Previous Article in Journal
One Size Does Not Fit All: A Multifaceted Approach to Educate Families about Newborn Screening
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Exploring the Cost-Effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) in the UK

1
Orchard Therapeutics, London W6 8PW, UK
2
Division of Cell Matrix Biology & Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
3
Great Ormond Street Hospital, London WC1N 3JH, UK
4
Birmingham Women’s and Children NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B4 6NH, UK
5
Precision AQ, Boston, MA 02108, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2024, 10(3), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns10030045
Submission received: 8 March 2024 / Revised: 12 June 2024 / Accepted: 17 June 2024 / Published: 26 June 2024

Abstract

Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is a fatal inherited lysosomal storage disease that can be detected through newborn bloodspot screening. The feasibility of the screening assay and the clinical rationale for screening for MLD have been previously demonstrated, so the aim of this study is to determine whether the addition of screening for MLD to the routine newborn screening program in the UK is a cost-effective use of National Health Service (NHS) resources. A health economic analysis from the perspective of the NHS and Personal Social Services was developed based on a decision-tree framework for each MLD subtype using long-term outcomes derived from a previously presented partitioned survival and Markov economic model. Modelling inputs for parameters related to epidemiology, test characteristics, screening and treatment costs were based on data from three major UK specialist MLD hospitals, structured expert opinion and published literature. Lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 1.5% to account for time preference. Uncertainty associated with the parameter inputs was explored using sensitivity analyses. This health economic analysis demonstrates that newborn screening for MLD is a cost-effective use of NHS resources using a willingness-to-pay threshold appropriate to the severity of the disease; and supports the inclusion of MLD into the routine newborn screening programme in the UK.
Keywords: cost-effectiveness; cost utility analysis; metachromatic leukodystrophy; MLD; newborn screening; NHS; decision-tree model cost-effectiveness; cost utility analysis; metachromatic leukodystrophy; MLD; newborn screening; NHS; decision-tree model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bean, K.; Jones, S.A.; Chakrapani, A.; Vijay, S.; Wu, T.; Church, H.; Chanson, C.; Olaye, A.; Miller, B.; Jensen, I.; et al. Exploring the Cost-Effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) in the UK. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2024, 10, 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns10030045

AMA Style

Bean K, Jones SA, Chakrapani A, Vijay S, Wu T, Church H, Chanson C, Olaye A, Miller B, Jensen I, et al. Exploring the Cost-Effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) in the UK. International Journal of Neonatal Screening. 2024; 10(3):45. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns10030045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bean, Karen, Simon A. Jones, Anupam Chakrapani, Suresh Vijay, Teresa Wu, Heather Church, Charlotte Chanson, Andrew Olaye, Beckley Miller, Ivar Jensen, and et al. 2024. "Exploring the Cost-Effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) in the UK" International Journal of Neonatal Screening 10, no. 3: 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns10030045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop