Herbicide Resistance: Another Hot Agronomic Trait for Plant Genome Editing
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Chemical/Herbicides Method of Weed Control
3. Mechanism and Approaches for Development of Herbicide Resistant Plants/Crops
3.1. Mutagenesis/Mutation Breeding
3.2. Transgenic Approach Including the Over-expression
3.3. Genome Editing for Development of Herbicide Resistant Crops
4. Advantages and Disadvantages of Genome Editing in Herbicide Resistance
5. Impact of Genome-Edited Herbicide Resistant Crops in Agriculture
6. Concluding Remarks and Perspectives
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ganie, Z.A.; Obrigawitch, T.; Kang, I.H.; Copeland, D.; Gutteridge, S.; May, J.; Schrage, B.; Albright, R.; Chandi, A. An outlook of FMC’s current and future herbicide-resistance management strategies. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 77, 1559–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hickey, L.T.; Hafeez, A.N.; Robinson, H.; Jackson, S.A.; Leal-Bertioli, S.C.; Tester, M.; Gao, C.; Godwin, I.D.; Hayes, B.J.; Wulff, B.B. Breeding crops to feed 10 billion. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 744–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Available online: www.fao.org (accessed on 9 August 2020).
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Recommendations for Improved Weed Management. Available online: www.fao.org/3/a0884e/a0884e.pdf (accessed on 11 August 2020).
- Adetunji, C.O.; Oloke, J.K.; Bello, O.M.; Pradeep, M.; Jolly, R.S. Innovation. Isolation, structural elucidation and bioherbicidal activity of an eco-friendly bioactive 2-(hydroxymethyl) phenol, from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (C1501) and its ecotoxicological evaluation on soil. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2019, 13, 304–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matloob, A.; Safdar, M.E.; Abbas, T.; Aslam, F.; Khaliq, A.; Tanveer, A.; Rehman, A.; Chadhar, A.R. Challenges and prospects for weed management in Pakistan: A review. Crop Prot. 2019, 134, 104724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauhan, B.S. Grand challenges in weed management. Front. Agron. 2020, 1, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brun, T.; Rabuske, J.E.; Confortin, T.C.; Luft, L.; Todero, I.; Fischer, M.; Zabot, G.L.; Mazutti, M.A. Weed control by metabolites produced from Diaporthe schini. Environ. Technol. 2020, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvarado-Serrano, D.F.; Van Etten, M.L.; Chang, S.-M.; Baucom, R.S. The relative contribution of natural landscapes and human-mediated factors on the connectivity of a noxious invasive weed. Heredity 2019, 122, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bahadur, S.; Verma, S.; Prasad, S.; Madane, A.; Maurya, S.; Gaurav, V.V.; Sihag, S.J. Eco-friendly weed management for sustainable crop production-A review. J. Crop Weed 2015, 11, 181–189. [Google Scholar]
- Abouziena, H.; Haggag, W. Weed control in clean agriculture: A review1. Planta Daninha 2016, 34, 377–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jabran, K.; Mahajan, G.; Sardana, V.; Chauhan, B.S. Allelopathy for weed control in agricultural systems. Crop Prot. 2015, 72, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zimdahl, R.L. Fundamentals of Weed Science, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2013; pp. 259–309. [Google Scholar]
- Del Rey, J.C.; Lizana, A.R.; Agüera-Vega, J.; Ruiz, M.P. Field sprayer for inter and intra-row weed control: Performance and labor savings. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2013, 11, 642–651. [Google Scholar]
- Bond, W.; Grundy, A. Non-chemical weed management in organic farming systems. Weed Res. 2001, 41, 383–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Cheng, L.; Long, W.; Gao, J.; Zhang, J.; Chen, S.; Pu, H.; Hu, M. Synergistic mutations of two rapeseed AHAS genes confer high resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides for weed control. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 2811–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrew, I.; Storkey, J.; Sparkes, D. A review of the potential for competitive cereal cultivars as a tool in integrated weed management. Weed Res. 2015, 55, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duke, S.O. Perspectives on transgenic, herbicide-resistant crops in the United States almost 20 years after introduction. Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 71, 652–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menendez, J.; Rojano-Delgado, M.; De Prado, R. Differences in herbicide uptake, translocation, and distribution as sources of herbicide resistance in weeds. In Retention, Uptake, and Translocation of Agrochemicals in Plants; Myung, K., Sctchivi, N.M., Kingston, C.K., Eds.; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2014; Volume 1171, pp. 141–157. [Google Scholar]
- Eichert, T.; Burkhardt, J. Quantification of stomatal uptake of ionic solutes using a new model system. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gaines, T.A.; Duke, S.O.; Morran, S.; Rigon, C.A.; Tranel, P.J.; Küpper, A.; Dayan, F.E. Mechanisms of evolved herbicide resistance. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 10307–10330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yuan, J.S.; Tranel, P.J.; Stewart, C.N., Jr. Non-target-site herbicide resistance: A family business. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Eerd, L.L.; Hoagland, R.E.; Zablotowicz, R.M.; Hall, J.C. Pesticide metabolism in plants and microorganisms. Weed Sci. 2003, 51, 472–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, S.J.P.d.; Nicolai, M.; Ferreira, R.R.; Figueira, A.V.d.O.; Christoffoleti, P.J. Herbicide selectivity by differential metabolism: Considerations for reducing crop damages. Sci. Agric. 2009, 66, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Edwards, R.; Brazier-Hicks, M.; Dixon, D.P.; Cummins, I. Chemical manipulation of antioxidant defences in plants. Adv. Bot. Res. 2005, 42, 1–32. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, R.; Liu, J.; Chai, Z.; Chen, S.; Bai, Y.; Zong, Y.; Chen, K.; Li, J.; Jiang, L.; Gao, C. Generation of herbicide tolerance traits and a new selectable marker in wheat using base editing. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 480–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weed Science Society of America (WSSA). Available online: https://wssa.net/wssa/weed/resistance/herbicide-resistance-and-herbicide-tolerance-definitions/ (accessed on 19 February 2021).
- Lombardo, L.; Coppola, G.; Zelasco, S. New technologies for insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant plants. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ni, Z.; Han, Q.; He, Y.Q.; Huang, S. Application of genome-editing technology in crop improvement. Cereal Chem. 2018, 95, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Govindaraj, M.; Vetriventhan, M.; Srinivasan, M. Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: An overview of its analytical perspectives. Genet. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zhang, D.; Hussain, A.; Manghwar, H.; ** herbicide-tolerant crops from mutations. In Induced Plant Mutations in the Genomics Era; Shu, Q.Y., Ed.; Joint FAO/IAEA Program: Rome, Italy, 2009; p. 315. [Google Scholar]
- Lenser, T.; Theißen, G.J. Molecular mechanisms involved in convergent crop domestication. Trends Plant Sci. 2013, 18, 704–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Georges, F.; Ray, H. Genome editing of crops: A renewed opportunity for food security. GM Crops Food 2017, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA). Pocket K No. 17. Genetic Engineering and GM Crops. Available online: https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/pocketk/document/Doc-Pocket%20K17.pdf (accessed on 8 October 2020).
- Beckie, H.J.; Hall, L.M. Genetically-modified herbicide-resistant (GMHR) crops a two-edged sword? An Americas perspective on development and effect on weed management. Crop Prot. 2014, 66, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busi, R.; Powles, S.B. Transgenic glyphosate-resistant canola (Brassica napus) can persist outside agricultural fields in Australia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 220, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA). Pocket K No. 16. Biotech Crop Highlights in 2018. Available online: https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/pocketk/document/Doc-Pocket%20K16-2019.pdf (accessed on 8 October 2020).
- Fartyal, D.; Agarwal, A.; James, D.; Borphukan, B.; Ram, B.; Sheri, V.; Yadav, R.; Manna, M.; Varakumar, P.; Achary, V.M.M. Co-expression of P173S mutant rice EPSPS and igrA genes results in higher glyphosate tolerance in transgenic rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dun, B.; Wang, X.; Lu, W.; Chen, M.; Zhang, W.; **, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, B.; Lin, M. Development of highly glyphosate-tolerant tobacco by coexpression of glyphosate acetyltransferase gat and EPSPS G2-aroA genes. Crop J. 2014, 2, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guo, B.; Guo, Y.; Hong, H.; **, L.; Zhang, L.; Chang, R.-Z.; Lu, W.; Lin, M.; Qiu, L.J. Co-expression of G2-EPSPS and glyphosate acetyltransferase GAT genes conferring high tolerance to glyphosate in soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- ** a novel artificial rice germplasm for dinitroaniline herbicide resistance by base editing of OsTubA2. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 19, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Qin, R.; Li, J.; Liao, S.; Shan, T.; Xu, R.; Wu, D.; Wei, P. A CRISPR-Cas9-mediated domain-specific base-editing screen enables functional assessment of ACCase variants in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 1845–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kuang, Y.; Li, S.; Ren, B.; Yan, F.; Spetz, C.; Li, X.; Zhou, X.; Zhou, H. Base-editing-mediated artificial evolution of OsALS1 in planta to develop novel herbicide-tolerant rice germplasms. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Zhang, R.; Meng, X.; Chen, S.; Zong, Y.; Lu, C.; Qiu, J.-L.; Chen, Y.H.; Li, J.; Gao, C. Targeted, random mutagenesis of plant genes with dual cytosine and adenine base editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Meng, X.; Zong, Y.; Chen, K.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Li, J.; Gao, C. Gene replacements and insertions in rice by intron targeting using CRISPR–Cas9. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Zong, Y.; Wang, Y.; **, S.; Zhang, D.; Song, Q.; Zhang, R.; Gao, C. Expanded base editing in rice and wheat using a Cas9-adenosine deaminase fusion. Genome Biol. 2018, 19, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hua, K.; Jiang, Y.; Tao, X.; Zhu, J.K. Precision genome engineering in rice using prime editing system. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 2167–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, R.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Shan, T.; Qin, R.; Wei, P. Development of Plant Prime-Editing Systems for Precise Genome Editing. Plant Commun. 2020, 1, 100043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tian, S.; Jiang, L.; Cui, X.; Zhang, J.; Guo, S.; Li, M.; Zhang, H.; Ren, Y.; Gong, G.; Zong, M. Engineering herbicide-resistant watermelon variety through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated base-editing. Plant Cell Rep. 2018, 37, 1353–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zong, Y.; Song, Q.; Li, C.; **, S.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, J.-L.; Gao, C. Efficient C-to-T base editing in plants using a fusion of nCas9 and human APOBEC3A. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 950–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ni, H.; Xu, Y.; Chen, Q.; Jiang, L.J.S.C.L.S. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated base-editing system efficiently generates gain-of-function mutations in Arabidopsis. Sci. China Life Sci. 2017, 60, 520–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Chen, C.; ** systems. Crop J. 2019, 7, 750–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, J.M. The rise and future of glyphosate and glyphosate-resistant crops. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 1035–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Metje-Sprink, J.; Sprink, T.; Hartung, F. Genome-edited plants in the field. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2020, 61, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CIBUS. Our Crops. Available online: https://www.cibus.com/crops.php (accessed on 17 September 2020).
- Gullickson, G. New Herbicide Site of Action, Gene-Edited Short-Stature Corn, Xtendflex Coming from Bayer. Available online: https://www.agriculture.com/news/crops/new-herbicide-site-of-action-gene-edited-short-stature-corn-xtendflex-coming-from-bayer (accessed on 21 October 2020).
- Zhang, Y.; Pribil, M.; Palmgren, M.; Gao, C. A CRISPR way for accelerating improvement of food crops. Nat. Food 2020, 1, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.L.; Nakagawa, H.; Karita, S.; Ohmiya, K.; Hattori, T. Rice embryo globulins: Amino-terminal amino acid sequences, cDNA cloning and expression. Plant Cell Physiol. 1996, 37, 612–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mariani, C.; De Beuckeleer, M.; Truettner, J.; Leemans, J.; Goldberg, R.B. Induction of male sterility in plants by a chimaeric ribonuclease gene. Nature 1990, 347, 737–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Wang, K.; Huang, W.; Liu, G.; Gao, Y.; Wang, J.; Huang, Q.; Ji, Y.; Qin, X.; Wan, L. The rice pentatricopeptide repeat protein RF5 restores fertility in Hong-Lian cytoplasmic male-sterile lines via a complex with the glycine-rich protein GRP162. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- He, Y.; Zhu, M.; Wang, L.; Wu, J.; Wang, Q.; Wang, R.; Zhao, Y. Programmed self elimination of the CRISPR/Cas9 construct greatly accelerates the isolation of edited and transgene-free rice plants. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 1210–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Plant | Genome Editing System | Delivery Method | Target Gene | Target Herbicide | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rice | CRISPR-Cas9 | Particle bombardment | ALS | Bispyribac- sodium | [111] |
CRISPR-Cas9 | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | ALS | Imazethapyr | [112] | |
TALEN | Ballistic delivery | OsALS | Bispyribac- sodium | [37] | |
Target-AID | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | ALS | Imazamox | [113] | |
ABE | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | OsTubA2 | Dinitroaniline | [114] | |
CBE | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | OsACCase | Gallant | [115] | |
BEMGE | Agrobacterium-mediated and Particle bombardment | OsALS1 | Bispyribac-sodium | [116] | |
STEMEs | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | ACCase | Haloxyfop | [117] | |
CRISPR–Cas9 | Particle bombardment | EPSPS | Glyphosate | [118] | |
ABE | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | ACCase | Haloxyfop | [119] | |
Prime editing | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | OsALS | Bispyribac sodium | [40] | |
Prime editing | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | ALS | Imidazolinone | [120] | |
Prime editing | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | OsACCase1 | Haloxyfop | [121] | |
Watermelon | CBE | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | ClALS | Tribenuron | [122] |
Wheat | n/dCas9-PBE | Particle bombardment | TaALS, ACCase | Sulfonylurea, Imidazolinone and Aryloxyphenoxy propionate | [26] |
n/dCas9-PBE | Particle bombardment | TaALS | Nicosulfuron | [123] | |
Maize | CBE | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | ZmALS | Sulfonylurea | [95] |
Cas9-gRNA | Particle bombardment | ALS | Chlorsulfuron | [110] | |
Arabidopsis | CBE | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | ALS | Tribenuron-methyl | [124] |
Oilseed rape | CBE | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | BnALS1 | Tribenuron-methyl | [125] |
Tomato and Potato | CBE | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | ALS | Chlorsulfuron | [126] |
Soybean | CRISPR–Cas9 | Particle bombardment | ALS1 | Chlorsulfuron | [127] |
Flax | ssODN and CRISPR/Cas9 | Protoplast transfection | EPSPS | Glyphosate | [128] |
Chile peeper | Intragenic method | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | EPSPS | Glyphosate | [129] |
Cassava | Cas9-gRNA | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | EPSPS | Glyphosate | [130] |
Potato | GVR | Agrobacterium-mediated transformation | ALS1 | Imidazolinone | [131] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hussain, A.; Ding, X.; Alariqi, M.; Manghwar, H.; Hui, F.; Li, Y.; Cheng, J.; Wu, C.; Cao, J.; **, S. Herbicide Resistance: Another Hot Agronomic Trait for Plant Genome Editing. Plants 2021, 10, 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040621
Hussain A, Ding X, Alariqi M, Manghwar H, Hui F, Li Y, Cheng J, Wu C, Cao J, ** S. Herbicide Resistance: Another Hot Agronomic Trait for Plant Genome Editing. Plants. 2021; 10(4):621. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040621
Chicago/Turabian StyleHussain, Amjad, **ao Ding, Muna Alariqi, Hakim Manghwar, Fengjiao Hui, Yapei Li, Junqi Cheng, Chenglin Wu, **lin Cao, and Shuangxia **. 2021. "Herbicide Resistance: Another Hot Agronomic Trait for Plant Genome Editing" Plants 10, no. 4: 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040621