Next Article in Journal
The Queen Is Dead, Long Live the Queen: The Vanishing of Pinna nobilis and the Onset of the Congeneric P. rudis (Mollusca: Bivalvia)
Previous Article in Journal
Benthic Diatoms on Macrophytes of the Israeli Mediterranean Coast
Previous Article in Special Issue
Is Chorioptes texanus to Displace Chorioptes bovis? Notes on the Mites Causing Bovine Chorioptic Mange in Central Europe
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Reproductive Response of Platynothrus peltifer (C.L. Koch, 1839) to Continuous Nitrogen Deposition

1
Department of Ecology, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
2
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Ecosystem and Landscape Dynamics (IBED-ELD), University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, P.O. Box 94240, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2024, 16(6), 340; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16060340
Submission received: 17 May 2024 / Revised: 3 June 2024 / Accepted: 5 June 2024 / Published: 11 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversity and Ecology of the Acari)

Abstract

:
Continuous nitrogen deposition threatens ecosystems by acidifying soils, causing a stoichiometric imbalance in the vegetation and ultimately, the disappearance of plant and animal species. There is a gap in knowledge of how decomposers such as oribatid mites cope with the effects of nitrogen deposition. Therefore, we conducted feeding experiments with the herbivorous mite Platynothrus peltifer (C.L. Koch, 1839) to assess its fitness as a measure of its reproductive response towards different nitrogen levels in its diet. Mites were collected from the field, starved, and allowed to lay eggs. We recorded the number of eggs during 60 days of experimental trial. The fecundity of mites varied with different elemental compositions, whereby phosphorus seemed to be a limiting factor. With ongoing nitrogen deposition in the future and concomitant phosphorus limitation, we expect a negative impact on the population dynamics of herbivorous decomposers such as Platynothrus peltifer.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen deposited in the environment by human activities increases the availability of nitrogen in a naturally nitrogen-limited system [1,2]. This leads to two main issues for the environment: first, it accelerates the plant growth of the overall vegetation. The rapidly growing plants also absorb all the remaining nutrients in the soil, storing them in organic biomass. At the same time, the soil pH drops rapidly due to the additional nitrogen, and the environment becomes more acidic. Decomposition is thereby slowed down, and in a soil environment of pH 4.2 or lower, aluminium and iron that have been stably bound to minerals come free [3]. Aluminium in a free ionised form harms plant roots and binds together with iron phosphorus from the soil to form insoluble phosphates, such as AlPO4 and FePO4 [4,5]. Continuous nitrogen deposition harms the environment over the long term and increases phosphorus limitation in soil ecosystems [6]. Consequently, many animal species from various taxa and plant species disappeared from the altered habitat [7,8,9].
The consequences of nitrogen deposition have come to effect in the Veluwe and pushed the ecosystem into a new state of blocked nutrient cycling. The oldest oak forests on the Veluwe, in the Netherlands in nutrient-poor sandy soil, are now suffering from a more pronounced phosphorus limitation than before in an already phosphorus limited system [10]. The vegetation became imbalanced in its elemental stoichiometry, meaning that all plant material increased in its nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratio. As a result, animals struggle to take up sufficient amounts of phosphorus, while due to their compensatory feeding strategy, they stop feeding when they have enough nitrogen [11]. Previous studies with insect herbivores showed that imbalanced stoichiometry decreases overall fitness, growth, and overall reproduction rate [9]. Correspondingly, the organic matter layer stacks up since decomposing organisms are not suited for the altered, acidic soil environment [12].
However, not all decomposers may be equally affected by these harsh conditions, as micro-arthropods are very resilient soil organisms. They are present in nearly every soil ecosystem with a Holarctic distribution. Micro-arthropods reach densities of up to 166 × 104 individuals per m2 in temperate forests and live predominantly in the litter and the first 5 cm of the topsoil [13]. To understand their ecological role in the soil system, micro-arthropods have been categorized into feeding guilds based on their enzymatic activities [14]. Herbivorous micro-arthropods contribute directly to decomposition through organic matter fragmentation and feeding, while fungivores feed on the decomposing fungi and enhance their growth [15,16]. Micro-arthropods that feed on plant material directly, are especially directly exposed to this stoichiometric imbalance in the vegetation and could possibly suffer fitness disadvantages.
To answer this question, this paper studies the oribatid mite Platynothrus peltifer, an asexual herbivorous grazer. We chose this species based on its feeding guild, its high abundance in nearly every soil, and its intermediate size of 865 μm, since bigger mite species appeared to be absent in phosphorus-limited forests. Its ability to starve for about 2 months without increased mortality makes it a suitable candidate for these experiments [14,17,18].
Numerous studies have demonstrated that Platynothrus peltifer responds to heavy metal pollution in its diet by reducing egg production [19]. However, there is a lack of information regarding the specific nutrients crucial to optimal egg production in this species. This gap in knowledge leads us to our central research question, as follows: How do nitrogen deposition and subsequent increases in nitrogen levels in the vegetation affect the egg production of Platynotrhus peltifer? We hypothesise that Platynothrus peltifer will produce fewer eggs when exposed to diets with high nitrogen and low phosphorus levels. This is based on findings from previous insect feeding studies, which have identified phosphorus as a critical nutrient [20].

