Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Leachate Generated by Sargassum spp. in the Mexican Caribe: Part 1 Spatial Variations
Previous Article in Journal
Forecasting the River Water Discharge by Artificial Intelligence Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-Heteroatom Doped Fe@CN Activation Peroxomonosulfate for the Removal of Trace Organic Contaminants from Water: Optimizing Fabrication and Performance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Treatment of Antibiotic Excess Sludge via Catalytic Wet Oxidation with Cu-Ce/γ-Al2O3 and the Production of a Carbon Source

1
School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Bei**g, Bei**g 100083, China
2
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2024, 16(9), 1249; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16091249
Submission received: 2 March 2024 / Revised: 21 April 2024 / Accepted: 22 April 2024 / Published: 27 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Catalytic Oxidation Processes for Water Treatment)

Abstract

:
In the present study, the effectiveness of catalytic wet oxidation triggered by using Cu-Ce/γ-Al2O3 to degrade antibiotic excess sludge was investigated, during which some small molecule carboxylic acids were produced, which are valuable in biological wastewater treatment as an organic carbon source. The influence of reaction parameters on the degradation efficiency was explored through single-factor and orthogonal experiments, including catalyst amount, reaction temperature and time, and oxygen supply amount. The results illustrated that the treatment system can achieve 81.2% COD and 93.8% VSS removal rates under optimized reaction conditions. Carboxylic acids produced after the sludge degradation mainly included acetic acid, propanoic acid, etc. The results of wastewater biological treatment experiments exhibited that the degraded solution after catalytic wet oxidation has potential to be used as a carbon source to meet the demand of biological treatment, which helps the removal of COD and TN. This work confirms the effectiveness of catalyst for enhancing antibiotic excess sludge treatment, which provided a new idea for the rational disposal of antibiotic excess sludge.

1. Introduction

Wastewater treatment plants have been employed throughout the world to treat wastewater and are a key part of the residential water cycle [1]. Due to the increase in the production and consumption of drugs, an increasing concentration of pharmaceutical compounds has gained much attention. However, due to the complex composition of sewage wastewater admitted to sewage treatment plants, antibiotic substances are difficult to be degrade effectively. At the same time, microorganisms in the sewage treatment system develop resistance under the influence of antibiotics, which not only deteriorates its treatment effect, but also may be discharged with the effluent water to cause a risk of polluting the natural water environment [2,3,4]. Pharmaceutical wastewater contains various high toxicity pollutants, including refractory antibiotics. Some antibiotics are adsorbed in pharmaceutical sludge. Therefore, it is important to adopt effective methods to dispose of antibiotic-containing sludge. Usually, the disposal methods of residual sludge include landfilling and incineration, among which incineration has certain economic benefits, while landfilling poses the risk of environmental leakage, which is not suitable for the treatment of hazardous sludge [5,6,7]. With regard to the incineration method, secondary pollutants can be released, for example, dioxins, sulfur, and nitrogen oxides [8]. In recent years, advanced oxidation technology has demonstrated a large application potential in sludge treatment [9,10,11]. Antibiotic sludge safety issues and resource utilization could be solved at the same time by choosing a reasonable disposal method. Catalytic wet oxidation technology has been widely studied due to its strong oxidizing properties for organic pollutants [12,13]. In this process, the solid was transferred to liquid through thermal hydrolysis, which happened during the solubilization process. This process provides high volume reduction efficiency and stabilization of heavy metals. Some small molecule organics, produced after the oxidation process, may be utilized for the growth of microorganisms. Furthermore, compared with expensive incineration technology, this process is cheaper, because it can be conducted with a self-sustaining condition and heat can be resource-utilized. However, there is a lack of detailed study on the treatment and utilization of antibiotic-containing sludge using catalytic wet oxidation, and the degradation mechanism is still unclear. The biochemical performance of the reaction solution after oxidative degradation of sludge and its performance as a carbon source for reuse in wastewater treatment systems are not clear. The antibiotic excess sludge can be degraded efficiently to improve its safety, and, at the same time, the degraded material can be used as a carbon source to replenish the sewage treatment system to improve the biochemical properties of the system, which is extremely favorable to save treatment costs and begin a new process.
Recent studies have focused on the exploitation of new catalysts, which induced a decrease in the operating temperature and an increase in the reaction efficiency [14,15]. For instance, various solid catalysts and homogeneous catalysts exhibited high efficiency, including Cu2+, Mn2+, and Ni2+ [16,17]. In our previous studies, we reported on some catalysts, for example, CuO-CeO2/γ-Al2O3, molecular sieve, etc. [18]. Aluminum oxides are commonly used as catalytic wet oxidation catalysts to enhance oxidation performance [19,20]. Among them, Al2O3 is widely used due to its good catalytic performance, high stability, low cost and is easy to obtain. γ-Al2O3 has a larger specific surface area than α-Al2O3, with excellent heat resistance and high porosity; thus, higher-activity catalytic materials can be obtained with it. Do** modification with rare earth metals can not only obtain well-dispersed composite catalysts, but it also greatly optimizes the reaction conditions and reduces energy consumption [14,21]. For example, a Cu-loaded catalyst exhibited a notable enhancement of the oxidation of acetaldehyde under wet oxidation conditions [22]. In Chou’s study, the oxidation of aromatic compounds was enhanced considerable with a Cu-based catalyst [23]. Taran et al. reported the noticeable effect of Cu in the catalytic wet peroxide oxidation for the treatment of formic acid and phenol [24]. In addition, a Ceria-based catalyst also attracted much attention in the catalytic wet oxidation of pollutants [25,26]. However, the catalytic wet oxidation of real industrial sludge has been rarely studied. Furthermore, the production of useful chemicals in the catalytic wet oxidation is not clear.
Some volatile fatty acids (VFAs), including acetic acid, propanoic acid, etc., can be generated in a considerable amount with in the wet oxidation solution of sludge [27]. These acids have the potential to be utilized as an organic carbon source for the biological treatment of wastewater. Gapes reported on the high yield of VFAs in the catalytic wet oxidation treatment of sludge [28]. Specifically, Chung reported that the concentration of propionic acid could be obtained with 13.5 mg/L at 240 °C in the catalytic wet oxidation of sewage sludge [29]. Up until now, a lot of the available literature has reported that acetic acid and other useful chemicals can be generated after the wet oxidation of organic pollutants [30,31]. Therefore, the study of the production and utilization of VFAs in the catalytic wet oxidation of sludge is very important.
Therefore, in the present study, we used the catalytic wet oxidation technique to treat antibiotic sludge in order to change its physicochemical properties and generate a microbially available organic carbon source. The degradation performance and influencing factors of the Cu-Ce-modified γ-Al2O3 catalyst on the antibiotic/sludge mixture were investigated. The organic acids produced during the degradation process were identified. Further, A/O processes were constructed to explore the effects of utilizing the degradation solution as a carbon source on the effluent indexes, and the effects of replacing the degradation solution by adding other carbon sources were compared. These results can provide a reference for the treatment of the antibiotic/sludge mixture and carbon source utilization.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of Cu-Ce/γ-Al2O3

The specific preparation method was as follows: γ-Al2O3 was used as a carrier, repeatedly washed with distilled water 3~5 times until the cleaning solution was clear, dried at 105 °C, and then roasted for 3 h at 550 °C. After cooling, it was placed in a mixed solution of Cu and Ce nitrate at a concentration of 2.0 mol/L. The pH value was adjusted to about 10.0 by adding NaOH; then, the solution was filtered and dried. Afterwards, it was baked in a muffle furnace at 700 °C for 3 h and cooled naturally to obtain a Cu-Ce/γ-Al2O3-supported catalyst.

2.2. Characterization

The morphology and structure of the prepared catalyst were analyzed via scanning electron microscope (FESEM, SU8020, HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan) measurements with energy-dispersive X-rays spectroscopy (EDS). Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis was used for the acquirement of the surface area and pore size distribution information (America, ** in the removal of COD and TN. This work confirms the effectiveness of this catalyst for enhancing excess antibiotic/sludge treatment, providing new ideas for the rational disposal of excess antibiotic/sludge.

Author Contributions

X.Z. contributed to the creation of this article; S.C. prepared the materials, conducted the experiments, collected the data, and performed the analyses; S.C. wrote the first draft of this manuscript; X.Z. and H.L. edited and revised this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided to them by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978499).

Data Availability Statement

The data can be made available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, J.; Liu, J.; Yu, H. Sources, fates and treatment strategies of typical viruses in urban sewage collection/treatment systems: A review. Desalination 2022, 534, 115798–115811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Arun, S.; **n, L.; Gaonkar, O.; Neppolian, B.; Zhang, G.; Chakraborty, P. Antibiotics in sewage treatment plants, receiving water bodies and groundwater of Chennai city and the suburb, South India: Occurrence, removal efficiencies, and risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 851, 158195–158204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sun, S.; Wang, Q.; Wang, N.; Yang, S.; Qi, H. High-risk antibiotics positively correlated with antibiotic resistance genes in five typical urban wastewater. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 342, 118296–118307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hazra, M.; Joshi, H.; Williams, J.B.; Watts, J.E.M. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistant bacteria/genes in urban wastewater: A comparison of their fate in conventional treatment systems and constructed wetlands. Chemos 2022, 303, 135148–135156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, J.; Xu, S.; Zhao, K.; Song, G.; Zhao, S.; Liu, R. Risk control of antibiotics, antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) during sewage sludge treatment and disposal: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 877, 162772–162787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hao, X.; Chen, Q.; Loosdrecht, M.C.M.; Li, J.; Jiang, H. Sustainable disposal of excess sludge: Incineration without anaerobic digestion. Water Res. 2020, 170, 115298–115308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. De la Torre-Bayo, J.J.; Martín-Pascual, J.; Torres-Rojo, J.C.; Zamorano, M. Characterization of screenings from urban wastewater treatment plants: Alternative approaches to landfill disposal. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 380, 134884–134896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kaya, Y.; Ersan, G.; Vergili, I. The treatment of pharmaceutical waste-water using in a submerged membrane bioreactor under different sludge retention times. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 442, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, S.; Han, Y.; Lu, X.; Zhi, Z.; Zhang, R.; Cai, T.; Zhang, Z.; Qin, X.; Song, Y.; Zhen, G. Microbial mechanism underlying high methane pro duction of coupled alkali-microwave–H2O2–oxidation pretreated sewage sludge by in-situ bioelectrochemical regulation. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 305, 127195–127206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, Y.; **ao, K.; Ou, B.; Liu, Y.; Yu, W.; Jian, S.; Hu, X.; Liu, H.; Lei, P.; Yang, J. Behavior of organic components and the migration of heavy metals during sludge dewatering by different advanced oxidation processes via optical spectroscopy and molecular fingerprint analysis. Water Res. 2023, 243, 120336–120343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liang, J.; Zhou, Y. Iron-based advanced oxidation processes for enhancing sludge dewaterability: State of the art, challenges, and sludge reuse. Water Res. 2022, 218, 118499–118506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Javid, F.; Ang, T.N.; Hanning, S.; Svirskis, D.; Burrell, R.; Taylor, M.; Wright, L.J.; Baroutian, S. Hydrothermal deconstruction of two antibiotics (amoxicillin and metronidazole). J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 325, 129330–129342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Boucher, V.; Beaudon, M.; Ramirez, P.; Lemoine, P.; Volk, K.; Yargeau, V.; Segura, P.A. Comprehensive evaluation of non-catalytic wet air oxidation as a pretreatment to remove pharmaceuticals from hospital effluents. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2021, 7, 1301–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kong, L.M.; Zhou, X.; Yao, Y. Catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of aniline in wastewater using copper modified SBA-15 as catalyst. Environ. Technol. 2016, 37, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Peralta, Y.M.; Sanabria, N.R.; Carriazo, J.G. Catalytic wet hydrogen peroxide oxidation of phenolic compounds in coffee wastewater using Al-Fe-pillared clay extrudates. Desal. Water Treat. 2015, 55, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Luck, F. A review of industrial catalytic wet air oxidation processes. Catal. Today 1996, 27, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marco, B.; Didier, C.; Stephane, D. Performances of soluble metallic salts in the catalytic wet air oxidation of sewage sludge. Catal. Today 2010, 157, 420–424. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zeng, X.; Liu, J.; Zhao, J.F. Catalytic Wet Oxidation of Pharmaceutical Sludge by Molecular Sieve Loaded with Cu/Ce. Catalysts 2018, 8, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cuauhtémoc, I.; Del Angel, G.; Torres, G.; Bertin, V. Catalytic wet air oxidation of gasoline oxygenates using Rh/γ-Al2O3 and Rh/γ-Al2O3–CeO2 catalysts. Catal. Today 2008, 133, 135588–135593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, Y.; Xu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, X.; Li, F.; Chen, X.; Cai, H.; Wang, J.; Shi, L.; Chen, X. Synergistic effect over a remarkable durable and active polymetallic Ru-doped Fe-Co-Ce/γ-Al2O3 nanocatalyst: Interfacial Lewis acid-base pair dependent reaction mechanism for landfill leachate. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122938–122947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Song, A.; Lü, G. Study of catalytic activity and product selectivity of M/Al2O3-CeO2 (M = Pt-Ru, Ru, and Pt) in catalytic wet air oxidation of methylamine. Chin. J. Catal. 2014, 35, 1212–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, Y.Z.; Fan, Z.Y.; Shi, J.W.; Liu, Z.Y.; Zhou, J.W.; Shangguan, W.F. Catalytic oxidation of low concentration formaldehyde with the assist of ozone over supported cobalt-manganese composite oxides. J. Mol. Catal. 2014, 1, 60–66. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chou, B.; Tsai, J.L.; Cheng, S. Cu-substituted molecular sieves as liquid phase oxidation catalysts. Microp. Mesop. Mater. 2001, 48, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Taran, O.P.; Zagoruiko, A.N.; Ayusheev, A.B.; Yashnik, S.A.; Prihod’ko, R.V.; Ismagilov, Z.R. Cu and Fe-containing ZSM-5 zeolites as catalysts for wet peroxide oxidation of organic contaminants: Reaction kinetics. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2015, 41, 9521–9537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, J.B.; Zhu, W.P.; Yang, S.X.; Wang, W.; Zhou, Y. Catalytic wet air oxidation of phenol with pelletized ruthenium catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 78, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Barbier, J.; Oliviero, L.; Renard, B.; Duprez, D. Role of ceria-supported noble metal catalysts (Ru, Pd, Pt) in wet air oxidation of nitrogen and oxygen containing compounds. Top. Catal. 2005, 33, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kang, K.; Quitain, A.T.; Daimon, H.; Noda, R.; Goto, N.; Hu, H.Y.; Fujie, K. Optimization of amino acids production from waste fish entrails by hydrolysis in sub- and supercritical water. Canad. J. Chem. Eng. 2001, 79, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gapes, D.J.; Stuthridge, T.R.; Strong, P.J.; Lei, R.J.; Aggrey, A.; James, S.P.; Raymond, S.T. Treatment of Biomass. Patent WO2013128390-A1, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  29. Chung, J.; Lee, M.; Ahn, J.; Bae, W.; Lee, Y.W.; Shim, H. Effects of operational conditions on sludge degradation and organic acids formation in low-critical wet air oxidation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Das, T.; Al-Waili, I.; Balasubramanian, V.; Kaparaju, P.; Parthasarathy, R.; Eshtiaghi, N. Process modelling and techno-economic analysis of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge integrated with wet oxidation using a gravity pressure vessel and thermal hydrolysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 169024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, B.; Liu, S.; Zhu, H.; Qian, W.; Wang, P.; Yang, R.; Ning, P. Enhanced NOx absorption in flue gas by wet oxidation of red mud and phosphorus sludge. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 465, 133075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The process flow diagram of the simulated two-stage A/O process (① nitrification liquid reflux from primary aerobic tank to primary anaerobic tank; ② nitrification liquid reflux from secondary aerobic tank to secondary anoxic tank; ③ nitrification liquid reflux from secondary aerobic tank to primary anaerobic tank; ④ sludge reflux from sedimentation tank to primary anoxic tank).
Figure 1. The process flow diagram of the simulated two-stage A/O process (① nitrification liquid reflux from primary aerobic tank to primary anaerobic tank; ② nitrification liquid reflux from secondary aerobic tank to secondary anoxic tank; ③ nitrification liquid reflux from secondary aerobic tank to primary anaerobic tank; ④ sludge reflux from sedimentation tank to primary anoxic tank).
Water 16 01249 g001
Figure 2. (a) SEM image of Cu-Ce/γ-Al2O3 and (b) the corresponding content of elements; (c) temperature-programed oxidation spectra; (d) BET linear curve of Cu-Ce/γ-Al2O3.
Figure 2. (a) SEM image of Cu-Ce/γ-Al2O3 and (b) the corresponding content of elements; (c) temperature-programed oxidation spectra; (d) BET linear curve of Cu-Ce/γ-Al2O3.
Water 16 01249 g002
Figure 3. Influence of catalyst dosage on the sludge degradation.
Figure 3. Influence of catalyst dosage on the sludge degradation.
Water 16 01249 g003
Figure 4. Influence of reaction temperature on sludge degradation.
Figure 4. Influence of reaction temperature on sludge degradation.
Water 16 01249 g004
Figure 5. Influence of reaction time on sludge degradation.
Figure 5. Influence of reaction time on sludge degradation.
Water 16 01249 g005
Figure 6. Influence of initial oxygen pressure on sludge degradation.
Figure 6. Influence of initial oxygen pressure on sludge degradation.
Water 16 01249 g006
Figure 7. COD (a) and TN (b) concentrations in the influent and effluent.
Figure 7. COD (a) and TN (b) concentrations in the influent and effluent.
Water 16 01249 g007
Table 1. Orthogonal experimental parameters.
Table 1. Orthogonal experimental parameters.
LevelFactors
(A)(B)(C)(D)
Catalyst Dosage
(g)
Temperature
(°C)
Time
(min)
Pressure of Oxygen
(MPa)
14.0220300.6
25.0240450.8
36.0260601.0
Table 2. Production of VFAs.
Table 2. Production of VFAs.
Reaction Temperature
(°C)
Acetic Acid
(mg/L)
Propionic Acid
(mg/L)
Isobutyric Acid
(mg/L)
Isovaleric Acid
(mg/L)
2001620905070
22026801408090
240347018090100
26036201506040
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chu, S.; Lin, H.; Zeng, X. The Treatment of Antibiotic Excess Sludge via Catalytic Wet Oxidation with Cu-Ce/γ-Al2O3 and the Production of a Carbon Source. Water 2024, 16, 1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16091249

AMA Style

Chu S, Lin H, Zeng X. The Treatment of Antibiotic Excess Sludge via Catalytic Wet Oxidation with Cu-Ce/γ-Al2O3 and the Production of a Carbon Source. Water. 2024; 16(9):1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16091249

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chu, Shangye, Hai Lin, and Xu Zeng. 2024. "The Treatment of Antibiotic Excess Sludge via Catalytic Wet Oxidation with Cu-Ce/γ-Al2O3 and the Production of a Carbon Source" Water 16, no. 9: 1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16091249

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop