Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Analysis of Water Surface Extent and Climate Change Parameters in Zarivar Lake, Iran
Previous Article in Journal
Satellite-Derived Estimates of Suspended CaCO3 Mud Concentrations from the West Florida Shelf Induced by Hurricane Ian
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Map** Aquatic Cyanobacterial Blooms Using Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery †

1
Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261, CNRS—Université de Tours, 37200 Tours, France
2
Remote Sensing Center, Lebanese CNRS, Riad al Soloh, 1107-2260 Beirut, Lebanon
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 5th International Electronic Conference on Remote Sensing, 7–21 November 2023; Available online: https://ecrs2023.sciforum.net/.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2024, 29(1), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/ECRS2023-15898
Published: 6 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of ECRS 2023)

Abstract

:
Algal blooms are harmful and can hinder the use of water. Remote sensing satellite images can help monitor the spatial–temporal distribution of these blooms. This helps us understand their dynamics and manage them better. In our work, we developed an algorithm using Sentinel-2 images. The validated algorithm showed good accuracy, suggesting the potential use of Sentinel-2 images to monitor algal blooms in other water bodies.

1. Introduction

Lakes and reservoirs are valuable natural resources that offer essential ecological, environmental, and hydrological services [1,2,3]. Cyanobacterial blooms are a serious problem in freshwater bodies, often suffering from eutrophication and the mismanagement of watersheds [4]. They can produce lethal cyanotoxins that threaten human health and aquatic inhabitants [5,6,7]. Therefore, to plan possible measures for protecting these natural ecosystems, innovative technologies and methods for monitoring water quality are needed [8,9,10]. Unlike classical in situ ground measurement methods that involve expensive field visits to a few sites in a lake, Earth Observation (EO) data can provide frequent surveys over a large area in a cost-effective way [11,12,13].
The latest generation of multispectral sensors on board of Sentinel-2 satellites is now used to assess the intra-annual spatial and temporal dynamics of phytoplankton abundance in shallow eutrophic lakes [14,15]. In order to estimate chl-a pigment, the development of satellite reflectance algorithms associated with phytoplankton biomass should be carried out [8]. Chl-a found in phytoplankton can be sensed by a variety of current and near-future satellite imaging technologies. The newest generation of medium-resolution multispectral sensors on board satellites such as Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 are now offering promising analyses for monitoring water quality [9,16] because of their fine spatial resolution, revisit time, and improved spectral band configuration in the visible–near-infrared wavelength range.
Chl-a has been widely estimated through remote sensing techniques [17,18,19]. However, few algorithms have been proposed for estimating chlorophyll-a as a proxy for productivity in eutrophic inland water using Senitnel-2. Since Sentinel-2 MSI has a band at 705 nm (B5), it can capture a chl-a peak.
In an aim to better understand the dynamics of cyanobacterial blooms, an algorithm based on Sentinel 2 was developed and validated. The algorithm was then used to map the spatial and temporal dynamics of these blooms throughout the reservoir.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

Karaoun Reservoir is the largest freshwater body in Lebanon. The reservoir is used for power production and irrigation. It has a surface area of 12 km2 at full capacity and a maximum and mean depth of 60 and 19 m, respectively [20]. The reservoir is classified as a hypereutrophic and monomictic water body with occurrence of cyanobacterial blooms during the spring and summer seasons, representing an interesting study case.

2.2. Field measurements

In situ measurements of the chl-a concentration were collected for band testing and algorithm development. Data were collected on 15 July 2016, 18 September 2017, 18 October 2017, and 29 August 2018, from a total of 23 sampling sites (n = 23). Similarly, an independent dataset was collected on 30 June 2017, 28 October 2017, 9 August 2018, 3 October 2018, and 23 October 2018 for validation purposes and consisted of a total of twelve sampling locations (n = 12). All campaigns were performed during Sentinel-2 overpasses.
Chlorophyll-a quantification was carried out according to the Lorenzen method [21]. A triplicate of each sample was filtered using Whatman GF/C filters. Chlorophyll-a was then extracted using 90% acetone by ultrasonication. The extracts were centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 12 min and then quantified using a spectrophotometer.
Spectroradiometric measurements were taken at several sites throughout the reservoir, synchronously with satellite overpasses, on 18 September 2017 and 18 October 2017 using a field spectroradiometer (ASD Field Spec 4) within a spectral range of 350–2500 nm and according to the SeaWiFS protocol [22]. To remove the glint effect, the method of [23] was applied.

2.3. Satellite data acquisition

A total of 38 cloud-free Sentinel-2 Satellite images were downloaded freely from the USGS. They are all level-1T-processed. Dates covered are between 20 August 2015 and 28 October 2018. The Sentinel-2 imagery consists of nine scenes collected in parallel with in situ measurements taken in 2016, 2017, and 2018.

2.4. Processing Images

Radiometric and atmospheric corrections were applied to the downloaded level 1 satellite images. The pre-processing steps of Sentinel-2 images consisted of radiometric calibration on SNAP, resampling bands on ENVI, atmospheric correction on 6S, and applying an algorithm on ArcGIS. The Sentinel-2 images were corrected using the 6S code (Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum), a radiative transfer code for modeling atmospheric scattering effects [24,25,26]. The Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) values that were needed as input for 6S were extracted from NASA’s AERONET (AErosol Robotics NETwork) program.

2.5. Algorithm development

A semi-empirical band ratio approach was chosen after testing multiple ones. Reflectance data were acquired from the first eight bands of Sentinel-2. The model was applied in the form of simple linear regression, Y = aX + b, where Y is the measured chl-a concentration, X is the applied band or band combination, a is the regression coefficient for X, and b is the constant term. The coefficient of determination R2 and the Pearson correlation coefficient were applied, searching for the best band combination.

3. Results

3.1. In Situ Results

Figure 1 shows the distribution of chl-a during nine field campaigns in 2016, 2017, and 2018. Four dates were used for calibration and five dates for validation. Both figures show wide ranges and variability across the sampled areas. The chl-a concentrations ranged from 8.3 to 169 μg/L, with a mean value of 63.83 μg/L. The highest spatial variation in [chl-a] occurred on 18 October 2017 and 28 October 2018, with a standard deviation of 30.67 and 64.35, respectively.

3.2. Chl-a Concentration Algorithm: Calibration and Validation

On a single-band level, Band 5 was correlated the most with the in situ PC measurements, with R2 = 0.69 and R = 0.831. For band combinations, the best fit between the bands’ reflectance and actual PC measurements was found for the band ratio B5/B4, with R2 = 0.862. Based on these findings, the empirical band ratio model was developed using a Red band 4 of spectral resolution (650–680 nm) with a Vegetation Red Edge band 5 (698–713 nm) to estimate chl-a at Karaoun Reservoir. The algorithm is shown in (Equation (1)):
Chl-a (μg/L) = 79.9 (B5/B4) − 57.2
An independent dataset (n = 12) acquired on 30 June 2017, 9 August 2018, and on 3, 23, and 28 October 2018, was used to evaluate and validate the performance of the developed band ratio algorithm using the established regression coefficients. During the mentioned dates, cyanobacterial blooms dominated the Karaoun Reservoir, with a high chl-a concentration ranging from 8.3 to 169 μg/L.
Figure 2 shows the scatter correlation plot between the measured and predicted chl-a contents from the developed band ratio algorithm with a high coefficient of determination, R2 = 0.8.
Figure 3 shows the spatio-temporal variations in chl-a concentration for the cloud-free days between 2015 and 2017, produced using the validated algorithm. The chl-a values mostly ranged between 5 and 190 μg/L. Expect for May and August 2017, a heterogenous spatial distribution was noticed throughout the reservoir.

4. Discussion

The assessment of chl-a by remote sensing uses its characteristic absorption features between 440 nm and 560 nm and at 670 nm [27]. The chl-a reflectance peak region (700–720 nm) may move toward a longer wavelength when phytoplankton is abundant. The results of [28] showed that the amplitude of the 705 nm peak against the 665–740 nm (B4–B6 of Sentinel-2) baseline was in very good correlation with the chl-a concentration in the studied lakes (R2 = 0.83). Since Sentinel-2 MSI has a band at 705 nm (B5), it can capture a perfect chl-a peak. The algorithm developed in this study is comparable to others. Pinardi et al., 2018, also developed an algorithm on an Italian lake using the band ratio of Bands 4 and 5 Senintel-2 images [14].
This study is the first attempt to evaluate the performance of the Sentinel-2 MSI sensor on chl-a retrieval algorithms coupled with in situ data at Karaoun Reservoir, located in an understudied region. The results achieved in this study have presented the use of simple linear regression analysis to develop an algorithm for chl-a estimation. After testing the bands of Sentinel-2, we chose the most suitable ratio from the highly correlated band ratios with the actual chl-a concentration.
The results are very encouraging for inland water monitoring and research. This algorithm will assist in monitoring phytoplankton blooms and supporting water management decisions for the optimal utilization of Karaoun Reservoir. The applicability of this algorithm was tested under high chl-a values and can be used on other eutrophic inland waters.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F.; methodology, A.F.; software, A.F.; validation, A.F., G.F., K.S. and D.M.; formal analysis, A.F. and G.F.; investigation, A.F. and G.F.; resources, A.F., K.S. and G.F.; data curation, A.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.F.; writing—review and editing, A.F., K.S. and G.F.; visualization, A.F. and G.F.; supervision, A.F., K.S. and G.F.; project administration, A.F.; funding acquisition, A.F. and G.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received financial support from the Lebanese CNRS.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data can be provided upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Matsui, S.; Ide, S.; Ando, M. Lakes and Reservoirs: Reflecting Waters of Sustainable Use. Water Sci. Technol. 1995, 32, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lehner, B.; Döll, P. Development and Validation of a Global Database of Lakes, Reservoirs and Wetlands. J. Hydrol. 2004, 296, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Williamson, C.E.; Saros, J.E.; Vincent, W.F.; Smol, J.P. Lakes and Reservoirs as Sentinels, Integrators, and Regulators of Climate Change. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2009, 54, 2273–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Darwish, T.; Atallah, T.; Fadel, A. Challenges of Soil Carbon Sequestration in NENA Region. SOIL 2018, 4, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fadel, A.; Guerrieri, F.; Pincebourde, S. The Functional Relationship between Aquatic Insects and Cyanobacteria: A Systematic Literature Review Reveals Major Knowledge Gaps. Total Environ. Res. Themes 2023, 8, 100078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Merel, S.; Walker, D.; Chicana, R.; Snyder, S.; Baur, E.; Thomas, O. State of Knowledge and Concerns on Cyanobacterial Blooms and Cyanotoxins. Environ. Int. 2013, 59, 303–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Munoz, M.; Cirés, S.; de Pedro, Z.M.; Colina, J.Á.; Velásquez-Figueroa, Y.; Carmona-Jiménez, J.; Caro-Borrero, A.; Salazar, A.; Santa María Fuster, M.-C.; Contreras, D.; et al. Overview of Toxic Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins in Ibero-American Freshwaters: Challenges for Risk Management and Opportunities for Removal by Advanced Technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 761, 143197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Matthews, M.W.; Odermatt, D. Improved Algorithm for Routine Monitoring of Cyanobacteria and Eutrophication in Inland and Near-Coastal Waters. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 156, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kutser, T. Quantitative Detection of Chlorophyll in Cyanobacterial Blooms by Satellite Remote Sensing. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2004, 49, 2179–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bertone, E.; Burford, M.A.; Hamilton, D.P. Fluorescence Probes for Real-Time Remote Cyanobacteria Monitoring: A Review of Challenges and Opportunities. Water Res. 2018, 141, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alcântara, E.H.; Stech, J.L.; Lorenzzetti, J.A.; Bonnet, M.P.; Casamitjana, X.; Assireu, A.T.; Novo, E.M.L. de M. Remote Sensing of Water Surface Temperature and Heat Flux over a Tropical Hydroelectric Reservoir. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 2651–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Akbari, E.; Alavipanah, S.K.; Jeihouni, M.; Hajeb, M.; Haase, D.; Alavipanah, S. A Review of Ocean/Sea Subsurface Water Temperature Studies from Remote Sensing and Non-Remote Sensing Methods. Water 2017, 9, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Awad, M.M. An Innovative Intelligent System Based on Remote Sensing and Mathematical Models for Improving Crop Yield Estimation. Inf. Process. Agric. 2019, 6, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pinardi, M.; Bresciani, M.; Villa, P.; Cazzaniga, I.; Laini, A.; Tóth, V.; Fadel, A.; Austoni, M.; Lami, A.; Giardino, C. Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Primary Producers in Shallow Lakes as Seen from Space: Intra-Annual Observations from Sentinel-2A. Limnologica 2018, 72, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bresciani, M.; Cazzaniga, I.; Austoni, M.; Sforzi, T.; Buzzi, F.; Morabito, G.; Giardino, C. Map** Phytoplankton Blooms in Deep Subalpine Lakes from Sentinel-2A and Landsat-8. Hydrobiologia 2018, 824, 197–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pahlevan, N.; Lee, Z.; Wei, J.; Schaaf, C.B.; Schott, J.R.; Berk, A. On-Orbit Radiometric Characterization of OLI (Landsat-8) for Applications in Aquatic Remote Sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 154, 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bresciani, M.; Stroppiana, D.; Odermatt, D.; Morabito, G.; Giardino, C. Assessing Remotely Sensed Chlorophyll-a for the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in European Perialpine Lakes. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 3083–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Duan, H.; Ma, R.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, B. Comparison of Different Semi-Empirical Algorithms to Estimate Chlorophyll-a Concentration in Inland Lake Water. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 170, 231–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brezonik, P.; Menken, K.D.; Bauer, M. Landsat-Based Remote Sensing of Lake Water Quality Characteristics, Including Chlorophyll and Colored Dissolved Organic Matter (CDOM). Lake Reserv. Manag. 2005, 21, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sharaf, N.; Bresciani, M.; Giardino, C.; Faour, G.; Slim, K.; Fadel, A. Using Landsat and in Situ Data to Map Turbidity as a Proxy of Cyanobacteria in a Hypereutrophic Mediterranean Reservoir. Ecol. Inform. 2019, 50, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lorenzen, C.J. Determination of Chlorophyll and Phaeo-Pigments: Spectrophotometric Equations. Limnol Ocean. 1967, 12, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fargion, G.S.; Mueller, J.L. Ocean Optics Protocols for Satellite Ocean Color Sensor Validation, Revision 2; National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center: Greenbelt, MD, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kutser, T.; Vahtmäe, E.; Paavel, B.; Kauer, T. Removing Glint Effects from Field Radiometry Data Measured in Optically Complex Coastal and Inland Waters. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 133, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Proud, S.R.; Fensholt, R.; Rasmussen, M.O.; Sandholt, I. A Comparison of the Effectiveness of 6S and SMAC in Correcting for Atmospheric Interference of Meteosat Second Generation Images. J. Geophys. Res. Atmospheres 2010, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, W.; Tamura, M.; Takahashi, H. Atmospheric and Spectral Corrections for Estimating Surface Albedo from Satellite Data Using 6S Code. Remote Sens. Environ. 2001, 76, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vermote, E.F.; Tanre, D.; Deuze, J.L.; Herman, M.; Morcette, J.-J. Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: An Overview. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1997, 35, 675–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dörnhöfer, K.; Oppelt, N. Remote Sensing for Lake Research and Monitoring – Recent Advances. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 64, 105–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Toming, K.; Kutser, T.; Laas, A.; Sepp, M.; Paavel, B.; Nõges, T. First Experiences in Map** Lake Water Quality Parameters with Sentinel-2 MSI Imagery. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A box plot showing ground measurements of chlorophyll-a concentrations used for (a) calibration and (b) validation.
Figure 1. A box plot showing ground measurements of chlorophyll-a concentrations used for (a) calibration and (b) validation.
Environsciproc 29 00072 g001
Figure 2. Chl-a algorithm (a) calibration and (b) validation.
Figure 2. Chl-a algorithm (a) calibration and (b) validation.
Environsciproc 29 00072 g002
Figure 3. Maps of chlorophyll-a concentration between year 2015 and year 2017 on Karaoun Reservoir.
Figure 3. Maps of chlorophyll-a concentration between year 2015 and year 2017 on Karaoun Reservoir.
Environsciproc 29 00072 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fadel, A.; Maatouk, D.; Slim, K.; Faour, G. Map** Aquatic Cyanobacterial Blooms Using Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2024, 29, 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECRS2023-15898

AMA Style

Fadel A, Maatouk D, Slim K, Faour G. Map** Aquatic Cyanobacterial Blooms Using Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2024; 29(1):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECRS2023-15898

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fadel, Ali, Doha Maatouk, Kamal Slim, and Ghaleb Faour. 2024. "Map** Aquatic Cyanobacterial Blooms Using Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 29, no. 1: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECRS2023-15898

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop