Next Article in Journal
Form Matters—Technical Cues in the Single Leg Heel Raise to Failure Test Significantly Change the Outcome: A Study of Convergent Validity in Australian Football Players
Previous Article in Journal
Green Synthesis of Cocos nucifera-Based Nanomaterials and Mechanistic Basis of Their Antimicrobial Action
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Resilience and Sense of Coherence among Female Fibromyalgia Patients Living in a Conflict Zone Who Underwent Fibrotherapy Intervention

by
Liraz Cohen-Biton
1,*,
Dan Buskila
2 and
Rachel Nissanholtz-Gannot
3
1
Departmen of Social Work, Ashkelon Academic College, Ashkelon 78211, Israel
2
Department of Internal Medicine H, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
3
Department of Health Systems Management, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
BioMed 2024, 4(2), 78-88; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomed4020006
Submission received: 8 February 2024 / Revised: 8 March 2024 / Accepted: 11 March 2024 / Published: 22 March 2024

Abstract

:
Objective: This study sought to examine whether the sense of coherence (SoC) and resilience among female fibromyalgia (FM) patients increased after participation in a fibrotherapy intervention program (FTI) and whether SoC and resilience increased among female FM patients (FFMPs) exposed to security threats who changed their co** strategies to problem-oriented co**. Methods: Ninety-six FFMPs aged 19–75 enrolled in the FTI program led by Rabbi Firer in Sderot, Israel. The intervention program is divided into three stages, each comprising a distinct weekly treatment plan. The treatment plans encompass the following modalities: physiotherapy adapted to FM conditions, group therapy, hydrotherapy, horticultural therapy/cooking therapy, Pilates, pottery therapy, and kundalini yoga. Each stage spans a duration of 10 weeks, culminating in a total program duration of 30 weeks. Results: The findings show that after participating in FTI, the problem-orientation level of co** and health indicators, including functional ability and physiological scores (pre- and post-exertion), increased while psychological distress levels decreased. Overall, all the physiological scales measured before and after the FTI showed a significant improvement among the entire sample. FFMPs with problem-oriented strategies reported higher levels of SoC and resilience after participating in the FTI program. Conclusions: The FTI provided FFMPs with tools to understand the meaning of their disease and its management, whereas before they were preoccupied with the presence of the disease and its negative impact on their lives. The participation of FFMPs in the FTI leads to a perceptual change, the adoption of problem-oriented co** strategies, and the increased utilization of co** resources, namely, SoC and resilience. Problem-oriented co** combined with high SoC and resilience led FFMPs to adopt health strategies such as physical activity and other empowering activities that raised their physical and mental health indicators.

1. Introduction

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a complex condition characterized by chronic pain, fatigue, sleep disorders, cognitive impairments, and other somatic symptoms [1]. FM falls under the category of medically unexplained functional somatic syndromes and is considered a somatization disorder [2]. The exact classification of FM remains imprecise [2,3]. Individuals with FM experience widespread chronic pain throughout the musculoskeletal system [4] and often exhibit central physical sensitivity and persistent pain [5,6]. Chronic pain, which persists or recurs for over three months, is a primary feature of FM [7]. It is recognized as “chronic primary pain” and is considered a separate condition [8]. FM is associated with neurosensitivity and reduced conditioned pain modulation (CPM) [9]. The concept of nociplastic pain arises from the understanding that nociception changes within the peripheral and central nervous system can lead to pain even without evidence of tissue damage or disease [10,11].
The prevalence of FM in the general population ranges from 0.2% to 6.6%, with higher rates among women (2.4–6.8%) [12]. The prevalence of FM symptoms among female teachers in Israel was 11.4%, significantly higher than the rate among male teachers (1.5%) [13]. While the exact etiology of FM remains unclear, trauma is recognized as a significant risk factor. FM patients commonly experience symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [14]. Early adverse experiences or prolonged traumatic stress in adulthood can affect the central nervous system circuits involved in pain regulation and stress response, potentially contributing to increased pain sensitivity in FM [15,16].

1.1. The Effect of Exposure to a Security Threat on FM Patients

This paper focuses on the co** strategies of female FM patients (FFMPs) who live in the Gaza Envelope in southern Israel, which is exposed to security threats. The effects of the security threats on residents in this region range from mild stress reactions to severe stress reactions, such as mood changes, hyper-arousal, anxiety, depression, and psychological distress, and somatic symptoms, such as muscular pain and symptoms of joint inflammation [17,18]. Ablin et al. [19] have found that there are more FM patients in the Gaza Strip than in other areas of the country and that the security threat has real physical consequences for FM patients. The diagnosis of FM is usually clinical, and doctors often treat the pain symptoms rather than the causes of the disease. FM patients’ main challenge is managing the disease, and co** resources and strategies are essential issues [5,20].

1.2. The Salutogenic Theory

Salutogenesis, a term coined by Aaron Antonovsky [21], proposes that life experiences contribute to sha** one’s SoC. Antonovsky’s salutogenic theory suggests that develo** a sense of coherence is a resilience factor in co** with stressful situations, reducing stress reactions, and maintaining physical and mental health against negative experiences. SoC is the central concept in the salutogenic model and is perceived as an internal co** resource that enables a person to cope positively with stress and maintain mental and physical health [22,23]. SoC provides the basis for mobilizing and activating co** resources, which is essential in promoting health and develo** resistance and resilience [24]. Salutogenesis is a conceptual framework for studies investigating internal co** resources that enable individuals such as FFMPs to cope optimally with their syndrome [25].

1.3. Resilience

Resilience is a multifaceted construct that encompasses various psychological and social dimensions. It has been recognized as a pivotal concept in human development and developmental psychopathology [26]. Resilience is characterized by positive adaptation patterns in the face of adversity and stressful life events [27,28]. Its conceptualization is grounded in the notion that individuals can withstand the impact of significant risk factors and adverse experiences without suffering from detrimental outcomes or deviating from their expected developmental trajectory [29]. Furthermore, resilience implies that individuals can recover and return to their prior level of functioning, with or without external support, following a setback or developmental crisis.

1.4. Co** Strategies in Stressful Situations

Co** involves cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage or tolerate internal or external demands caused by a stressful event or situation. Co** strategies are influenced by an individual’s appraisal of a situation as a threat or challenge and the perception of internal and external resources [30,31]. The study focuses on three co** strategies: problem-oriented co**, emotion-oriented co**, and avoidant co**. Problem-oriented co** aims to solve or change the source of the stress and includes co** planning and actions to manage the situation. Emotion-oriented co** is maladaptive and can lead to mental health problems. In contrast, avoidant co** involves disengagement behavior and denial [32]—internal resources such as a sense of coherence (SoC) and resilience influence co** strategies. Positive health outcomes were associated with problem-oriented co**, while negative health outcomes were linked with emotion-oriented and avoidant co** strategies [33,34].
We posit that an intervention program has the potential to enhance focused co** mechanisms in dealing with challenges in FFMPs. Following recent studies that have found the potential for promoting resilience [35,36,37] and a sense of coherence [38,39] through intervention programs, we aimed to investigate whether a specialized intervention program tailored for FFMPs would impact their co** patterns, thereby enhancing resilience and SoC in the face of the challenges experienced by these patients. In the current study, we have chosen to concentrate on the fibrotherapy intervention program (FTI) which was developed at the Ezra Le’Marpe (Help for Healing) Rehabilitation Medical Center, headed by Rabbi Avraham Elimelech Firer. The program helps FFMPs through holistic body and mind treatment. It combines physical therapy, Pilates, hydrotherapy, emotional response in therapeutic groups, gardening, cooking therapy, and a ceramics workshop that summarizes the process that FFMPs go through.
From this, the following hypotheses have emerged:
The study hypotheses
H1: 
Following the FTI program, a positive relationship will be found between problem-focused co** and the SoC, so a high tendency to use a problem-focused co** strategy will be expressed in an increasing SoC.
H2: 
Following the FTI program, a negative relationship will be found between the SoC and the level of symptoms of the disease; the higher the SoC, the less the psychological distress, the physiological indices (increase in endurance), and the functional difficulty.
H3: 
Following the FTI program, a positive relationship will be found between problem-focused co** and resilience, so a high tendency to use a problem-focused co** strategy will increase resilience.
H4: 
Following the FTI program, a negative relationship will be found between resilience and the level of symptoms of the disease; the higher the resilience, the less the psychological distress, the physiological indices (increase in endurance), and the functional difficulty.

2. Materials and Methods

A total of 96 female FM patients aged 19–75 residing in the Gaza Envelope area who received fibrotherapy intervention at the Medical Rehabilitation Center Ezra Le’Marpe in 2020 were recruited to participate in the study. The socio-demographic characteristics of the sample are presented in Table 1. To be eligible for the study, participants needed to meet the following criteria: (1) medical diagnosis by a physician of FM for at least one year; (2) age between 19 and 75; (3) Jewish women who speak Hebrew to minimize the potential for data bias resulting from language and cultural differences; and (4) due to confidentiality and accessibility issues, it was more realistic to approach patients who were treated at the Ezra Le’Marpe Rehabilitation Medical Center. The sample was selected based on convenience, and the data collection process was concluded after reaching 100 subjects.
All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. We confirm that all experimental protocols have been approved by an institutional and/or licensing committee on behalf of the Ariel University Ethics Committee. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

2.1. Tools

The quantitative data collection process was carried out in two stages: at the beginning and end. At each stage, we distributed 96 questionnaires (a total of 192 questionnaires).

2.2. Socio-Demographic Data

The questionnaires included socio-demographic variables: age, socio-economic status, religious belief, and degree of proximity to the Gaza Strip. In addition, the questionnaires included the number of years since the diagnosis of FM.

2.3. Brief COPE

The Brief COPE [40] questionnaire was designed to examine co** tendencies. The reliability measures in similar studies were as follows: problem-oriented α = 0.85; emotion-oriented α = 0.67; avoidance α = 0.65 [41].

2.4. Sense of Coherence Scale

The SoC questionnaire [22] was administered in its abbreviated version with 13 items with predictive validity [26]. The reliability in similar studies was α = 0.85 [42].

2.5. CD-RISC-10 Scale

The original Connor–Davidson [28] resilience scale was shortened to 10 items by Campbell-Sills and Stein [43]. The internal reliability of the original Connor–Davidson study was α = 0.89.

2.6. Health Survey (SF-36)

The SF-36 questionnaire was tested and validated by Lewin-Epstein et al. [44], with the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of its dimensions ranging from 0.76 to 0.93.

2.7. The Scale of Psychological Distress

The questionnaire was developed initially by Ben-Sira [45], with a shortened version of the questionnaire adapted by Sagy and Dotan [46]. The questionnaire contains five items from the Langer index [47] to measure psychological balance. The reliability in similar studies was α = 0.75.

2.8. Exposure to Stressful Events

The five-item questionnaire was designed to build an index of the level of exposure by combining the items [42].

2.9. Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire—Revised (FIQR)

The FIQR questionnaire examined FM symptoms. A previous study revealed a reliability of α = 0.95 [48].

2.10. The 6MW Test

The primary variable measured is the total distance the FMP walked. The 6MW test provides information that may better measure a patient’s ability to perform daily activities as a correlate of standard quality of life [49].

2.11. Intervention Program: The Fibrotherapy Model

Table 2 describes the FTI, which is carried out in three rounds of 10 weeks each, and at each stage, the patient receives a different set of 3 therapy sessions per week (for a total of 30 weeks).

2.12. Data Analysis

The data obtained from the questionnaires were coded in SPSS software. The testing of the hypotheses was first carried out through correlations by Pearson tests regarding the research variables among the entire sample. Later, regressions were conducted for each of the dependent variables. Subjects who did not respond to certain variables were not included in the analyses referring to these variables.

3. Results

Table 3 presents the change levels of co** patterns, problem-oriented patterns, psychological distress, functional ability, physiological scales, and SoC after the intervention program.
The distribution of change levels of co** patterns after the intervention program, which was published previously by the authors of this paper [52,53], shows that before and after the intervention, about two-thirds consistently used problem-oriented co** and one-third shifted from avoidant or emotion-oriented co** to problem-oriented co** after the program. Those who used problem-oriented co** showed reduced psychological distress post-intervention, and their health-related quality of life notably improved. Participants who did not employ problem-oriented co** did not significantly reduce psychological distress, and no notable improvement in health-related quality of life was found. All the participants showed an increase in a distance scale pre-exertion. Findings also showed mixed changes in physiological scales, with some decreases and increases post-intervention. Overall, problem-oriented co** was associated with positive changes in psychological distress, functional ability, and some physiological measures post-intervention. In contrast, non-problem-oriented co** showed mixed results in these areas.
The mean differences in SoC before and after FTI according to the level of change in co** patterns, which were published previously by the authors of this paper [53], are presented in Table 3. The findings supported our second hypothesis and showed a significant difference in the level of SoC resilience among problem-oriented FFMPs before and after participating in FTI (t (55) = 2.46, p = 0.02), as this group reported a higher level of SoC following FTI. There was no significant difference in the level of SoC before and after participating in FTI among FFMPs who did not use problem-oriented co** [53].
Analysis of the distribution of resilience data before and after participation in FTI among problem-oriented FFMPs showed a significant improvement in the level of resilience among problem-oriented FFMPs (t (55) = 9.38, p < 0.001), as this group reported a higher level of resilience following FTI (M = 2.96, SD = 0.50) compared to the level of resilience before participating in FTI (M = 2.04, SD = 0.58). The extent of the effect between the two measurement dates was high (Cohen’s d = 1.68) [54] (Figure 1).
Analysis of the distribution of resilience data before and after participation in FTI among FFMPs who did not use problem-oriented co** showed a significant improvement in levels of resilience (t (39) = 5.05, p < 0.001), as this group reported a higher level of resilience following FTI (M = 2.82, SD = 0.74) compared to the level of resilience before participating in FTI (M = 2.02, SD = 0.62). The extent of the effect between the two measurement dates was high (Cohen’s d = 1.16) [54] (Figure 2). We found that participation in FTI improved the level of resilience among the study subjects, problem-oriented and non-problem-oriented FFMPs. However, the effect size index significantly improved among problem-oriented FFMPs. Hence, our third hypothesis was confirmed.

4. Discussion

This paper examined how co** strategies affect the SoC and resilience levels among FFMPs under a prolonged security threat after participating in the FTI program. research [52,53] also established a link between stressful situations, such as security threats, and intensified FM symptoms. Qualitative findings from elaborate research by the authors of this paper [54,55,56] revealed physical conditions among FFMPs under security threats that included pain and stiffness during sirens to the point of entering a state of physical paralysis for hours after the threat had passed. Findings from these studies suggest that FFMPs transitioning from emotion-oriented or avoidance co** to problem-oriented strategies during FTI demonstrated significant improvement.
The secondary outcomes of our study show that problem-oriented co** involves adapting to stressors by modifying difficulties due to chronic illness, leading to a better quality of life.
Previous analyses [54,55,56] revealed that participation in FTI group therapy fostered attitude changes, transforming feelings of isolation into shared experiences and common goals among FFMPs. This shift from individual co** to collective participation led to increased optimism and a more assertive approach to managing the disease. In addition, problem-oriented co** post-FTI correlated with reduced psychological distress, improved physiological measures, and enhanced functional ability, indicating comprehensive health enhancement. According to Paterson [57], the perception of reality provides the basis for the way people with chronic illness interpret and cope with their illness. Most treatments for FM patients address pain, imbalance, and sleep disorders. However, a few studies proposed to follow a program for resilience and sense of coherence among patients [58,59].
Patients who have developed or use problem-oriented co** patterns use what Antonovsky [22,25] called “generalized resistance resources” (GRRs), that is, the qualities or resources that provide support and assistance in co** with daily stressors. According to Shing et al. [60], one major factor contributing to resilience is harnessing positive emotions, even during a difficult or stressful time. Positivity improves resilience in two main ways. First, positive emotions help construct social, psychological, and physical resources over time and develop co** skills for future times of stress. Second, according to Fredrickson’s broaden-and-build theory [61], positive emotions can help people expand their thoughts, actions, and attention to the moments around them. Our data show that the level of mental resilience of the FFMPs increased following their participation in the FTI. This finding has great significance since “resilience” combines flexibility and the ability to return to life with elements related to accepting and adapting to change and co** with the consequences of FM. The more a person adapts, the higher their resilience level, allowing them to cope better with stressful situations [62].
Our analysis revealed increased mental resilience among FFMPs following FTI participation, highlighting the significance of positivity and adaptability in co** with FM consequences. Problem-oriented co** led to higher levels of improvement, emphasizing the acquisition of co** resources and engagement in various proactive actions to manage FM. Contrary to Antonovsky’s [21] claim that SoC develops between childhood and age 30 and is less likely to change after that, as can be established from previous studies [63,64], our data indicate that SoC increased following the FTI program.
The study’s primary focus was on how co** strategies, particularly problem-oriented co**, influenced SoC, resilience, and overall health outcomes among FFMPs in the context of prolonged security threats. The findings indicated substantial improvements across various health indicators post-FTI, particularly among those who adopted problem-oriented co** strategies.

5. Conclusions

The study highlighted the immense impact of FFMPs’ participation in FTI on transforming co** strategies. It notably shifted many women from disease preoccupation to active disease management. Through shared experiences in the program, FFMPs adopted problem-oriented co**, engaging in actions like physical exercises to enhance their quality of life despite the enigmatic nature of FM. Despite FM remaining a complex condition without definitive causes or diagnostic tests, our research demonstrated that FTI participation improved health. Emotional engagement during the program allowed participants to explore, discuss, and accept their condition, suggesting the scope for intervention programs to empower FFMPs and foster problem-oriented co**.
Moreover, participation in FTI enabled FFMPs to comprehend the disease’s significance, manage it effectively, and enhance their SoC. While empirical changes in SoC were lower than anticipated post-FTI, qualitative insights revealed substantial cognitive and behavioral shifts, emphasizing meaningfulness, understanding, and management of FM. This suggests the importance of comprehensively considering both emotional perceptions and empirical data in understanding chronic diseases.
Additionally, the study concluded that problem-oriented co** strategies facilitated the acquisition of resilience among participants. Facing and co** with challenges using this strategy reflected mental flexibility, aiding individuals in rebounding from setbacks and confronting life’s adversities. Furthermore, the research emphasized the pivotal role of physical activity in co** with FM symptoms, and engaging in purposeful physical activity, driven by the desire to manage the condition, notably improved health indicators despite the pervasive musculoskeletal pain experienced by FFMPs.

6. Limitations

The study included only female participants; thus, the results may not be generalized to male FM patients or patients from different cultural backgrounds. The study did not include a control group, making it difficult to determine whether the observed improvements were due to the intervention program or other factors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.C.-B. and R.N.-G.; methodology, L.C.-B.; software, L.C.-B.; validation, L.C.-B., R.N.-G. and D.B.; formal analysis, L.C.-B., D.B. and D.B.; investigation, L.C.-B.; resources, L.C.-B.; data curation, L.C.-B.; writing—original draft preparation, L.C.-B.; writing—review and editing, L.C.-B., D.B. and R.N.-G.; visualization, L.C.-B.; supervision, R.N.-G.; project administration, L.C.-B.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the Ethics Committee of Ariel University. However, there are restrictions on the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study and are therefore not publicly available. However, the data are available from the authors upon reasonable request and with the approval of the ethics committee. Also, some of the data form a basis for further research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bair, M.J.; Krebs, E.E. Fibromyalgia. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020, 172, ITC33–ITC48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Häuser, W.; Fitzcharles, M.A. Facts and myths pertaining to fibromyalgia. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2018, 20, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sumpton, J.E.; Moulin, D.E. Fibromyalgia. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2014, 119, 513–527. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Buskila, D.; Abramov, G.; Biton, A.; Neumann, L. The prevalence of pain complaints in a general population in Israel and its implications for utilization of health services. J. Rheumatol. 2000, 27, 1521–1525. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Bellato, E.; Marini, E.; Castoldi, F.; Barbasetti, N.; Mattei, L.; Bonasia, D.E.; Blonna, D. Fibromyalgia syndrome: Etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Pain Res. Treat. 2012, 2012, 426130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Adams, L.; Turk, D. Psychosocial factors and central sensitivity syndromes. Curr. Rheumatol. Rev. 2015, 11, 96–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Treede, R.D.; Rief, W.; Barke, A.; Aziz, Q.; Bennett, M.I.; Benoliel, R.; Cohen, M.; Evers, S.; Finnerup, N.B.; First, M.B.; et al. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: The IASP classification of chronic pain for the international classification of diseases (ICD-11). Pain 2019, 160, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alciati, A.; Nucera, V.; Masala, I.F.; Giallanza, M.; La Corte, L.; Giorgi, V.; Sarzi-Puttini, P.; Atzeni, F. One year in review 2021: Fibromyalgia. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2021, 39, S-3–S-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tzadok, R.; Ablin, J.N. Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for Fibromyalgia. Pain Res. Manag. 2020, 2020, 6541798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liptan, G.L. Fascia: A missing link in our understanding of the pathology of fibromyalgia. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2010, 14, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Trouvin, A.P.; Perrot, S. New concepts of pain. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2019, 33, 101415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Marques, A.P.; De Sousa, A.; Santo, E.; Berssaneti, A.A.; Matsutani, L.A.; Lee, S. Prevalence of fibromyalgia: Literature review update. Rev. Bras. Reumatol. 2017, 57, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Buskila, Y.; Buskila, D.; Jacob, G.; Ablin, J.N. High prevalence of fibromyalgia among Israeli school teachers. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2019, 37, S21–S26. [Google Scholar]
  14. Whipple, M.; Toussaint, L.; Fleming, K.; Nanda, S.; Mohabbat, A.; Vincent, A. (221) Associations between post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and mental health in fibromyalgia. J. Pain 2016, 17, S31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Coppens, E.; Van Wambeke, P.; Morlion, B.; Weltens, N.; Giao Ly, H.; Tack, J.; Luyten, P.; Van Oudenhove, L. Prevalence and impact of childhood adversities and post-traumatic stress disorder in women with fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain. Eur. J. Pain 2017, 21, 1582–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Waller, E.; Scheidt, C.E.; Endorf, K.; Hartmann, A.; Zimmermann, P. Unresolved trauma in fibromyalgia: A cross-sectional study. J. Health Psychol. 2016, 21, 2457–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Elran, M.; Israeli, T.; Padan, K.; Altchuler, A. Social resilience in the Jewish communities around the Gaza Strip Envelope during and after Operation Protective Edge. Mil. Strateg. Aff. 2015, 7, 5–26. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shpigelman, C.N.; Gelkopf, M. Psychological Impact of Exposure to War and Terrorism on Individuals with Physical or Sensory Disabilities; Haifa University: Haifa, Israel, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ablin, J.N.; Cohen, H.; Clauw, D.J.; Shalev, R.; Ablin, E.; Neumann, L.; Sarzi-Puttini, P.; Buskila, D. A Tale of Two Cities—The effect of low intensity conflict on prevalence and characteristics of musculoskeletal pain and somatic symptoms associated with chronic stress. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2010, 28, S15–S21. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lerman, S.F.; Rudich, Z.; Shahar, G. Does war hurt? Effects of media exposure after missile attacks on chronic pain. J. Clin. Psychol. Med. Settings 2013, 20, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Antonovsky, A. Health, Stress, and Co**: New Perspectives on Mental and Physical Well-Being; The Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  22. Antonovsky, A. Unraveling the Mystery of Health: How People Manage Stress and Stay Well; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  23. Antonovsky, A. The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promot. Int. 1996, 11, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Eriksson, M.; Lindström, B. Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: A systematic review. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2006, 60, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Antonovsky, A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc. Sci. Med. 1993, 36, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Greve, W.; Staudinger, U.M. Resilience in later adulthood and old age: Resources and potentials for successful aging. In Developmental Psychopathology: Risk, Disorder, and Adaptation, 2nd ed.; Cicchetti, D., Cohen, A., Eds.; Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 796–840. [Google Scholar]
  27. Patterson, J.M. Understanding family resilience. J. Clin. Psychol. 2002, 58, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Connor, K.M.; Davidson, J.R.T. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress. Anxiety 2003, 18, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rutter, M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 1987, 57, 316–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Anshel, M.H.; Raviv, S.; Jamieson, J. Cognitive appraisals and co** strategies following acute stress among skilled competitive male and female athletes. J. Sport. Behav. 2001, 24, 128–134. [Google Scholar]
  31. Levy, A.R.; Nicholls, A.R.; Polman, R.C.J. Pre-competitive confidence, co**, and subjective performance in sport. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sport. 2011, 21, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Y.; Peng, Y.; Xu, H.; O’Brien, W.H. Age differences in stress and co**: Problem-focused strategies mediate the relationship between age and positive affect. Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev. 2018, 86, 347–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Penley, J.A.; Tomaka, J.; Wiebe, J.S. The association of co** to physical and psychological health outcomes: A meta-analytic review. J. Behav. Med. 2002, 25, 551–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bennett, D.S.; Hersh, J.; Herres, J.; Foster, J. HIV-related stigma, shame, and avoidant co**: Risk factors for internalizing symptoms among youth living with HIV? Child. Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 2016, 47, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, J.J.W.; Ein, N.; Gervasio, J.; Battaion, M.; Reed, M.; Vickers, K. Comprehensive meta-analysis of resilience interventions. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2020, 82, 101919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, Y.; Chi, I.; Zhan, Y.; Chen, W.; Li, T. Effectiveness of resilience interventions on psychosocial outcomes for persons with neurocognitive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 709860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chmitorz, A.; Kunzler, A.; Helmreich, I.; Tüscher, O.; Kalisch, R.; Kubiak, T.; Wessa, M.; Lieb, K. Intervention studies to foster resilience: A systematic review and proposal for a resilience framework in future intervention studies. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2018, 59, 78–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vastamäki, J.; Moser, K.; Paul, K.I. How stable is sense of coherence? Changes following an intervention for unemployed individuals. Scand. J. Psychol. 2009, 50, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Langeland, E.; Vaandrager, L.; Nilsen, A.B.V.; Schraner, M.; Meier Magistretti, C. Effectiveness of interventions to enhance the sense of coherence in the life course. In The Handbook of Salutogenesis; Mittelmark, M.B., Bauer, G.F., Vaandrager, L., Pelikan, J.M., Sagy, S., Eriksson, M., Lindström, B., Magistretti, C.M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 201–219. [Google Scholar]
  40. Carver, C.S. You want to measure co** but your protocol’s too long: Consider the brief COPE. Int. J. Behav. Med. 1997, 4, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sagi, S.; Braun-Lewensohn, A. Reactions to stressful situations and co** resources among adolescents under fire: A comparison between chronic and acute stressful situations. Megamot 2014, 49, 754–774. [Google Scholar]
  42. Braun-Lewensohn, O.; Celestin-Westreich, W.; Celestin, L.P.; Verté, D.; Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I. Prevalence of post traumatic stress and emotional and behavioral problems among Israeli adolescents exposed to ongoing terrorism. Int. J. Psychol. Res. 2010, 5, 117–144. [Google Scholar]
  43. Campbell-Sills, L.; Stein, M.B. Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. J. Trauma Stress 2007, 20, 1019–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lewin-Epstein, N.; Sagiv-Schifter, T.; Shabtai, E.L.; Shmueli, A. Validation of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Hebrew Version) in the adult population of Israel. Med. Care 1998, 36, 1361–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ben-Sira, Z. A scale of psychological distress. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 1979, 4, 337–356. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sagy, S.; Dotan, N. Co** resources of maltreated children in the family: A salutogenic approach. Child Abus. Negl. 2001, 25, 1463–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Langer, P. Compulsivity and response set on the Structured Objective Rorschach Test. J. Clin. Psychol. 1962, 18, 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bennett, R.M.; Friend, R.; Jones, K.D.; Ward, R.; Han, B.K.; Ross, R.L. The revised fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQR): Validation and psychometric properties. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2009, 11, R120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. American Thoracic Society. ATS statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002, 166, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jain, F.; Lenze, E.; Lavretsky, H. Advances in mind/body therapies: Concept, data and delivery. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2023, 31, S13–S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Singh, S.; Rai, S.K.; Pndya, B.V.; Kumar, R. Yoga and Meditation, 1st ed.; AGPH Books: Bhopal, India, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  52. Compas, B.E.; Jaser, S.S.; Dunn, M.J.; Rodriguez, E.M. Co** with chronic illness in childhood and adolescence. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2012, 8, 455–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Buskila, D.; Neumann, L.; Vaisberg, G.; Alkalay, D.; Wolfe, F. Increased rates of fibromyalgia following cervical spine injury: A controlled study of 161 cases of traumatic injury. Arthritis Rheum. 1997, 40, 446–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cohen-Biton, L.; Buskila, D.; Nissanholtz-Gannot, R. Problem-oriented co** and resilience among Fibromyalgia patients who live under security threat and undergone Fibrotherapy intervention program. J. Psychosom. Res. 2023, in press. [CrossRef]
  55. Cohen-Biton, L.; Buskila, D.; Nissanholtz-Gannot, R. The correlation between problem-oriented co** and a sense of coherence among fibromyalgia patients who underwent the fibrotherapy model intervention program. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2022, 40, 1143–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cohen-Biton, L.; Buskila, D.; Nissanholtz-Gannot, R. The effect of the Fibrotherapy intervention program on the co** patterns of fibromyalgia patients. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2022, 28, 278–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Paterson, B.L. The shifting perspectives model of chronic illness. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2001, 33, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chiaramonte, R.; Bonfiglio, M.; Chisari, S. Multidisciplinary protocol for the management of fibromyalgia associated with imbalance. Our experience and literature review. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 2019, 65, 1265–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Turcotte, K.; Oelke, N.D.; Whitaker, G.; Holtzman, S.; O’Connor, B.; Pearson, N.; Teo, M. Multi-disciplinary community-based group intervention for fibromyalgia: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Rheumatol. Int. 2023, 43, 2201–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shing, E.Z.; Jayawickreme, E.; Waugh, C.E. Contextual positive co** as a factor contributing to resilience after disasters. J. Clin. Psychol. 2016, 72, 1287–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fredrickson, B.L. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2004, 359, 1367–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cabanyes Truffino, J. Resilience: An approach to the concept. Rev. Psiquiatr. Salud Ment. (Engl. Ed.) 2010, 3, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Binder, H.P.; Mesenholl-Strehler, E.; Paß, P.; Christian Endler, P. Sense of Coherence (SOC) among psychotherapists in Austria, differentiated according to number of individually completed training therapy sessions. Sci. World 2006, 6, 2196–2199. [Google Scholar]
  64. Callahan, L.F.; Pincus, T. The sense of coherence scale in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995, 8, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distribution of resilience data before and after participation in FTI among problem-oriented FFMPs.
Figure 1. Distribution of resilience data before and after participation in FTI among problem-oriented FFMPs.
Biomed 04 00006 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of resilience data before and after participation in FTI among FFMPs who could be more problem-oriented.
Figure 2. Distribution of resilience data before and after participation in FTI among FFMPs who could be more problem-oriented.
Biomed 04 00006 g002
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the study sample (n = 96).
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the study sample (n = 96).
VariableValuesn%MSDRange
Marital statusSingle99.4
Married6971.9
Divorced/separated1515.6
Widow33.1
Religious affiliationSecular3334.4
Traditional2930.2
Religious2425
Orthodox1010.4
ResidenceCity/town6567.7
Community village22.1
Rural village2121.9
Kibbutz77.3
Other11
Age 53.0313.0819–75
Years since diagnosis 7.946.341–30
Number of children 3.552.010–10
Table 2. The FTI program.
Table 2. The FTI program.
StageActivityDuration (min)
Stage 1 (10 weeks)Physiotherapy adapted to FM conditions 160
Group therapy60
Hydrotherapy 230
Stage 2 (10 weeks)Horticultural therapy/cooking therapy60
Hydrotherapy30
Pilates60
Stage 3 (10 weeks)Pottery therapy90
Hydrotherapy30
Kundalini yoga 360
1 The physiotherapy sessions were based on tailored physical exercises for fibromyalgia, encompassing activities aimed at alleviating pain and promoting proper functionality (sitting and standing) to mitigate discomfort. 2 Hydrotherapy is a form of physiotherapy conducted in water. Due to the water’s temperature being maintained at 34 °C coupled with the advantages of physical exertion in water (buoyancy), some women exhibited a higher capacity to perform exercises with greater intensity in water compared to on land. 3 While there is no conclusive scientific evidence to suggest that kundalini yoga is specifically better for women who suffer from pain compared to other types of yoga, some practitioners and proponents of kundalini yoga believe that it can be beneficial for women [50]. Kundalini yoga places a significant emphasis on various breathing techniques (pranayama). Proper breathing can have a calming effect on the nervous system and may contribute to pain management and stress reduction [51].
Table 3. Mean differences in SoC before and after FTI according to the level of change in co** patterns (n = 96).
Table 3. Mean differences in SoC before and after FTI according to the level of change in co** patterns (n = 96).
SoC before FTI (n = 96)SoC after FTI (n = 96)
MSDMSDt
(df)
Did not use problem-oriented strategies4.040.784.070.63194.0
−39
Used problem-oriented strategies4.121.494.431.182.463
−55
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cohen-Biton, L.; Buskila, D.; Nissanholtz-Gannot, R. Resilience and Sense of Coherence among Female Fibromyalgia Patients Living in a Conflict Zone Who Underwent Fibrotherapy Intervention. BioMed 2024, 4, 78-88. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomed4020006

AMA Style

Cohen-Biton L, Buskila D, Nissanholtz-Gannot R. Resilience and Sense of Coherence among Female Fibromyalgia Patients Living in a Conflict Zone Who Underwent Fibrotherapy Intervention. BioMed. 2024; 4(2):78-88. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomed4020006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cohen-Biton, Liraz, Dan Buskila, and Rachel Nissanholtz-Gannot. 2024. "Resilience and Sense of Coherence among Female Fibromyalgia Patients Living in a Conflict Zone Who Underwent Fibrotherapy Intervention" BioMed 4, no. 2: 78-88. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomed4020006

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop