; Soberg, H.; Sveen, U.; Bautz-Holter, E.; Jahnsen, R.; Walsem, M.; Bragstad, L.; Hjelle, E.; et al. The challenges of describing rehabilitation services: A discussion paper. J. Rehabil. Med. 2018, 50, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- The World Bank. From Double Shock to Double Recovery; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Elhai, M.; Benavent, D.; Aouad, K.; Studenic, P.; Bertheussen, H.; Primdahl, J.; Zabalan, C.; de Wit, M.; Gossec, L. Involving patients as research partners in research in rheumatology: A literature review in 2023. RMD Open 2023, 9, e003566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Conley, B.; Bunzli, S.; Bullen, J.; O’Brien, P.; Persaud, J.; Gunatillake, T.; Nikpour, M.; Grainger, R.; Barnabe, C.; Lin, I. What are the core recommendations for rheumatoid arthritis care? Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Clin. Rheumatol. 2023, 42, 2267–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Moe, R.H.; Vliet Vlieland, T.P.M. Current and Future Challenges for Rehabilitation for Inflammatory Arthritis. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061808
Moe RH, Vliet Vlieland TPM. Current and Future Challenges for Rehabilitation for Inflammatory Arthritis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(6):1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061808
Chicago/Turabian StyleMoe, Rikke Helene, and Thea P. M. Vliet Vlieland. 2024. "Current and Future Challenges for Rehabilitation for Inflammatory Arthritis" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 6: 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061808