2. Materials and Methods

For this experiment, the oribatid mite Platynothrus peltifer (C.L. Koch, 1839) was collected from the field and kept in Petri dishes for a feeding trial of six different food types, plus a negative control without food. Food consisted of dried leaves from an oak and an aspen tree, each with three different seasons of leaves, varying in nutritional contents such as nitrogen, carbon, and several trace elements. During 60 days of feeding experiments, the number of laid eggs was recorded as a measure to connect nutrition with reproduction success.

2.1. Collection of Specimens

Platynothrus peltifer is an herbivorous grazer that can best be found in litter layers of deciduous trees and the vegetation layer of moss of the class Bryophyta. The collection of mosses of the species Hypnum jutlandicum and Thuidium tamariscinum proved to be most successful during the experiments [17]. Samples were taken in the Heumersoord Forest in Nijmegen (51°48′25.3″ N, 5°52′18.2″ E). The Heumersnoord Forest is a coniferous dry forest that is maintained for wood production. It includes different biotopes, such as heathland, dunes, and mixed-forest parts of coniferous and deciduous tree species. All samples were taken randomly under tree-covered, shaded, and moist areas around the given coordinates. Mosses of the species Hypnum jutlandicum and Thuidium tamariscinum were collected to extract mites.
Following a Berlese–Tullgren approach to extraction [21,22], moss was placed upside down on a round manual sieve with different mesh sizes between 0.8 and 2 mm and a sieve pan filled with tap water. Sieves were left to dry in a light room under a potassium light bulb for at least 48 h. This slow drying process ensured that the mites had enough time to escape the heat and migrate towards the water bowl, where they could be collected. Live Platynothrus peltifer could easily be recognised by its dark brown colour, two dorsal ridges, size, and the fact that it sank to the bottom in the sieve pan.
All mites were collected in one 55 mm ⌀ plastic Petri dish with glass fibre filter paper and tap water until experiments began. They were stored in a climate chamber at 11 °C and 75% humidity. Mites did not receive any food until the start of the experiments, since P. peltifer can endure long periods without food [17]. All mites were, on average, starved for 14 days before the start of the feeding trial.

2.2. Experimental Conditions in the Climate Chamber

All experiments were carried out in 55 mm ⌀ plastic Petri dishes without notches, containing a 50 mm-diameter glass fibre filter paper (Brand: Wattman, not bleached) to ensure moisture. The Petri dishes were placed with closed lids (not airtight) in a 17 °C climate chamber at 75% humidity and a 14 h light/10 h dark rhythm to mimic summer conditions during the whole 60 days of the experiment. The Petri dishes were examined under a stereomicroscope with a magnification of 10–40× to investigate for laid eggs. This experimental setting is based on experiments from Siepel [17] and was modified to ensure standardisation.

2.3. The Food Treatments

To mimic real food conditions, leaves from two trees, Populus tremula L. (1753) (P) and Quercus robur L. (1753) (Q), were used. Both tree species are typically found in Dutch forests; the summer oak Quercus robur L. (1753) has been kept in the Veluwe for wood economy, while the Populus tremula L. (1753) tree can be found in smaller forest stands, such as the Gelderse port or close to the German border. The leaves were collected in 2021 directly from the trees during different seasons, namely, spring, summer, and autumn in the Veluwe area near Beekbergen (52°08′57.0″ N 5°57′29.8″ E for the oak leaves and 52°10′03.1″ N 6°00′41.1″ E for the poplar leaves). Leaves were collected at heights of 1.5–2 m directly from the tree; the trees did not show any signs of insect herbivory or pests. The leaves were oven-dried for 24 h at 70 °C, ground to powder, and stored in airtight plastic vessels until use. In total, that makes the following 6 food treatments: PV, PZ, and PN from Populus tremula for spring, summer, and autumn, as well as the other three treatments, QV, QZ, and QN, the same with leaves from Quercus robur. Elemental values of the food treatments can be found in Section 3.
To check for eggs laid based on stored energy resources, one treatment control was kept moist at the same condition as the other Petri dishes but did not receive any food.

2.4. Experimental Handling

The experiments lasted 60 days in total, during which mites were fed twice, once on day 0 at the beginning of the trial and the second time on day 30 with excess food (measured in a mite spoon), while faeces were not removed from the Petri dishes.
The Petri dishes were checked approximately once a week for new eggs. Found eggs were recorded with the day of the experiment and placed into a new Petri dish, and dead mites were recorded and discarded. A mite was considered dead when it did not move anymore and either (a) had its legs fall off when touched with a needle, (b) had its internals everted outside the anal plate, or (c) did not move after 2 min of touching it. Petri dishes were checked under a stereo microscope with a magnification of 10–40 times. Eggs were relocated with a small painting brush.
In total, 350 mites were used in the feeding trial, distributed over 7 treatments (6 leaf treatments + control), each with 5 replicates per treatment and 10 mites per Petri dish.

2.5. Nutritional Analysis

Nutritional analysis was carried out for the food treatments (PV, PZ, PN, QV, QZ, QN) right before the food trials were started. Carbon and nitrogen content were measured on a vario microcube analyser in total percentages of the sample and transformed into PPM. Trace elements, such as calcium, iron, potassium, magnesium, manganese, sodium, sulphur, silicon, phosphorus, and zinc, were measured on ICP-OES (iCap 6300) in PPM. Phenols were measured in the facilities of the University of Amsterdam, following the Folin Ciocalteu phenol protocol (see Supplementary Materials) [23].

2.6. Statistical Data Handling

Data were processed in the program R Studio, and parts of the script were adapted from Joost Vogel’s data analysis [20,24].
Further, the data analysis of this paper is mainly focused on linking the nutritional data of the food treatments with the help of models with the number of eggs laid.
To also account for deaths for later data processing, the unit mite days were calculated based on the egg-laying data over time. It contains the number of live mites per each time interval of checking for eggs, separately, and has been summed up to the unit mite days sum, which accounts for all mites that were alive and present during the experiment per Petri dish. For example, if 10 mites were present during the whole 60 days, this Petri dish has a 600 mite days sum.
Based on the mite days sum, the productivity was calculated as follows: the number of total eggs divided by the mite days sum; therefore, all the eggs were put into perspective for live mites.
The unit productivity is used for the linear models to link nutrients to a positive or negative contribution to egg production since it saves one degree of freedom of mortality that is already included in the unit productivity. Based on AIC values and VIC for explanatory variables, linear models with the best fit to explain productivity have been chosen (see Table A5 and Table A6 for complete model lists and p-values).
In the following sections, food treatments in this experiment are addressed with their abbreviations as introduced in Section 2.3. For a clearer overview, a table is provided below with the abbreviations and the types of food treatments they contain.

3. Results

3.1. Food Quality

Each food treatment has been measured for elemental composition, and values have been transformed into PPM. Nutrients and trace elements have been further checked for correlation and identified for influence on productivity by means of linear models (see Appendix A). In the case of highly correlated elements, we took care not to include both elements in a single model (see Appendix B).
In general, we observed a clear seasonal pattern in nutritional contents and trace element contents across our leaf treatments, with either an increasing or decreasing trend through the seasons from spring to summer to autumn.
Leaves from the spring season show poplar tree treatments with the highest amount of nitrogen, with summer being the next lowest and autumn having the lowest value for the treatments (Figure 1A). For the oak leaves, this pattern is disrupted by leaves from summer having the highest nitrogen, then spring and autumn in decreasing order.
Phosphorus content decreased in all treatments over the season (Figure 1B), with poplar tree treatments having higher phosphorus values than the oak treatments, while oak leaves from summer also showed the lowest phosphorus content among all treatments.
For phenolic content, the summer treatment of both trees showed the lowest values, followed by spring, with slightly higher values, and autumn, with the highest phenolic content, while leaves from the oak tree have an overall higher phenolic content than those of the poplar tree (Figure 1C).
For potassium, all leaf treatments decreased from spring, which had the highest amounts of potassium, to autumn, which had the lowest amounts of potassium, with the poplar tree having higher potassium values than the oak tree (Figure 2A). For silicon, the pattern is the opposite; spring was shown to have the lowest amount, increasing equally per treatment towards the autumn treatments, which had the highest amount of silicon, while the poplar tree has higher values of silicon compared to the same seasonal treatment (Figure 2B).

3.2. Mite Fecundity

Across treatments, mites that fed on spring leaves from poplar (treatment PV) produced more eggs compared to the control treatment; treatment PV was significantly more productive in comparison to the control treatment, PZ, PN, and QN (Figure 3, pairwise t-test with Bonferroni correction, p.adj < 0.02). In fact, treatment PV was the most productive treatment, with an average number of 74.2 eggs ± 18.01 sd (control 39.4 ± 5.03 sd). For both trees, Populus tremula and Quercus robur, the most productive treatments were spring leaves, followed by summer and autumn.
To explain the reproduction rate from leaf nutrients and elemental content, the best linear model among different candidates appears to be carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P), whereby phosphorus and nitrogen separately contribute positively to the productivity, and carbon contributes negatively (see Table A5 and Table A6). When used as a combined ratio, for example, CN, NP, or CNP, the ratio appears in the model to contribute positively to productivity.
Phenolic content appears to always contribute negatively to different combinations with different nutrients (see Table A5 and Table A6).
For the elements, only potassium (K) and silicon (Si) were shown to have a significant effect on the productivity in single linear models (lm productivity~potassium + silicon, p value < 0.05, R-adj = 0.4471); other element candidates have been excluded based on a correlation matrix (see Table A7).

4. Discussion

The results show that productivity as a measure of laid eggs by Platynothrus peltifer is influenced by interactions between carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and phenolic content in different ways.
In all models, carbon showed a negative contribution to productivity. The total content of carbon in foliar material is provided in various molecular ways, mostly as structural molecules such as cellulose and lignin [25]. Platynothrus peltifer was shown to have both enzymes to digest cellulose and lignin [14]. Nevertheless, the consumption of those structural molecules is intensive in energetic costs due to these specific enzymes for digestion and less preferred by herbivores [26]. All Quercus robur treatments were shown to have the highest amounts of carbon and phenolics, as well, compared to leaves from Populus tremula within the same season. The detrimental combination of possibly hard-to-digest carbon sources and phenols may have led to lower production of eggs due to inefficient energy uptake.
In all models, nitrogen appears to have had a positive contribution towards productivity as a measure of laid eggs. Nitrogen plays a pivotal role in various metabolic processes within animals by being integrated into essential amino acids, which are the building blocks of proteins and enzymes. This incorporation is essential for the synthesis and function of these vital biological molecules [27]. Regardless of showing higher nitrogen contents than average for European trees (see Appendix D, [12,28,29]), it still shows to have a positive effect. Following the studies by Mellert and Göttlein [30], leaves from Quercus robur in this experiment were shown to have surplus nitrogen content—up to extreme levels of nitrogen (see Appendix D for harmonised values into mg/g); however, possessing phosphorus levels according to the present concentrations still appears to have a positive contribution to egg production. Additionally, nitrogen levels may have surpassed critical thresholds for herbivores, as evidenced by treatment QZ, which exhibited the highest nitrogen content but did not yield the highest productivity among all food treatments.
As a result, this leads to the conclusion that phosphorus could be the limiting element for egg production since food treatment PV had the overall highest productivity and the highest phosphorus content (see Figure 1). Several studies by Vogels et al. [8,9,20] show that invertebrate herbivores performed better relating to metabolic processes like growth or egg production with food enriched in P in comparison with low P content and can be found in higher abundances and diversities in P-richer soil. Very little is known about the metabolic requirements of herbivorous Acari since they belong to the taxa of arachnids, which appear to be mostly predatory or parasitic.
From all measured trace elements, potassium and silicon were shown to have a significant effect on productivity; potassium was shown to have a positive influence and silicon was shown to have a negative influence. Generally, it is known that potassium is needed on a cellular level for muscular locomotion [27], but further, it is also known that spiders need potassium for web production, and it appears in high concentrations in their venom [31,32].
Silicon, on the other hand, is known to have a protective effect against herbivory in grasses, in which it damages the mouthparts of arthropod herbivores [33]. This finding aligns with the negative impact of silicon on productivity; the autumn leaves were shown to have the highest silicon concentration and were, in comparison with leaves from the same tree, shown to have the lowest productivity.
Generally speaking, mites seem to have eaten the offered food, since faeces aggregated in the experimental Petri dishes and food piles visually disappeared over time. In the control treatment without any food, white, crystal-like faeces appeared, which leads to the assumption that they tried to eat the transparent glass fibre filter paper. The fact that mortality was not significantly higher in the control treatment than in the other food treatment, glass fibre passing their digestion does not seem to affect them. Mites seem to be unable to discriminate between food items they encounter. In the underground life of the soil, in which all kinds of food items appear for the rather unselective feeder herbivorous grazer mite, this strategy can work perfectly well and does not make discriminating between food items necessary, as the digestive capacity here determines the nutrient uptake [14,34,35].

5. Conclusions

We showed that egg production in Platynothrus peltifer responded to the different food treatments. Variations in egg production across food treatments could be related to differences in carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and phenolic contents in the leaves provided. Although these leaf characteristics covary, our models indicated phosphorus as a limiting element. Other elements, such as potassium and silicon, could also help explain the variation in egg production, but to a lesser extent. However, to pinpoint more precisely which elements are essential for egg production, more experiments using artificial food treatments are needed. Mites fed with leaves from Populus tremula from the spring were shown to have the highest egg production. These leaves had the highest phosphorus content, second-highest nitrogen content, and second-lowest phenolic content. With high values of potassium and low values of silicon, they appear to be the optimal mix in this feeding experiment.
With the ongoing nitrogen deposition, higher levels of nitrogen in the environment and in plant material can be expected for the coming future [36]. The acidification of the already nutrient-poor sandy soils will increase, and elements such as phosphorus will be less available chemically in the soil, which will eventually lead to stoichiometrically imbalanced vegetation. We already know that many different invertebrate herbivores suffer fitness loss due to imbalanced food. [7,20,37], and therefore, we can expect to see a change in the egg production of Platynothrus peltifer and possibly other herbivores in the increasingly P-limited forests.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting material is accessible under https://zenodo.org/records/11488404?token=eyJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiJ9.eyJpZCI6IjI0YjYxYzVjLTM2OGEtNGFkYS05NzRmLTY3ZjU0ZGE5ODhlOSIsImRhdGEiOnt9LCJyYW5kb20iOiJlN2Q0Yjg1YzIwZTQyNWYwMDM0ZDM1ODYyMjgxYWFjMyJ9.BKOI7SN5yWOIkL4To8TZuzDL8Fh0DIgI32uJu9tx0_xSj9m6l3D1I7aFTCPHspXF8D1FbwXQmxKTFuEl66lxeA (accessed on 1 June 2024). In Mitedata.xlsx table 1: PlathynothrusPeltifer, table 2: SumEggsPPeltifer; in Nutrients.xlsx table 1:Sheet1, table 2: N P %, table 3: Calculation, table 4: Explanation; in LmSummary table 1: PreAnalysisNutrients, table 2: CorMatrix, table 3: CorMatrixCNP, table 4: LmRequirements, table 5: CNP Models, table 6: Trace Elements, table 7: Deaths.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation and methodology, H.S.; formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft preparation and writing, M.-C.P.; measurement of phenolics, E.A.d.N.; review and editing, J.B. and H.S.; supervision, H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Provincie Gelderland with project number OF-20.172.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings will be archived open access in the data repository Zenodo upon acceptance for publication. For the review process, we have included the dataset in a temporary Appendix as a supporting file for the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Wilco C.E.P. Verberk for his advice in the preparation phase, guidance for statistical analysis, and comments on this paper. This paper is dedicated to Wilhelmus Jacobus Bekker, who gave me a home to flourish as a person and as a scientist.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Correlation matrix for carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and phenols (Phenols_mgL) from food treatments, calculated in R with the cor() command, outputting Pearsons’s correlation coefficient between the measured elements.
Table A1. Correlation matrix for carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and phenols (Phenols_mgL) from food treatments, calculated in R with the cor() command, outputting Pearsons’s correlation coefficient between the measured elements.
CNPPhenols_mgL
C10.536502−0.611590.654046
N0.5365021−0.20767−0.25218
P−0.61159−0.207671−0.49191
Phenols_mgL0.654046−0.25218−0.491911

Appendix B

Table A2. Correlation matrix calculated with the cor() command in R, outputting Pearson’s correlation coefficient between measured elements, using raw PPM data (number after the element is the wavelength the element has been measured in).
Table A2. Correlation matrix calculated with the cor() command in R, outputting Pearson’s correlation coefficient between measured elements, using raw PPM data (number after the element is the wavelength the element has been measured in).
Ca3179Fe2599K_7664MgMn2576Na5889S_1820Si2516Zn2138
Ca317910.7943810.0286970.955909−0.064060.7613660.6011260.8359050.934073
Fe25990.7943811−0.402420.6147660.3855770.7969240.2311380.9476020.780686
K_76640.028697−0.4024210.314619−0.78129−0.440610.725328−0.37597−0.05156
Mg0.9559090.6147660.3146191−0.2970.6100130.7606790.67280.880869
Mn2576−0.064060.385577−0.78129−0.29710.327982−0.609250.472874−0.00593
Na58890.7613660.796924−0.440610.6100130.3279821−0.026780.8535580.904203
S_18200.6011260.2311380.7253280.760679−0.60925−0.0267810.2101280.391889
Si25160.8359050.947602−0.375970.67280.4728740.8535580.21012810.830888
Zn21380.9340730.780686−0.051560.880869−0.005930.9042030.3918890.8308881

Appendix C

Table A3. Levene test result to check the homogeneity of productivity as a response variable.
Table A3. Levene test result to check the homogeneity of productivity as a response variable.
Formula: Levene.Test (Productivity~Treatment)
statisticp-valuedfdf.residual
1.0521940.413868628
Table A4. Test results of the Shapiro–Wilk normality test on the residuals on the linear model with productivity~treatment.
Table A4. Test results of the Shapiro–Wilk normality test on the residuals on the linear model with productivity~treatment.
(Intercept)CModel_NameNPNPCNCNPC:N:PN:PC:NPhenols
0.0648652.86 × 10−6lmCNP1NANANANANANANANANA
0.052925NAlmCNP20.00012NANANANANANANANA
0.06017NAlmCNP3NA0.003749NANANANANANANA
0.066675−8.06 × 10−6lmCNP40.000212NANANANANANANANA
0.063544−3.88 × 10−6lmCNP5NA0.006537NANANANANANANA
0.053706NAlmCNP60.000124−0.00036NANANANANANANA
0.064686NAlmCNP7NANA0.000272NANANANANANA
0.088012NAlmCNP8NANANA−0.00058NANANANANA
0.090213NAlmCNP9NANANANA−0.0033NANANANA
0.065932−5.16 × 10−7lmCNP10NANA0.000291NANANANANANA
0.064352NAlmCNP11NA0.009386NA−0.00135NANANANANA
0.04864NAlmCNP12NANANANANA6.38 × 10−9NANANA
0.048713NAlmCNP13NANANANANANA2.91 × 10−5NANA
0.053881NAlmCNP14NANANANANANANA2.50 × 10−8NA
0.064893−2.00 × 10−5lmCNP150.0002420.010069NANANANANANANA
0.065837NAlmCNP16NA0.005633NANANANANANA−1.86 × 10−6
0.062315NAlmCNP170.000151NANANANANANANA−2.10 × 10−6
0.059825NAlmCNP180.0001380.001453NANANANANANA−2.26 × 10−6
0.06329.20 × 10−6lmCNP19NANANANANANANANA−3.16 × 10−6
0.087187NAlmCNP20NANANA−0.00062NANANANA2.42 × 10−7
0.073158NAlmCNP21NANA0.000378NANANANANA−1.76 × 10−6
0.087785NAlmCNP22NANANANA−0.00438NANANA9.64 × 10−7
Table A5. Overview table of linear models to explain productivity as a measurement of laid eggs with different explanatory variable combinations. The code to produce this table can be found in R code in Supplementary Materials section of this paper. Intercept column gives the value for intercept in the model summary, model_name for the name used in the R code; numeric values in all other columns are p-values from the model summary for the corresponding element. When the element has not been part of the model, an NA is given in the table. Following R syntax: for interaction between elements, NP, CN, and CNP are calculated elemental ratios between those elements.
Table A5. Overview table of linear models to explain productivity as a measurement of laid eggs with different explanatory variable combinations. The code to produce this table can be found in R code in Supplementary Materials section of this paper. Intercept column gives the value for intercept in the model summary, model_name for the name used in the R code; numeric values in all other columns are p-values from the model summary for the corresponding element. When the element has not been part of the model, an NA is given in the table. Following R syntax: for interaction between elements, NP, CN, and CNP are calculated elemental ratios between those elements.
Productivity
statisticp-valuemethod
0.9013720.004305Shapiro-Wilk normality test
Table A6. Overview table of linear models, with productivity as a measure of eggs as the responsive variable with additional information about model fit, ordered for increasing values of delta AIC; see Supplementary Materials R code for more information on how the table was created. df = degrees of freedom from model summary, AIC = Akaike information criteria, deltaAIC = difference between calculated AIC, rel.L.L = relative likelihood, see R code, weights = AIC weights; VIF = separately calculated variance inflation factor from car package (only calculated for linear models with explanatory variables ≥ 2, whereby both variables receive the same VIF, while every variable receives its own VIF within the model when 3 or more explanatory variables are included, table borders mark affiliation of VIF to the model name. See Table A5 for model components. order of VIF = order of explanatory variables in the linear model call.
Table A6. Overview table of linear models, with productivity as a measure of eggs as the responsive variable with additional information about model fit, ordered for increasing values of delta AIC; see Supplementary Materials R code for more information on how the table was created. df = degrees of freedom from model summary, AIC = Akaike information criteria, deltaAIC = difference between calculated AIC, rel.L.L = relative likelihood, see R code, weights = AIC weights; VIF = separately calculated variance inflation factor from car package (only calculated for linear models with explanatory variables ≥ 2, whereby both variables receive the same VIF, while every variable receives its own VIF within the model when 3 or more explanatory variables are included, table borders mark affiliation of VIF to the model name. See Table A5 for model components. order of VIF = order of explanatory variables in the linear model call.
dfAICdeltaAICrel.LLWeightsVIF
lmCNP155−160.876010.3568726.356318083
lmCNP123−159.6511.2247350.5420660.1934484.028078
lmCNP133−159.5051.370710.5039110.1798322.541963
lmCNP114−158.9221.953420.3765480.1343791.525181185
lmCNP174−156.8634.0128310.134470.0479891.142255696
lmCNP44−156.1964.6797360.096340.0343812.432755632
lmCNP185−155.1725.7031690.0577530.020611.249905996
lmCNP23−153.9646.9119780.0315560.0112611.570094
lmCNP143−153.6077.2685880.0264030.0094221.68696
lmCNP64−151.9818.8943970.0117110.0041791.54166742
lmCNP194−149.44111.434530.0032890.0011742.033455996
lmCNP93−149.34611.529890.0031360.001119
lmCNP214−149.1311.74580.0028150.0010041.173931567
lmCNP164−148.81212.063740.0024010.0008571.227276607
lmCNP83−148.37812.497320.0019330.00069
lmCNP73−148.35912.516280.0019150.000683
lmCNP33−147.88212.993870.0015080.000538
lmCNP224−147.87213.003810.0015010.0005361.849768094
lmCNP204−146.41814.457470.0007250.0002591.482416442
lmCNP13−146.40814.467120.0007220.000258
lmCNP104−146.37914.49650.0007110.0002541.71459025
lmCNP54−146.37514.500640.000710.0002533.855024085
Table A7. Linear model result to explain productivity as a measure of laid eggs, with potassium (K) and silicon (Si) as explanatory variables; see R script for full list of tested linear models to check for a significant explanation of productivity data.
Table A7. Linear model result to explain productivity as a measure of laid eggs, with potassium (K) and silicon (Si) as explanatory variables; see R script for full list of tested linear models to check for a significant explanation of productivity data.
lmNut2, Formula: lm(Productivity ~ Potassium + Silicon)
termestimatestd.errorstatisticp-valueAdj. R Square/VIF
(Intercept)0.0672620.007938.4823991.08 × 10−90.4471
K_76640.0016340.0003344.9005632.65 × 10−51.023448
Si2516−0.01150.003765−3.054680.0045161.023448

Appendix D

Table A8. Overview table with nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) contents in different units to compare with the literature values.
Table A8. Overview table with nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) contents in different units to compare with the literature values.
SampleP PPMP in %P in mg/g SampleN % N mg/g SampleN in PPMN/P Ratio
QV6.1450.061450.61452.7927.927945.40277
QZ5.5220.055220.55223.1831.831857.58783
QN5.2020.052020.52021.5615.615629.98847
PV5.0560.050560.50562.8328.328355.9731
PZ3.2160.032160.32162.2222.222269.02985
PN4.4980.044980.44980.999020.00889

References

  1. Galloway, J.N.; Aber, J.D.; Erisman, J.W.; Seitzinger, S.P.; Howarth, R.W.; Cowling, E.B.; Cosby, B.J. The Nitrogen Cascade. Bioscience 2003, 53, 341–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vitousek, P.M.; Aber, J.D.; Howarth, R.W.; Likens, G.E.; Matson, P.A.; Schindler, D.W.; Schlesinger, W.H.; Tilman, D.G. Human Alteration of the Global Nitrogen Cycle: Sources and Consequences. Ecol. Appl. 1997, 7, 737–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. De Graaf, M.C.; Bobbink, R.; Verbeek, P.J.; Roleofs, J.G. Aluminium Toxicity and Tolerance in Three Heathland Species. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1997, 98, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bohn, H.L.; Myer, R.A.; O’Connor, G.A. Soil Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nijssen, M.E.; WallisDeVries, M.F.; Siepel, H. Pathways for the Effects of Increased Nitrogen Deposition on Fauna. Biol. Conserv. 2017, 212, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Siepel, H.; Bobbink, R.; Van De Riet, B.P.; Van Den Burg, A.B.; Jongejans, E. Long-Term Effects of Liming on Soil Physico-Chemical Properties and Micro-Arthropod Communities in Scotch Pine Forest. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2019, 55, 675–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Siepel, H.; Vogels, J.; Bobbink, R.; Bijlsma, R.-J.; Jongejans, E.; de Waal, R.; Weijters, M. Continuous and Cumulative Acidification and N Deposition Induce P Limitation of the Micro-Arthropod Soil Fauna of Mineral-Poor Dry Heathlands. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 119, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vogels, J.J.; Verberk, W.; Lamers, L.P.M.; Siepel, H. Can Changes in Soil Biochemistry and Plant Stoichiometry Explain Loss of Animal Diversity of Heathlands? Biol. Conserv. 2017, 212, 432–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vogels, J.J.; Van De Waal, D.B.; WallisDeVries, M.F.; Van Den Burg, A.B.; Nijssen, M.; Bobbink, R.; Berg, M.P.; Olde Venterink, H.; Siepel, H. Towards a Mechanistic Understanding of the Impacts of Nitrogen Deposition on Producer–Consumer Interactions. Biol. Rev. 2023, 98, 1712–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Maarleveld, G.C.; Pape, J.C.; Studiekring voor de Veluwe (Bennekom). Geologie En Bodemkunde van Het Nationale Park “De Hoge Veluwe”; Studiekring voor de Veluwe: Gent, Belgium, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  11. Simpson, S.J.; Simpson, C.L. The Mechanisms of Nutritional Compensation by Phytophagous Insects. In Insect–Plant Interactions (1990); CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1990; ISBN 978-0-203-71173-6. [Google Scholar]
  12. Perry, D.A.; Oren, R.; Hart, S.C. Forest Ecosystems; JHU Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  13. Siepel, H. Biodiversity of Soil Microarthropods: The Filtering of Species. Biodivers. Conserv. 1996, 5, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Siepel, H.; de Ruiter-Dijkman, E.M. Feeding Guilds of Oribatid Mites Based on Their Carbohydrase Activities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1993, 25, 1491–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hanlon, R.D.G.; Anderson, J.M. The Effects of Collembola Grazing on Microbial Activity in Decomposing Leaf Litter. Oecologia 1979, 38, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Siepel, H.; Maaskamp, F. Mites of Different Feeding Guilds Affect Decomposition of Organic Matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1994, 26, 1389–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Siepel, H. Niche Relationships between Two Panphytophagous Soil Mites, Nothrus silvestris Nicolet (Acari, Oribatida, Nothridae) and Platynothrus peltifer (Koch) (Acari, Oribatida, Camisiidae). Biol. Fertil. Soils 1990, 9, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Van Straalen, N.M.; Verhoef, H.A. The Development of a Bioindicator System for Soil Acidity Based on Arthropod pH Preferences. J. Appl. Ecol. 1997, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khalil, M.A.; Janssens, T.K.; Berg, M.P.; van Straalen, N.M. Identification of Metal-Responsive Oribatid Mites in a Comparative Survey of Polluted Soils. Pedobiologia 2009, 52, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vogels, J.J.; Verberk, W.C.E.P.; Kuper, J.T.; Weijters, M.J.; Bobbink, R.; Siepel, H. How to Restore Invertebrate Diversity of Degraded Heathlands? A Case Study on the Reproductive Performance of the Field Cricket Gryllus campestris (L.). Front. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 9, 659363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Siepel, H.; Van de Bund, C.F. The Influence of Management Practises on the Microarthropod Community of Grassland. Pedobiologia 1988, 31, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Weigmann, G. Hornmilben (Oribatida): Acari, Actinochaetida; Goecke & Evers Keltern: Keltern, Germany, 2006; ISBN 3-937783-18-0. [Google Scholar]
  23. Blainski, A.; Lopes, G.C.; De Mello, J.C.P. Application and Analysis of the Folin Ciocalteu Method for the Determination of the Total Phenolic Content from Limonium brasiliense L. Molecules 2013, 18, 6852–6865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  25. Arab, L.; Seegmueller, S.; Kreuzwieser, J.; Eiblmeier, M.; Rennenberg, H. Atmospheric pCO2 Impacts Leaf Structural and Physiological Traits in Quercus petraea Seedlings. Planta 2019, 249, 481–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brodeur-Campbell, S.E.; Vucetich, J.A.; Richter, D.L.; Waite, T.A.; Rosemier, J.N.; Tsai, C.-J. Insect Herbivory on Low-Lignin Transgenic Aspen. Environ. Entomol. 2006, 35, 1696–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Berg, J.M.; Tymoczko, J.L.; Gatto, G.J.; Stryer, L. Stryer Biochemie; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; ISBN 978-3-662-54619-2. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cao, S.K.; Feng, Q.; Su, Y.H.; Chang, Z.Q.; **, H.Y. Research on the Water Use Efficiency and Foliar Nutrient Status of Populus euphratica and Tamarix ramosissima in the Extreme Arid Region of China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 62, 1597–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Orgeas, J.; Ourcival, J.-M.; Bonin, G. Seasonal and Spatial Patterns of Foliar Nutrients in Cork Oak (Quercus suber L.) Growing on Siliceous Soils in Provence (France). Plant Ecol. 2003, 164, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mellert, K.H.; Göttlein, A. Comparison of New Foliar Nutrient Thresholds Derived from van Den Burg’s Literature Compilation with Established Central European References. Eur. J. For. Res. 2012, 131, 1461–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, X.; Huang, Y.F.; Shao, Z.Z.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, P.; Knight, D.P.; Vollrath, F. Function of Potassium in Spinning Process of Spider Nephila. Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 2004, 25, 1160–1163. [Google Scholar]
  32. Langenegger, N.; Nentwig, W.; Kuhn-Nentwig, L. Spider Venom: Components, Modes of Action, and Novel Strategies in Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analyses. Toxins 2019, 11, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hall, C.R.; Waterman, J.M.; Vandegeer, R.K.; Hartley, S.E.; Johnson, S.N. The Role of Silicon in Antiherbivore Phytohormonal Signalling. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Luxton, M. Studies on the Oribatid Mites of a Danish Beech Wood Soil. 1. Nutritional Biology. Pedobiologia 1972, 12, 434–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Luxton, M. Food and Energy Processing by Oribatid Mites. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol 1979, 16, 103–111. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bobbink, R. Effecten van Stikstofdepositie Nu En in 2030: Een Analyse; Greenpeace Nederland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mohren, G.M.J.; Van Den Burg, J.; Burger, F.W. Phosphorus Deficiency Induced by Nitrogen Input in Douglas Fir in the Netherlands. Plant Soil 1986, 95, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Nitrogen (A), phosphorus (B), and phenolic content (C) measured in PPM for all food treatments; see Table 1 for abbreviation explanation.
Figure 1. Nitrogen (A), phosphorus (B), and phenolic content (C) measured in PPM for all food treatments; see Table 1 for abbreviation explanation.
Diversity 16 00340 g001
Figure 2. Potassium content (A) and silicon content (B) measured in PPM for all food treatments; see Table 1 for abbreviation explanation.
Figure 2. Potassium content (A) and silicon content (B) measured in PPM for all food treatments; see Table 1 for abbreviation explanation.
Diversity 16 00340 g002
Figure 3. Violin boxplot per treatment, showing the productivity as a measure of laid eggs, including time and mortality as components; letters indicate significant differences of treatments to one another; see Table 1 for abbreviation explanation.
Figure 3. Violin boxplot per treatment, showing the productivity as a measure of laid eggs, including time and mortality as components; letters indicate significant differences of treatments to one another; see Table 1 for abbreviation explanation.
Diversity 16 00340 g003
Table 1. Explanation of used abbreviations for food treatments.
Table 1. Explanation of used abbreviations for food treatments.
PVPopulus tremula leaves—spring
PZPopulus tremula leaves—summer
PNPopulus tremula leaves—autumn
QVQuercus robur leaves—spring
QZQuercus robur leaves—summer
QNQuercus robur leaves—autumn
ConControl treatment (has not received any food during the experiments)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Petersdorf, M.-C.; Bruggink, J.; de Nijs, E.A.; Siepel, H. Reproductive Response of Platynothrus peltifer (C.L. Koch, 1839) to Continuous Nitrogen Deposition. Diversity 2024, 16, 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16060340

AMA Style

Petersdorf M-C, Bruggink J, de Nijs EA, Siepel H. Reproductive Response of Platynothrus peltifer (C.L. Koch, 1839) to Continuous Nitrogen Deposition. Diversity. 2024; 16(6):340. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16060340

Chicago/Turabian Style

Petersdorf, Marie-Charlott, Joren Bruggink, Evy A. de Nijs, and Henk Siepel. 2024. "Reproductive Response of Platynothrus peltifer (C.L. Koch, 1839) to Continuous Nitrogen Deposition" Diversity 16, no. 6: 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16060340

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop