Next Article in Journal
Expanding the MAPPs Assay to Accommodate MHC-II Pan Receptors for Improved Predictability of Potential T Cell Epitopes
Previous Article in Journal
Selective Noradrenaline Depletion in the Neocortex and Hippocampus Induces Working Memory Deficits and Regional Occurrence of Pathological Proteins
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly of Protosalanx chinensis and Response to Air Exposure Stress

1
College of Fisheries, Key Lab of Freshwater Animal Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, Engineering Research Center of Green Development for Conventional Aquatic Biological Industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Key Laboratory of Freshwater Fisheries and Germplasm Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuxi 214081, China
3
Wuxi Fisheries College, Nan**g Agricultural University, Wuxi 214081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2023, 12(9), 1266; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12091266
Submission received: 2 June 2023 / Revised: 5 September 2023 / Accepted: 11 September 2023 / Published: 21 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In the present study, we assembled a high-quality chromosome-level genome of Protosalanx chinensis, which is the first chromosome-level genome for Salangidae. These genomic data provide a fundamental resource for ecological and adaptation studies of Protosalanx chinensis, and offer a deeper understanding of the response to air exposure stress and species conservation.

Abstract

Protosalanx chinensis is a suitable particular species for genetic studies on nearly scaleless skin, transparency and high sensitivity to hypoxia stress. Here, we generated a high-quality chromosome-level de novo assembly of P. chinensis. The final de novo assembly yielded 379.47 Mb with 28 pseudo-chromosomes and a scaffold N50 length of 14.52 Mb. In total, 21,074 protein-coding genes were predicted. P. chinensis, Esox lucius and Hypomesus transpacificus had formed a clade, which diverged about 115.5 million years ago. In the air exposure stress experiment, we found that some genes play an essential role during P. chinensis hypoxia, such as bhlh, Cry1, Clock, Arntl and Rorb in the circadian rhythm pathway. These genomic data offer a crucial foundation for P. chinensis ecology and adaptation studies, as well as a deeper understanding of the response to air exposure stress.

1. Introduction

Protosalanx chinensis (family Salangidae, order Salmoniformes, Figure 1) is a small annual cold-temperature fish endemic to East Asia and has some specific morphological characteristics, including transparency and scaleless skin [1,2,3,4]. P. chinensis exhibits strong ecological plasticity, with populations found in both freshwater and seawater habitats, including the Yangtze River Basin and its associated lakes (Taihu Lake, Hongze Lake, etc.), as well as the offshore waters of the Yellow Sea, Bohai Sea and East China Sea [1,5,6]. Due to the important economic value of P. chinensis, it was widely translocated to many lakes and reservoirs in northern China in the mid-1980s, and gradually formed a stable population [7]. This deliberate act of artificial translocation has engendered a remarkable shift, resulting in a notable proliferation of P. chinensis across diverse aquatic habitats, effectively amplifying its presence [7]. Studies of the genomic and physiological characteristics of P. chinensis have helped us to better understand the environmental adaptations of P. chinensis.
P. chinensis is a valuable model for studying the molecular mechanisms underlying the evolution of hypoxia. P. chinensis is difficult to obtain alive and can die quickly when stressed by hypoxia during net fishing [1]. Previous studies on the genome of P. chinensis have focused only on phylogeny, sexual differentiation, and skeletal development [2,3]. A basic understanding of stress and the corresponding physiological state of P. chinensis is still lacking. An air exposure stress experiment is an effective experimental tool with which to understand the stress state. An air exposure experiment on gilthead seabream showed that stress-induced hormonal changes affected the liver’s metabolic organization and highlighted the crucial role of vasotocinergic and isotocinergic pathway [8]. A study of rainbow trout demonstrated changes in miRNAs in fish blood during air exposure and identified several miRNA markers [9]. As an economically valuable fish, P. chinensis has not yet been fully cultured in captivity and transported live, so there is potential value in studying its response to hypoxic stress.
With the development of genomic (particularly long-reads) sequencing, two draft genome assemblies of P. chinensis had recently been reported with assembly quality with a contig N50 of 17.2 Kb [2], and a contig N50 of 103 Kb [3], respectively (Protosalanx hyalocranius and Protosalanx chinensis were the same species). Although these two genome drafts provide preliminary genetic information of P. chinensis, these genomes are deficient due to the limitation of sequencing technology. Therefore, chromosome-level genomes and comparative genomics resource are essential to understanding ecological and evolutionary research, translocation adaptation, and genetic improvement.
Here, we generated a high-quality chromosome-level de novo assembly of P. chinensis. A set of protein-coding genes was annotated, and the evolutionary history of P. chinensis was analyzed. In the air exposure stress experiment, the expression pattern of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was investigated. These genomic data offer a crucial foundation for P. chinensis ecology and adaptation studies, as well as a deeper understanding of the response to air exposure stress and species conservation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and DNA and RNA Sequencing

We collected muscle samples from an adult P. chinensis individual in the Hongze Lake at Jiangsu, China, for sequencing (Figure 1). After the muscle samples were collected, they were rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until DNA extraction. DNA was extracted from muscle tissue. RNA was extracted from the larvae. DNA was extracted following the phenol/chloroform DNA extraction method. After the extraction of the DNA and RNA, corresponding quality control was conducted according to different library construction types. The quality control included assessing the concentration, purity, and fragment integrity of the samples.
With the BGI MGISEQ platform, a short insert WGS library was generated according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. A PacBio HiFi library was constructed using a QIAGEN Blood & Cell Culture DNA Midi Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and then sequenced on the PacBio Sequel II system. A Hi-C library was generated using the Mbo I restriction enzyme and sequenced on the BGI MGISEQ platform. We constructed one PacBio HiFi library with an insert fragment size of approximately 15 kb, and one Hi-C library with an insert fragment size of approximately 300 bp.
Fifteen RNA libraries were constructed using the TRIzol Total RNA Isolation Kit (Takara, San Jose, CA, USA) after which the concentration and purity of the extracted RNA were measured to ensure quality. Subsequently, the RNA was fragmented into appropriate lengths using digestion enzymes. This fragmented RNA was then reverse-transcribed to synthesize cDNA, which underwent end repair, addition of specific adapter sequences, and PCR amplification for library construction. Finally, the constructed RNA library was sequenced on the BGI MGISEQ platform.

2.2. Sequencing QC and Genome Assembly

We used the SOAPnuke v2.1.7 [10] pipeline to filter out the low-quality and adaptor reads. After that, we calculated the K-mer (k = 21) frequency distribution with Jellyfish v2.2.6 [11] and analyzed the result using GenomeScope v1.0 [12]. HiFi reads with about 62× coverage were sequenced using the PacBio Sequel platform and cleaned with SMRTLink v8. The contig assembly was carried out using Hifiasm v0.16.1-r375 [13], followed by a removal of the redundant sequences with the Purge-Haplotigs [14] program. Subsequently, the contigs were further connected to the chromosome level using the Juicer v1.5 [15] and 3D-DNA v180922 [16] pipelines. The BUSCO completeness score of the P. chinensis genome was calculated using BUSCO v5.2.2 [17] based on the actinopterygii (odb10) dataset.

2.3. Identification of Repetitive Sequences

We identified the repetitive sequences using a combination of de novo and homolog-based methods. For de novo annotation, we used RepeatModeler v1.0.4 (http://www.repeatmasker.org/RepeatModeler/, accessed date: 23 February 2023) and LTR-FINDER v1.0.7 [18] software to construct a primary library. This customed library was used to screen repeat sequences via the program RepeatMasker v4.0.7 [19]. For the homolog-based prediction, we utilized RepeatMasker v4.0.7 [19], RepeatProteinMasker v4.0.7 [19] and Tandem Repeat Finder v4.10.0 [20] based on the Repbase database.

2.4. Genome Annotation

Gene prediction was conducted through a combination of homology-based prediction, ab initio prediction and transcriptome-based prediction methods. Next, 96.4 Gb RNA-seq data were directly mapped to P. chinensis assembly with Hisat2 v2.1.0 [21] to identify putative exon regions and splice junctions. StringTie v1.3.5 [22] was then used to assemble the mapped reads into gene models and validated using PASA v2.5.2 [23]. Finally, we identified the candidate coding regions by employing TransDecoder v5.5.0 (https://github.com/TransDecoder/TransDecoder, accessed date: 23 February 2023). For homology-based annotation, we downloaded the assemblies and gene annotation files of four actinopterygii species (Danio rerio, Oryzias. latipes, P. hyalocranius and Salmo salar) from the NCBI database. Combined with the above RNA-seq and homolog data, we predicted the homology-like coding sequences using GeMoMa v1.8 [24]. A total of 1200 high-quality coding genes were used to train the predictors using August v3.2.1 [25] and SNAP v2006-07-28 [26] (Korf, 2004) and then ab initio prediction was performed. Lastly, we integrated all the protein-coding genes predicted using the above three strategies with the EVidenceModeler (EVM) pipeline v1.1.1 [23].

2.5. Phylogenetic and Gene Family Analysis

We used OrthoFinder v2.3.11 [27] to cluster protein-coding genes. Single-copy orthologous genes (1:1:1) were aligned using MAFFT v7.310 [28]. Referring to the methods used in previous studies on P. chinensis [3], we used PhyML v3.3 [29] with the HKY85 model to construct a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree with 100 pseudoreplicates. All branches had 100/100 bootstrap support, showing phylogeny consistent with a previous study [3]. We estimated the species divergence time using MCMCTREE in PAML v4.9 [30]. Four divergence time points from TimeTree (http://timetree.org.cn, accessed date: 23 February 2023) were used to calibrate the divergence times: (a) Callorhinchus milii and Latimeria chalumnae (421.5–461.6 MYA), (b) L. chalumnae and Lepisosteus oculatus (416.4–422.2 MYA), (c) L. oculatus and Anguilla Anguilla (372.4–383.4 MYA) and (d) **-stone towards unraveling the intricate mechanisms governing the species’ survival and adaptation strategies, further expanding our understanding of the complex interplay between genetics, physiology, and environmental stressors.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://mdpi.longhoe.net/article/10.3390/biology12091266/s1, Figure S1: 21-mers analysis for estimating the genome size of P. chinensis; Figure S2: Divergence distribution of repetitive elements in P. chinensis genome; Figure S3: Distribution of gene, coding sequence, exon, and intron lengths, and exon number in P. chinensis and other four genomes; Figure S4: Gene function annotation results in the five databases of NR, InterPro, KEGG, SwissProt and KOG statistics Venn diagram; Figure S5: Phylogenetic tree of 16 species based on maximum-likelihood using 2152 single-copy orthologs; Figure S6: Estimation of divergence times of 16 species; Figure S7: Functional enrichment results of expansion gene families in P. chinensis genome, Terms with p < 0.01 was selected; Figure S8: Functional enrichment results of extraction gene families in P. chinensis genome, Terms with p < 0.01 was selected; Table S1: Sequencing data used for the genome P. chinensis assembly; Table S2: The information of P. chinensis genome survey analysis; Table S3: The statistics of length and number for the de novo assembled Protosalanx genomes; Table S4: Statistics of chromosomal length of P. chinensis genome; Table S5: Repetitive sequences in P. chinensis genome; Table S6: Transposable elements in P. chinensis genome; Table S7: Gene predictions in P. chinensis genome; Table S8: The evidence supporting the gene models of P. chinese genome; Table S9: BUSCO analysis result of P. chinensis genome; Table S10: Functional annotations of P. chinensis genes; Table S11: Gene family clustered; Table S12: The statics of Syntenic Blocks; Table S13: Top 20 pathway resulted from KEGG. KEGG enrichment of the markable expanded gene family in P. chinensis genome; Table S14: Top 20 pathway resulted from KEGG. KEGG enrichment of the markable extracted gene family in P. chinensis genome; Table S15: Data for analysis in this study; Table S16: RNA map ratio; Table S17: KEGG Pathway enrichment analysis for upward trend DEGs; Table S18: Pathway enrichment analysis for downward trend DEGs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z. (Yanfeng Zhou); methodology, Y.Z. (Yanfeng Zhou); formal analysis, X.Z. and Y.D.; investigation, X.T. and Y.Z. (Yifan Zhou); writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z. (Yanfeng Zhou) and X.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the grant from the Key R&D project of Hubei Province (2022BBA0050) and Basic scientific research project of the Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (2020TD61).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Freshwater Fisheries Research Center (FFRC) of the Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (CAFS) (FEH20200807, 2020/08/07).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw genome sequencing data for P. chinensis were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database under Accession the BioProjectID PRJNA915822. The genome assembly, genome annotation, coding sequences, protein sequences, repeat annotation and functional annotation files were deposited in Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22144694.v1 (accessed date: 23 February 2023).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tang, F.; Gao, W.; Li, H.; Liu, W. Biology and fishery ecology of Protosalanx chinensis: A review. J. Fish. China 2020, 44, 2100–2111. [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu, K.; Xu, D.; Li, J.; Bian, C.; Duan, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, M.; You, X.; You, Y.; Chen, J.; et al. Whole Genome Sequencing of Chinese Clearhead Icefish, Protosalanx hyalocranius. Gigascience 2017, 6, giw012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, J.; Qi, J.; Shi, F.; Pan, H.; Liu, M.; Tian, R.; Geng, Y.; Li, H.; Qu, Y.; Chen, J.; et al. Insights into the Evolution of Neoteny from the Genome of the Asian Icefish Protosalanx chinensis. iScience 2020, 23, 101267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Z.; Fu, C.; Lei, G. Biodiversity of Chinese Icefishes (Salangidae) and Their Conserving Strategies. Biodivers. Sci. 2002, 10, 416–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Dong, S.; Wang, Q.; Sun, Z. The isozyme genetic structures in large icefish (Protosalanx hyalocranius) and Taihu Lake icefish (Neosalanx taihuensis). J. Dalian Fish. Coll. 2005, 20, 111–115. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jian, Y.; Xun, X.; HongBo, L. Bioaccumulation of elements in icefish Protosalanx hyalocranius from the Taihu Lake and Hongze Lake. Oceanol. Et Limnol. Sin. Hai Yang Yu Hu Chao 2009, 40, 201–207. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kang, B.; Deng, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J. Transplantation of Icefish (Salangidae) in China: Glory or Disaster? Rev. Aquac. 2015, 7, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Skrzynska, A.K.; Maiorano, E.; Bastaroli, M.; Naderi, F.; Míguez, J.M.; Martínez-Rodríguez, G.; Mancera, J.M.; Martos-Sitcha, J.A. Impact of Air Exposure on Vasotocinergic and Isotocinergic Systems in Gilthead Sea Bream (Sparus aurata): New Insights on Fish Stress Response. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ikert, H.; Lynch, M.D.J.; Doxey, A.C.; Giesy, J.P.; Servos, M.R.; Katzenback, B.A.; Craig, P.M. High Throughput Sequencing of MicroRNA in Rainbow Trout Plasma, Mucus, and Surrounding Water Following Acute Stress. Front. Physiol. 2021, 11, 588313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Shi, C.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Li, Y.; Ye, J.; Yu, C.; Li, Z.; et al. SOAPnuke: A MapReduce Acceleration-Supported Software for Integrated Quality Control and Preprocessing of High-Throughput Sequencing Data. Gigascience 2018, 7, gix120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Marçais, G.; Kingsford, C. A Fast, Lock-Free Approach for Efficient Parallel Counting of Occurrences of k-Mers. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vurture, G.W.; Sedlazeck, F.J.; Nattestad, M.; Underwood, C.J.; Fang, H.; Gurtowski, J.; Schatz, M.C. GenomeScope: Fast Reference-Free Genome Profiling from Short Reads. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 2202–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cheng, H.; Concepcion, G.T.; Feng, X.; Zhang, H.; Li, H. Haplotype-Resolved de Novo Assembly Using Phased Assembly Graphs with Hifiasm. Nat. Methods 2021, 18, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Roach, M.J.; Schmidt, S.A.; Borneman, A.R. Purge Haplotigs: Allelic Contig Reassignment for Third-Gen Diploid Genome Assemblies. BMC Bioinform. 2018, 19, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Durand, N.C.; Shamim, M.S.; Machol, I.; Rao, S.S.; Huntley, M.H.; Lander, E.S.; Aiden, E.L. Juicer Provides a One-Click System for Analyzing Loop-Resolution Hi-C Experiments. Cell Syst. 2016, 3, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dudchenko, O.; Batra, S.S.; Omer, A.D.; Nyquist, S.K.; Hoeger, M.; Durand, N.C.; Shamim, M.S.; Machol, I.; Lander, E.S.; Aiden, A.P.; et al. De Novo Assembly of the Aedes aegypti Genome Using Hi-C Yields Chromosome-Length Scaffolds. Science 2017, 356, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Simão, F.A.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Ioannidis, P.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: Assessing Genome Assembly and Annotation Completeness with Single-Copy Orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3210–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, Z.; Wang, H. LTR_FINDER: An Efficient Tool for the Prediction of Full-Length LTR Retrotransposons. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, W265–W268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chen, N. Using Repeat Masker to Identify Repetitive Elements in Genomic Sequences. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2004, 5, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Benson, G. Tandem Repeats Finder: A Program to Analyze DNA Sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, D.; Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. HISAT: A Fast Spliced Aligner with Low Memory Requirements. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kovaka, S.; Zimin, A.V.; Pertea, G.M.; Razaghi, R.; Salzberg, S.L.; Pertea, M. Transcriptome Assembly from Long-Read RNA-Seq Alignments with StringTie2. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Haas, B.J.; Salzberg, S.L.; Zhu, W.; Pertea, M.; Allen, J.E.; Orvis, J.; White, O.; Buell, C.R.; Wortman, J.R. Automated Eukaryotic Gene Structure Annotation Using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol. 2008, 9, R7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Keilwagen, J.; Hartung, F.; Grau, J. GeMoMa: Homology-Based Gene Prediction Utilizing Intron Position Conservation and RNA-Seq Data. Gene Predict. Methods Protoc. 2019, 1962, 161–177. [Google Scholar]
  25. Stanke, M.; Waack, S. Gene Prediction with a Hidden Markov Model and a New Intron Submodel. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, ii215–ii225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Korf, I. Gene Finding in Novel Genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Phylogenetic Orthology Inference for Comparative Genomics. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nakamura, T.; Yamada, K.D.; Tomii, K.; Katoh, K. Parallelization of MAFFT for Large-Scale Multiple Sequence Alignments. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 2490–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guindon, S.; Dufayard, J.-F.; Lefort, V.; Anisimova, M.; Hordijk, W.; Gascuel, O. New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, Z. PAML 4: Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 1586–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; Debarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.; **, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A Toolkit for Detection and Evolutionary Analysis of Gene Synteny and Collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. De Bie, T.; Cristianini, N.; Demuth, J.P.; Hahn, M.W. CAFE: A Computational Tool for the Study of Gene Family Evolution. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 1269–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast Gapped-Read Alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, B.; Dewey, C.N. RSEM: Accurate Transcript Quantification from RNA-Seq Data with or without a Reference Genome. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Roberts, A.; Trapnell, C.; Donaghey, J.; Rinn, J.L.; Pachter, L. Improving RNA-Seq Expression Estimates by Correcting for Fragment Bias. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-Seq Data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bairoch, A.; Apweiler, R. The SWISS-PROT Protein Sequence Data Bank and Its Supplement TrEMBL in 1999. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gui, J.-F.; Zhou, L.; Li, X.-Y. Rethinking Fish Biology and Biotechnologies in the Challenge Era for Burgeoning Genome Resources and Strengthening Food Security. Water Biol. Secur. 2022, 1, 100002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lu, G.; Luo, M. Genomes of Major Fishes in World Fisheries and Aquaculture: Status, Application and Perspective. Aquac. Fish. 2020, 5, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tang, F.-J.; Liu, W.; Wang, J.-L.; Li, Z.; **e, S.-G. Diet Composition and Transition of Clearhead Icefish (Protosalanx hyalocranius) in Lake **ngkai; Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences: Kunming, China, 2013; Volume 34, pp. 493–498. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Harris, R.M.; Hofmann, H.A. Seeing Is Believing: Dynamic Evolution of Gene Families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 1252–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mu, Y.; Li, W.; Wu, B.; Chen, J.; Chen, X. Transcriptome Analysis Reveals New Insights into Immune Response to Hypoxia Challenge of Large Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys crocea). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 98, 738–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lu, Y.-P.; Zheng, P.-H.; Zhang, X.-X.; Li, J.-T.; Zhang, Z.-L.; Xu, J.-R.; Meng, Y.-Q.; Li, J.-J.; **an, J.-A.; Wang, A.-L. New Insights into the Regulation Mechanism of Red Claw Crayfish (Cherax quadricarinatus) Hepatopancreas under Air Exposure Using Transcriptome Analysis. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2023, 132, 108505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wu, L.; Tang, D.; Shen, C.; Bai, Y.; Jiang, K.; Yu, Q.; Wang, Z. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of the Gills of Cardisoma armatum Provides Novel Insights into the Terrestrial Adaptive Related Mechanism of Air Exposure Stress. Genomics 2021, 113, 1193–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Moore, M.N.; Allen, J.I.; McVeigh, A.; Shaw, J. Lysosomal and Autophagic Reactions as Predictive Indicators of Environmental Impact in Aquatic Animals. Autophagy 2006, 2, 217–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. McGeachy, M.J.; Cua, D.J.; Gaffen, S.L. The IL-17 Family of Cytokines in Health and Disease. Immunity 2019, 50, 892–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xue, T.; Liu, Y.; Cao, M.; Zhang, X.; Fu, Q.; Yang, N.; Li, C. Genome-Wide Identification of Interleukin-17 (IL-17)/Interleukin-17 Receptor (IL- 17R) in Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) and Expression Pattern Analysis after Vibrio anguillarum Infection. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2021, 121, 104070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, L.; Zhang, R.; Wang, X.; Zhu, H.; Tian, Z. Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Molecular Mechanisms Responsive to Acute Cold Stress in the Tropical Stenothermal Fish Tiger Barb (Puntius tetrazona). BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Brijs, J.; Sandblom, E.; Axelsson, M.; Sundell, K.; Sundh, H.; Huyben, D.; Broström, R.; Kiessling, A.; Berg, C.; Gräns, A. The Final Countdown: Continuous Physiological Welfare Evaluation of Farmed Fish during Common Aquaculture Practices before and during Harvest. Aquaculture 2018, 495, 903–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wu, J.; Zhang, W.; Li, C. Heat and Hypoxia Exposure Mediates Circadian Rhythms Response via Methylation Modification in Apostichopus Japonicas. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 721465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jerônimo, R.; Moraes, M.N.; de Assis, L.V.M.; Ramos, B.C.; Rocha, T.; Castrucci, A.M.d.L. Thermal Stress in Danio Rerio: A Link between Temperature, Light, Thermo-TRP Channels, and Clock Genes. J. Therm. Biol. 2017, 68, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Xu, K.; **ao, X.; Mu, W. Comparison of Effects in Sustained and Diel-Cycling Hypoxia on Hypoxia Tolerance, Histology, Physiology and Expression of Clock Genes in High Latitude Fish Phoxinus lagowskii. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2021, 260, 111020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Peng, L.-B.; Wang, D.; Han, T.; Wen, Z.; Cheng, X.; Zhu, Q.-L.; Zheng, J.-L.; Wang, P. Histological, Antioxidant, Apoptotic and Transcriptomic Responses under Cold Stress and the Mitigation of Blue Wavelength Light of Zebrafish Eyes. Aquac. Rep. 2022, 26, 101291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mao, Y.; Zhang, G. A Complete, Telomere-to-Telomere Human Genome Sequence Presents New Opportunities for Evolutionary Genomics. Nat. Methods 2022, 19, 635–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Illustration of P. chinensis.
Figure 1. Illustration of P. chinensis.
Biology 12 01266 g001
Figure 2. Genome characteristics of P. chinensis.
Figure 2. Genome characteristics of P. chinensis.
Biology 12 01266 g002
Figure 3. Genome-wide Hi-C heatmap of P. chinensis.
Figure 3. Genome-wide Hi-C heatmap of P. chinensis.
Biology 12 01266 g003
Figure 4. Genome synteny between P. chinensis and H. transpacificus, P. chinensis, and E. lucius.
Figure 4. Genome synteny between P. chinensis and H. transpacificus, P. chinensis, and E. lucius.
Biology 12 01266 g004
Figure 5. Number of expanded and contracted gene families in P. chinensis.
Figure 5. Number of expanded and contracted gene families in P. chinensis.
Biology 12 01266 g005
Figure 6. DGEs analysis. (a) UpSetR plots depicting the number of unique and shared DEGs. (b) Trend analysis of DEGs expression profiles.
Figure 6. DGEs analysis. (a) UpSetR plots depicting the number of unique and shared DEGs. (b) Trend analysis of DEGs expression profiles.
Biology 12 01266 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, Y.; Zhang, X.; Tang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Ding, Y.; Liu, H. Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly of Protosalanx chinensis and Response to Air Exposure Stress. Biology 2023, 12, 1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12091266

AMA Style

Zhou Y, Zhang X, Tang X, Zhou Y, Ding Y, Liu H. Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly of Protosalanx chinensis and Response to Air Exposure Stress. Biology. 2023; 12(9):1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12091266

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Yanfeng, **zhao Zhang, Xuemei Tang, Yifan Zhou, Yuting Ding, and Hong Liu. 2023. "Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly of Protosalanx chinensis and Response to Air Exposure Stress" Biology 12, no. 9: 1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12091266

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop